Society for Engineering Education, 2024Investigating the Impact of Team Composition, Self-Efficacy, and Test Anxiety on Student Performance and Perception of Collaborative Learning: A Hierarchical Linear Modeling ApproachIntroductionA notable transition in higher education towards the adoption of active and collaborative learningapproaches has been in progress for many decades [1][2]. The shift has been motivated byincreasing evidence that these teaching methods can improve student engagement, motivation,and achievement in specific courses [3][4]. These approaches are very different from traditionallecture-based teaching methods, which mainly promote passive learning, where students areexpected to passively absorb
; Chris Ferekides Dept. of Electrical Engineering, *Dept. of Psychology, University of South Florida Tampa, Florida, United States Abstract This paper presents the second year results of the work supported by the National Science Foundation’s Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (IUSE/PFE: RED) Program under the project titled "IUSE/PFE:RED: Breaking Boundaries: An Organized Revolution for the Professional Formation of Electrical Engineers." Specifically, this part of the study looks at action-state orientation and its impacts on student success. The first-year results were presented at the 2023 ASEE Conference in Baltimore, MD with the academic paper titled "Predicting Academic Performance for Pre/Post
; faculty and staff fatigue; and loss of community – focus groupsof over 100 Sam Houston State faculty members identified student skill gaps as summarized inTable 1 on the next page.Interestingly, the Learning Loss skill gaps summary of Table 1 connects directly to the Gallup-Purdue Index Report [11] that identifies six important factors for student success; see Table 2 onthe page following.These six factors “so strongly related to graduates’ lives and careers [it] is almost hard to fathom. . . yet few college graduates achieve the winning combination [11].” The more of these factorssurvey respondents reported receiving in college, the greater their degree of well-being andcareer engagement later in life. So, what is the takeaway? Our actions as
class.Figs 8(b) and 8(c) show that students have indeed gained an appreciation for what electricalengineering is, both in the classroom and in the broader context of general impact. This goesnicely with Secs 3.1.2 and 3.1.3 as it shows that there is true learning happening that allows thestudents to grow throughout the course. It is fascinating that zero students indicated that theyunderstood what electrical engineering was prior to the course. Just this finding alone is evidenceenough for why such classes are so greatly important.3.2 Course evaluationsUniversity-administered course evaluations contain both numerical and qualitative responses. Forboth of these, the focus will be on recent offerings of the course, comparing the three times
Paper ID #38654Board 88: Work in Progress: Impact of Electronics Design Experience onNon-majors’ Self-efficacy and IdentityTom J. Zajdel, Carnegie Mellon University Tom Zajdel is an Assistant Teaching Professor in electrical and computer engineering at Carnegie Mellon University. Dr. Zajdel is interested in how students become motivated to study electronics and engineer- ing. He has taught circuits, amateur radio, introductory mechanics, technical writing, and engineering de- sign. Before joining CMU, Tom was a postdoctoral researcher at Princeton University, where he worked on electrical sheep-herding of biological
-yearCornerstone of Engineering course to address the need for building communication skills forfirst-year engineering students [10]. Even though this skill can be taught and assessed, the resultsof past surveys show that engineering students are inadequately equipped to meet this need. TheUniversity of Houston has a Technical Communication for Engineers class that focuses onengineering communication skills including written proposals, specifications, progress reports,technical reports, individual and group oral presentations, essays on engineering ethics,contemporary engineering issues, and the impact of engineering decisions [11]. Duke Universityoffers an Engineering Design & Technical Communication class for first-year students [12].Sorby and
”. 3 LO 3 “Analyze the use of filters and their interpretation in the time and frequency domains and implement standard filters in hardware and/or software”. 4 LO 4 “Apply computations of the four fundamental Fourier transforms to the analysis and design of linear systems”. 5 LO 5 “Demonstrate professional communication through formal documents that communicate solutions to problems and document projects within the domain of signals and systems”.The GUEST approach toward offering office hours (Greet, Understand, Explain, Share, Thank) ispromised to students in the welcome slides shown on the first day of class (Figure 1). This modelis adapted from
tips with their audiences. Ambassadors are alsoencouraged to create materials to be included in the library. This initiative will promote digitalsafety, enhance community engagement, and foster leadership and communication skills amongstudents.By participating in the Cybersecurity Ambassador Program, students gain a deeperunderstanding of cybersecurity concepts and how to apply them to their personal andprofessional lives. They will also develop valuable communication and leadership skills as theywork to educate others on this critical topic.Ultimately, this program aims to create a network of local chapters of CybersecurityAmbassadors who can promote basic cybersecurity literacy in their communities and helpprevent cyber threats such as
Alliance(MESA) to further connect the campus to the community through family engagement and bybuilding and sustaining the connection between students’ families and faculty and staff in thecomputer science and computer engineering departments. Through focus groups and informalinteractions with families, we gained a deeper understanding of what cultivated and sustainedtheir engagement over five years. We ran two focus groups, one in Spanish and one in English;family members self-selected into the focus group based on language affinity. Through thesefocus groups, as well as through informal interactions (at both on and off campus activities,including over meals at local restaurants), we learned about parents’/caregivers’ relationshipswith their
routine adaptations of class activity plans based on the immediate performanceresults of students. Since this is a work in progress paper, we also hope to garner feedback fromthe engineering education community of ways that we can measure the impact of theseassessments.Here are several options we are considering for future work which are grounded in past studies: 1. Measuring student’s self-efficacy and test anxiety similarly to Malespina and Singh [4] 2. Gathering information on student interaction such as first time wrong and time spent on the formative assessment activities as discussed in Barlow et.al. [5] 3. Marchisio et.al. Look at Nicol and Macfarlane-Dick's Model of Feedback and Hattie and Timperley's Model of
in the readingmaterial and course content.But how do students actually engage when question answers are available with a click? Dostudents attempt to answer the question before revealing the answer? Or do students skipattempting the question and jump immediately to reveal the answer?This paper aims to quantify the "earnestness" of student behavior in an online, interactive circuitanalysis textbook over a period of one year. We measure student earnestness by looking at thepercentage of students revealing answers prior to making a solution attempt. Thus, earnestnesscan indicate student engagement with the learning material.We investigate how student earnestness correlates with length of time in the course (as definedby progression through
project to active participation under the mentorship and guidance fromtrained professionals. Elevating the role of the community from simply project beneficiary toactive contributor and leader was an approach for keeping the project focus on the community,building local capacity, allowing the students to be engaged at a level deemed appropriate by thecommunity, and avoiding issues of White Saviorism [21].Comprehensive student preparation was viewed as a way to improve the impact of a project andenhance student learning. This includes technical training, but also cultural training, for examplehow to avoid stereotypes and a “deficit” mindset. The preparation can include student-to-studentmentorship (for longer-term projects) and mentorship from
providers, to systematically improve the repository impact and to prepare for itseventual scale-up. The vision of RECET to enable more effective collaboration between ECEprograms for educational delivery has been socialized throughout the communities served byECEDHA and IEC. There have been articles in online newsletters and presentations at onlineand in-person meetings, with a particular emphasis on regional meetings of department heads.Unfortunately, interest in a repository like RECET has waned since COVID-19 restrictions onECE educational delivery have been eliminated. Many programs have gone to a new normal, butthey have done so by almost entirely addressing their remote delivery issues locally. ECEdepartmental leadership largely considers the
studyhabits (as expected), but some also include extracurricular activities such as involvement instudent clubs including IEEE as and on-campus housing activities.IntroductionThere are many factors that have been linked to academic success of college students. Althoughthe importance of cognitive ability has been well established (Richardson et al., 2012), less clearis the potential impact of cognitive control processes (how people maintain effort toward goals)that impact behavior linked to academic performance. Our focus in this presentation is exploringhow the cognitive control process of action-state orientation (Kuhl, 1992) of students would linkto academic behavior that is important for academic success. Our focus here is the link of twodomains
methods to navigate through some of the challenges resulting from removingtypical prerequisites, and the trade-off between breadth and depth. Specifically, we apply thismethod in an undergraduate information security course in engineering that covers networksecurity, while many students do not have computer networks background prior to taking thecourse. We combined two different approaches for hands-on exercises on network firewalls. Thefirst one is a video gaming approach (CyberCIEGE), and the second one is based on setting upmultiple virtual machines (SEED labs). Students are surveyed to indicate how they perceived thedifferent hands-on methods. We analyze the results (from surveys and exam questions) todemonstrate the impact of removing
Paper ID #37418The CARE methodology: A new lens for introductory ECE course assess-mentbased on student challenging and rewarding experiencesAya Mouallem, Stanford University Aya Mouallem (she/her) is a PhD candidate in Electrical Engineering at Stanford University. She received a BEng in Computer and Communications Engineering from the American University of Beirut. Aya is a graduate research assistant with the Designing Education Lab at Stanford, led by Professor Sheri Sheppard, and her research explores the accessibility of introductory electrical engineering education. She is supported by the Knight-Hennessy Scholarship
toevaluate the research question: Was there a difference in undergraduate studentperformance in a junior-level microcomputers course based on the delivery format?Further, student opinions of course instruction, which captured student feedback using bothLikert-scale questions and open-ended equations, will be analyzed to evaluate qualitativedifferences based on delivery format. These details are expected to help other engineeringeducators in evaluating how delivery format may impact their own courses as they are designingnew courses or revising existing courses.Summary of ECE 383The electrical engineering course analyzed for this work was a 15-week course delivered at theUniversity of Alabama; a large, southeastern public university in the United
hones students’ skills in soliciting community stakeholderfeedback in order to generate innovative solutions. In PFE I, students are introduced toengineering and ethical best practices, as well as various career opportunities. In PFE II, studentsare further introduced to careers in technology development, research, and academia. Studentstour engineering labs, experience faculty guest lectures, and consider how to solicit and integratecommunity stakeholder perspectives as they generate solutions to engineering-related problems.Finally, in PFE III, students learn how to use ethical engineering principles to create designs thatmeet societal needs. In each PFE I–III course, about 50 out-of-class hours are allocated forworking on students’ capstone
competency development of these students.Specifically, the research aims to address the following questions: 1. What impact does participation in IRiKA have on the global competencies of both undergraduate and graduate engineering students? 2. How does varying research experience in microelectronics contribute to developing students’ global competencies within the IRiKA program? 3. In what ways do undergraduate and graduate engineering students' experiences in developing global competencies differ when engaged in international research experiences?Literature ReviewNumerous investigations have highlighted the advantages of international research programs.Research indicates that for students across various majors, engaging in
otherhand, the primary disadvantage of traditional in-person learning is the lack of flexibility. Studentsmust attend classes at specific times and locations, which can be difficult for those with busyschedules or who live far away from the school. Additionally, in-person learning can be disruptive,as their peers or the environment may distract students. However, the traditional in-person learningexperience can have a positive impact on student learning and engagement. Previous studies haveshown that students who participate in in-person learning are more likely to retain information anddevelop a deeper understanding of the material [4].The COVID-19 pandemic has affected education in various aspects. Several studies reported thechallenges with
outsidelearning through quiz discussions. Similarly, in the recap section, instructors can ask the class to“describe the most challenging part of this assignment, and why it was challenging.” Instructorsare also encouraged to reflect on the impact of their chosen teaching styles, the effectiveness ofclass activities, and the overall engagement level of students. This constant reflection allowsinstructors to have the opportunity to modify content delivery methods, optimizing the balancebetween fixed and flexible elements within the PNP structure, adjust the length of activities,modify the difficulty level of the guided questions, and tailor support mechanisms based on theobserved progress of individual students and the class as a whole. This constant
differentconditions. This approach was meticulously designed with Universal Design for Learning (UDL)principles in mind [7], aiming to promote inclusivity and engagement among all students. UDLemphasizes providing multiple means of representation, expression, and engagement to cater todiverse learners, facilitating success in specific tasks and measurable achievements, therebyenhancing overall performance outcomes. Throughout the module, we incorporated theseprinciples by offering students various pathways to access information, express theirunderstanding, and engage with the material effectively. For example, instead of relying solelyon traditional lectures, we began each lesson with hands-on explanations of the sensor devices,followed by data collection
, peer tutoring, and troubleshooting activities. To conclude, traditional methods havetheir place, but PCB integration in the Digital Electronics curriculum seems paramount in elevatinglearning efficacy and student engagement, underlining the imperative of hands-on, experientiallearning in today’s engineering education framework.IntroductionSTEM occupations employ about 25% of the labor force in the United States [1]. In 2021, 34.9million (24%) of the 146.4 million people in the workforce between the ages of 18 and 74 workedin STEM fields [1]. With a poor retention rate of 38.3%, African Americans account for only 5%of engineering ” ’bachelor’s degree holders. Unengaging learning environments have a factor toplay in this [2]. The ASEE retention
et al. [17] reported after an experimental design studythat students' presentation after engaging with hands-on devices reflected improvement in criticalthinking and peer learning competencies. This stressed the importance of student-centeredlearning, hence strengthening the result that hands-on learning with miniature devices can boostcritical thinking skills among learners. Test anxiety can lead students to postpone fulfilling theirobligations and perform their tasks with less proficiency [18]. Additionally, the literature hasshown that test anxiety can determine the academic performance of learners [19]. An improvementin learners’ test anxiety simply means it is lowered, and hence, learners can focus on the task athand and bring their
often fails to capture the interest of young audiences. Furthermore, thesedemonstrations may lack interactive elements that prompt curiosity, preventing students frombeing able to experiment with the demonstrations in a hands-on way. In response to thischallenge, we created this device as a "primer" to stimulate students' interest, preparing theirappetite for more in-depth academic content. This paper outlines a student-developed projectaimed at engaging young visitors at a robotic research institute during open-house events. Thisinteractive device, named the “Magic Orb” demonstrates a figurative orb that hovers on top ofthe user's palm as it is being moved. To implement and understand this experiment, studentsutilize applied knowledge in
from Seattle University. Most of them are local to Washington state and they commute to campus. For others, the desire to live in one of the fastest growing regions in the nation draws them to Seattle.• Mission – Seattle University is a mission-driven institution that focuses on educating the whole person. The University’s commitment to social justice, environmental sustainability, and community engagement resonates with prospective students who desire a well-rounded education. Student responses show a deep connection to the mission and values of Seattle University. Some students experience community-engaged service learning in the core courses they choose, giving them an opportunity to connects concepts in the
our studentresearchers are given and recommended best practices for undergraduate research in this area aredetailed. Finally, how this work dovetails with our implementation of a multi-disciplinaryintroductory quantum computing course running for the first time this Spring is also described.1. IntroductionEducational scholars widely agree that engaging students in authentic undergraduate researchexperiences is a high-impact pedagogical practice as it promotes student-centered learning andresults in several positive learning outcomes including improved problem-solving, critical-thinking, and communication skills [1], [2], [3]. Undergraduate research programs also help withpersonal development, giving students improved attitudes, self
dynamics, enhancing understanding through sharedideas. Martin-Gutierrez et al. [12] implemented augmented reality in an electrical engineeringcourse. However, the study primarily evaluated immediate student feedback, not exploringlong-term educational impact. Hadfield-Menell et al. [14] focused on theoretical aspects oncooperative inverse reinforcement learning without real-world validation. Vliet et al. [15]investigated the impact of flipped-class pedagogy on student motivation and learning strategies,finding enhanced critical thinking and peer learning. However, these effects were not long-lasting,indicating a need for repeated use.Jo et al. [16] observed increased student participation and interest in flipped classrooms withgaming elements
for student preparation, fostering effectiveclassroom engagement, and offering supplementary resources for further assistance as needed. Asthis course is taught specifically towards ECE students by an ECE faculty, the in-class problemsolving examples and exercises are designed with engineering application in mind. Interactivelaboratory-like demos are also included to facilitate student understanding. In addition, studentswork on quizzes before coming to the class, but completion of these quizzes does not require themreading new lecture contents beforehand. Supplementary optional material such as web resources,recorded videos, and additional examples is provided, particularly for students that need extra help.The instructor also worked with
behaviors consistentbetween students in control systems courses, which tend to be upper-level courses, and studentsin circuit analysis courses, which tend to be introductory-level courses? We compare the resultsfor the Control Systems Engineering zyBook to a similar earlier investigation in the BasicEngineering Circuit Analysis zyBook, and to earlier investigations in computer science zyBooks.The resulting analysis shows more student earnestness on questions with particular parameters.Through this study, we expect to improve understanding of students’ engagement with onlineinteractive learning materials and factors that correlate with different levels of studentengagement, to inform the further evolution of interactive