AC 2007-14: ASSESSMENT OF ETHICS MODULES IN AN ENGINEERINGCURRICULUMMysore Narayanan, Miami University DR. MYSORE NARAYANAN obtained his Ph.D. from the University of Liverpool, England in the area of Electrical and Electronic Engineering. He joined Miami University in 1980 and teaches a wide variety of electrical, electronic and mechanical engineering courses. He has been invited to contribute articles to several encyclopedias and has published and presented dozens of papers at local, regional , national and international conferences. He has also designed, developed, organized and chaired several conferences for Miami University and conference sessions for a variety of organizations. He is a
finding released in a 2 page brief“Benchmarking the competitiveness of the United States in Mechanical EngineeringBasic Research” published in October 2007 by the National Academies, Washington, DC[www.nas.edu]. The handle to the process is, newer innovations overtaking the older andmaterials engineers working with chemical and electrical engineers. Ethically, people arelooking for tough and reliable gadgets which compare with older generation gadgets andwhich are smart enough to stay that way. Ideas that move the technological market arefull of iffy claims vs. iron–clad Guarantees. The ethical meanings of precise, simple, lowcost, efficient, maximize and replace are shady. Toys can now offer some valuablelessons to the design professionals. We
AC 2008-916: TEACHING ENGINEERING ETHICS IN A MULTI-DISCIPLINARYENVIRONMENTDavid Godfrey, U.S. Coast Guard Academy David Godfrey, MSEE, PE, is an assistant professor at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy (USCGA). He graduated from USCGA with his BSEE in 1992 and earned his MSEE from University of Rhode Island in 1997. He holds the rank of Lieutenant Commander in the U.S. Coast Guard. Address: U.S. Coast Guard Academy, Department of Engineering, 27 Mohegan Ave., New London, CT 06320-8101; telephone: 860-444-8536; fax: 860-444-8546; e-mail: David.J.Godfrey@uscga.edu.Todd Taylor, U.S. Coast Guard Academy Todd Taylor is an Associate Professor at the US Coast Guard Academy (USCGA). He is the
AC 2012-4784: NANOTECHNOLOGY: TEACHING ETHICAL AND SO-CIAL ISSUES IN A STS COURSEDr. Ahmed S. Khan, DeVry University, DuPage Ahmed S. Khan is a Senior Professor in the College of Engineering and Information Sciences, DeVry Uni- versity, Addison, Ill. He received his M.Sc. (applied physics) from University of Karachi, an M.S.E.E. from Michigan Technological University, and an M.B.A. from Keller Graduate School of Management., and his Ph.D. from Colorado State University. His research interests are in the areas of fiber optic com- munications, faculty development, nanotechnology, application of telecommunications technologies in distance education, and impact of technology on society. He teaches wireless engineering
AC 2008-968: PATHWAYS TO LEARNING: ORCHESTRATING THE ROLE OFSUSTAINABILITY IN ENGINEERING EDUCATIONRichard Theis, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescottpatricia watkins, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Library MLIS, Research and Reference Instruction LibrarianMary Angela Beck, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Assistant Professor of Humanities and Communications Page 13.966.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Pathways to Learning: Orchestrating the Role of Sustainability in Engineering EducationAbstractThe 2001 Action Plan put forth by the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) articulatesthe
education, particularly in France and the United States, hasits roots in military academies. The first institution of higher education in the UnitedStates to grant a degree in engineering was the United States Military Academy at WestPoint (Davis9; Hacker15). Streett34 describes in detail how the military culture ofregimentation has infused engineering education through the 20th century.Despite the strong historical connections between engineering and the military, the periodafter World War II ushered in a new era in which military support for engineering –particularly through organized, funded research & development – became dominant andinstitutionalized. Seely32 describes the nearly singular support of the Department ofDefense in funding
AC 2007-2446: ACADEMIC INTEGRITY AMONG ENGINEERINGUNDERGRADUATES: SEVEN YEARS OF RESEARCH BY THE E^3 TEAMCynthia Finelli, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia J. Finelli is Managing Director of the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching North and Associate Research Scientist of Engineering Education at the University of Michigan (U-M). She joined U-M in April 2003 after serving as Founding Director of the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning, Richard L. Terrell Professor of Excellence in Teaching, and Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at Kettering University. Dr. Finelli earned a B.S.E.E. degree (1988), an M.S.E. degree (1989), and a Ph.D. degree (1993) in Electrical
AC 2011-1669: AI & SCIFI: TEACHING WRITING, HISTORY, TECH-NOLOGY, LITERATURE AND ETHICSRebecca A. Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato Rebecca A. Bates received the B.S. degree in biomedical engineering from Boston University in 1990, the M.S. degree in electrical engineering from Boston University in 1996 and the Ph.D. degree in elec- trical engineering from the University of Washington in 2004. She also received the M.T.S. degree from Harvard Divinity School in 1993. She is currently an Associate Professor in the Computer Science de- partment at Minnesota State University, Mankato. Her research interests include speech recognition and understanding as well as engineering education
Engineering Education. 85(2) 1996: 93-96; Muskavitch, Karen M.T. “Cases andGoals for Ethics Education.” Science and Engineering Ethics. 11(3) 2005: 431-434.2 Weil, Vivian. “Ethics in Engineering Curricula.” Research in Philosophy and Technology 8, 1985: 243-250;“Teaching Ethics to Scientists and Engineers: Moral Agents and Moral Problems.” Science and Engineering Ethics1(3), 1995: 403-416.3 Kymlicka, Will. “Rawls on Teleology and Deontology.” Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol 17, No.3 (Summer1988), pp173-190. This article is also good for framing ethical discussion by distinguishing duty and utilityapproaches through a discussion of ‘the right vs. the good’ or ‘deontology vs. teleology.’4 Brittan, Samuel. “Two Cheers for Utilitarianism.” Oxford
Industrial Engineering in 2001 and is currently a member of the full time faculty as an Assistant Professor. She is the course coordinator and one of the lecturers of the “Ethics in Engineering” course offered to student’s studying engineering. In May 2003 Dr. Atasoylu was appointed Vice Dean for the Faculty of Engineering. She is on the board of directors of the Research Center for Water and Marine Sciences at EMU since November 2002, on the board of directors of the Advanced Technology Research and Development Institute since December 2004 and an Advisory Board member of the EMU Continuing Education Center since September 2004. She is also an active member of several committees
Pedagogy for Engineering Ethics InstructionAbstractGE 301- Principles of Engineering Practice is a required course for Valparaiso UniversityCollege of Engineering students. The course was revamped in Spring 2005 to betteremphasize engineering aspects of ethics, economics, sustainability, and sociopoliticalissues.As part of teaching ethics, students have traditionally been assigned an individuallywritten ethics paper. Since students were allowed to select their own cases, it was notuncommon for some students to select the same case. There was also limited discussionbetween students regarding the cases they chose, or how they would judge the behaviorsof engineers in these cases.Starting with the Spring 2005 Semester, ethics instruction increased
through argument visualization in collaborative learningAbstract:As a committee organized in 2009 by the National Academy of Engineering recognized,ethics education should foster the ability to analyze complex decision situations and ill-structured problems. This presentation aims to build on the NAE‘s insights and reports aboutan innovative teaching approach that has two main features: first, it places the emphasis ondeliberation and on self-directed, problem-based learning in small groups of students; andsecond, it focuses on understanding ill-structured problems. The first innovation is motivatedby an abundance of scholarly research that supports the value of deliberative learningpractices. The second results from a
, Mankato Rebecca A. Bates received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Washington in 2004. She also received the M.T.S. degree from Harvard Divinity School in 1993. She is currently Professor and Chair of the Department of Integrated Engineering program at Minnesota State University, Mankato, home of the Iron Range and Twin Cities Engineering programs.Dr. Deborah K. Nykanen P.E., Minnesota State University, Mankato Deborah K. Nykanen is a Professor of Civil Engineering at Minnesota State University, Mankato. She received her Ph.D. degree in civil engineering from the University of Minnesota in 2000. Her teaching, research and professional experience focus on water resources, hydrology and
of 2020 directive, a new semester lengthcourse was designed to teach ethics to junior and senior engineering students at PurdueUniversity. The objective of the course was to demonstrate that exposure to and involvement inan ethics course specifically designed for engineers can mature the moral reasoning skills ofthose students who participate. The course was organized around three sections. Section I of thecourse grounded the students in ethical theory. The remaining part of the course utilized faculty-led (Section II) and student-led case studies (Section III) to continue to mature their moralreasoning skills in an engineering context.The progress of moral reasoning skills was measured using the Defining Issues Test (DIT2). Theassessment
to teach,especially in ways that capture students’ interest and attention. A variety of approaches areimplemented including dedicated courses inside and outside of engineering, as well as weavingethical case studies throughout the curriculum 3-5. Creative approaches to teaching engineeringethics including argumentation, eye-witness role playing, videos, engineering ethics lunches, andeven an engineering ethics board game have previously been presented 6-10. The objective of thisassignment was to combine the common practice of integrating an ethics unit into a first yearIntroduction to Engineering course with the innovation of a creative fiction assignment requiringthe students to generate and reflect upon an ethical dilemma of personal
technical learning [1][2], however in most cases where fiction is used, it supports professional learning in areas likeethics. In this paper, the authors go beyond the presentation of a case study where literature wasused to frame and guide discussions around ethics in an engineering course by coding studentartifacts for values. Specifically, the student engineers participating in a seminar course wererequired to read and reflect in writing on Prey by Michael Crichton [3]. To set the stage for thiscase, some of the moral philosophy arguments around the use of fiction are discussedculminating in the conclusion that fiction is an appropriate tool in the teaching of ethics. Then,we will examine how literature has been broadly used in technical courses
, Page 13.1299.8Australia ; Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth. 390 p. [3] Ng, J., Engineering ethics: Good rules to follow. Engineering Management, 2003. 13(6): p. 30-33. [4] Whitbeck, C., Ethics in engineering practice and research. 1998, Cambridge, England ; New York: CambridgeUniversity Press. 330 p. [5] Baum, R.J., Ethics and engineering curricula. The Teaching of ethics ; 7. 1980, Hastings-on-Hudson, N.Y.:The Hastings Center, Institute of Society, Ethics, and the Life Sciences. 79 p. [6] Herkert, J.R., Continuing and emerging issues in engineering ethics education. The Bridge, 2002. 32(3). [7] ABET, Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. 2007, ABET, Inc.: Baltimore. [8] Harris, C.E., M. Davis, M.S. Pritchard, and M.J. Rabins
AC 2009-2183: CASE ANALYSIS: A TOOL FOR TEACHING RESEARCH ETHICSIN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FOR GRADUATE STUDENTSDidier Valdes, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Didier M. Valdés is a Professor in the Civil Engineering Department of the University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez. Dr. Valdés holds a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering and spacializes in Transportation Engineering. His resarch interests include issues in the Transportation area of Civil Systems and Ethical issues related to research and engineering. He is currently a Co-PI in the GERESE project.Erika Jaramillo Giraldo, University of Puerto Rico Erika Jaramillo-Giraldo holds a BS in Civil Engineering and is currently Graduate student in
projects related to reducing turbine loads and increasing energy capture. She has applied experiential learning techniques in several wind energy and control systems classes and began engineering education research related to social justice in control systems engineering in fall 2014.Dr. Jon A. Leydens, Colorado School of Mines Jon A. Leydens is an associate professor in the Division of Liberal Arts and International Studies at the Colorado School of Mines, USA, where he has been since 1997. Research and teaching interests include communication, social justice, and engineering education.Dr. Barbara M. Moskal, Colorado School of Mines Dr. Barbara Moskal is a Professor of Applied Mathematics and Statistics and the Director of
engineering is obligatorilydifferent than teaching a technical engineering topic, like statics. Whereas the latter involvesfixed constants, physical principles, and solving equations, ethics is more verbal, involvingdiscussion and essay forms of interaction. Students may be required to participate in onlinediscussions, post to blogs, and submit research papers. With large class sizes, instructorworkload could become substantial. The pedagogical goal of the present project is to developthe means to better prepare engineering students for professional careers in which they exerciseethical judgement in their technical work and are cognizant of the impact of their decisions onindividuals, the community, and beyond. The research goal is to develop ways in
, American Institute of Chem- ical Engineers, and Dance Marathon. She also works for the College of Engineering as a teaching assis- tant, student ambassador, and research assistant. After graduation, she hopes to attend graduate school to further her education. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 WIP: Piloting an Ethics Choose-Your-Own Adventure Activity in Early Engineering EducationAbstractEngineering requires designing, redesigning, and developing new technologies that can havelarge positive impacts on society. But engineering can also come with negative, oftenunforeseen, consequences, side effects, or by-products. Dynamite
responsibility" to the more specific, "ability to recognize ethical and professionalresponsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must considerthe impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societalcontexts"1 (p. 28). While this criterion pertains to undergraduate engineering education, thecriteria for Master programs include the "fulfillment of the baccalaureate level generalcriteria"2 (p. 5).Several researchers have examined various methods on how to effectively teach engineeringethics, with an emphasis on what topics should be included and what kind of format should beused. In particular, debate has ensued on whether ethics should be taught as a 'standalonecourse' or if it should be
appropriatecontent? What teaching methods and curriculum models are preferable? Which works best:required course, ethics across-the-curriculum, integration of ethics and science, technology andsociety, or integration of the liberal arts into the engineering curriculum? Which outcomeassessment methods are most suitable?According to a “Survey of Ethics-Related Instruction in U.S. Engineering Programs”4, it wasfound that only 27 percent of ABET-accredited institutions listed an ethics related courserequirement, even though an increasing number of philosophers, engineers, and ethicists focustheir research and teaching on engineering ethics. What complicates the problem is that differentfaculty have provided varying definitions for what “understanding ethical
engineering programs due to ABET accreditation criteria. Frontiers in Education Conference 2011: p. S1B-1-S1B-6.8. Eisen, A., Berry, R., The Absent Professor: Why we don't teach research ethics and what to do about it. The American Journal of Bioethics, 2002: p. 38-49.9. Newberry, B., The Dilemma of Ethics in Engineering Education. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2004. 10: p. 343-351.10. Corey, G., Student workbook for Ethics in Action. Pacific 1 Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1998.11. Duncan, J., Case Study: Public Access to Government Data. GISProfessional Ethics Project, 2009.12. Hamilton III, J., The Seven Step Method for Analyzing Ethical Situations. 1990.13. Jersey, T., Procedures for Analyzing Ethical Dilemmas. 2001.14. Pimple, K., Using
Paper ID #34187Class Exercises Involving Ethical Issues Reinforce the Importance andReach of Biomedical Engineering (and the Impact of the Coronavirus onTeaching Strategy and Measures of Assessment)Dr. Charles J. Robinson, Clarkson University IEEE Life Fellow, AIMBE Founding Fellow, U.N.E.S.C.O. Academician. Director, Center for Rehabilita- tion Engineering, Science, and Technology (CREST), and Shulman Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY. (Retired) Senior Rehab Research Career Scientist, VA Medical Center, Syracuse, NY. Adjunct Professor, Department of Physical Medicine and
see ethics in theirundergraduate engineering education. It is clear that there is no consensus among academia andengineering ethics education researchers about the multiple dimensions of engineering ethicseducation in undergraduate programs and due to this lack of consensus, there exist a lot ofvariations about engineering ethics education [17], [20], [28]. A few reported research studieshave captured the wider view of these variations. Colby & Sullivan [20] conducted a qualitative study focused on electrical and mechanicalEngineering programs in 2002. Other publications provide more anecdotal syntheses ofvariations of engineering ethics education based on the authors’ teaching experience ofengineering ethics [29], [30]. Barry &
& Environmental Engineering at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech). He received a Ph.D. in civil engineering from Virginia Tech in 1995. His areas of teaching and research include engineering education, international collaboration and hydrology & water resources. Page 13.622.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008Fostering Ethics Problem Solving in Engineering Trough Cognitive Flexibility Hypertext: An Application of Questioning as Links Abstract This paper describes a new computer-based learning
currently works as a Research Associate and Deputy Director at the Murdough Center for Engineering Professionalism (MCEP) and National Institute for Engineering Ethics (NIEE) at Texas Tech University. He oversees the day to day operations of the center’s distance learning courses for both engineering students and practicing engineers. Additionally, he provides lectures on ethical theory and other topics in an on-campus engineering ethics course. Burgess was also a member of the Ethics in the Curriculum Task Force for Texas Tech’s Quality Enhancement Plan. The Quality Enhancement Plan was a crucial component of Texas Tech’s accreditation with the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools. A theme throughout these roles
, architected materials, smart structures, structural stability, structural art, biomimetics, fiber-reinforced composites, sustainable infrastructure and bridge engineering. He co-authored more than 40 publications, actively presented in national conferences, and received multiple student awards during his graduate studies. Beyond research activities, Dr. Hu has six years of teaching experience through a variety of roles and have mentored more than 10 undergraduate students on different research programs.Dr. Natassia Brenkus, Ohio State University Natassia Brenkus is an Assistant Professor at The Ohio State University. Her research interests include prestressed concrete behavior and structural durability
Paper ID #35003Examining Faculty Barriers and Challenges in Adopting Ethical Pedagogiesin Online EnvironmentsMr. Samuel Aaron Snyder, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Sam Snyder is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He received his Bachelors of Science in Materials Science and Engineering in 2017 from Virginia Tech. His current research interests are in engineering ethics education and exploring the relationship between empathy and ethical decision-making.Dr. Diana Bairaktarova, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Diana Bairaktarova is an