, Construction, and Environmental Engineering at San Diego State University. She received her PhD and MS degrees from University of Colorado at Boulder. Dr. Mladenov is the Director of the Water Innovation and Reuse Lab at SDSU and leads projects on decentralized water reuse systems and water quality in pristine and polluted environments. She is also a founding member of the Area of Excellence, ”Blue Gold: Mitigat- ing the Effects of Water Scarcity,” an interdisciplinary and collaborative group conducting research and educational activities on topics relevant to water scarce regions of the world. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 FACULTY, STUDENT, AND PRACTITIONER INITIAL
Paper ID #24049The UTEP Edge: A Student Success Initiative for Developing High-impactPracticesDr. Peter Golding, University of Texas, El Paso Professor and Undergraduate Program Director in the Department of Engineering and Leadership at UTEP; Director of the Center for Research in Engineering & Technology Education (CRE@TE); Provost Faculty Fellow in Residence in the Center for Faculty Leadership and Development at UTEP.Mr. Mike Thomas Pitcher, University of Texas, El Paso Mike Pitcher is the Director of Academic Technologies at the University of Texas at El Paso. He has had experience in learning in both a
engineeringcurriculum.ASEE saw an increase in interest in the topic and launched the Engineering LeadershipDevelopment Division (LEAD) as of 2015. LEAD has grown to over 1,000 members across over400 institutions and seeks to “support the creation of engineering leadership educationalprograms and outcomes, viewed by those who participate in the programs and those who hire thegraduating students, as the best in the world” [1]. A strategic planning committee, analyzing thedrivers of change and the challenges related to engineering leadership, developed four strategicinitiatives to focus research and initiatives of the division. These four initiatives highlighted theneed to understand the concept of engineering leadership and how to incorporate it intoengineering
Paper ID #25953Perceived Importance and Confidence in Leadership Ability: A National Sur-vey of Final Year Canadian Engineering StudentsDr. Serhiy Kovalchuk, University of Toronto Serhiy Kovalchuk is a research associate at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering, University of Toronto.Qin Liu, University of Toronto Dr. Qin Liu is a research associate at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering, University of Toronto.Dr. Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto Cindy Rottmann is the Associate
information, consisting ofaccounts of leadership styles practiced and/or experienced by the interviewees in the workplace.Transcripts of the interviews were then analyzed using an open and axial coding strategy todevelop codes based on the descriptive data provided by participants. During the open codingphase, the researchers reflected and recorded interesting findings based on the data. The axialphase translated initial findings into conceptually similar concepts and resulted in the codebookfound in Table 2.Table 1. Engineering Participant Demographics Company Size Leadership Level Engineering Background Participant 1 Large Project Engineer Civil Engineering
leadership learningresearch, we generate a list of recommendations for engineering educators, industry leaders andengineering leadership researchers.Introduction: Reviewing the literature CoP (community of practice) styleLave and Wenger’s notion that workplace learning takes place in a Community of Practice (CoP)helped us characterize our collaborative literature review experiment as a simultaneous processof learning and professional socialization [4]. A summer reading group—initiated by ourDirector and Senior Research Associate—began with two objectives: 1) to generate a literaturereview for the next phase of our engineering leadership project and 2) to build cohesion in ourexpanding, interdisciplinary research team. We sent out invitations to five
Paper ID #25598Counting Past Two: Engineers’ Leadership Learning TrajectoriesDr. Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto Cindy Rottmann is the Associate Director of Research at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, University of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering leadership in university and workplace settings as well as ethics and equity in engineering education.Dr. Doug Reeve, University of Toronto Dr. Reeve is the founding Director of the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (Troost ILead) (2010-2018) at the University of Toronto. After a lengthy career as a
Paper ID #25196Exploring the Relationship Between Students’ Engineering Identity and Lead-ership Self-EfficacyDr. William J. Schell IV P.E., Montana State University William J. Schell holds a Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering – Engineering Management from the University of Alabama in Huntsville and M.S. and B.S. degrees in Industrial and Management Engi- neering from Montana State University (MSU). He is Associate Professor in Industrial and Management Systems Engineering and Associate Director of the Montana Engineering Education Research Center at MSU with research interests in engineering education and the
standard format, it is easy to copy/paste or import/export action items across a variety oftracking tools. While this detailed agenda template was shared broadly within the company, ithas seen less reuse outside the initial group – possibly because of the quantity of different worktracking tools used by the trained and untrained groups (greater than 20 tools are in commonusage at the company, all with redundant capabilities and used without integration or centralizeddata authority).Lessons Learned and Future WorkThis case study provides insight for the successful adaptation of professional skills trainingmaterials from academic/research settings to the corporate world. In addition to ensuring that thecurriculum materials utilize language and
, and communicate this construct to their undergraduate students. In this paper,we seek to gain an initial understanding of the intersections of faculty knowledge and value ofengineering leadership by asking the overarching research question: How do faculty come toknow leadership within engineering education? As part of a larger study exploring definitions ofleadership across students, faculty, and industry professionals, the results from this analysis - aswell as findings that warrant further inquiry - will be used to develop a semi-structured interviewprotocol to guide faculty interviews in subsequent phases of the larger project.Conceptual Framework: Faculty Ways of KnowingTo gain a deeper understanding of the ways in which faculty come to
.’ Many of thesestudents lack the confidence and skillsets to lead the teams and organizations that must executethe complex and often-large project work of technology research, management, and/ordevelopment. Students who possess the ability to solve technical problems, manage budgets, andapply basic business principles in an effort to develop a product or solution may become adeptengineering managers. However, students who can inspire a team to complete and deploy productsand solutions so that the whole team’s productivity is greater than the sum of the expertise of eachindividual team member can become engineering leaders. Engineering leadership programs atresearch universities often have the challenging problem of developing curriculum for
Paper ID #28973An Evaluation of an Engineering Leadership Development Program on AlumniJob Placement & Career ProgressionDr. Dena Lang, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Lang is the Associate Director of the Engineering Leadership Research Program at Penn State Uni- versity. She holds a BS in Mechanical Engineering from West Virginia University, an MBA from Johns Hopkins University, and a PhD in Kinesiology with a focus on Biomechanics from Penn State University. Dr. Lang’s previous professional experiences and research interests range from mechanical engineering facilities design to research that
theImprovement of Mentored Experiences in Research. EIE was pilot tested in 2017-18 by the DEFat the Association’s annual Convention and by several other facilitators at sessions hosted bychapters across the country. The EIE curriculum was revised slightly based on feedback fromthese initial offerings, and the current version incorporates about 3 hours of activities, organizedinto three sections:Section 1: Introduction: Establishing group dynamics and laying the ground rules are perhapstwo of the most important steps to a successful training. Once established, these parameters helpensure participants engage in shared learning of ways to become more conscious of equity,inclusion and ethics issues as they relate to the practice of engineering. Learning
Paper ID #22197Evolution of Leadership Behaviors During Two-Semester Capstone DesignCourse in Mechanical EngineeringRebecca Komarek, University of Colorado, Boulder Rebecca Komarek is the Assistant Director of the Idea Forge and Managing Director of Catalyze CU at the University of Colorado Boulder. She has taught in the areas of education research and leadership development and served as a design team adviser. She is earning her PhD in engineering education with a focus on leadership development.Dr. Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder Daniel W. Knight is the Program Assessment and Research Associate at
Dean (Student Professional Development) in the Schulich School of Engineering at the University of Calgary. He is responsible for co-curricular programming related to professional skills development. He is also an award-winning teacher, a fellow of Engineers Canada and a professor of chemical engineering with a research focus in medical and industrial bioprocessing.Emily Wyatt, University of Calgary: Schulich School of Engineering Emily Wyatt is the Specialist for Diversity & Student Professional Development in the Schulich School of Engineering at the University of Calgary. Her role focuses on student engagement, leadership, and diversity & inclusion initiatives for current and prospective engineering students
, and a practical leadershipexperience. We discuss the pedagogical approaches that: 1) foster reflective self-leadership; 2)support the emergence of personal vision; and 3) create learning communities. We conclude bysharing recommendations for engineering educators to implement engineering-graduate-student-specific, leadership development initiatives at their institutions.ContextThe Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering at U of T is home to approximately 3000graduate students and postdoctoral fellows and 5000 undergraduate students. The graduatestudent population is divided equally into three degree-programs, PhD, research-based Masters,and course-based, professional Masters. Of all graduate students, 29% identify as women and42% are
to ensure that their development goals are in alignment with industry needs.The current paper reports on a subset of questions from our larger alumni survey. Theoverarching aim of the larger study is to assess the impact of the ELD minor on initial jobplacement (salary and job responsibilities), relevance to job responsibilities, effectiveness inpreparing alumni for their job responsibilities, and career progression. The larger study will alsoevaluate the impact of co-variates such as years of work experience, supervisory responsibilities,discipline, and participation in volunteer activities on alumni perceptions regarding leadershipcompetencies.The research questions for this paper are: 1) Compared to the CoE Comparison group, do ELDM
Paper ID #29532Using Competing Values Framework to map the Development of Leadershipskills as Capstone Design students Transition to the WorkplaceMr. Tahsin Mahmud Chowdhury, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Tahsin Mahmud Chowdhury is a PhD student at Virginia Tech in the department of Engineering Edu- cation. Tahsin holds a bachelors degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering and has worked as a manufacturing professional at a Fortune 500 company. As an Engineering Education researcher, he is interested in enhancing professional competencies for engineering workforce development in academia and
identify the desirableskills/competencies, traits, or dimensions of leadership that are deemed essential for graduatingengineers, from the perspectives of industry recruiters and managers [6]–[9].Broadly, industry-engaged research has found socio-emotional intelligence as well as skills andpersonality traits such as persuasion, (adaptive) communication, teamwork, initiative,confidence, humility, sociability, optimism, and integrity to be associated with effectiveengineering leadership [7], [9]–[11]. Of note, findings have been mixed on the associationbetween effective engineering leadership and technical mastery or mathematical-logicalintelligence, the assumed requirements to the practice of engineering [9], [10]. This by no meanscorroborates the
Havan, University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignMs. Charlotte HathawayDr. Blake Everett Johnson, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Dr. Blake Everett Johnson is a Teaching Assistant Professor and Director of Instructional Laborato- ries in the Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign. His research interests include experimental fluid mechanics, measurement science, and engi- neering education. He oversees undergraduate laboratories in fluid mechanics and heat transfer. Pedagog- ically, Dr. Johnson employs evidence-based writing instruction, active learning, inquiry-based laboratory instruction, and initiatives that empower students to do hands-on
assistant professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Ingenuity Labs at Queen’s University. Prior to starting his current position, Major (Retired) Hungler served in the Royal Canadian Airforce. His research is now focused on developing virtual and augmented reality for the next generation of simulation in education and training.Kaitlyn Brant, Queen’s University Kaitlyn Brant, BScE, MEng, is a recent graduate of Queen’s University. She has obtained degrees in both geological and mining engineering where she has most recently focused on the concepts of socially- conscious and socially-sustainable engineering. Kaitlyn believes that through education and leadership training, the next generation of engineers can
publications, and is co-author with Elaine Millam of the 2012 McGraw-Hill book ”Leadership for Engineers: The Magic of Mindset.” He has been active in SME’s Manufacturing Education & Research Community and its Accreditation Com- mittee. Bennett has served as an ABET Engineering Accreditation commissioner and has been leader of SME’s Center for Education. Bennett is one of the founders of the Engineering Leadership Development Division and past Chair.Dr. Eugene Joseph Audette, University of St. Thomas Currently, Professor and Associate Dean, Emeritus, School of Education, University of St. Thomas, St. Paul-Minneapolis, Minnesota; and a licensed consulting psychologist in limited private practice with emphases in
Louisiana State University. He obtained both his baccalaureate and master’s degrees from LSU ME and his doctorate from Purdue University’s School of Mechanical Engineering. He has been actively engaged in teaching, research and curricula development since joining the LSU faculty in 1988. As Associate Dean in the College of Engineering (2004-2014), he acquired significant funding from NSF to support the development of several initiatives aimed at improving student retention and graduation rates as well as supporting faculty with development of effective learning and teaching pedagogies.Dr. Joseph Learned Odenwald Joseph Odenwald worked in student affairs for twelve years. He previously served as assistant dean for
formability analyst. Since 1998, Dr. Smith complimented his industrial experience with part-time adjunct faculty positions at the University of Detroit, Mercy and Oakland University where he taught Metal Forming and Material Sci- ence classes, respectively. Such experiences helped pave the way for his full-time, associate professor position at Oakland University, where he explored a variety of research areas within the mechanics of sheet metal forming arena. Following a sabbatical at the University of Southern California, Dr. Smith recently initiated a parallel research track in the area of biomimetics, where he is investigating the use of biomimetic tactile sensors for the purpose of bio-tissue irregularity detection. In
- petencies through teaching and one-on-one coaching. She is most interested in developing student knowl- edge of leadership to impact their successful transition to the workplace.Dr. Dena Lang, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Lang is the Associate Director of the Engineering Leadership Research Program at Penn State Uni- versity. She holds a BS in Mechanical Engineering from West Virginia University, an MBA from Johns Hopkins University, and a PhD in Kinesiology with a focus on Biomechanics from Penn State University. Dr. Lang’s previous professional experiences and research interests range from mechanical engineering facilities design to research that applied engineering and molecular biology approaches to
] determined that engineers valued threecharacteristics in their leaders: 1) technical competence, 2) facilitation of collaborativeoptimization, and 3) organizational innovation. The researchers noted that these characteristicsare indicative of servant leaders who have technical expertise. Of this triad of competencies, onecould say that the technical element provides the ticket to entry into engineering leadership andsets the context for its practice. Many important and worthwhile initiatives in engineering leadership development arefocused on the development of communication, social, and business skills among engineers (e.g.[1]). To restate, this area of development is oriented to predominantly non-engineering skills.Often, improvement in such
behavior. While initiatives to developleadership skills are ubiquitous, few have demonstrated effectiveness in cultivating mature,authentic interpersonal interaction necessary for relational leadership. In addition, while manytheories have attempted to understand leadership, an increasingly popular—and successful--approach to understanding relational leadership development is identity.Previously published qualitative analysis of participant data from Human Interaction Labs(HILs) has provided insight into personal development and the mechanisms through whichparticipants were impacted and has been previously published. These labs provide a scaffold forcultivating intrapersonal, interpersonal, and group-based competencies by promoting anauthentic
Paper ID #32864Faculty Members’ Perceptions of Engineering Students’ Preparedness forLeadership CompetenciesMr. Hwangbo Bae, University of Florida Hwangbo Bae joined Simmons Research Lab at the University of Florida in August 2019 as a Ph.D. student. He received a Bachelor of Science and a Master of Science degrees in Civil & Environmental Engineering at Virginia Tech in 2018 and 2019, respectively. His major interest in research is under- standing professional values of construction workforce and the role of leadership that promote employee motivation for work, as well as job satisfaction and wellbeing.Dr. Madeline
Engineering. He has over 13 years of experience working in industry where he learned how important hands-on education and professional development are for preparing students to succeed in the workplace.Dr. Heidi Reeder, Boise State University Heidi Reeder is the Director of the Leadership Certificate programs in the College of Innovation and Design at Boise State University, and a Professor of Communication. As a social scientist her research interests include leadership, commitment, gender, and pedagogy. Her articles have been published in top communication and social psychology journals including Sex Roles, Communication Monographs, and the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. She earned a B.S. in communication
Paper ID #28810Military Leadership for Engineers: A Comprehensive Look at Leadershipfrom Army Doctrine to Engineering Course WorkLt. Col. Brian J Novoselich P.E., U.S. Military Academy Brian Novoselich is an active duty Army Lieutenant Colonel currently serving as an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy (West Point). He earned his Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech in 2016. He holds Master’s and Bachelor’s degrees in mechanical engineering from The University of Texas at Austin and West Point respectively. His research interests include