Paper ID #14655Sports, arts and concrete canoes: Engineers learning to lead outside the for-mal curriculumDr. Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto Cindy Rottmann is a Research Associate at the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead) at the University of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering leadership, engineering ethics education, critical theory, teacher leadership and social justice teacher unionism.Dr. Robin Sacks, University of Toronto Dr. Sacks is an Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering at the University of Toronto teaching leadership and positive
the first Chair, and the late Dr. William Leonhard gave full backing to theEngineering Leadership Development Minor throughout its existence.In May, 1992, Dr. Matson was recruited from the University of Houston by the EngineeringCollege at Penn State to be the first Director of The Leonard Center for Innovation andEnhancement of Engineering Education. The stated goal of the Center was to identify the needsof the students and of the marketplace, develop curriculum innovations and teaching methods,test the innovations, and integrate the successful results into the engineering programs. Drawingon his experience developing and teaching courses in creativity, innovation, andentrepreneurship, Matson applied those lessons to the creation of the
Paper ID #15201Charting the Landscape of Engineering Leadership Education in North Amer-ican UniversitiesMr. Mike Klassen, Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, University of Toronto Mike Klassen is a Leadership Programming Consultant with the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead) at the University of Toronto where he develops leadership programs and industry partnerships for engineers. His research interests include engineering leadership, organizational culture, and higher education. Mike has a Graduate Diploma in Social Innovation from the University of Waterloo and a BASc in
Paper ID #13000Leadership Characteristics within the Making CommunityJames Logan Oplinger, Arizona State UniversityDr. Micah Lande, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Micah Lande, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor at the Polytechnic School in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches human-centered engineering design and innovation courses in the engineering and manufacturing engineering programs. Dr. Lande researches how tech- nical and non-technical people learn and apply a design process to their work. He is interested in the intersection of designerly epistemic identities
simulations became useful tools for teaching mostly business management and businessstrategy. Today, simulations continue to be used extensively in the training of militarypersonnel 2, medical personnel 3, and engineers, as they provide opportunities in which futuredecision-makers can practice making decisions in a risk-free environment.Shaw 4 reviews literature on the benefits of using simulations in the classroom and suggests thatsimulations: (i) provide “students with a much deeper understanding of differing perspectives”,and (ii) that they can lead to students engaging in “affective learning.” Affective learning refersto students being able to change their perspectives and attitudes on issues at hand, experiencingempathy for others, and more
- lez has been recognized for scholarly work, education innovation and socio-entrepreneurial humanitarian efforts. He is known and respected for actively incorporating students into all three of these areas. Among many highlights of his scholarly work, he was awarded a prestigious National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Research Service Award for his work in neuromuscular control and musculoskeletal biomechanics on children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Dr. Gonzalez’s scholarly work includes over 100 publications in journals and conference proceedings many of which are co-authored with his students. For his efforts and innovation in engineering education Dr. Gonzalez has received the American Society
in communicating with potential stakeholders (potential funders,collaborators, managers). This may be accomplished within the context of research projects, ormore broadly, within the context of leading projects and organizations. Fundamentally, when a 10school teaches its students to develop and communicate a vision, they are teaching them to stayfocused on the big picture, even while working on intricate details of a technical project. This isa valuable leadership skill that is central to the pillar of CC. Second, we suggest engineering schools continuously encourage students to Adopt aPlatform Mentality. We draw from literature on innovation to make a distinction betweenproducts and
Paper ID #12205Teaching and Assessing Professional Skills in an Undergraduate Civil Engi-neering CurriculumDr. William J. Davis P.E., The Citadel William J. Davis is a professor in Civil & Environmental Engineering at The Citadel in Charleston, SC. He received his Ph.D. in civil engineering from Georgia Tech and is a registered professional engineer. His research interests focus on transportation infrastructure planning and design, highway safety, and active living by design. He teaches courses in engineering management, transportation engineering, geographic information systems, and land surveying.Dr. Dimitra
engineering education practice, we must have positive change in both thebehaviors of the participants and the systems within which these participants act.The development of the IRE program is one story of change in engineering education. One ofthe factors that make this story of particular research interest is that it focuses on the environmentin which the change is occurring and the administrative and political structures necessary for thatchange to be sustainable. This research, then, sheds light on the systemic barriers to change inhigher education and builds on previous work, including Kolmos and de Graaff’s10 summary ofinstitutional change in higher education and the complexities associated with movement fromtraditional teaching systems to
other-centered Love unlocking human potential). Core Values (Accountability, Leadership in Excellence, Integrity, Leadership in Mission, and Teamwork) and self-discovery alignment 2. Leadership Skills Learning Workshop deep dives- Students attend three 4 hour sessions where we teach a model of leader effectiveness, skills inventory, a leader profile that is useful with engineers (KAI), and various exercises to drive home the learning. Leadership Models and Behaviors, Interpersonal Effectiveness, Developing Professional Competence, Teams and Interdependent Work Groups, Innovation and Cognitive Problem-Solving and Ethics and Decision-Making are significant skills we teach. 3. Leadership Speaker Series – A
American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Engineering Leadership as Principled NonconformityFour years at MIT permanently solders some primary circuits of the mind, and perhaps for that reason some modes of thinking seem permanently closed to me. --Richard Meehan, Getting Sued and Other Tales of the Engineering Life, p. 18As a recent review article in the Leadership Quarterly (2014)1 reported, “Leadershipdevelopment has emerged as an active field of theory building and research, providing a morescientific and evidence-based foundation to augment the long-standing practitioner interested inthe topic” (p. 63). Like many of the papers submitted to the Engineering
% of interviewers thought professor and students should try hard totackle engineering challenges together. Partial experts think that the point-to-pointcommunication and cooperation in the engineering practice surpass the scope of pureknowledge teaching and it more reflects inheritances of scientific idea and scientific taste. Through a series of discussion, we continuously improved the construct definitions thatverified each construct throughout research. We conducted interceder agreement checks todetermine whether the same constructs (or different ones) were selected18. In the fifth phaseof the analysis, we categorized the findings into four themes that incorporated. We reviewedthe themes to determine how they might contribute to an
Paper ID #17388Developing the Global Engineering Leader at a Leading Engineering Institu-tion in the SoutheastDr. Adjo A Amekudzi-Kennedy, Georgia Institute of Technology Professor Adjo Amekudzi-Kennedy’s research, teaching and professional activities focus on civil infras- tructure decision making to promote sustainable development. She studies complex real-world systems and develops infrastructure decision support systems to promote sustainable development. Kennedy earned a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering (Structures) from Stanford University in 1994, a Master of Science in Civil Engineering (Transportation
Paper ID #15222’Lion Leadership Lessons Video Series’ - Delivering Engineering LeadershipLessons to a Broad AudienceDr. Dean H. Lang, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Lang is currently the Associate Director of the Engineering Leadership Research Program at Penn State University. She holds a BS in Mechanical Engineering from West Virginia University, an MBA from Johns Hopkins University, and a PhD in Kinesiology with a focus on Biomechanics from Penn State University. Dr. Lang’s previous professional experiences and research interests range from mechanical engineering facilities design to research that
Paper ID #12047Building Piece by Piece: Teaching Engineering Leadership through Inte-grated ModulesDr. Clinton Stephens, Iowa State University Dr. Clinton M. Stephens is a lecturer for leadership education with the Carrie Chapman Catt Center for Women and Politics at Iowa State University. Currently, Stephens coordinates the Catt Center’s burgeon- ing leadership program and teaches classes in leadership development including CLPS 322, ”Leadership Styles and Strategies in a Diverse Society.” Stephens continues his research and dissemination work that focuses on student leadership development, specifically assessing
of Alabama, and a Ph.D. in Leadership and Policy Studies from Peabody College of Vanderbilt Univer- sity. Her teaching interests relate to the professional development of graduate engineering students and to leadership, policy, and change in STEM education. Primary research projects explore the preparation of graduate students for diverse careers and the development of reliable and valid engineering education assessment tools. She is a NSF Faculty Early Career (CAREER) and Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) recipient.Mr. Amadin Osagiede, Purdue University, West Lafayette Amadin Osagiede is an MBA candidate in the Krannert School of Management at Purdue University. He obtained a
Paper ID #9937Leadership in Multidisciplinary Project Teams: Investigating the emergentnature of leadership in an engineering education contextMegan Kenny Feister, Purdue University Megan K. Feister is a doctoral candidate in the Brian Lamb School of Communication at Purdue Uni- versity. Her research focuses on organizational identity and socialization, team communication, ethical reasoning development and assessment, and innovation and design. Megan holds a B.A. in communica- tion from Saint Louis University and a M.A. in Organizational Communication from the University of Cincinnati.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue
, Clemson University Jeff Plumblee, PhD, MBA is a Research Assistant Professor with joint appointments in Engineering & Science Education and Civil Engineering at Clemson University. Plumblee creates, directs, assesses, and grows engagement opportunities for students, including experiential-learning and project-based commu- nity engagement opportunities. Plumblee’s primary interests are in engineering and innovation in resource constrained environments and seeking ways to offer these programs to a broader audience, including partnering with other universities and developing online platforms for community engagement courses. Plumblee is the Founding Director of Clemson Engineers for Developing Countries, a student
positions during his 23-year career in the US Army Corps of Engineers. He is a graduate of Norwich University and Florida Tech, where he earned a master’s in Organizational Leadership and Psychology. He is a US Army Ranger and served as Professor of Military Science and Leadership at Providence College, and also at Florida Tech. Prior to assuming his teaching role at Northeastern Universities Gordon Engineering Leadership program, he spent five years in industry as Director of Operations of King Industries in Norwalk CT.Prof. Simon Pitts, Northeastern University Simon Pitts is director of Northeastern University’s Gordon Institute of Engineering Leadership and pro- fessor of practice in engineering leadership. Before
leadershipprograms, Tonkay, G., and Zimmers, E.9 remarked that they “migrated their honors engineeringleadership program to the general engineering population because they found it was the middleof the class (who) tended to do quite well years after graduation, often advancing into positionsof leadership.”Although engineering leadership is viewed as important to a student’s professional skill set, thereare issues: limited room in engineering curriculums to dedicate time for a leadership course(s) 10;or engineering faculty may lack the background and training to effectively teach team skills tothe students11. These problems provide the impetus for new and innovative engineeringleadership programs.With leadership so closely intertwined with personal traits of
Harrington is a professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the Univer- sity of Wisconsin, where he has been since 1996. His research and teaching interests primarily involve drinking water treatment, distribution, and regulatory policy. He is currently the department’s associate chair for the undergraduate program and the Suzanne & Richard Pieper Family Foundation Servant leader chair for the university’s College of Engineering. Page 23.847.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013
become extinct and new opportunities surface to address emerging markets with innovative solutions not previously possible. The urgency to have regular and trusted information on the state of the art in a field is greater than ever. 3. As the potential for new and unique business models to disrupt current practices, staying on top of and understanding the implications of these trends may be critical to success or even survival.Figure 2: Nine Work Strategies Identified by Bell Labs Figure 3: T-Shaped Professional as used by IBM5.3 Engineers and networkingOne key for success in building a network is developing the skills in reaching out to someonenew, uncomfortable for many engineers. Studies14,15, using tools such
Paper ID #13725Engineering Leadership Education: A Review of Best PracticesRobyn Paul, University of Calgary Robyn is a Master of Science candidate in Civil Engineering at the Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary. Her research focuses on the impact that teaching engineers leadership has on early career success. She co-founded the Engineering Education Students’ Society and is involved with initiatives to collaborate nationally to increase the conversation with students about engineering education.Dr. Lynne Gradon Cowe Falls P.Eng., University of Calgary
over six years of industrial experience as a bridge construction project engineer for a construction contractor and as a research engineer for the Naval Civil Engineering Labora- tory in Port Hueneme California. His teaching interests include construction equipment, cost estimating and construction process design. His research interests include highway and heavy construction methods, road maintenance methods, innovations in construction process administration, engineering education, hybrid learning and online learning. Page 26.1447.1 c American Society for Engineering Education
spent 14 years in industry where he held leadership positions focused on process improvement and organizational develop- ment.Dr. Bryce E. Hughes, Montana State University Bryce E. Hughes is an Assistant Teaching Professor in Adult and Higher Education at Montana State University, and holds a Ph.D. in Higher Education and Organizational Change from the University of Cal- ifornia, Los Angeles, as well as an M.A. in Student Development Administration from Seattle University and a B.S. in General Engineering from Gonzaga University. His research interests include teaching and learning in engineering, STEM education policy, and diversity and equity in STEM. c American Society for Engineering
Paper ID #17468Developing Engineering Leaders Using a Reflective Autobiographical Exer-cise ˜ Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyDr. David Nino, David Ni˜no, Ph.D., is a Senior Lecturer in the Bernard M. Gordon-MIT Engineering Leadership Program, where he has a strong commitment to the development of leadership among undergraduates and graduate students across MIT and among engineers, more broadly. In addition to MIT teaching, he is active in an international consortium of engineering leadership centers and a founding officer of the Engineering Leadership Development Division of the American Society of
and Innovation Management graduate program. Previously, Meg served as the Director of the Career & Corporate Connection’s office at the Smeal College of Business at Penn State University. Meg is a board certified coach with experience in developing students’ leadership and professional competencies through teaching and one-on-one coach- ing. She is most interested in developing student competencies in leadership to impact their successful transition to the workplace and career success.Dr. Dena Lang, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Lang is currently the Associate Director of the Engineering Leadership Research Program at Penn State University. She holds a BS in Mechanical Engineering from West
following fall 2014 course. Thisincluded curriculum design and the teaching of the course. Page 26.502.5 Upon being given the opportunity, the students were hired to work closely with TheUniversity of Texas at El Paso and Olin College of Engineering to identify the three main focusareas they wished to address in the course as well an overall goal for the course. Theseinstructional focus areas were leadership identity development, innovative thinking, and handson skills. They were selected with the ultimate goals of introducing new students to engineeringleadership, building an engaging and interactive course, and initiating the students
Paper ID #11557DEVELOPMENT OF THE JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY UNDERGRAD-UATE ENGINEERING LEADERSHIP PROGRAMDr. Kyle G. Gipson, James Madison University Dr. Kyle Gipson is an Assistant Professor at James Madison University (United States) in the Department of Engineering (Madison Engineering) and the Center for Materials Science. He has taught courses per- taining to topics for first-year engineering, materials science and engineering, engineering design, systems thinking and engineering leadership. He has a PhD in Polymer, Fiber Science from Clemson University. His research background is in the synthesis of polymer
change, disruptive/transformative innovation, development studies, strategic planning, and public policy. Mahmoud has authored/co-authored 50+ peer-reviewed published papers in well-reputed international conferences and journals, in addition to 25+ institutional/curricular frameworks and internal reports. Mahmoud has attained a number of research funding grants from the UK, Malaysia, and Qatar, and won a number of awards and scholarships during his studies and professional career. After finishing his Doctorate, Mahmoud worked as a researcher at Loughborough University, UK. In Fall 2011, he moved to Qatar University (QU), Qatar, as a faculty member with the Dean’s Office, College of Engineering. In Fall 2012, Mahmoud