course. This study is inspired by such a course, where students work inmultidisciplinary teams for two semesters in designing, building, and testing projects. Theobjective is to evaluate the process of students’ self-placement in team roles and the impact ofthese roles on their engagement and perception of success during the project developmentexperience, to investigate how student role placement, rotation and execution contribute to theirdevelopment of leadership and teamwork skills. Results are presented from a mixed methodssurvey and data from three cohorts of students between 2021 and 2023, including questions onthe students’ course goals, role assignments, role rotations, and if their roles affected theirengagement, success, or team’s
inclusive engineering environment.Students explore topics such as diversity in engineering, the impact of implicit and systemic bias,how to create inclusive cultures, community engagement, and leadership in diverse engineeringenvironments. The course enlists engineering students' energy, creativity, social conscience, andon-the-ground perspectives in improving the diversity environment. We engage students throughvarious active learning techniques to allow them to practice leadership skills (such as how to bean ally), engage in diverse teams through exploring their peers’ perspectives, and develop a senseof belonging in a safe, inclusive learning environment.While the grant ended in 2013, the College of Engineering has continued to invest in the
us understand which, if any, antecedents and impacts areunique to engineers. The small body of literature addressing engineers’ happiness, specifically,presents opportunities for further empirical studies, especially on engineers in the workplace (asopposed to students studying engineering), in different fields of engineering, and among differentdemographic groups of engineers. Finally, further research could be done to define anddistinguish between terms such as “happiness,” “engagement,” “satisfaction,” and “experience”in the engineering field, as well as more broadly. References[1] El-Sharkawy, S. A., Nafea, M. S., & Hassan, E. E. D. H. (2023). HRM and organizational learning in knowledge
are done at the faculty/student level or institutional level and focus on helpingstudents meet the system's demands. Instead, in this initiative, we attempt to engagedepartmental leadership in transforming STEM educational ecosystems. In this paper, we look atone specific example of how ecosystems can be impacted by engaging in communities ofpractice with faculty and leaders at universities with a high number of minoritized students tocreate systems that, instead, meet students where they are, making the educational processrewarding and fulfilling for all.FrameworkThe goal of our NSF-supported project, known colloquially as Eco-STEM, is to establish aSTEM educational ecosystem that allows all individuals within the ecosystem to thrive
into therealm of engineering leadership work. We do not purport that this conditional sub-sample representsall individuals in our sample engaging in engineering leadership-related work (especially given non-positional and distributed modes of leadership [18]), yet we required a consistent method of boundingthe scope of occupational experiences on which to focus, given the quantity and variety of occupationaloutcomes we observed. There are undoubtedly many others among our sample pursuing or engagingin engineering leadership across different types of careers or earlier in their engineering leadershipjourneys; for these reasons, we frame the findings that follow as pertinent to the engineeringleadership education community without claiming they
instruction), this projectempirically measures the impact of identity-based reflexive instruction on student leader identityand perceptions of leadership. Results indicate that reflexive instruction is effective in impactingboth student leader identity growth and development of more expansive views of leadership. Inaddition, this project accomplished a core goal of creating an engineering leadership instructionalmodule that can be easily integrated in existing curricular and programmatic structures.Literature ReviewWhile engineering education has long successfully attended to technical preparation for theprofession, the past several decades have seen an increasing focus on developing professionalskills, such as communication and teamwork. Leadership
trainingsession is below. This scenario enables students to organize their ideas, to increase clarity andcompassion of their messaging for better impact and have a simple framework with which toshare these ideas with clients, colleagues, peers, executives as well as with non-technicalaudiences.Sample Scenario: One of the most difficult communications is when our engineer is ethicallytorn between challenging/standing up to or agreeing with upper management. In this scenario,we explored the ethical choice of challenging a NO from the boss in a diplomatic and effectiveway, outlining the step-by-step phrases as we advocate for our idea, position it for the mutualbenefit of the larger team/project and make our ask.Topic 5: Elevate Conversation SkillsMost STEM
mergeddesign thinking, leadership, and engineering into a cohesive origami engineering course.IntroductionTwenty years ago, the National Academy of Engineering published The Engineer of 2020:Visions of Engineering in the New Century [1]. The publication called upon engineeringeducators to develop students’ performance skills, including teamwork competencies, to augmenttheir technical education. Since then, the engineering education community has engaged in avigorous discussion regarding the development of these skills, resulting in various pedagogiesand approaches being developed and tested. In addition to research, universities have installedleadership development programs either in or adjacent to their engineering programs [2].However, this sudden
foster committed and productive relationships with various stakeholders,including themselves and their teams, users of their technologies, and those affected by theirengineering efforts. Developing leadership skills is essential for engineers, enabling them towork effectively in teams, make informed decisions, communicate effectively, solveproblems, manage projects, and drive innovation. These skills are crucial for professionalsuccess and for the positive impact of engineering on society. Leadership is widely recognizedas a key component of business success, with 89% of business leaders considering itfundamental. The engineering student graduation profile emphasizes the need to developleadership skills, setting the expectation that students
, pp. 70–81, 2014, doi: 10.1177/1354067X13515940.[27] M. S. Ross, J. L. Huff, and A. Godwin, “Resilient engineering identity development critical to prolonged engagement of Black women in engineering,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 92–113, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1002/jee.20374.[28] S. Secules et al., “Positionality practices and dimensions of impact on equity research: A collaborative inquiry and call to the community,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 19–43, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1002/jee.20377.[29] J. Saldaña, The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, 3rd ed. 2016. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.[30] “NSBE Vision, Mission & Objectives - National Society
, writing, andcommunication skills that are vital to successful careers in science and engineering [29].Student participation in REU programs was impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and raisedconcerns related to REU learning outcomes. Several REU programs over the past few years wereheld remotely or virtually due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Research on the impacts of virtual orremote REU programs is limited. One study by Nyarko and colleagues highlighted how, despitechallenges encountered during a virtual REU, students demonstrated gains in knowledge,confidence, and communication skills [30]. Even as many REUs return to in-person experiences,research into the impacts of virtual or remote REUSs can be useful as developers and hosts ofREUs and other
productive involvement. Recently, the JLLA expanded its activities by taking on an outreach project to address foodinsecurity among graduate students at UConn. JLLA views this effort multi-pronged, it provides arealistic opportunity for JLLA members to take on leadership roles on a topic that is important tothem and their community, and they hope to make a difference. Multiple surveys and studies onstudents at the UConn Storrs campus [8] and graduate students in general have been conducted[9,10]. These studies identified several contributing characteristics associated with food insecurity,as well as their impact on students. These studies indicate a need for further assessment andintervention to address the issue of graduate food insecurity
the biotech and pharmaceutical industries for eight years. Jessica’s experience leading multidisciplinary teams strengthened her perspective that the ability to empathize, communicate and collaborate is integral to success in engineering.Dr. Andrea Chan, University of Toronto, Canada Andrea Chan is a Research Associate at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering | University of TorontoCatherine MacKenzie Campbell MacKenzie Campbell is a MASc student in Chemical Engineering specializing in Engineering Education. Her thesis is exploring how the quality of work-integrated learning experiences shape women engineers’ career intentions, with a focus on intersectionality and diverse engineering fields
computational power is greatly expanding its impactand influence in leadership, i.e., data, and computation on it, is used to enhance the practice ofleadership. These developments have wide-ranging impacts for organization and will force us toaddress thorny ethical challenges.This work will address a small slice of the overall picture, i.e., an initial exploration in the Fall 2023semester of student and industry perceptions about specific ethical questions on Gen AI’s impact oncareers and the workplace. The intent is to help students in our undergraduate Engineering Leadershipclass at Texas A&M University to be resilient in their own careers and to navigate the ethical watersof Gen AI in decision making in their workplaces.We use a flipped
engineering educators: Engineering Leaders 1) employ the full range of engineering skills and knowledge in the design of socio-technical innovations while 2) seeking to understand, embrace, and address the current and future impact of their work in context by 3) actively fostering engaged and productive relationships with diverse stakeholders, including themselves and their team, the users of their technologies, and those impacted by their engineering work.The call for increased focus on professional skills in holistic engineering education has remained consistent for nearly three decades[1], [2], [6]. These calls were answered by and evolution in student outcomes for ABET accreditation which for 2022-2023 includeboth EL and
, graduate students, and undergraduate students. Beyond professional roles, eachperson within a network will also identify as a mentor, mentee, and peer mentor depending on therelationship with another person. From a teaching perspective, the mentorship relationshipsbetween faculty members and graduate students are crucial in developing future educators andleaders [6]. This aspect of faculty mentorship is often undervalued and essential to enhancing thegraduate educational experience. The role of social networks in these relationships and howvarious factors influence the leadership trajectory of engineering educators is worth furtherexploration.Understanding how mentees and mentors are motivated to engage within this network may giveperspective to
College of Engineering at the University of Michigan engaged in an multi-yearexperiential learning initiative to develop a framework to support students to intentionally explorelearning opportunities, engage meaningfully in experiences, reflect on what they have learned,and communicate the value of the core competencies they have developed [9]. Experientiallearning has been identified as a high-impact educational practice [12], and provides theopportunity for the student to develop and practice competencies in authentic settings [13]. Tosupport experiential learning, the College of Engineering developed a set of key professionalcompetencies (Table 1) through a strategic vision process involving faculty, staff, students,alumni, and industry
key areas: (1) Using systemsmapping to understand wicked problems; (2) Engaging with fields of knowledge outside ofengineering; and (3) Articulating and engaging each student’s own ways of knowing andleadership style. Within the first area, students are expected, by the end of the course, to be ableto describe and create multiple types of system maps and choose appropriate systems mappingtechniques for a given problem or task. The course enables the student to construct systems mapswhich elucidate a complex socio-technical problem, evaluate and provide feedback on mapsconstructed by others, iterate based on research and reflection, and communicate the map withclarity. The second area signals the need for engagement with and an openness to
’ perspectives. In the future, the scope of data collection can be expanded to includemore team projects with diverse student team members, different engineering disciplines andvarying levels of expertise to capture a more comprehensive range of perspectives and to gainbroader understanding of boundary-crossing experiences. Furthermore, integrating perspectivesfrom other stakeholders such as instructors, industry partners, or community members couldprovide a more holistic understanding of the effectiveness of the GED course and its alignmentwith industry needs. In the longer term, longitudinal studies could be conducted to gain insightson the long-term impact of the GED course on students' leadership competencies, and to assesshow their experiences in
is scheduled to commencelater in 2024.Implications. The Experiential Leadership course demonstrates one way of converting therequirements of a co-curricular program into a curricular offering. For students, the course mayfoster both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation for pursuing leadership development goals. The linkto intrinsic motivation is described above. The modest extrinsic motivators—enrollment in aone-credit course and fulfillment of an academic certificate requirement—provide impetus forpursuing the associated activities. Program directors and staff may benefit from improvedattendance, engagement, and retention rates. Although engineering educators might hope tocreate thriving programs on the basis of intrinsic motivation alone
the specific context of engineering consulting by studying one mid-size, Canadianengineering services firm. More specifically, the research question we seek to address is who isidentified as a leader inside engineering consulting firms and why; for example, what skills,qualities or other attributes are recognized within the firm? By examining engineering leadershipin situ, we acknowledge the prospect that “engineering leadership” may be impacted by thecontext in which it is practiced. This work will support engineering educators in furtherunderstanding engineering leadership, particularly for Capstone, design, and other problem-based, project-based courses where students are meant to be situated in replicated professionalpractice
approaches and engineering leadership concepts within theengineering curriculum, both internally at our own institutions, and more broadly as members ofnational engineering education communities of practice such as the Canadian EngineeringEducation Association (CEEA), the CEEA Sustainable Engineering Leadership and Management(SELM) special interest group, the National Initiative on Capacity Building and KnowledgeCreation for Engineering Leadership (NICKEL), Graduate Attribute Continuous ImprovementProcess (GACIP), Canadian Society for Chemical Engineering (CSChE), the American Societyfor Engineering Education (ASEE) and the ASEE Engineering Leadership DevelopmentDivision (LEAD). We are instructors with both industry and academic experience who
participant who was committed to building university-industrypartnerships noted that his proud moment experience gave him a leadership methodology he isstill using today. This methodology not only supported his professional development as anengineering leader, but also had a positive impact on several generations of students, academics,and industry partners. While few participants were able to articulate their impact as engineeringleaders in such an explicit way, all 29 distilled leadership lessons from proud moments enablingthem to pay benefits forward to others in their respective “communities of practice”[27]. Thisfinding suggests that researchers interested in examining dominant narratives about ELdevelopment in professional practice would do
inclusion, practicinginclusive leadership is essential. Leaders in engineering organizations play a significant role inshaping work spaces, environments, policies, cultures, values, and social norms [10]. It isessential for inclusive leaders to be mindful of the cultures they are perpetuating and seek todevelop a culture of belonging where all individuals, regardless of identity or privilege, believethey can thrive [10]. Inclusive CulturesWorkplace cultures and environments can greatly impact performance, productivity, efficiency,teamwork, communication, collaboration, job satisfaction, employee engagement, stress, andburnout and even retention [12]. The scholar Schein indicated that culture can be broken downinto various levels including
format of Appendix B).As part of the conclusion to the class-wide debrief, the second-year student ELL facilitatorrevealed that the Acceptable Use Policy from The Mystery Lab was in fact an excerpt from MIT’sAcceptable Use Policy, with the institution name changed. The policy excerpt, therefore, illustratedhow one large non-profit institution handles its widely-accessible internal resources in a contextwhere many community members are engaged in personal side-projects and pursuits; while“incidental” use for personal purposes is allowed in some cases, resources are indeed substantiallyrestricted in their acceptable uses. Instructors explained to students the educational reasoningbehind the choice to embed MIT’s policy into the activity: to
impactful leadership developmentexperience.Preliminary evaluation of students’ responses showed changes in several areas, such as theirconfidence with assuming leadership roles. Although sharing the results of the reflection was notrequired, communications with the students after the exercise revealed periods of participantfrustration that were mitigated by the group discussions prior to entering the escape rooms. Bythe end of the escape room activity and its associated self-assessment activities, many studentslearned the value of strategizing before the event and clearly communicating to groupmatesbefore entering a potentially high-stress situation. Considering the relative abundance of escaperooms that have opened across the country and their
participants well exceeds their representation in targeted majorswhen compared with the general population in the college and with national metrics.IntroductionThis work-in-progress paper reports on a leadership and innovation skills development programsupported by an ongoing 3-year grant from the US Office of Naval Research (ONR). The papershares both practice and research. The program aims to have a significant impact on the successand careers of 60-70 students at a non-military urban engineering college, especially women andunderrepresented students. The college, the Purdue School of Engineering & Technology inIndianapolis, has historically had a substantial number of recent engineering graduates employedby a nearby DoD base, the Naval Surface
communication in diverse contexts. ShDr. Robert L. Nagel, James Madison University & Carthage College Dr. Robert L. Nagel is Director of Engineering at Carthage College and Professor of Engineering at James Madison University. Dr. Nagel, a mechanical engineer by training, performs research on engineering student learning and engagement with a focus on interventions, pedagogies, and design methodologies. Through his research, he seeks to gain applicable knowledge for increasing student engagement and re- ducing barriers in engineering, design, and making. At James Madison University, Dr. Nagel has been KEEN Leader, sophomore design coordinator, and Director of the Center for Innovation in Engineer- ing Education. At