for the WISE K-12 Outreach Committee. Meera joined the University of Calgary in 2015.Prof. Qiao Sun, University of Calgary Qiao Sun is a professor in the Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering at the University of Calgary. She is also the Associate Dean (Diversity and Equity) at the Schulich School of Engineer- ing. She obtained her BSc in Power Machinery Engineering and MSc in Mechanical Engineering from Shanghai Jiao Tong University in 1982 and 1986 respectively, and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Victoria in 1996. She has taught engineering courses such as engineering mechanics, numerical analysis, control systems and advanced robotics. Her teaching excellence has been
Paper ID #5794Preparing STEM Students for Success in Physics Through an Intensive Sum-mer Program ˜Ms. Polin Yadak, Canada College I was born in 1969 in Iran/Tehran. I received my first BS in Psychology in 1994 from Azad University in Tehran. My family and I immigrated to the United State of America in 2000. I received my second BS in Astrophysics in 2007 and my MS in physics in 2010. I have always enjoyed teaching both physics and mathematics. I am currently employed as Physics Instructor at Ca˜nada College and Skyline College.Dr. Amelito G Enriquez, Canada College Amelito Enriquez is a professor of
, particularly in science classes have clearly been shown to put studentsin a role of passive rather than active learning [1]. Traditional instructional methods have alsobeen shown to be very inadequate in terms of promoting deep learning and long-term retentionof important concepts. Students in traditional classrooms acquire most of their “knowledge”through classroom lectures and textbook reading. A troubling fact is, after instruction, studentsoften emerge from our classes with serious misconceptions [2 - 6]. Research on theconstructivist approach to learning (i.e. the learner must construct their knowledge) reveals thatwhen students are actively engaged with the material, learning is clearly enhanced [7]. Theactive process of writing within a science
National Science Foundation ASEE Visiting Scholar. Dr. Larkin is the author of a book chapter pub- lished in 2010 entitled ”Women’s Leadership in Engineering” in K. O’Connor (Ed.) Gender and Women’s Leadership: A Reference Handbook (Vol. 2, pp. 689 – 699). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. In 2013 her paper entitled ”Breaking with Tradition: Using the Conference Paper as a Case for Alterna- tive Assessment in Physics” received an award for best paper in a special session entitled Talking about Teaching (TaT’13), at the 42nd International Conference on Engineering Pedagogy (IGIP) held in Kazan, Russia. In January 2014 the Center for Teaching, Research and Learning at AU presented Dr. Larkin with the Milton and Sonia
allowsstudents to engage actively in the processes of conjecturing, testing and thinking revision17,18,19.Models and modeling perspective18,19,20,21 is used to develop mathematical models and conceptsby having students: a) work on real life problematic situations that extend their way of thinking,b) analyze collected data from real situations that allows them to explore patterns and regularitiesof the mathematical models, and c) identify the use of mathematical and physical concepts andprocedures by solving problems using the constructed models.Figure 2. Main modeling perspectives that serve as the foundation of the integrated Physics andMathematics courses.Course objectiveThe objective of the course is to teach what is needed when it is needed through
goes far beyond being ableto demonstrate that the ABET criteria have been met. Tittle reminds us that STEM degrees arenot earned strictly through mathematical and other technically-based courses32. Using data fromthe National Report Card, she notes that just 52 percent of high school graduates scored at thebasic level in writing and just 38 percent at the basic level in reading. This is a troublesome factgiven that many of these students will go on to populate our college classrooms. In fact, Trittlenotes the rising number of development and remedial courses on reading and writing thatcontinue to rise and have overflowing enrollments on college campuses across the U.S. This factis quite disturbing.In an informal study involving 140 community
the opportunity toparticipate in the sorghum project through the senior design experience. We would also like tothank Ame Gelalecha and Dr. Greg Mowry for sponsoring the Injera senior design project. Andfinally we would like to thank and express our gratitude to Dr. Don Weinkauf for supporting ‘peaceengineering’ and summer student interns.Bibliography1. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc. Annual Report 1998.2. http://www.geerthofstede.nl/index3. Von Grebmer, K., Nestorova, B., Quisumbing, A., Fertzinger, R., Fritschel, H., Pandya- Lorch, R., Yohannes, Y., “2009 Global Hunger Index: The Challenge of Hunger—Focus on Financial Crisis and Gender Inequality”, International Food Policy Research Institute, November 2009
. Page 12.747.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 First Time Accreditation of a Multi-disciplinary Engineering Physics ProgramAbstractIn 2006, Tarleton State University successfully achieved ABET accreditation of EngineeringPhysics, its first engineering program. This Engineering Physics program is a multidisciplinaryengineering program with emphases in electrical engineering, computer engineering, andmaterials physics. Several challenges above and beyond the proof of continuous improvement inCriteria 1-8 had to be overcome to accomplish this accreditation. Tarleton State is a traditionallyliberal arts school and serves a predominantly rural area with only a few local engineeringindustries
uniformprobability distribution with a standard deviation =a/3. Uncertainties are propagated in thesame manner as in traditional error analysis6. For a measurement result y based on a set of ndirect measurements xi through a measurement equation y=f(x1..xn), the expanded uncertainty iny is 2 n f n 1 n f f Uy kp xi 2 2 xi x j Page 22.1048.3 i 1 xi
Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. (2007). Beyond bias and barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.[10] Byers, N. & Williams, G. (Eds.). (2006). Out of the shadows: Contributions of twentieth-century women to physics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.[11] http://www.goldieblox.com/, Accessed 01.03.14.[12] Larkin, T.L. (2010), Women’s Leadership in Engineering. In K. O’Connor (Ed.) Gender and Women’s Leadership: A Reference Handbook (Vol 2, pp. 689 – 699). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.[13] LeBold, W. W. & LeBold, D. J. (1998, March). Women engineers: A historical
engineering. For high-achieving students who have already shown aptitude inmathematics and science a university outreach program can challenge them beyond thetraditional classroom environment, providing first-hand exposure to research scientists andengineers as well as an introduction to the university science and engineering culture. The YoungEngineering and Science Scholars (YESS) program 1 is for college-bound high school juniorsand seniors of underrepresented minority groups who have strong academic credentials and aninclination towards science and engineering disciplines. The goals of the program are to nurturetheir interests in science and engineering through challenging academic courses, faculty lectures,and tours of the Caltech campus and
Paper ID #12758RESISTANCE IS FUTILE: A NEW COLLABORATIVE LABORATORYGAME BASED LAB TO TEACH BASIC CIRCUIT CONCEPTSDr. James G. O’Brien, Wentworth Institute of Technology James G. O’Brien is an associate professor of Physics at Wentworth Institute of Technology in Boston, MA. James is currently pursuing educational pedagogies in engineering education through game-ification of education and the design of competitive table top games which engage students in an exciting atmo- sphere to help facilitate learning of essential physics concepts. Aside from a love of gaming and its role in education, James is also the Vice President
identify where the mistakes are; Page 24.591.6B. Generalization step to learn from their mistakes by generalizing beyond the specific problem; (Henderson & Harper 2009) C. Production step to generate a new solution using the problem solving strategy provided (Read→ Draw→ Label → Identify → Equations → Solve→ Substitute→ Check (Serway, Vuille&Faughn, College Physics textbook). Quizzes were re- graded again and solutions were posted online afterwards. This activity was performed for every quiz. During the whole semester, students were also asked to conduct mistake categorization exercises twice, in
of a group facilitate the retrieval of related ideas;8 comparing different ideas, whichinduces a sense of competition;9,10 exposing the ideas of others, which allows novel connectionsor combinations of existing ideas to be made;11 and using the higher rate of idea generation tolead to more persistence.11Nurturing group C/I is of particular importance in engineering education for a variety of reasons.Since classes are usually taught as groups, this is an easy, accessible, and familiar environment.Like many things in the classroom, even though techniques for enhancing C/I can be practiced ina group, they can also be used individually. Moreover, complex problems often are beyond thecapacity of an individual and require group solutions
phenomena. Implications for teaching were also providedto facilitate educators developing more efficient instructional design supported withsimulations or any visual representations.Reference:1. Cataloglu, E., & Robinett, R. W. (2002). Testing the development of student conceptual and visualization understanding in quantum mechanics through the undergraduate career. American Journal of Physics, 70(3), 238-251.2. Zollman, D. A., Rebello, N. S., & Hogg, K. (2002). Quantum mechanics for everyone: Hands-on activities integrated with technology. American Journal of Physics, 70(3), 252-259.3. Chi, M. T. H. (2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust. The Journal of
theUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, and 70% of these earned an engineering degree. Survey questions were categorized under six specific groups as shown in Table (I).4 Table (I)lists the question labels. Corresponding labeled questions used in this study are listed in Tables(II) and (III). Students indicated their level of agreement to various statements regarding aspectsand experiences of learning utilizing a scale of 1 through 3, where “1” indicated “not much”, “2”indicated “some”, and “3” indicated “very much”. “Not applicable” was also a choice. Table (I): MPEX survey questions4Question Desirable responses Undesirable responses Question labelgroupIndependence Learns independently and
waysthroughout the curriculum, from simple tasks such as plotting functions, to sophisticated taskssuch as simulating the dynamics of a complex system. We are also connecting the theory ofidealized physical systems with real systems through the combination of computer simulationsand validation experiments. Through continued exposure, we anticipate that our students willembrace computation as a useful tool in their arsenal. This paper describes our project, whichinvolves five physics faculty and an advisor from the School of Engineering who has expertise ineducation.IntroductionMost physics research these days involves the use of computers for data collection and analysis,simulations, symbolic manipulation, and numerical analysis. As the American
within a uniform gravitational field isroutinely neglected in engineering mechanics and physics courses because of the mathematicalcomplications that appear in the governing equations of motion when the drag effect is properlyincluded. In contrast, this effect and its consequences are purposefully examined in this article.The drag force exerted on the projectile, as induced by its movement through the atmosphere, ismodeled in accordance with a power-law relation that involves the projectile speed. But for theproblem formulation chosen, the governing equations of motion are non-linear and coupled, yetthey still permit an exact solution to be obtained in the form of a parametric description of theprojectile motion (in the case of the quadratic
of general physical principles.In the past, student engagement has suffered as students struggled to relate class topics to thedesign fields. Borrowing from successful aspects of engineering education, I have recentlyredesigned this course to better complement the practical and applied nature of these disciplines.Rather than traditional problem solving and calculations, students learn through analysis ofcomplex systems. In lieu of homework and exams, the focus of the class has been shifted togroup projects and case studies which demonstrate the application of important topics. As acenterpiece of the course, students are tasked with the construction and presentation of RubeGoldberg chain-reaction machines. This provides a structure by which
third outcome is one that we specifically added due to the vision of our hostinstitute. At Wentworth Institute of Technology, externally collaborative learning is at the heartof the educational environment. The fourth outcome is regarding perspective. If a student is todevote such time to a project, they should be able to discuss the history and relevance of theproject to people in the field. Lastly, outcomes five and six give the student an attainable andclear goal for the project. These goals also serve as motivation for senior level students to add totheir growing resumes. It should also be noted that these outcomes are also easily matched toengineering accreditation outcomes such as the ABET a) through k) rubrics.General DiscussionWe should
necessary for engineering practice. 4Table 1: ABET Student Outcomes in relation to Engineering Physics and Biomedical Engineering 50 percent of the course grade is based on the evaluation of the aforementioned design project,which is the assessment tool used in the evaluation of student performance on outcome c and d intable 1. The project presentation relates to outcome g, and both the lab exercises and projectdesign relate to outcome k. Lab exercises account for 25% of the course grade, and theremaining 25% is split between digitally-administered homework assignments and tests on a
to help K-12 teachers with units on sound and waves, and to incorporate crash safety topics into their physics curriculum.Janet Brelin-Fornari, Kettering University Dr. Brelin-Fornari is a professor of Mechanical Engineering and the Director of the Kettering University Crash Safety Center. She began work as an engineer with General Motors and has spent the last twelve years in academia. Dr. Brelin-Fornari teaches in the areas of dynamics, systems, and controls. She also conducts research in pediatric mobility safety. And, she brings both the classroom and the research together for students at the undergraduate and K-12 levels.Joseph Neal, Kettering University Graduate Research Assistant, Kettering University
complementary MOS transistors (CMOS) in order toachieve high-density circuits with both high-speed and a reduced power budget. Thesefactors are also how we define much of our classroom dialogue in all forms of electrical andcomputer engineering.Driven by demands for smaller, faster, and more extensive circuits, MOS device dimensionshave been reduced to sub-micron levels [1]. At these sizes a few volts of potential producesextremely high electric fields, a factor that is both beneficial and problematic. The highfields are what enables the desired qualities of the MOS device. But the high fields also pushthe analyses well beyond most of the simple physics, which has its laws and roots in low-field laboratory benchwork. So classroom descriptions of the
averagestudents of science‖ (p. 9). Hence, a traditional science classroom may present potential barriersthat could inhibit learning for some students. In addition, Tobias describes students in the‗second tier‘ as students who are often very capable of doing well in science, but for one reasonor another, choose not to. Often, non-majors who enroll in a science course, perhaps to completea university requirement, may well be categorized as students in the second tier. It is preciselythese students that one wants to reach in order to provide them with a wider array of options asthey move through the academic ladder. While traditional teaching methods can work well forsome students depending upon their individual learning styles; they can present roadblocks
of deep learning and long-term retention of important concepts. Studentsin traditional classrooms acquire most of their “knowledge” through classroom lectures andtextbook reading. A troubling fact is, after instruction, students often emerge from our classeswith serious misconceptions [2] - [6].A significant body of educational research supports the fact that students must be functionallyactive to learn [7] - [9]. Furthermore, Koballa, Kemp, and Evans [10] note that "ALL studentsmust become scientifically literate if they are to function in tomorrow's society" (p. 27).Scientific literacy is of critical importance for all students at all educational levels.The National Science Education Standards [11] strongly emphasize that inquiry
served as a National Science Foundation ASEE Visiting Scholar. In 2010 she was honored at the XI Confer- ence on Engineering and Technology Education (INTERTECH 2010) in Ilh´eus, Brazil with an award in Recognition of Global Outreach and Contributions to the fields of Engineering and Technology Education Worldwide. Dr. Larkin is the author of a book chapter published in 2010 entitled ”Women’s Leadership in Engineering” in K. O’Connor (Ed.) Gender and Women’s Leadership: A Reference Handbook (Vol 2, pp. 689 – 699). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Jessica Uscinski, American University Page 23.1197.1
in student competitions over the past 15years, including: the University Nanosat program2,3,4 (UNP-3 and UNP-8), with NASA in thestudent ElaNa5 and Microgravity programs, with the DOE solar car challenge, and with ASEE instudent poster and academic paper competitions.6,7,8With manifold new teaching tools, equipment advances, software analysis tools, search engines,3-D printers, and better ways of teaching, our goals should move beyond conventionalengineering BS degrees, Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) proficiency exams and ABETaccreditation learning outcomes. A three year BS engineering degree with one year of distanceor online classes (and proficiency exam) could be envisioned that results in students achievingthe desired learning outcomes
university requirement, may well be categorized as students in the second tier. It is preciselythese students that one wants to be reach in order to provide them with a wider array of optionsas they move through the academic ladder. While traditional teaching methods can work wellfor some students depending upon their individual learning styles; they can present roadblocks tolearning for others. The active process of writing may provide one mechanism through whichthese barriers to learning can be reduced and possibly even removed. Tobias [19] also indicatesthat writing can serve as a means to help students relieve their anxiety as well as help themunlearn models and techniques that have been shown to be scientifically unsound. This paper
address the students’ critical thinking skills prior to presenting quantummechanical approaches to the solutions of a particle motion. Because of the nature of thecomplexity of the subject, coupled with students’ presumption of the subject being confusingand not conceivable there needs to be an approach that stimulates their curiosity and desire tolearn the new subject and believe that without this new concept understanding our ever changingworld is somewhat difficult. We need to give them the view of how the world is progressivelychanging and technology has evolved and keeps evolving. I should agree that at times this mightpush students beyond their cognitive limits and out of their comfort zones, but this will benefitthem in acquiring the
Jan. 13, 2012. 22 Midkiff, K. Clark, Thomas A Litzinger, and D. L. Evans. "Development of engineering thermodynamics concept inventory instruments." Frontiers in Education Conference, 2001. 31st Annual. Vol. 2. IEEE, 2001. Page 26.1313.10