for Control and Coordination of Tasks among Mobile Robot and Robotic Arm.”Dr. Khalid H. Tantawi, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Dr. Khalid Tantawi is an Assistant Professor of Mechatronics at the University of Tennessee at Chat- tanooga . He holds a PhD and MSc. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Alabama in Huntsville, and a double MSc. in Aerospace Engineering from the Institut Superieur de l’Aeronautique et de l’Espace and University of Pisa. He served as a Program Evaluator for ABET- ETAC commission, as a trainer for Siemens Technik Akademy, and was the elected chair of the Engineering section of the Tennessee Academy of Science in 2022 and 2017. His research interests include MEMS, Lipid
System For Aircraft Structural Health Monitoring” and thesis title was ”Development of Software System for Control and Coordination of Tasks among Mobile Robot and Robotic Arm.”Dr. Khalid H. Tantawi, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Dr. Khalid Tantawi is an Assistant Professor of Mechatronics at the University of Tennessee at Chat- tanooga . He holds a PhD and MSc. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Alabama in Huntsville, and a double MSc. in Aerospace Engineering from the Institut Superieur de l’Aeronautique et de l’Espace and University of Pisa. He served as a Program Evaluator for ABET- ETAC commission, as a trainer for Siemens Technik Akademy, and was the elected chair of the Engineering
integrating the entrepreneurial mindset, STEAM(specifically, the arts), and bio-inspired design has been shown to improve student engagement,motivation, and learning outcomes. How did this interdisciplinary learning experience affectyour ability to engage with the newly developed curriculum?2. What went well? What didn't go so well? What will you do differently next time?3. What skills did you learn? Please consider both professional skills (e.g., communication,collaboration, etc…) and context-specific skills (e.g., topic area). Why are these skills importantfor engineers in the real world?3.4 Data Analysis Procedure(s)Analyzing the qualitative data of metacognitive reflection determined project impacts and ABETstudents' learning outcomes. The three
Activity. She obtained a Ph.D. in English Literature from Chiba University in 2002. Her current main research interests are: 1) how including humanities courses in an engineering education curriculum can help students to gain flexibility, and an appreciation of equity, and a greater richness of ideas; 2) finding and solving the systematic issues impacting the effectiveness of engineering education, specifically in the context of project-based learnings; and 3) assessing the impact of interdisciplinary engi- neering project-based learnings. Below are her recent presentations at international conferences: WERA 2022, APAIE 2022, IIAI DSIR 2021, IIAI DSIR 2020, WERA 2019. She obtained the Outstanding Paper Award in DSIR
moreopportunities for simulation activities, and scaffolding more of the skills that go into connectingwith, communicating with, and collaborating with others. They write: “These findings suggestthat, first, the university needs to change the curriculum of entrepreneurship courses by bringingpractitioners as instructors, conducting fieldwork with more compositions than theories in theclassroom.” (p. 7). Wardana et al. (2020) also argue that, if universities were serious aboutentrepreneurship, they would provide capital for small projects, developed by students, thatcould become a sustained business. While capital is important, the main point is to provide moreopportunities for students to gain real experience with, not just theories about
Paper ID #36765Examining the differences in the grade point average (GPA) forengineering students enrolled in entrepreneurial education programsDr. Prateek Shekhar, New Jersey Institute of Technology Prateek Shekhar is an Assistant Professor - Engineering Education at New Jersey Institute of Technology. His research focusses on examining translation of engineering education research in practice, assessment and evaluation of dissemination initiatives and educational programs in engineering disciplines. He holds a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin, M.S. in Electrical Engineering from
significant.In a previous study, the innovation self-efficacy of undergraduate students enrolled in two juniorand senior level environmental engineering courses was found to increase after studentscompleted an activity on designing K-12 STEM projects related to the course outcomes (See fullinstrument in Bolhari and Tillema, 2022). In a follow-on study, it was of interest to evaluate theimpacts of the addition of mentors into the curriculum design activity. Previous research foundthat various forms of mentoring might increase innovation self-efficacy. In co-curricularactivities with communities via the group Design for America (DFA), student teams receivedbrief weekly coaching sessions with professional designers, and interviews identified these
ofinterdisciplinarity and stakeholder engagement. We will close with both a section on “lessonslearned” throughout this process, as well as a section on the “deliverables” that have emergedfrom this process thus far. These ‘deliverables’ tie to benefits that, we believe, will enhancecareer preparation for students.theories of interdisciplinaritySeveral theories could have supported our work on developing a program in SocialEntrepreneurship. We are aware of the literature suggesting that theories of community-engagement (Tekic et al., 2022; Wallerstein et al. 2020), and even collaborative building () couldhave been used to guide this project. However, the development of this project was madepossible by a grant from funders who have a particular interest in
-focused project. Davis et al. shared two case studiesof incorporating entrepreneurship topics into mechanical engineering automotive courses, andfound that faculty often felt overburdened to cover the technical content and were hesitant to addadditional skills or activities that may take time away from those topics [7]. While there aremultiple methods to integrate EML into classes shared on EngineeringUnleashed.com, onechallenge with existing resources is the duration of the proposed activities. Research by Gillespiefound faculty who commented on the web resources were often favorable of the activityproposed, but were not always able to adopt them into their own courses claiming courses hadtoo many technical topics to cover and too little class
curriculum in two main ways: as required, stand-alonecourses [26] or embedded entrepreneurial mindset into existing engineering courses. Severalexamples have been successful with the latter, and the KEEN organization can help providefunding to make these changes to the curriculum [25-28]. This methodology is more aligned withresearch by Winberg et al. [12] that calls for the coupling of technical and professional content.It is recommended that engineering program coordinators introduce alternate assessment theoriesinto the engineering curriculum. Examples include a scale based on the Theory of PlannedBehavior [13] to assess student attitudes toward professional skills, including communication,ethical decision-making, cultural adaptability
discovering gaps in EM assessment tools? 3. How might we connect people to EM assessment tools that already exist?BackgroundEngineering faculty have been working to incorporate entrepreneurial mindset in curriculum formany years. Several efforts have been made by prior authors to summarize the existing literatureon assessment of EM. In an effort to find the appropriate tools for assessing entrepreneurialmindset, a systematic literature search resulted in a comprehensive listing of availableinstruments and surveys. Prior work by Grzybowski et al. had provided a preliminary structurecategory [2]. Each individual instrument or survey has multiple items listed including what isbeing assessed, any studies used to determine its
-curricular programs can provide these opportunities outside of the packed engineering curriculumwhile offering outlets for students to develop a growth mindset, build self-awareness, and learn totake initiative and build ventures in real-world settings.Developing creative and dynamic engineers requires a multi-faceted approach to engineeringcurricula. Theoretical courses, hands-on activities, project based learning, teambuilding andleadership opportunities all need to be packed into an accredited curriculum. The challenge for allengineering educators is to provide sufficient and consistent opportunities for engineering studentsto explore new ideas and approaches, act upon those ideas and transform them into value for othersand themselves. A co
of Texas at Austin, M.S. in Electrical Engineering from University of Southern California and B.S. in Electronics and Communication Engineering from India. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Examining the KEEN 3Cs Framework using content analysis and expert reviewAbstractThe KEEN 3Cs (Curiosity, Connections, and Creating Value) framework for entrepreneurialmindset (EM) was developed by the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) toguide curriculum development, faculty professional development, and student-related initiativeswhen seeking to integrate EM into engineering education. The framework has seen growingpopularity and acceptance