understanding of these programs, future workshould focus on extending beyond student perspectives and incorporating input from programinstructors. This multi-perspective approach will provide a more detailed representation of theoutcomes for students participating in invention education, as well as insights into the challengesand successes faced by instructors in implementing the curriculum. Future research should alsoinclude older participants, middle and high school, to understand how their experiences andoutcomes change across different stages of education.As educators strive to enhance STEM engagement, ongoing research is vital to document thelasting impact of invention education programs. Identifying specific components that supportstudent success
experiences influence undergraduate science and engineering students’ EM, and 2)How does the international experience modality (i.e., study abroad or COIL) impactdevelopment of EM? To understand the impact of these international experiences, we aredesigning a qualitative, parallel study across five U.S. institutions representing a mix ofin-person and COIL international experiences for undergraduate students at different academiclevels within science and engineering disciplines. We aim to connect transformative learningtheory, focused on multiculturalism and connectedness, with international experiences using EMas the theoretical framework. While surveys will support understanding of multiculturalism gainsand overall view of the experience, concept
, communication, and networking skills after the course. Another study byLagouda, et al [9] looked at the impact of an I-Corps program on undergraduate and graduateengineering students at a large university and found the program had an overall positive effect onstudent’s perceptions, and students who participated maintained a high interest inentrepreneurship. The results from these studies suggest the I-Corps model has several potentialbenefits within undergraduate education, but more research is needed to elucidate the features ofI-Corps that are most valuable at the undergraduate level. Thus, we have created a newEntrepreneurial Bioengineering course intended to promote students’ entrepreneurialengagement and development of an entrepreneurial mindset
Bilayer Membrane sciences, and advanced manufacturing.Dr. Beshoy Morkos, University of Georgia Beshoy Morkos is an associate professor in the Department of Mechanical and Civil Engineering at Florida Institute of Technology where he directs the STRIDE Lab (SysTems Research on Intelligent De- sign and Engineering). His lab currently performs research ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023How to engage engineering students in teaching linear elasticity through entrepreneurially-minded bio-inspired projects Jeffrey Ma1*, Lisa Bosman2, Maged Mikhail3, Khalid Tantawi4, Beshoy Morkos51 Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis
significantlyincreased collaboration, communication, and networking skills after the course. Another study byLagouda, et al [9] looked at the impact of an I-Corps program on undergraduate and graduateengineering students at a large university and found the program had an overall positive effect onstudents’ perceptions, and students who participated maintained a high interest inentrepreneurship. The results from these studies suggest the I-Corps model has several potentialbenefits within undergraduate education, but more research is needed to elucidate the features ofI-Corps that are most valuable at the undergraduate level. Thus, we have created a newEntrepreneurial Bioengineering course intended to promote students’ entrepreneurialengagement and development of
time to add new ideas or projects [8]. Theyfound that fewer than 25% of the sampled classroom-specific resources could be completed inone class period or less. There appears to be a need in the engineering education community forshorter EML activities that enhance students' abilities to learn and engage with technical content.Active learning is described in different ways, and some of them include: a) “..anything thatinvolves students in doing things and thinking about the things they are doing”, b) “involvesproviding opportunities for students to meaningfully talk and listen, write, read and reflect on thecontent ideas, issues and concerns of an academic subject”, c) “increasing of studentparticipation or ‘interactivity’, for the purpose of
Paper ID #40086Introducing Entrepreneurship in Manufacturing courses: A Hands-onProject approachDr. Anu Osta, Rowan University Dr Anu Osta is a Senior Lecturer in Mechanical Engineering Department at Rowan University. His teaching interests are Mechanics, Materials and Manufacturing and Design. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Introducing Entrepreneurship in Manufacturing courses: A Hands-on Project approachIntroductionOne of the driving purpose of entrepreneurship education is to enable the student community tobe able to convert the idea in their minds into a thriving, growing
metaphorical connotations, and create a plan to either enhance the object or create a completely new object based on its original object’s function. Next, the groups were invited to pick a second object and repeat the process. The groups were given the option of combing their two source objects into one new creation, or to fully start over with their new product. Students were also given less time to work with their second object than they were given with their first. The goal of repeating the exercise with less time was to fully instill the concept of creating from source media as well as to allow students to engage in non-judgmental idea generation.3. Presentation: The groups were encouraged, but not
assessment data provided evidence to support the notion that our curricularchanges affected students’ EM attributes of Connections and Creating Value over the academicyear, yet we have not yet reported assessment data to support students’ growth in the Curiosityattribute.Measurement and Assessment of CuriosityThe 5DCS, developed by Kashdan and colleagues [12], is a product of efforts to consolidate andsynthesize decades of research on the theoretical perspectives of curiosity into onecomprehensive framework. Data collected from three discrete surveys – a community survey of508 adults, an Mturk survey of 403 adults, and a nationally represented household survey of3000 adults, were analyzed using factor analysis. From this analysis, the authors found
offering a minor or specialized courses, incorporatingentrepreneurial mindset (EM) elements into existing courses, running student competitions thatfocus on ideation and value creation, providing physical spaces to support EM development, andso on. At the University of New Haven, we employ both curricular and extracurricular activitiesto foster EM in students including integration of EM in specific courses in all four years ofstudents’ programs, a few competitions held throughout the academic year, a living learningcommunity with a focus on EM, and an entrepreneurial engineering certificate. These activitiesare summarized in Figure 1. Extracurricular activities are offered to all in the same manner butare optional. Through these activities
entrepreneurial process, and the business model canvas, and work inteams of three to four students on what will be their final deliverable at the end of the semester: abusiness plan for a social enterprise of their creation, that addresses a sustainability/climate issue.The course has been very successful in its implementation, with consistently positive commentsfrom students. This paper provides an overview of the course, course topics, and courseassignments. The course places a strong emphasis on the positive impact businesses andentrepreneurial pursuits can have on addressing societal problems, and in particular onaddressing climate change, and highlights the positive role engineers can have on humanity.These foci have been found to be especially
will also engage in a cadence of“continuous improvement” conversations to add additional targeting courses, add additionalcourses that are already taught as part of other degree plans, and iterate on the materials and thedegree plan as we better understand the needs of our students. In this way, we hope to continueour focus on interdisciplinarity and stakeholder engagement as the bedrock of continuousimprovement for this degree plan.We also believe that this program will add to the preparation of our students. As shown above,many of the suggested skills and dispositions align with the literature, but it was a strength tohave a community stakeholder group that could amplify the need for specific skills anddispositions. It was also helpful to
engineers. The main research question this poses is how doesconcept mapping affect STEM students' understanding of entrepreneurial mindset?ABET Computing Criteria lists these three student outcomes: 1. Communicate effectively in a variety of professional contexts. 2. Recognize professional responsibilities and make informed judgments in computing practice based on legal and ethical principles. 3. Function effectively as a member or leader of a team engaged in activities appropriate to the program’s discipline. [2] 1In order to implement these principles effectively, the research team integrated an activity that
significant.In a previous study, the innovation self-efficacy of undergraduate students enrolled in two juniorand senior level environmental engineering courses was found to increase after studentscompleted an activity on designing K-12 STEM projects related to the course outcomes (See fullinstrument in Bolhari and Tillema, 2022). In a follow-on study, it was of interest to evaluate theimpacts of the addition of mentors into the curriculum design activity. Previous research foundthat various forms of mentoring might increase innovation self-efficacy. In co-curricularactivities with communities via the group Design for America (DFA), student teams receivedbrief weekly coaching sessions with professional designers, and interviews identified these
meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors. An ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences. An ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts. An ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives.Figure 1: Empty self-assessment form. This form will be filled in by students at the start of their senior year
curriculum in two main ways: as required, stand-alonecourses [26] or embedded entrepreneurial mindset into existing engineering courses. Severalexamples have been successful with the latter, and the KEEN organization can help providefunding to make these changes to the curriculum [25-28]. This methodology is more aligned withresearch by Winberg et al. [12] that calls for the coupling of technical and professional content.It is recommended that engineering program coordinators introduce alternate assessment theoriesinto the engineering curriculum. Examples include a scale based on the Theory of PlannedBehavior [13] to assess student attitudes toward professional skills, including communication,ethical decision-making, cultural adaptability
integrating the entrepreneurial mindset, STEAM(specifically, the arts), and bio-inspired design has been shown to improve student engagement,motivation, and learning outcomes. How did this interdisciplinary learning experience affectyour ability to engage with the newly developed curriculum?2. What went well? What didn't go so well? What will you do differently next time?3. What skills did you learn? Please consider both professional skills (e.g., communication,collaboration, etc…) and context-specific skills (e.g., topic area). Why are these skills importantfor engineers in the real world?3.4 Data Analysis Procedure(s)Analyzing the qualitative data of metacognitive reflection determined project impacts and ABETstudents' learning outcomes. The three
Thinking Skills and Social innovation, design education, and creativity stimuli in Creativity and thinking are the dominant education toward multidisciplinary approaches and innovation central vehicles for creativity and innovation diffusion.[7] 2021 The impact of Lean Innovation Undergraduate innovation programs entrepreneurship positively impact students' education on the
. The survey focused on understanding the impact of theworkshop on participants’ research and engagement with student researchers (both undergraduate andgraduate).Likert Questions for the Learning Objectives (1-5 Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree scale)As a result of this workshop, I was be able to:• Examine how an entrepreneurial mindset is vital to my own research activities• Identify how directed research activities can be used to foster an entrepreneurial mindset for researchstudents, or my own projects• Design and test a variety of techniques for integrating disciplinary research in educational activities,both formally and informally, as well as curricular, co-curricular, and extra-curricular• Examine how I might take advantage of my
sectors [2]. By 2050,projections reveal that two-thirds of the world's population will live in cities [3]. Green buildinghas become increasingly crucial to sustainable cities' economic, social, and environmentaldevelopment in this future urban vision. Engineering plays a significant role in achieving thesesustainability goals. As a result, integrating green building concepts into engineering educationadvances students' knowledge and skills toward developing complex and transdisciplinarysolutions to create sustainable cities and communities [4]. In addition, incorporatingsustainability in the engineering curricula attracts many students seeking to build and maintain abetter and safer planet for themselves and future generations [5].On the other
the engineering skills already beingtaught in classrooms with outcomes that support the development of being “entrepreneuriallyminded,” hence, the phrase Entrepreneurially Minded Learning. Entrepreneurially mindedindividuals are powerful agents of societal good, progress, and human flourishing, especiallywhen disciplinary skills are complemented by excellent collaboration and communication skillsand are founded on character. Individuals who exercise an entrepreneurial mindset recognizeproblems as opportunities, assess potential impact of solutions, and use their skills to create valuefor others. This is what is desired in undergraduate students. Students need to be exposed tothese concepts early in their academic career and by doing so, this
their academic careers.Students who engage with this content in the classroom will be surveyed to assess theeffectiveness of the modules. There is a plan to conduct student surveys at the end of each courseand one-year post exposure to evaluate both the immediate and long-term impact of thematerials. The project team hypothesizes that students who engage early with the videos andpaired curriculum will be more likely to participate in research and remain engaged for longer.Preliminary survey results support this hypothesis, showing students self-report learning gainsand an increased interest in research and research-related careers.This project is part of a Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) initiative to infuseEM into UGR
]. 3 Although there is diversity among EEPs across schools, students at large institutions havethe option to self-select their entrepreneurship education path, which may result in variability inlearning outcomes and participation climate [7], [17], [18]. Prior research has explored theimpact of student characteristics and the type of EEPs on their GPAs, with mixed results [7],[17]. Additionally, student background and learning demographics have been found to influencethe type of entrepreneurship program students choose to engage in [19]. However, there is still aneed for further understanding of the inner workings of different EEPs [20]. This motivates thecurrent study to explore associations between characteristics of students who
problem-finders and problem-solvers [11]. The entrepreneurialprocess encourages students to identify opportunities or needs based on their experiences, whichpromotes a higher level of engagement and allows learning expansion. It also trains engineers tobecome effective communicators and team players with the ability to solve multidisciplinaryengineering problems [12].Meanwhile, as noted in [13], the project-based learning approach grants students the freedom tobecome active learners and produces a positive impact on their performance. Project-basedlearning is a teaching methodology that allows students to acquire the knowledge and expertiseof the learned concepts using project development. Many researchers have identified PBL as asuccessful tool
and skills in addition to thefoundational mathematical and scientific expertise required within engineering [2], [3]. Inclusionof these concepts and skills support the growth of an entrepreneurial mindset (EM) which is acollection of mental habits that target one’s impact on society and the value they create for it [4].Methods to implement an EM in education emphasize one’s approach to critical thinking,innovation, and value creation as both a learning activity and outcome (i.e., [5], [6]). Theexecution of EM-focused curricula and the subsequent outcomes have resulted in student-centered benefits, namely, the growth of their professional skills [7]. Students report that sucheducation contributes to their ability to communicate professionally
and the mechanical engi- neering program. She is also the Co-Director of the Grand Challenges Scholars Program (GCSP) at ASU. In this role, she focuses on student support and tracking, curriculum, program requirements, as well as programming for current students in GCSP. Dr. Zhu was also involved in the ASU ProMod project, the Engineering Projects in Community Service program, the Engineering Futures program, the Global Fresh- man Academy/Earned Admission/Universal Learner Courses Program, and the ASU Kern Project. She was a part of the team that designed a largely team and activity based online Introduction to Engineering course. She has also co-developed two unique MOOCs, Introduction to Engineering and
integrate ST in theircurriculum to allow students to explore and become familiar with sector-specific stakeholdersand how they interact together.An additional implication of ST in engineering education focuses on engineeringentrepreneurship education. There are no courses or programs explicitly discussing the use of STin engineering entrepreneurship education. ST has been emerging in business and entrepreneurialteachings in various fields, bringing focus on the impacts of business decisions on the overalllandscape of business, product life cycles and sustainability. Researchers have argued for apractice-based pedagogy that combines perspectives from entrepreneurship and systemsthinking. Lunch et al. argue that this method could work as a catalyst
research to maximize research impact. Each workshop includes videocontent, a workbook, and a moderator guide, with workshops designed to be deployed either in‐person or virtually facilitated by a workshop moderator.In designing our interventions, we considered alignment with guidelines provided by the Councilon Undergraduate Research (CUR), which include curating engaging and high‐impactopportunities, creating a community of student scholars, peer mentoring, opportunities for earlyand sustained involvement, and program assessment [1].To assess the impact of our workshop-based interventions on student research productivity andattitudes toward research, we developed a retrospective, post-experience survey and a one-yearfollow-up survey for students
highlighted increased engagement andmotivation for the newly developed project. Second, students positively noted the opportunity toapply greater amounts of creativity to the newly implemented project. Third, students explainedhow STEAM was the core component allowing for interdisciplinary understanding within thenew project.1. Introduction1.1 Problem IdentificationAs the world moves closer and closer to a global economy, new approaches to problem-solvingwill be needed more and more. One way to prepare engineering graduates to enter the globalworkforce and solve complex problems is through experiential learning [1]. Unfortunately,Engineering students have limited opportunities for experiential learning (often limited tofreshman-level Introduction to
Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor (emerita) of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford Univer- sity. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 The Nexus of Entrepreneurship and Innovation–a new construct for looking at the creative contributions of engineering graduatesABSTRACTEngineers are called upon to possess strong analytical and communication skills, exhibitpractical ingenuity, and be creative thinkers, all the while upholding high ethical standards. Inmore recent times they are also expected to be innovative and