) among other skills.Environmental engineering education is well positioned to provide students with opportunities totake a global approach to environmental problems. Study abroad experiences are known toprovide cultural immersion that exposes students to different social situations, and when relatedto the students’ academic program, these experiences provide technical diversity, or differentways to handle professional situations, that otherwise would not be experienced in the classroomor home institution (Downey et al., 2006; Lucena et al., 2008). International research and studyabroad experiences result in the development of the individual’s global engagement as well ascareer choices and technical knowledge (Page et al., 2009). Coupling the
]. Additionally, the EnvironmentalEngineering Grand Challenges seek to sustainably supply food, water and energy, while curbingclimate change and adapting to its impacts [3].The Environmental Engineering Grand Challenges also give direction on how to enhanceenvironmental engineering curriculum to address these grand challenges. In addition to depth ofenvironmental engineering knowledge, the environmental engineer should also develop breadthin areas such as systems analysis, data science, social sciences, policy, law, humanities, health,global cultures and engagement [3]. This breadth can be achieved through extracurricular studentcontests and projects, such as EPA’s P3 student design competition or Engineers WithoutBorders. While international projects
four person teams examine projects through the feasibility andconcept design phases to evolve and develop concepts that are not only technically feasible buteconomically, culturally, socially and politically acceptable. Course projects require literaturesearches and regulatory investigations. The technical nature of projects includes biological,chemical, mass transfer, and physical processes studied by the students in previous courses. Alesson on design heuristics is included to facilitate brain storming sessions. The use of decisionmodels to evaluate alternatives is required. Students also analyze the carbon footprint ofpotential courses of action and use this information in their decision models. In addition, allprojects include design of
greenhouse effect,” Environmental Education Research, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–17, Feb. 2011.[23] G. Liarakou, I. Athanasiadis, and C. Gavrilakis, “What Greek Secondary School Students Believe about Climate Change?,” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, vol. 6, pp. 79–98, 2011.[24] P. Punter, M. Ochando‐Pardo, and J. Garcia, “Spanish secondary school students’ notions on the causes and consequences of climate change,” Int J Sci Educ, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 447– 464, Feb. 2011.[25] M. Karpudewan, W.-M. Roth, and M. N. S. B. Abdullah, “Enhancing Primary School Students’ Knowledge about Global Warming and Environmental Attitude Using Climate Change Activities,” Int J Sci Educ, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 31–54
limestoneOverall, since Rose-Hulman primarily offers undergraduate degrees, the principal outcome of aresearch project is the student’s learning. To this end, the learning objectives for the summerresearch students were:After completion of the research project, students should be able to 1. write testable hypotheses 2. design and carry-out experiments in a reproducible way 3. analyze data and identify key findings 4. communicate findings in written, visual and verbal formThe final deliverables of a research project included a research paper to be archived in theuniversity’s library system, a poster and/or oral presentation given to an internal audience and anexternal audience if feasible (depends on timing and funding), and records of physical lab
machine), to improvestudents’ conceptual understanding of inversion and air quality problems. The expected studentoutcomes from the activity are as follows: (1) Define inversion as a natural and importantmeteorological phenomenon; (2) Articulate a deeper understanding of inversion mechanics; and(3) Relate inversion with high ground level air pollutant concentrations. A pre-activity quiz of thestudents’ understanding, from their reading, was used to establish a baseline. The same quiz wasdelivered as a post-activity quiz, following the demonstration. We compared the results from thepre-activity quiz scores with the post-activity quiz scores. The results indicated an improvementin students’ understanding of inversion and air quality. The correct
. Figure 1: Cohort DescriptionBoth sections of the course were designed to have assessments comprised of three (3) exams,two (2) individual reports, three (3) homework sets, and six (6) quizzes. Homework sets andquizzes covered material from three (3) to six (6), 50-minute lectures that generally supportedone (1) chapter from the textbook. In the experimental section, classroom games replaced two(2) of two (2) lectures on Risk Assessment, two (2) of four (4) lectures on wastewater treatment,and one (1) of three (3) lectures on solid waste management. Pre-tests were given to bothsections prior to the material for these topics to compare technical skills building with thematerial presented with and without classroom-based games. See Appendix C and D
University-West Lafayette, personal communication.8. Yoder, R., “Engineering by the Numbers,” https://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/college-profiles/15EngineeringbytheNumbersPart1.pdf.9. Principles and Practices of Engineering: Exam Specifications and design standards,National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES),http://ncees.org/engineering/pe/.10. Daigger, G.T., Murthy, S., Love, N.G., Sandino, J., “Transforming EnvironmentalEngineering and Science Education, Research, and Practice,” Environmental EngineeringScience, pp. 42-50, 34(1), 2017.11. Harrison, J., Klotz, L., “Women as Sustainability Leaders in Engineering: Evidence fromIndustry and Academia,” International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(3
necessary. These assignments could be online interactivemodules where students can read brief summaries and then participate in short answer typesquestions. Alternately, readily available videos from technical societies (AWWA, ASCE.WEF, etc.) could be used. The availability and quality of supplementary material haveimproved with time but the material is not comprehensive and still lack variety. Educatorshave limited options for finding appropriate multi-media substitutes for reading assignmentsbecause not every lesson or concept is available in video/interactive format.Additional resources are available on websites of federal environmental agencies such as theUnited States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), the United States GeologicalSurvey
8-10 Project Management, Calculations 0-4 5-7 8-10 Preparation and Organization (30 points) Poor Fair Good Evidence of Effort & Organization 0-4 5-7 8-10 Legible and Appropriate Information 0-4 5-7 8-10 Variety of Visual Aids (graphics, tables) 0-1 2-3 8-10 Technical writing style, professionalism 0-1 2-3 8-10Results – Overall grades in the courseTables 4 shows the grades for key assignments in the green
the pilot system.These labs sessions were classified as physical, biological, and ecological, based on the topic(see example in Figure 3). The first laboratory exercise on the hydraulic characterization ofmedia was fully developed and the experiments were based on the experience/knowledge gainedduring the building and testing of the pilot. Finally, in the final recommendation section of thecapstone report, the students proposed several research themes/projects for undergraduate andgraduate to undertake, as well as STEM related activities at Northeastern University.Physical: Media choice is paramount when it comes to designing the most efficient systempossible. In this lab we will analyze the relationship between media size, permeability
Engineers and Scientist (AAEES), and registered as a Chartered Engineer (CEng) by the U.K. Engineering Council. He is recognized as a Diplomate of the American Academy of Sanitarians (D.AAS). His scholarship, teaching, service, and professional practice focus in the fields of environmental biotechnology and sustainable development where he specializes in promoting Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WaSH), food and nutrition security, energy efficiency, and poverty alleviation. Oerther’s awards for teaching include the best paper award from the Environmental Engineering Division of ASEE, as well as recognition from the NSPE, the AAEES, and the Association of Environmental Engineering and Science Professors (AEESP). He
anengaging online experience [3].There are a number of challenges in the transition to online learning for the professors, but thereare just as many, if not more, challenges for the approximately 200 million post-secondarystudents, who have also had to transition to new learning environments in a short period of time[4]. Students found it difficult to adjust to different online learning styles from differentprofessors [5]. For instance, some professors recorded themselves in front of a whiteboard andposted the video on the Learning Management System (LMS), while maintaining a traditionalhomework, quiz, and exam schedule, while other professors produced interactive livesynchronous learning sessions that included student engagement, online assignments
include requiring synchronous onlinemeetings [7], having weekly online discussion sessions that promote a sense of community [3],[6], [7], [10], dividing teaching content into smaller modules to help students focus [6], [10],having a back-up plan for unexpected issues, slowing down speech during lectures to allowstudents to capture key points, utilizing teaching assistants to share the extra requirements, usingvarious methods to modify homework and reading to strengthen students’ active learning outsideof class, providing feedback to student assignments [10], making compelling lecture videos,establishing presence with a welcome message, frequent notices and feedback, and setting andreminding often of time management expectations [6]. Solutions to
transitioned tohybrid in-person / remote learning approaches to prevent further outbreaks on campuses. WhileCOVID-19 has been devastating, we propose that the pandemic also presents anunprecedented opportunity to reflect, reassess, and ‘bounce forward’ to become more efficient,effective, and resilient. The National Academy of Sciences’ definition of resilience has spurred atheory of resilience that centers on four successive stages surrounding a disruptive event, suchas COVID-19: (1) plan and prepare, (2) absorb, (3) recover, and (4) adapt. In this paper wepropose a framework that environmental programs can employ to ‘adapt’ (stage 4) and ‘bounceforward’ to a more resilient modus operandi long-term. The framework first identifies eachactivity a
Division of ASEE, as well as recognition for excellence in teaching from the NSPE, the AAEES, and the Association of Environmental Engineering and Science Professors (AEESP). He participated in both the 2006 and the 2015 conferences of the National Academies Keck Futures Initiative (NAKFI) as well as the 2011 Frontiers of Engineering Education Symposium (FOEE) of the U.S. National Academies. Oerther is a four-time recipient of Fulbright, and he has been recog- nized with a Meritorious Honor Award by the U.S. Department of State. Due to his collaborations with nurses and healthcare professionals, Professor Oerther has been inducted as a Lifetime Honorary Member of Sigma Theta Tau, the International Honor Society of
campslesson plans that integrated sustainability education in middle schools. The main reason forconducting a systematized literature review is that it allows researchers to be able to demonstrateall the technical approaches for gathering the literature, such as the entire process of the searchand exclusion criteria [20]. This study followed the steps proposed by Borrego and Froyd [21] forthe engineering education context. 1. Identify scope and research question and provide a conceptual framework, logical model 2. Define exclusion criteria 3. Find sources 4. Assess quality for each study 5. Synthesize.Data AnalysisThis study analyzed 73 peer-reviewed journal articles in two stages
Education. Tony has a PhD from Indiana University in Higher Education and Student Affairs.Dr. Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Julia M. Williams is Interim Dean of Cross-Cutting Programs and Emerging Opportunities and Pro- fessor of English at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Her research areas include technical commu- nication, assessment, accreditation, and the development of change management strategies for faculty and staff. Her articles have appeared in the Journal of Engineering Education, International Journal of En- gineering Education, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, and Technical Communication Quarterly, among others. c American Society
some technical inaccuracies.ABET outcomes have been addressed to some extent in these exercises because the assignmentsespecially critical review and SWPPP were designed to allow students learn from theknowledgebase and devise their own design. Students would encounter numerous opportunitiesthat allow them to accomplish these intangible outcomes.Peer-Review WorkshopsOne of the effective writing strategies suggested by Sharp et al includes peer-editing15. We haveconducted two peer-review sessions to provide feedback on SWPPP and reflective writingexercises. The instructor received support from Maroon Institute for Writing Excellence (MIWE)at the university to conduct peer-review workshops (15-20 minute presentation/ discussionfollowed by
, 2004.7. M. Frank, I. Lavy, and D. Elata, “Implementing the Project-Based Learning Approach in an Academic Engineering Course,” International Journal of Technology and Design Education, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 273-288, 2003.8. S. Tewari, “Environmental Engineering Laboratory Development to Promote Active and Hands-on Learning,” Second Mid Years Engineering Experience Conference Slump to Jump!, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, March 30 - April 1, 2016.9. C. M. Tummala, and S. Tewari, “Developing Laboratory-Based Experimental Setups to Simulate Electro-Kinetic Fence for Salt Water Intrusion Prevention in Coastal Areas,” 92nd Annual Meeting of Louisiana Academy of Science, Louisiana State University, Alexandria, LA
Paper ID #19496Continuing Assessment of Sustainability Skills in the Environmental and CivilEngineering CurriculumDr. Diane L. Bondehagen, Florida Gulf Coast University Dr. Diane Bondehagen is an assistant professor of Environmental Engineering in the Department of Envi- ronmental and Civil Engineering at Florida Gulf Coast University’s U.A. Whitaker School of Engineering. She received her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Wisconsin at Madison in 1983, her M.S. in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Florida International University in 1999, and her Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering Sciences from the
, undergraduate and graduate students can gain new skills and knowledge as theyresearch, develop, design, and implement scientific and technical solutions to environmentalchallenges. The P3 Award Program is composed of two phases (Phase I and Phase II) that awardgrants on a competitive basis. The P3 award is nationally highly competitive with selection of 20awards for Phase I and only 3 awards for Phase II per year. This paper describes the developmentof multidisciplinary year-long national student design project from the concept development,students recruit and involvements, and proposal development to the execution of the awardedresearch projects.MethodsSince 2015, a new and innovative advising method by integrating education and researchprojects for
Engineering Division of ASEE, as well as recognition for excellence in teaching from the NSPE, the AAEES, and the Association of Environmental Engineering and Science Professors (AEESP). He participated in both the 2006 and the 2015 conferences of the National Academies Keck Futures Initiative (NAKFI) as well as the 2011 Frontiers of Engineering Education Symposium (FOEE) of the U.S. National Academies. Oerther is a four-time recipient of Fulbright, and he has been recog- nized with a Meritorious Honor Award by the U.S. Department of State. Due to his collaborations with nurses and healthcare professionals, Professor Oerther has been inducted as a Lifetime Honorary Member of Sigma Theta Tau, the International Honor Society
our evaluations shows, students often failed to see howproviding technical evidence and information are an integral part of a writing task, or howcommunication and collaboration are necessary for successful engineers.During the fourth year of the program, the courses Rhetoric and Composition and Introduction toDesign were combined into a single course that spanned two quarters. In this course, studentsdesigned and communicated a project to improve campus sustainability. Their projects rangedfrom lowering heating costs, reducing food waste, and improving lighting in a residence hall, tobuilding rain gardens and human-powered kitchen appliances. Integrating the two classesimproved both the design and communication of these projects. Students
expert. Step 3 was a final technical review to make sure all online content was clear and operational. Revisions were required at each step and managed by the InTeGrate mentor. The second assessment phase was to pilot the module and measure student attitudinal and aspirational changes, as well as student learning gains. For the pilot tests, 41 students in four courses completed the module at four institutions (University of Utah, Colorado Mesa University, University of Georgia, and North Carolina A&T University). The four courses and number of students were: Sustainability and Water is a freshman/sophomore course at University of Utah. 8 students (4 environmental and sustainability
- ence was as a strategic planning at the United States Central Command in support of Operation Inherent Resolve (actions against ISIS). Academically, COL Starke specializes in environmental engineering with research and teaching interests in drinking water, public health, and microbial-mediated processes to in- clude renewable energy resources. COL Starke taught senior-level design courses in Physical and Chem- ical Processes, Biological Treatment Processes, and Solid and Hazardous Waste Technologies. COL Starke has published several peer reviewed research articles and has presented his research at national and international conferences. He maintains a focus on the scholarship of teaching and learning in en
/ZLW & IfU. In addition to this, he is managing partner and consultant of the Nets ’n’ Clouds Consulting f¨ur Technologieentwicklung und Organisationsoptimierung GmbH (Consulting for Technology Development and Organisational Optimisa- tion). He has been working at the Cybernetics Lab since 1997, where he was head of the Communication and Organisational Development division from 1999 to 2010 and of the Knowledge Management division from 2003 to 2006. Dr. Hees studied Economic Geography, Politics and International Technical and Economic Cooperation at RWTH Aachen. He completed his thesis on ”Regional Organisational Structures in the Building and Construction Industry – Generating Turbulence-tolerant Strategic
ourlecture halls, and preparing for their professional careers. This next generation of engineers haslived their entire lives as beneficiaries of the information technology revolution. They are skilledin instantaneously researching a topic on the internet and making global connections with a fewswipes of their fingers. These skills give digital native students awareness of themultidisciplinary facets (social, cultural, political, economic, and technical) of contemporaryengineering problems as well as prime their penchant for team integration [3], [4]. ABET, the higher education accrediting body that helps set an engineering student onto theroad towards professional licensure, also recognizes that multi-disciplinary teamwork is arequisite skill
essays on engineering interests,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver BC, June 26-29, 2011. Paper AC 2011-727, 16 pp.[21] M.W. Ohland, S.D. Sheppard, G. Lichtenstein, O. Eris, D. Chachra, and R.A. Layton, “Persistence, Engagement, and Migration in Engineering Programs,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97(3), pp. 259-278, July 2008.[22] B.N. Geisinger and D. R. Raman, “Why they leave: understanding student attrition from engineering majors,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 29 (4), pp. 914- 925, 2013.[23] B.A. Myers, Evaluating Admission Practices as Potential Barriers to Creating Equitable Access to Undergraduate
) classified energy literacy into threedomains: cognitive, affective, and behavioral. Emphasizing that energy literacy encompasses notonly technical and scientific knowledge, but also values and attitudes (the “affective” domain)and habits and practices (the “behavioral domain”), they concluded that effective energyeducation should target knowledge and values, asserting that this combination would result inmore responsible energy-related actions. Dias et al. (2004) stated that barriers to efficient energyuse include institutional, market, organizational, and behavioral concerns. They asserted thatrational energy education must go beyond attention to “elementary” conservation measures –such as turning off lights – to promote understanding of energy