-sponsored,technological research university in the Midwest. During senior year exit-interviews, studentspreviously commented that the environmental engineering degree program was “overly focusedon the design of wastewater treatment plants”, and students suggested that additional designexamples be considered to offer breadth of content for students to pursue.In response to student feedback, the existing course, CArE5619 Environmental EngineeringDesign – Lecture and Lab, was significantly modified both in content and pedagogical approachby the new course instructor (DBO).The course content, including the semester-long design project, was modified to focus on theredesign of the local food system including sustainability and life cycle principles of
ABET’s expectations and terminology. In narrowing the scope of the framework,then, an effort was made to focus more directly on ABET-associated sustainable designconcepts, most specifically the societal, environmental, economic, and global design contexts[6].The second objective of the development of a new framework was to keep the frameworkapplicable to a variety of different design disciplines. This is an area the EOP framework hasalready addressed well. While the new framework was intended to most immediately serve onlya civil engineering program, the goal was to not sacrifice the ability for the framework to beadapted to other disciplines by defining its focus too narrowly.Finally, the last objective of the development of an alternative to
engineeringcurriculum?One approach, taken by several institutions of higher education, (e.g., [2]-[4]) is offersustainability-related certificates; some are general certificates in sustainability studies whileothers focus on specialized topics. At 12–15 credits, such certificates would not typically fit intoa four-year engineering program. Other institutions offer specialized sustainability-relatedcertificates to working professionals in areas such as triple-bottom-line corporate reporting [5],design and construction of green buildings [6], and life cycle assessment [7]. However, thesecertificate programs are either too large (10 credits or more), or too technically specialized formost undergraduate engineering programs, or both.In contrast, this paper
V.P. Sanchez is an Associate Professor in the Swanson School of Engineering’s Civil & Envi- ronmental Engineering department and the Associate Director for the Mascaro Center for Sustainable Innovation at the University of Pittsburgh. He serves as the Program Director for the Master’s in Sustain- able Engineering, the Undergraduate Certificate in Sustainability, the John C. Mascaro Faculty Fellows, and the Sustainability Global Engagement grant. He is the faculty lead for the University Honors College Food Ecosystem Scholar Community. His research lab, Sustainable Design Labs, focuses on fusing analytical chemistry, sustainability design principles and data analytics to address Water and Sustainability grand
Pennsylvania State University in 2010. She completed her Ph.D. from University of Connecticut in 2017 where she worked on creating nano and micro devices that could interDr. Lisa K. Murray, Western New England University Dr. Murray is an a Assistant Professor of Practice in the First Year Program at Western New England University. She holds a BS in biomedical engineering, masters in education and a masters and a PhD in engineering management. Her research interests are in engineering education, advanced manufacturing, design for additive manufacturing, sustainable manufacturing, medical manufacturing, quality and regulatory standards for medical devices, project management, process improvement, and culturally sustaining
and treatment, all programs offer a wide variety of course work.Due to the growth of EnvE from sanitary engineering (historically water and wastewatermanagement and treatment) the abundance of available courses is logical. All three require fluidmechanics (in line with ABET requirements) and one hydrology course. Among additional watermanagement and treatment courses, Cal Poly Humboldt allows the most freedom of choice. Thesecond list in their curricular requirements, titled “Engineering Design”, includes 17 courseoptions covering virtually all of the EnvE subdisciplines, eight of which are water focused. UW-Platteville requires the most breadth within water treatment and management courses. Likewise,while all three programs offer at least
every graduating engineer, regardless of subdiscipline, needsto acquire to design, code, build, and implement solutions that are socially and environmentallysustainable. The desired outcome from using the EOP Framework in curricular transformation isa pipeline of engineers, inventors, and innovators who create structures, designs, products, andservices that help people and nature flourish.What is the EOP Framework?The EOP Framework is not a research framework but a practical implementation tool thatsupports educators in integrating environmental and social sustainability concepts and tools intoengineering courses, programs, and departments. It provides a vetted list of 92 core andadvanced sustainability-focused student learning outcomes that
Systems in Environmental Engineering Daniel B. Oerther Missouri University of Science and Technology, 1401 North Pine Street, Rolla, MO 65409 Sarah Oerther Goldfarb School of Nursing at Barnes-Jewish College, 4483 Duncan Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110AbstractPreviously, we reported on a revamping of an existing design course to shift from a focus onsewage treatment plant design to a focus on the (re)design of local food systems. To introduceengineering students to qualitative research methods as part of community-based participatoryresearch, we used instructional materials from the nursing profession. Results from studentfeedback
recruitment phaseto the graduation phase.Curriculum: The ENE curriculum includes environmental engineering courses, and the ENEmajors can minor in WRM too. Except for the Water Transporation elective in WRM, neitherprogram coursework covers the core transportation courses. However, these programs haveenhanced their water, air, noise, and solid waste management course components to addresspertinent transportation-related topics. These topics include greenhouse gas emissions, noise andenergy related to transportation, highway culvert design, water quality, and garbage collectionproblems. Table 2 provides existing courses at Central State University in its ENE and WRMprograms. In addition to these courses, the Department of Manufacturing Engineering
distinct specialty, will suffice for teaching sustainability principles ratherthan the need for integration throughout engineering courses, programs, and departments is 2023 ASEE National Conferencesufficient. As a result, a majority of engineering students graduate without adequate training inhow to solve problems, communicate and collaborate across disciplines, and make critical designdecisions (e.g. related to design, materials sourcing, manufacturing, distribution, disposal, etc.),all of which are fundamental to preparing engineers to succeed in their profession and meettoday’s sustainability-related challenges by developing cutting-edge technological solutions thatare not only more sustainable but net zero
foundthat people tend to believe that scientists and researchers are ‘competent’ and ‘cold’, with thelatter leading to people not trusting scientists’ intentions. With a trend of increasing mistrust ofelites, experts, science and institutions, there is need for engineers and scientists to developgreater social and emotional intelligence and improved communication skills [8], [9]. In additionto the need for gaining people’s trust, there is need to make knowledge usable by supportinglegislative work. Legislators are called to legislate on a myriad of technical issues in areas wherethey have limited or no expertise. Therefore, there is need for researchers who are capable of notonly designing technical solutions, compiling technical specifications
Fulbright-Nehru Postdoctoral Scholar, Dr. Alfredo investigated rurally implemented drinking water treatment plants in India. Prior to joining the faculty at USF, she was a Research Program Manager at DC Water. She holds a Professional Engineering license in the state of Virginia.Dr. Deirdre Cobb-Roberts, University of South Florida Deirdre Cobb-Roberts, Ph.D., is a Professor of Social Foundations and Department Chair of the Department of Educational and Psychological Studies at the University of South Florida. She was previously a McKnight Junior Faculty Fellow. Her research focuses on gendered racism experienced by Black women in faculty and administrative positions within higher education institutions. Additionally, she
findings demonstrate that our approach shows promise forachieving these objectives through the implemented coursework.IntroductionThe engineering profession has always aimed to serve society’s needs. However, in some cases,engineering designs and products benefit some at the detriment of other groups [1], [2]. Withjustice issues affecting millions around the world, many engineering programs have startedintroducing modules and themes in their curriculum to educate students on such injustices andoffer approaches to help them address these issues. The environmental engineering discipline isuniquely positioned to recognize environmental injustice, understand its adverse health andeconomic outcomes, and advance ethical approaches and solutions to
adapting to and mitigating climatechange, and providing safe and accessible water, demand that the next generation of scientistsand engineers think about and solve problems in novel ways. This requires a review of howengineering courses and programs are currently preparing students for the globalizing workforce[1]-[3]. These challenges, known as wicked problems, are complex issues without clearboundaries and are driven by stakeholders’ differing values, interests, and conceptions of theproblem and its solution [4]. They are also inherently about sustainability.To better equip the STEM workforce to tackle wicked problems, students must linkmultidisciplinary perspectives from the social sciences to critical design skills [5]. In addition,the
Transformation ofEnvironmental engineering Education for Modern society (STREEM)”, has embarked on thetransformation of its curriculum from a hierarchical, topic-focused course structure into a modelin which integrated, and project-based learning courses are delivered in every year of a student’sprogram of study.Conceptual Framework for the ProgramThe STREEM project engages a core team of all seven tenure-track faculty in the environmentalengineering program in a multi-year curriculum design and implementation effort. It alsoinvolves faculty with expertise in philosophy, public policy and administration, sustainability,engineering management, and communications to support the core team in definingmultidisciplinary competencies needed by environmental
Inclusion. Estell has received multiple ASEE Annual Conference Best Paper awards from the Computers in Education, First-Year Programs, and Design in Engineering Education Divisions. He has also been recognized by ASEE as the recipient of the 2005 Merl K. Miller Award and by the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) with the 2018 ASEE Best Card Award. Estell received the First-Year Programs Division’s Distinguished Service Award in 2019 and the 2022 Computers in Education Division Service Award. Estell currently serves as an ABET Commissioner and as a subcommittee chair on ABET’s Accreditation Council Training Committee. He was previously a Member-At-Large on the Computing Accreditation
program at the U.S. Green Chamber of Commerce. She holds a B.S. in Environmental Management and Protection from Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. Her professional background is primarily based in sustainability literacy and engagement via sustainability research, curriculum development, and conference management.Dr. Abdulmalik Bamidele Ismail, The University of Alabama Abdulmalik Bamidele Ismail finished their Ph.D. in 2024 in the Department of Civil Engineering leading and managing national projects on building energy efficiency and construction decarbonization funded by the National Science Foundation and the Department of Energy. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Empowering Change
engineering courses [10, 11, 12, 13, 14].While there has been some evidence of these activities improving students’ engagement andenthusiasm regarding water treatment topics [10, 13] or ability to better recognize social contexts[12], little evidence was found on the way these activities may actually influence students’learning of water treatment concepts, particularly at higher levels on Bloom’s Taxonomy.Project DevelopmentA problem-based, active, constructive, and collaborative water treatment design project wasdeveloped at Cedarville University. This project has been structured to encapsulate manyrecommended features of PBL, as it is open-ended, realistic, teamwork based, and scaffolded.The idea for this project originated from Dr. Darryl Low at
Paper ID #41859Evaluating the Efficacy of Project-Based Approach for Teaching HumanitiesCourses to Engineering StudentsDr. Brainerd Prince, Plaksha University Brainerd Prince is Associate Professor and the Director of the Center for Thinking, Language and Communication at Plaksha University. He teaches courses such as Reimagining Technology and Society, Ethics of Technological Innovation, and Art of Thinking for undergraduate engineering students and Research Design for PhD scholars. He completed his PhD on Sri Aurobindo’s Integral Philosophy from OCMS, Oxford – Middlesex University, London. He was formerly a Research
of greenengineering, cultivate the engineering culture of "environment, health and safety" ofengineering students, and strengthen the sense of social responsibility for sustainabledevelopment of all students. Table 1 Core Qualities of Sustainable Engineering Talents Ability Description Enterprise EHS Risk Management Basics: EHS overview, risk and safety, environmental protection, product safety, occupational health, accident and emergency, process safety and public safety. Knowledge Green China Series: Green chemistry, green chemical engineering, green materials, green pesticides, green food, green energy and
to manage stormwater and create green spaces. Aneglected green roof on the Shiley School of Engineering building was used as a service learningopportunity and to build community. This student-led green roof rehabilitation effort over thelast 2 years has included plant selection, weeding, and planting on the roof. Plants wereevaluated each year for growth and drought tolerance, and a survey was given to studentvolunteers to evaluate the experience. During Year 1, three plots were planted with thyme, stonecrop, and a sedum mix to determine which plants did best. All of the thyme died, and the sedummix partially died off in the center. The stone crop survived and grew. Based on the results fromYear 1, the thyme plot was replanted with stone
Georgia Institute of Technology. Her research focuses on design and engineering education with a focus on promoting diversity and inclusion. She has served as PI and co-PI for grants from multiple spon- sors including NSF and Amazon totaling more than $9M. In addition, her STEM outreach programs and curricula have impacted hundreds of thousands of K-12 students nationwide. She is the cofounder and director of Georgia Tech’s K-12 InVenture Prize, a statewide invention competition, open to all students and teachers in Georgia. She earned her BS in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign in 2007, and her Masters and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Tech in 2009 and 2012. Dr
student responses to ‘emotion about the presentation experience’ during the post-presentationdebrief session are shown in Table 1. The largest number of students expressed feeling ‘proud’and a ‘big sigh of relief.’ Multiple key university stakeholders attended the students’ finalpresentation, including the Provost, the Director of Sustainability, a member of the Board ofTrustees, the Director of University Design, the Assistant Vice President for FacilitiesManagement, three Senior Project Managers, the Director of the Care of Our Common HomeStrategic Plan Pathway, and the Engineering Director of Development, along with several otherengineering faculty members. Some attended on Zoom while others were in person. The students’relief and pride were
activity and transportation. This reduction in humanactivity has resulted in changes to air quality, and there is growing interest in understanding theimpacts of lockdowns on air quality in cities.12,13 During the Covid-19 pandemic, it waschallenging to train STEM undergraduate students without giving them any hands-on labexposures. The summer exchange programs for undergraduate STEM students were fundedthrough Maryland Space Grant Consortium (MDSGC) in the year of 2020 and 2021. Theopportunity for this virtual research experience was one of the avenues to hone a variety of dataanalytical skills along with gaining content in the environmental sciences and engineering with aspecial emphasis in statistics and chemistry. The activities were adapted
embraced by communities. AsEngineers, these are considerations that must be part of any design criteria that involve thedeployment of technologies within communities. If we do not understand the desires andconcerns of the communities that will decide whether they partake in RWH initiatives, we cannotbe successful as Engineers with the technical skills to provide an alternative solution to alleviatesunny-day flooding. Future workPerceptions, opinions, and knowledge of RWH practices and climate change were evaluated in anortheast neighborhood of El Paso. The same analysis will be conducted for the city, including amuch fuller picture of the sociodemographic breakdown, including a hydrologic/hydraulicanalysis
roles in the workforce (Prince & Felder, 2006; Dym et al., 2005). II. APPROACHTheoretical Approaches for Engineering Education & Sustainability Survey Sections In the realm of engineering education, integrating sustainability requires a multifacetedapproach that encompasses technical knowledge and fosters an understanding of environmental,economic, and social dimensions (Gagnon, 2009; Boarin & Martinez-Molina, 2022; Rao et al.,2013). Our survey design was informed by several key theoretical frameworks to assess students'knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors towards sustainability. Knowledge Section (S1): Constructivism and systems thinking guided the development ofquestions
solutions design. • Emphasizing “trade-offs” between multiple dimensions rather than achieving balance and win-win solutions. • Using tools that do not incorporate sustainability dimensions into measurements and scope.There was strong consensus among faculty that approaches to the design process should not belimited to the technical dimensions of design only, but should include the natural environment,society, economics, and other contextual dimensions.Systems ThinkingFaculty were asked to interpret what “systems thinking” means to them and how it relates to theEnvironmental Engineering program. Shared meanings about systems thinking identified in theinterviews highlight themes that faculty can reinforce in course content and
Biological Systems Engineering at the University of Nebraska - Lincoln. She received her B.S. and M.S. in Food Science from Cornell University and her Ph.D. in Food Process Engineering from the Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering at Purdue University. She was an inaugural faculty member of the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She is currently a Professor in Biological Systems Engineering at the University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Her role in the College of Engineering at UNL is to lead the disciplinary-based education research initiative, establishing a cadre of engineering education research faculty in the engineering departments and creating a graduate program. Her research focuses
Regulations • Safety, Health, and Loss Prevention • Principles of Design • Power and Energy Systems • Supply Chain Management • Systems Engineering • Creative Design • Disasters and Modern Society • Cities and Technology in the Industrial Age • Bioethics • Business & Engineering Ethics • Nature & ReligionC-Tier Courses: • Introduction to Design • Senior Capstone Design • Material Science and Engineering • Design for Manufacturing • Technical Communication • Software Project Management • Six Sigma • Computing in a Global Society • Computational Modeling • Product DesignD-Tier Courses: • Engineering Statistics • Biomaterials • Entrepreneurship and Leadership • Polymer
(education; engineering; public affairs; arts andsciences; food, agriculture, and environmental sciences; business; law). The OhioState EmPOWERment Program in convergent graduate training for a sustainableenergy future enrolls Ph.D. students studying any aspect of energy from degreeprograms any college in Ohio State and engages them in several curricular andco-curricular elements that are designed to dovetail with their Ph.D. degreeprogram requirements in ways that do not extend their time to graduate. TheOhio State EmPOWERment Program established at Ohio State an energy StudentCommunity of Practice and Engagement (SCOPE), a Graduate InterdisciplinarySpecialization (GIS), and an undergraduate Research in Sustainable Energy(RISE) summer research