requirements.)The designation is administered by a faculty member in the engineering department, called thesustainability coordinator, who performs the following annual tasks: • Communicate with instructors of the sustainability challenges course (ENGR184) to build a database of students who start the designation, • Communicate with instructors of the sustainability analysis course (ENGR384) to collect draft sustainability designation dossiers from students. • Collect and review final dossiers from students in the semester prior to their graduation. • Monitor the list of approved elective courses for suitability. Propose the inclusion of new courses
University of Guelph (Ontario, Canada).Dr. Lynn A. Albers, Hofstra University Dr. Lynn Albers is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering of the Fred DeMatteis School of Engineering and Applied Science at Hofstra University. Her previous academic contribution was as one of the founding five faculty/staff at Campbell University, helping the newly formed School of Engineering grow and establish roots in the community. A proponent of Hands-On Activities in the classroom and during out-of-school time programs, she believes that they complement any teaching style thereby reaching all learning styles. She earned her doctorate in Mechanical Engineering from North Carolina State University specializing in thermal sciences
/ Deliver updates on project with empathy & concern for others 23 Interpersonal Professional written communication (reports, emails) Interact with diverse stakeholders Adapting communication style to audience at hand Effective interpersonal skills, broadly Combination of sufficient breadth/depth on multi-disciplinary Technical topics & appreciation for other's perspective 17 Expertise Sufficient breadth/depth on multi-disciplinary topics Compassion for environmental and social issues Attitude Frame
“Entangled Worlds:Technology and the Anthropocene — Ushering the Planetocene: New Humanity and Post-Anthropocene Technologies.” The term Anthropocene is proposed and increasingly employed todenote the current epoch in which human activity has a dominant effect on the planet [4]. Theterm Planetocene is a concept that envisions an era where the primary focus is on prioritizing theneeds and well-being of our planet as a whole. Ushering in the Planetocene is a call to action fora collective, global commitment to safeguard our planet's natural systems and ensure aharmonious coexistence between human species in societies and the broader biosphere.This course, co-designed by faculty from both humanities and technology backgrounds,leverages the expertise
be perceived as“distracting” by some students of engineering. This result highlights the importance of futureefforts by more faculty in the program to increase student awareness of and to facilitate freediscussion with students to surface personal bias and pursue for self-improvement in the area ofsocial justice.Comment G represents a useful transition from the examination of comments about the instructorand to begin to focus on comments about the course format. For example, comment G indicatingthat the instructor should “push students harder” is complimentary to Comments L and M, whichsurfaced the concern that the course “lacked depth in engineering”. In general, studentsresponded positively to the blended, flipped, modified mastery
to achieving a sustainable world. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A Toolkit for Expanding Sustainability in Engineering Utilizing Foundations of the Engineering for One Planet InitiativeAbstractRecently, there has been a significant push to prepare all engineers with skills in sustainability,motivated by industry needs, accreditation requirements, and international efforts such as theNational Science Foundation’s 10 Big Ideas and Grand Challenges and the United Nations’Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This paper discusses a new toolkit to enable broaddissemination of vetted tools to help engineering faculty members teach sustainability usingresources from the
interest in engineering education. She develops materials and re- searches best practical classroom approaches for integrating computation and computational thinking in introductory CEE courses; and for promoting teamwork, communication and problem-solving in context, throughout the CEE curriculum.Dr. Ashlynn S. Stillwell, University of Illinois Urbana - Champaign Dr. Ashlynn S. Stillwell is an Associate Professor and the Elaine F. and William J. Hall Excellence Faculty Scholar in Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her research focuses on creating sustainable water and energy systems in a policy-relevant context. She earned a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the
Biological Systems Engineering at the University of Nebraska - Lincoln. She received her B.S. and M.S. in Food Science from Cornell University and her Ph.D. in Food Process Engineering from the Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering at Purdue University. She was an inaugural faculty member of the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She is currently a Professor in Biological Systems Engineering at the University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Her role in the College of Engineering at UNL is to lead the disciplinary-based education research initiative, establishing a cadre of engineering education research faculty in the engineering departments and creating a graduate program. Her research focuses
of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale,” J. Soc. Issues, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 425–442, 2000, doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00176.[4] C. L. Ruff and M. A. Olson, “The attitudes of interior design students towards sustainability,” Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 67–77, Mar. 2009, doi: 10.1007/s10798-007-9038-0.[5] “SOLIDWORKS Sustainability Overview - 2022 - SOLIDWORKS Help.” Accessed: Feb. 06, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://help.solidworks.com/2022/english/SolidWorks/sldworks/c_Sustainability_Overview.h tm[6] “Disassembly and Recycling | Sustainability Workshop.” Accessed: Feb. 06, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://sustainabilityworkshop.venturewell.org/products/disassembly-and
Foundationprovides funding and mentoring to support faculty and their integration of EOP learningobjectives into their classes.EOP’s efforts have been highly successful in supporting faculty to integrate sustainability intothe curriculum with the ASEE EOP Mini-Grant program Cohorts developing 34 new courses thathave impacted over 1600 students. Thus many students have benefitted from these curricularchange efforts, but students, the target audience of these changes, have not yet played asignificant role in shaping these change efforts. We hypothesize there is much to learn fromstudents; students bring fresh, innovative perspectives, and the inclusion of students promotes auser-centric approach, whereby educational changes can be designed with their specific
concerned about the effects of climate change, and felt that sustainabledevelopment should be universally taught in higher education yet only 26% of respondents felttheir coursework was covering these issues in depth.7 Despite sustainability becoming a morepopular topic in engineering education programs in recent years, a few key hurdles remain thatare preventing or slowing the pace of curricular change, to more fully integrate sustainabilityacross engineering courses and programs.8 Barriers include: 1) belief that there is no space tointegrate sustainability into already jam-packed engineering courses, 2) lack of confidence orlack of familiarity with how to bring sustainability into the classroom, and 3) trust one-offmodules, seminars, or a
and criteria for success.Grand Challenges of Engineering in Addressing Air Quality:Air quality is a critical issue facing the world today, with numerous sources of pollutioncontributing to poor air quality in many regions. This problem affects human health, theenvironment, and the economy, and it requires a comprehensive and interdisciplinary approach tobe addressed effectively.1,2,3,4 Engineering has a key role to play in addressing air quality, asengineers are involved in the design, development, and implementation of technologies andsystems to improve air quality23. The grand challenges of engineering24 in addressing air quality,including the need for new technologies to measure and monitor air quality, the development ofeffective
metacognitive andreasoning strategies, teamwork skills, and even class attendance” [4]. However, some of thetradeoffs include that PBL can be less effective at developing content knowledge, the wrongconclusions students reach may go uncorrected, the activities are often difficult for the instructorto implement, and students may be resistant to the new paradigm of being responsible for theirown learning [4, 5]. Several of these concerns may be mitigated by implementing an approachinvolving “scaffolding” as a balance between challenge and support, with heavy instructorsupport at the beginning of an activity that is then gradually reduced throughout the activity [2,4]. To make PBL even more effective, the problems to be solved may involve activity
Paper ID #43556The Sustainability as Stewardship Framework: A Revision of the Engineeringfor One Planet Framework for an Existing Civil Engineering Program at aChristian InstitutionDr. David Brian Dittenber P.E., Cedarville University David Dittenber is an associate professor of civil engineering at Cedarville University, where he has served since 2020. Prior to joining the faculty at Cedarville, David taught at his alma mater, LeTourneau University, for seven years, serving as an associate professor and chair of civil and environmental engineering. He completed his master’s and doctoral graduate studies in civil engineering
practice it may be easier tobuild consensus around them. As the world’s largest development lending institution, the World Bank grappleswith these challenges daily. The CCG Chief Economist’s team seeks to illuminate the issue by:- In the long run, seeking to mainstream new approaches for robust decision making (RDM) into the design and implementation of WB projects, as well as into the analytical methods and policy processes of clients.- In the short-run, educating various audiences about deep uncertainty, how managing uncertainty differs from managing risk, and what tools are available to support RDM.In the past, researchers and practitioners have relied largely on lectures and publications to communicate todecision makers both the