Paper ID #26030The Professional Doctorate in Technology Leadership, Research & Innova-tionDr. Kathryne Newton, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Dr. Kathy Newton is an Associate Dean of Graduate Programs and Faculty Success for the Purdue Poly- technic Institute at Purdue University. She is a Professor of Supply Chain Management Technology in the School of Engineering Technology. Her teaching and scholarly interests are in the areas of supply chain management, quality control, and graduate education. She served as Department Head of Industrial Technology from 2007 to 2010. Prior to her appointment at Purdue University in
Paper ID #10334Workshops on Fundamental Engineering Skills: A Graduate Student-LedTeaching InitiativeJustin M. Foley, Applied Physics Program, University of Michigan Justin is a doctoral candidate in the Applied Physics Program at the University of Michigan. His disser- tation research involves spectral manipulation, including broadband reflectance and narrowband filtering, using subwavelength dielectric gratings. He is currently the president of the student chapter of ASEE at the University of Michigan. In addition to his research and education interests, Justin holds a position with the Office of Technology Transfer
AC 2010-217: STRENGTHENING THE U.S. ENGINEERING WORKFORCE FORINNOVATION: FOUNDATIONS OF PROFESSIONAL GRADUATE EDUCATIONFOR THE NATION'S ENGINEERS IN INDUSTRY - PART II MID-CAREERDEVELRoger Olson, Rolls-Royce Corporation Page 15.1104.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010GSD-2010-1455-Panel Paper #2 Strengthening the U.S. Engineering Workforce for Innovation: Foundations of Professional Graduate Education for the Nation’s Engineers in Industry ─ Part II Mid-Career Development: Organizational Leadership ─ AbstractThis is the second of four invited panel papers prepared specifically for the National Collaborative
Morgan State University. He has worked for Morgan State University since 1990.Dr. Jumoke ’Kemi’ Ladeji-Osias, Morgan State University Dr. J. ’Kemi Ladeji-Osias is Associate Professor and Associate Chair for Graduate Studies in the De- partment of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Morgan State University in Baltimore. She teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in computer engineering. Dr. Ladeji-Osias earned a B.S. in electrical engineering from the University of Maryland, College Park and a Ph.D. in biomedical engineering from Rutgers University. She is the Principal Investigator for Doctoral Scholars in Engineering. Dr. Ladeji-Osias’ involvement in engineering curricular innovations includes outcomes-based
INNOVATIVE GRADUATE PROGRAM IN NANOENGINEERINGAbstract: Joint School of Nanoscience and Nanoengineering (JSNN) is establishing a new master'sdegree program in nanoengineering. The program will be highly interdisciplinary, drawingexpertise and resources from various disciplines from two universities North Carolina A&T StateUniversity and University of North Carolina, Greensboro. Master of Science in Nanoengineeringis designed for students with strong backgrounds in either engineering or science who seekadditional specialized education and training to qualify them for positions in the field ofnanoengineering or nanotechnology design, research and development, or manufacturing. The proposed Master of Science
13.558.3innovation is a very purposeful and systematic practice. It is not the linear or sequential processfollowing basic research as portrayed in 1945, by Vannevar Bush 1. Rather, creative engineeringprojects in industry frequently drive the need for directed strategic research efforts atuniversities, when necessary, or when anticipated, to gain a better understanding of the naturalphenomena involved. With this in mind, the ability to build and sustain a culture of innovation isbecoming the skill that is truly needed to sustain America’s viability, yet in many organizations,it is left to chance. Engineering education would rather place their efforts on more technicaltools instead of teaching the art of collaboration.3. Creating Cultures of InnovationIn
criteria for research-oriented faculty.2. The Professional Advancement Path for EngineersIn modern, high technology industries, engineers are a necessary, and a valued resource. Theseengineers create (invent), design, develop, and innovate to produce new / improved /breakthrough technologies. Most of these engineers enter the industrial workplace with aBaccalaureate degree. They progress up the professional ladder to increased compensation, andhigher pay grades as their capability is demonstrated by a progressive gain in their abilities, andnot by seniority. The process of Lifelong Learning for these engineers in industry is verynecessary since the engineering profession is not static, but continues to advance rapidly. Thislearning is composed of
and innovation has itselfchanged substantially during the last half-century15. Yet, with notable exceptions, themainstream of U.S. engineering graduate education has not reflected this change. As EricWalker, former president of Pennsylvania State University and ASEE, pointed out:“Teaching Research Isn’t Teaching Engineering … The key idea is that engineering is asystem of [leadership] that results in the satisfaction of human needs … The effectivenessof an engineer is measured by how well he or she … invents and innovates.”16Whereas both U.S. Science and Engineering enterprises are vital to the national innovationsystem, they have been funded and treated in the past as if they were linear, sequentialpursuits. They are not … Science and
incollaborative research settings, especially at the graduate level. Graduate engineering studentsare immediately expected to assimilate into a laboratory group, usually an interdependent team,with varying degrees of guidance by faculty members. The group dynamics and the role of trustas graduate students learn to conduct collaborative research is underexplored, but may haveramifications for the way in which graduate programs are structured or in how graduate studentsare matched with potential research advisors.Other theories and research also seek to understand mechanisms by which experts innovate inprofessional settings, and many of these have been applied to engineering education. Theories ofdistributed cognition 20 have been employed to understand
is currently a fifth-year PhD candidate in the department of Civil and Environmental Engineer- ing at the University of California at Berkeley. His main research interests are geotechnical earthquake engineering, soil-structure-interaction and physical modeling. Ben completed his undergraduate degree at the Georgia Institute of Technology in 2006.Nicholas W Trombetta, University of California at San Diego Nick Trombetta is a third-year PhD candidate in the department of Structural Engineering at the University of California at San Diego. His current research interests include soil-structure interaction, earthquake en- gineering, and seismic design. Nick completed his B.S. in Civil Engineering at the University of
. Page 12.1422.3Two students, one working on his MS thesis and another providing computer support are alsoassigned to the EI. Through its research and education activities the EI has collaborations withmany LANL technical divisions.Technical ThrustThe technology thrust of the EI is damage prognosis, a multidisciplinary engineering scienceconcerned with assessing the current condition and predicting the remaining life of a widevariety of structural systems. Developing damage prognosis capabilities requires coordinateddevelopment of 1) advanced sensing and telemetry hardware, 2) novel signal processing andpattern recognition algorithms, and 3) complex multi-scale, physics-based predictive modeling asshown in Figure 2. ‚ High-Fidelity
and 2015.9 An analysis ofthe areas in which these new PhD programs have developed is presented in Figure 1. Thecategory, “other” includes innovative or novel programs such as Nanoengineering, etc. Figure 1. New Ph.D. Programs Reported to ASEE 2006-2015 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0A rising research university in Idaho recognized the regional need for high tech professionalswith advanced education. As a result, three doctoral programs were developed over a 10-yearperiod, including one discipline-specific program in Electrical and Computer Engineering, andtwo interdisciplinary degree programs, Materials Science and Engineering, and Computing.In researching the literature surrounding the establishment of doctoral degree programs
college) is regularly the requirement for tenure (via somequantitative measures, such as end-of-semester evaluations). Therefore, one may opine thatdespite the availability of centers for teaching and learning on many college campuses or theubiquity of teaching workshops, new faculty in engineering need to spend their available time intheir research pursuits to meet the tenure requirements in that area (e.g. external funding dollars,grant submissions, archival publications, mentoring graduate students to degree completion, etc.)One approach to address this concerning issue is to provide a baseline foundation of engineeringeducation training for potential faculty members during their Ph. D. training. A few of theseprograms exist already at various
Paper ID #15175Learning to Conduct ”Team Science” through Interdisciplinary EngineeringResearchDr. Catherine G.P. Berdanier, Purdue University, West Lafayette Catherine G.P. Berdanier holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. She earned her B.S. in Chemistry from The University of South Dakota and her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from Purdue University. Her research interests include graduate-level engineering education, including engineering writing, inter- and multidisciplinary graduate education, innovative and novel grad- uate education experiences, global learning, and
engineering practice in industry to enhance U.S. technological innovationand competitiveness. The paper sets a solid foundation and educational philosophy ofprofessional engineering graduate education specifically designed to encourage, inspire, andenable the continued professional growth of the nation’s engineers, working in industry, beyondthe baccalaureate entry-level [level 1 and 2]. It differentiates between the traditional aims ofgraduate education for scientific research for academic/research positions and those of advancedprofessional engineering graduate education for engineering leadership positions in industry foreffective technology development innovation, and other creative engineering works.The comparison differentiates between the
can prosper over the long-term?II. National Imperative for Technology InnovationDuring the last five years of its investigation phase, the National Collaborative Task Force has examinedthe U.S. system of engineering graduate education and the need for universities, government, and industryto strengthen the development of the U.S. Engineering Workforce for competitiveness and nationalsecurity purposes. The findings of the National Collaborative include the following: Finding # 1: As the Council on Competitiveness points out ─ “Innovation will be the single most important factor in determining America’s success through the 21st century” … “For developed nations, no longer able to compete on cost, the capacity to innovate is the most
required for thenew economy, and the role of professional or soft skills in getting and keeping a job. Infact, according to one recent research report (discussed extensively below), only 31.5%of four year graduates enter the workforce with excellent professional skills.1 While theresearch report discusses graduates of four-year institutions and their work skills, thisauthor posits that any identified shortcomings in four-year education can be remedied notonly by changing the education in undergraduate education, but also by addressing thoseemployer needs at the graduate level. Without question, technical skills are required intechnical professions, but those technical skills alone are no longer sufficient to preparegraduates in engineering and
underlyingissues as the field emerges, such as those related to curriculum, teaching and learning; developmentof expertise; and diversity, equity, and inclusion. Many of these focuses will be applicable tograduate-level engineering education, because of the specialization and development of expertisethat AM requires; however, our vision for engineering education research in AdditiveManufacturing can be extended to specialized undergraduate programs or courses as well. References[1] ISO/ASTM 52900, “Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing Technologies – General Principles – Terminology,” ASTM B. Stand., vol. i, pp. 1–9, 2015.[2] W. Gao, Y. Zhang, D. Ramanujan, K. Ramani, Y. Chen, C. B
, National Academy Press, 2006.3. National Academy of Engineering, Educating the Engineer of 2020: Phase II Report, 2005.4. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) website, 2009.5. National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) website, 2009.6. Gregory, S.A., Edited, Creativity and Innovation in Engineering, Butterworth, 1972.7. Bush, V., Science: The Endless Frontier, 1945.8. Sanders, R., Brown, F.R., Science and Technology: Vital National Assets, Industrial College of the Armed Forces, 1966.9. National Academy of Engineering, Educating the Engineer of 2020: Phase I Report, 2004.10. Walker, E.A., Teaching Research Isn’t Teaching Engineering, ASEE, 1969.11. Ibid.12. Ramo, S., The Systems Approach, Cure for Chaos
Paper ID #14958Characterization of Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts Criteria in NSFGraduate Research Fellowship Program ApplicationsDr. Catherine G.P. Berdanier, Purdue University, West Lafayette Catherine G.P. Berdanier holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. She earned her B.S. in Chemistry from The University of South Dakota and her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from Purdue University. Her research interests include graduate-level engineering education, including engineering writing, inter- and multidisciplinary graduate education, innovative and novel grad- uate
University resources toexternal inventors. Three agreements have already been signed with WNC inventors. The launching of entrepreneurial engineering teams began simultaneous to the problemidentification activity. As described above, the teams launched projects that go beyond thetechnical solution. Project documentation includes market research, patent searches, productrequirements, work breakdown structures and project schedules. One of the projects directed at arehabilitation device for patients who have undergone total knee replacement is described in acompanion paper. An additional dimension to the Collaborative is the stimulation of innovation in communitycollege students. The goal is to launch annual innovation challenges for community
Pennsylvania StateUniversity. The course design incorporates lecture, discussion, active learning, and peer learningactivities that allow the students to experience the teaching process first hand. The courseincorporates two teaching observations, one by the course instructor and the other in the form ofa peer observation. The purpose of this paper is to share the experience, lessons learned and thebenefits of the course as it prepares a diverse population of graduate assistants to be teachers inundergraduate engineering courses. Publications that support teaching and learning strategies,model programs and framework for TA seminars are represented in the research.2 However, theresearch is lacking in the area of “how to implement” a program for TAs in
AC 2011-2780: BOOTSTRAPPING A NEW GRADUATE CURRICULUMTHROUGH AN ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTERDevdas M. Pai, North Carolina A&T State University (Eng) Devdas M. Pai is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering and serves as Director for Education and Out- reach for the NSF Engineering Research Center for Revolutionizing Metallic Biomaterials. His research and teaching interests are in the areas of manufacturing processes and materials engineering.Robin Guill Liles, North Carolina A&T State University Robin Guill Liles is associate professor in counseling and counselor education in the Department of Hu- man Development and Services in the School of Education at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State
revisitthe material for several years; in the interim, she completed her doctorate, spent a year as a post-doctoral researcher while teaching as an adjunct at a regional comprehensive university, workedin industry for a time, and then accepted an academic position.BackgroundGraduate students in engineering have a variety of motivations for pursuing their education.While some are focused primarily on research and plan to continue that focus in industry oracademia, others have a strong interest in teaching, and plan to pursue an educational career at ateaching-focused institution. Some universities, in their efforts to promote outreach and expandthe population of future engineering students, recruit these graduate students into outreachprograms
focuses on the nature of engineering; engineering habits of mind, how engineering knowledge is created and shared and how it is learned especially outside the classroom. Over the past 30 years, he has conducted field research on the practice of engineering design, new product development and innovation in variety of industries, in large and small firms with an emphasis on design thinking, most recently in relation to sustainability. He also studies engineering education as a complex system, and the design and evaluation of next generation learning environments. This research is intrinsically multidisciplinary and draws on methodologies from the humanities, social and behavioral sciences and involves collaboration with
courses on lasers and optoelectronic device physics at Penn State University and created an optoelectronics training curriculum for Agere employees. He received an MS in Chemical Physics from Indiana University and a PhD in Physics from Stevens Institute of Technology. He has 16 publications and 6 patents on optical devices.Himanshu Jain, Lehigh University Himanshu Jain is currently the T.L. Diamond Distinguished Chair in Engineering and Applied Science, a Professor of Materials Science and Engineering, and Director of NSF’s International Materials Institute for New Functionality in Glass at Lehigh University. Previously, he conducted research at Argonne and Brookhaven National
work in engineering education involves curricular reform, teaching and learning innovations, assessment, and faculty development. Dr. Litzinger has more than 50 publications related to engineering education including lead authorship of an invited article in the 100th Anniversary issue of JEE and for an invited chapter on translation of research to practice for the first edition of the Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research. He serves as an Associate Editor for Advances in Engineering Education and on the Advisory Board for the Journal of Engineering Education. He was selected as a Fellow of ASEE in 2008 and of ASME in 2012. He holds a B.S. in Nuclear Engineering from Penn State, an M.Eng. in Mechanical
AC 2012-3154: CREATING AND SUSTAINING PRODUCTIVE RESEARCHGROUPS IN GRADUATE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS: RESULTS FROMA FACULTY AND FUTURE FACULTY WORKSHOPMr. John Andrew Janeski, Virginia Tech John Andrew Janeski is a Dean’s Teaching Fellow and Ph.D. candidate in the Aerospace and Ocean Engineering Department. His primary research interests center around spacecraft dynamics and control. However, the Dean’s Teaching Fellowship has afforded him the opportunity to pursue research topics that span his experiences as a graduate student and instructor. He earned his bachelor’s degree in physics from Rhodes College.Dr. Erin Crede, Virginia Tech Erin D. Crede completed her Ph.D. in engineering education from Virginia Tech
AC 2012-4876: ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE IN SUPPORT OF SIX SIGMAAND INNOVATION: CAN IT CO-EXIST?Mr. Sai Bhanu Prasad Chennupati, Purdue University, West Lafayette Sai Chennupati is currently pursuing a M.S. in industrial technology at Purdue University, West Lafayette, Ind. He is interested in Six Sigma, finance, supply chain management, lean manufacturing, and innova- tion. He received his B.E in mechanical engineering from PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore, India.Dr. Chad M. Laux, Purdue University, West Lafayette Chad Laux is an Assistant Professor in the Industrial Technology Department at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Ind. He teaches courses in Lean manufacturing, and Six Sigma Quality. His research
information, data and science literacy skills that will allow them to succeed in a global economy. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Implementing a Graduate Class in Research Data Management for Science/Engineering StudentsIntroduction: Research data management (RDM) is an integral part of engineering and science graduatestudent life, both during graduate school and in their future occupations. Federal agencies,including NSF[1], NIH[2], and USGS[3], are now requiring the submission of a DataManagement Plan (DMP) when submitting proposals for funding. Carlson et al. further advocatefor RDM by stating “… it is not simply enough to teach students about handling data, they mustknow