synchronous, cohort-based nature of our program provides several unique opportunities forproject instruction, collaboration, and assessment. All students enrolled in the project course attendsynchronous lectures. Over the two semesters, lectures covering topics such as project definition,how to give a presentation, how to prepare a technical document, and data analysis are presented.Each student team is advised by the course instructor and team progress is assessed during weeklyvideo conferences in which students describe implementation challenges, discuss design and im-plementation progress, and perform brief demonstrations. All students are expected to participatein the advising sessions. Students may be co-located or in different locations. In
the graduate students are separated based on international status, where onlydomestic students’ demographic information is available. The race/ethnic backgrounds of ourdomestic students are 35% Hispanic/Latinx, 8% Black or African American, 7% White (Non-Hispanic/Latinx), and 3% Asians.The mentorship literature tends to emphasize the experiences of doctoral students whileneglecting students enrolled in master’s programs [24]. The experiences of master’s studentsmatter, and improving their experiences is critical in their success. Since mentorship has beenshown to improve the experiences and success of doctoral students [25], we believe that it can beapplied to master’s students, particularly those on a thesis track as well. Therefore
displayspecific traits and perform a multitude of other indispensable activities including ethical andprofessional behavior, resilience, clear communication, change management, risk-taking, teambuilding, conflict management, and decision-making [7,8]. The criticality of these issues andpotential ways to expose students to such skill sets has been encouraged by the publication of aSpecial Issue on Engineering Education: Beyond Technical Skills [7]. ABET also indicates theneed for such skill development via Criterion 3 where students must display the ability tofunction on multidisciplinary teams, understand professional and ethical responsibility,communicate effectively, and understand the impact of engineering solutions in a context thatincludes global
course was alsodesigned and implemented by the Communication Lab Director and tutors from the EECS Com-munication Lab, together with the EECS Department Head and a faculty advisor. It provided anoverview of relevant technical communication tasks, detailed below, facilitated by guest lecturesand hands-on workshops.3.2.1 The communication course’s operationThe course consisted of a weekly, two-hour session. Topics covered a range of technical com-munication tasks, as outlined in Table 3. Typically each session began with an introductory guestlecture (∼30 min), followed by small-group workshops run in parallel, in separate rooms, and ledby Communication Lab tutors. Guest lecturers were selected based on (1) their example as goodcommunicators and
was delayed by six months or less. We alsofound that low-SES students and doctoral students were more likely to delay their graduationbecause of the pandemic. Figure 2. Delayed Graduation due to the COVID-19 Pandemic In terms of job search self-efficacy (Figure 3), the one-sample t-test results showed thatthe means for all items are statistically different from 0 (The Same), meaning that, in general,engineering graduate students showed less confidence in their job search since the COVID-19outbreak occurred. In particular, females, low-SES students, international students, and studentswith disabilities were less confident than their peers. Figure 3. Job Search Self-Efficacy affected by the COVID 19
achievement in students,” British Journal of Psychology, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 509–521, 2004.[6] H. Anttila, S. Lindblom-Ylänne, K. Lonka, & K. Pyhältö, “The Added Value of a PhD in Medicine - PhD Students’ Perceptions of Acquired Competences,” International Journal of Higher Education, vol. 4, no. 2, 2015. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v4n2p172[7] K. Danna & R. Griffin, “Health and well-being in the workplace: A review and synthesis of the literature,” Journal of Management, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 357–384, 1999.[8] D. Eisenberg, E. Golberstein, & J. Hunt, “Mental health and academic success in college”, The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, vol. 9, no. 1, 2009.[9] S. Lipson & D. Eisenberg
students [8]. Mental health awarenessweeks on campuses often include mindfulness sessions, yoga classes, and lectures on thegrowing mental illness rates within academia and the college-aged population. While these dohelp raise awareness and provide opportunities for student to practice techniques to improve theirmental health, three key problems can be identified in leveraging only these interventions: (1)one week of heightened support does not suffice for an entire year, (2) attending events can addadditional time-stress to already time-stressed students, and (3) these events do not address theunderlying problems that led to mental illness within students [8]. Providing more of theopportunities offered during awareness weeks over the entire
use of the rubric, several faculty dialogues were held prior to the 2018-2019admissions cycle. These sessions were dedicated to discussing the positive and negativepredictors of graduate school success, using data from STEM studies [25, 38-39]. Additionally,the rubric designers attended faculty meetings in each department to walk through the rubric.Finally, in order to encourage faculty to use this tool, the school dean’s office required acompleted rubric for each nominee to a school-level fellowship.Figure 1: First Iteration of PhD Holistic Admissions Rubric Category Criterion 1 2 3 4 Score Letters of Knowledge of applicant Writer does
environmental studies, evolution, evolutionary medicine, and research practices in science.Dr. Rachel McCord Ellestad, University of Tennessee at Knoxville Rachel McCord Ellestad is a a Senior Lecturer and Research Assistant Professor in the Engineering Fundamentals Division at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville. She received her Ph.D. in Engi- neering Education from Virginia Tech. Her research interests include the impact of metacognitive and self-regulated learning development on engineering student success, particularly in the first year.Dr. Cory Hixson, Colorado Christian University After earning my B.S. in Engineering Science at Penn State University (2007), I began working as an audio-video engineer/designer. I
management of TSA personnel conducting screening activities, regulatory inspections, law enforcement, administrative, and budgetary functions for all airports in Arkansas. Additionally, Dr. Ham provided technical assistance to TSA management on five major national investigations involving violations of Federal criminal laws and regulations. As the General Manager of the Compliance Program for the Office of Security Operations, Dr. Ham set policy for 2100 inspectors and established the TSA Surface Training Academy. While in this position, Dr. Ham established policy to train Senior Executive Service leaders, inspectors, Federal Security Directors, Federal Air Marshals, international students, and other TSA personnel in mass
- tance missions. In 2012, Lieutenant Fischer was assigned to Naval Base Ventura County (NBVC) as the Assistant Public Works Officer and Assistant Officer in Charge of San Nicolas island. During his assign- ment to NBVC, Lieutenant Fischer supported Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division (NAWC-WD) and several other installation tenants by managing reliable utility and facility operations as well as over- seeing facility and airfield service contracts. In 2014, Lieutenant Fischer began his overseas tour with Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC), Far East. He served as the Facility Support Contract Manager (FSCM) for Public Works Yokosuka and was then reassigned as the Assistant Operations Officer and
program, Academy for Co-creativeEducation of Environment and Energy Science (ACEEES), in 2012 with a 7 year grant awardedby the Japan Society for Promotion of Science (JSPS) Program for Leading Graduate Schools15.ACEEES' mission is to educate next generation doctoral students to become global energyscientist and engineers by developing their leadership qualities as well technical expertise inenergy and environmental science through coursework, interdisciplinary projects, research andother activities with international industry-government-university oversight (Fig. 1). JSPScreated the Leading Graduate Program to support doctoral student education, provide financialsupport to students, raise doctoral education quality and increase the number of
success in an increasingly globalized world.I. Introduction As the field of engineering becomes more globalized, the need for engineers to beglobally competent is increasingly important. The development of global competency isparticularly important for engineering graduate students, who will soon be leaders in industryand academia. Many of the challenges facing our society require global collaboration, and it istherefore necessary that engineering graduate students develop an ability to work in these globalcontexts [1]. However, many graduate engineering programs focus primarily on research and ondeveloping students’ technical skills with less emphasis on skills needed for students’ jobs andcareers after graduation [2-3
rendering.The nomenclature used (Figure 3) in the present work is: spacing (s), pitch (p), height (H),thickness (t), length (L), base width (W), and base thickness (tb) [19]. However, compared toactive cooling systems, passive cooling system have lower heat dissipation rates, andenvironment conditions such as air temperature and wind speed will affect the heatdissipation rates [20]. Active cooling system concludes micro-channels, spray cooling and jetimpingement, Abdolzadeh showed spray cooling could reduce cell temperature from 58°C to37°C [21], however, spray cooling require water usage and the heat from the cell is wasted.The active cooling system is more efficient and more technically feasible if the waste heatfrom cooling system can be reused in
4 Travel ban / Politics (D) 3 5 Cultural differences (D, A) 2 5 Language barrier (B, D, A) 1 10 Religion Minority (D, A) 2 5 Stereotype (D, A) 1 5 Professional Life International students’ affairs/ internship (Name 3 7 discrimination in job applications) (D, A) Scholarships/salary (D) 2 9 Adviser-advisee
States Census Bureau’s regional division, the following four regionsare identified: 1) Northeast; 2) Midwest; 3) South; and 4) West (See Table 3). Table 3: United States Geographical Regions Region 1 State Region 3 State (Northeast) abbr. (South) abbr. Maine ME Delaware DE New Hampshire NH Maryland MD Vermont VT District of Columbia DC Massachusetts
. Lu, and M. Bartlett, “Engineering identity development: A review of the higher education literature,” International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 254–265, 2018.[2] J. Lave and E. Wenger, Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.[3] K. L. Meyers, M. W. Ohland, A. L. Pawley, S. E. Silliman, and K. A. Smith, “Factors relating to engineering identity,” Global Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 119–131, 2012.[4] O. Pierrakos, T. K. Beam, J. Constantz, A. Johri, and R. Anderson, “On the development of a professional identity: engineering persisters vs engineering switchers,” San Antonio, TX, 2009.[5
varyconsiderably and we found no evidence of programs sharing the same assessment instruments orprotocols. A few examples are below. They describe evaluation from different viewpoints and we presentthem here to show examples of the diversity of methods employed, and some research outcomes andreflections. • One paper described the use of specific assessment methods including competency rubrics, individual development plans, and ePortfolios for evaluation (Chang, Semma, Fowler, & Arroyave, 2021). The rubrics encompassed professional and technical skills including: 1) interdisciplinary knowledge generation, 2) collaboration, 3) conflict resolution, 4) oral communication, 5) written communication, 6) self-reflection, 7
innovation.In technical fields such as engineering, the underrepresentation of African American, Black,Hispanic, and Native American engineering graduate students compared to peers who are Whiteis a well-documented issue [1]. For every seven majoritized students that complete a doctoraldegree in engineering, only one minoritized student will obtain the same degree in the U.S. [2],[3]. Commissions have identified disproportionate representation in the workforce as a majorchallenge due to barriers that are socio-cultural, economic, and historical in nature [4]. At thesame time, research studies have provided empirical evidence that highlights the differences inthe experiences of African American, Black, Hispanic, and Native American
Paper ID #33433Mrs. Giannina Costa, Universidad Andres Bello PhD in information technology from Atlantic International University, Magister in Computer Science from Andr´es Bello University of Chile, Computer Engineer from Federico Santa Mar´ıa Technical Uni- versity of Chile. Director of the degree in Computer Civil Engineering and Computer Engineering at the Andr´es Bello University, Chile. His research and teaching focuses on information management, and business intelligence. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Early detection of delayed graduation in master's studentsAbstractDelayed graduation is a factor of concern at the master's
Factors in GraduateEducation,” International Journal of Doctoral Studies, vol. 12, pp. 251–279, 2017, doi:10.28945/3903.[22] C. R. Clark, S. H. Mercer, V. Zeigler-Hill, and B. A. Dufrene, “Barriers to the Success ofEthnic Minority Students in School Psychology Graduate Programs,” School PsychologyReview, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 176–192, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.1080/02796015.2012.12087519.[23] R. Cros,“Results NRT Trainee Survey”, The LEAD Center, University of WisconsinMadison , 2019-2020.[24] C. Margerison, "Individual development plans," Libr,” Contemporary Issues in EducationResearch (CIER), vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 147–158, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.19030/cier.v8i3arian CareerDevelopment, Vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 4-10, 1994.[25] "K-State Olathe Industry Mentor Program
different settings. The latterincluded researchers in academia, industry and government; teachers, professors and lecturers inK-12, undergraduate-only and R-1 institutions; freelancers, entrepreneurs and managers workingin their own, startup and larger companies; scientists working in technical support and technicalsales; as well as scientists and engineers with experience working in nonprofits, government andscience policy, or in art, media and entertainment. In addition, practical career tools and skills forSTEM professionals were discussed in several breakout sessions. Finally, the symposium endedwith a panel discussion comprising four diverse and accomplished recent Ph.D. graduates, whodiscussed mental health and communication issues prior to
.(2011, para. 3) concisely argue: technical writing is usually not the same as scholarly writing, and scholarly writing is required in most research-based writing projects, such as theses and directed projects. As opposed to being concise, to the point, or having the data speak for themselves, scholarly writing relies on analysis, synthesis, and logical construction of a proposition with appropriate support. Technical writing is generally designed primarily to transmit specific information, while scholarly writing is designed to underpin the creation of new knowledge.Thus, the way in which technical communication programs approach teaching writing—along with debates on whether or not technical writing
of practice for Mechanical Engineering faculty dedicated to continuous quality improvement in pedagogy; and leading and evaluating emerging educational technology innovations such as digital badges, adaptive learning, and learning analytics. She conducts research related to the scholarship of teaching and learning in Mechanical Engineering in order to improve practice in the department and con- tribute to the national and international Engineering Education research community through presentations and publications.Catherine G.P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University Catherine G.P. Berdanier is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Penn- sylvania State University and is the
applications, optimization of off-grid energy systems, wind turbine aero- dynamics, and wind integration on the electrical system. He has worked extensively with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory and the International Energy Agency on grid integration of wind and hy- dropower technologies. He is a member of the editorial board of Wind Engineering, serves on the board for the North American Wind Energy Academy, and is President of the board for the Western Energy Futures Institute.Dr. Nena E. Bloom, Northern Arizona University Dr. Nena Bloom is an evaluator and education researcher at the Center for Science Teaching and Learning at Northern Arizona University. The primary area of her work is evaluating STEM education
level.Dr. Nick M. Safai, Salt Lake Community College Dr. Nick M. Safai has been an ASEE officer and member for the past 24 years. He is the Division Chair for ASEE-ID. He is the Program Chair for Graduate Studies Division. He has been the seven-time elected as the Program Chair of the ASEE International Division for approx- imately the past 18 years. Nick has had a major role in development and expansion of the international division. Under his term as the International Division Program Chair the international division expanded, broadened in topics, and the number of sessions increased from a few technical sessions to over eighteen sessions in the recent years. Nick has served in the ASEE Graduate Studies division
): 31–58.36. Kivunja, Charles. 2014. “Do You Want Your Students to Be Job-Ready with 21st Century Skills? Change Pedagogies: A Pedagogical Paradigm Shift from Vygotskyian Social Constructivism to Critical Thinking, Problem Solving and Siemens’ Digital Connectivism.” International Journal of Higher Education 3(3): 81– 91. http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/view/5156.37. Chompalov, Ivan Mihailov, and Lubomir Savov Popov. 2014. “Sociology of Science and the Turn to Social Constructivism.” Social Sciences 3(2): 59–66.38. Hinojosa, A. S. et al. 2016. “A Review of Cognitive Dissonance Theory in Management Research: Opportunities for Further Development.” Journal of Management XX(X): 1–30. http://jom.sagepub.com/cgi
Beta Pi. His research on passive radon-resistant new residential building construction was adapted in HB1647 building code of Florida Legislature. Najafi is a member of numerous professional societies and has served on many committees and programs, and continuously attends and presents refereed papers at international, national, and local professional meetings and conferences. Lastly, Najafi attends courses, seminars and workshops, and has developed courses, videos and software packages during his career. His areas of specialization include transportation planning and management, legal aspects, construction contract administration, and public works.Miss Sarah Rajkumari Jayasekaran
: come from faculty directly. . . need lead time; think of 3 people who can give you a personal rec, not just a form letter Transcripts: need official from the college, not copies Application fees: will likely cost money; pick some safety schools, some reaches, some up the middle • Open question and answer session • Distribution of follow-up survey (5 minutes: repeat IRB disclaimer and instructions)Seminar #2: “What is Graduate School Like?”In the fall of 2016, an additional seminar was created to augment the general information session.This one focused mainly on the daily life of graduate students (e.g., what classes to take,social/communal atmosphere, how to do research, etc.). This topic was chosen
at least two disciplines whileaddressing a real-world system problem. During the interdisciplinary research process,researchers from a variety of disciplines cross boundaries to solve the specific real-worldproblems and create new knowledge [3, 4, 5, 6].Recognizing the potential of interdisciplinarity, national efforts, such as the Integrative GraduateEducation Research and Training (IGERT) initiative, have emerged. The IGERT program,initiated in 1997 and terminated in 2012 funded 125 groups of faculty to “educate U.S Ph.D.scientists, engineers, and educators with the interdisciplinary backgrounds, deep knowledge inchosen disciplines, and technical, professional, and personal skills to become in their own careersthe leaders and creative