matters concerning the coursesections, takes on 10% instructional responsibility.UGA courses are currently being taught in Beijing during the spring, summer, and fall terms.Each course offered onsite in Beijing spans approximately 15 weeks of instruction, followed byfinal exams. Similar to the MBB program offered in Athens, each UGA credit hour correspondsto approximately 750 contact minutes. The specific course calendar is determined collaborativelyby both institutions, ensuring alignment with official Chinese holidays and equivalence to theUGA calendar approved for the Athens campus.During the second year of the MBB program, students participate in a faculty-mentored researchproject. They work under the mentorship of a faculty member from the
faculty members in Ethiopian higher education,particularly in STEM disciplines, remains very low compared to their male counterparts [11],[13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. This raises concerns about the gender gap in the faculty composition 2and the potential negative impact on the academic environment, campus climate, and academicachievements, especially for female students in Ethiopian higher education.This study aims to shed light on the gender diversity issues within the engineering faculty at onepublic university in Ethiopia. By examining the trends and statistics related to the representationof women faculty members in engineering and technology
Framework (HuQF)and the Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area(ESG). For a new tertiary education program, the higher education institution submits a proposalto the Educational Authority, which includes information on the program’s goals, structure,curriculum, and resources. The Educational Authority invites MAB to prepare an expert’sopinion on the proposal according to ESG2015 guidelines, which includes conducting a reviewof the curriculum, faculty, facilities, and resources as well as an assessment of the institution’soverall ability to deliver the program. If the program meets the required standards, theEducational Authority grants accreditation. Once a program is accredited, MAB may monitor
analyze how faculty provide support amidstthe challenges faced by international students in their roles as educators. Our main objective is tocomprehensively understand faculty perceptions and practices regarding the support ofinternational students in engineering programs. By delving into their experiences, we aim touncover valuable insights that can inform and enhance institutional efforts aimed at fostering asupportive environment for international students in the United States. Through our research, weseek to contribute to the ongoing discourse concerning the needs of international students andoffer practical recommendations for enhancing their academic and extracurricular experiences,as well as outcomes, within engineering
and collaborative softwaredevelopment), and the IntelliJ IDE (an industry-standard Integrated Development Environment).From a pedagogical perspective, the small class sizes and detailed feedback provided onstudents’ graded work as well as the use of a coding standard (including standards fordocumentation of code) and the use of unit testing in a first-year course were new practices forthem. Although the Indian faculty struggled through internet connectivity issues and attendedlive class sections that were at inconvenient times, the faculty from India showed incrediblecommitment for what was essentially an extra assignment for them beyond their regularworkload.Faculty on the US side also described the experience as enlightening and informative
to address the issues andchallenges among international students, the approaches or methods could be a partial butimperfect solution for everyone. Building a sense of community and shared responsibility amongstaff, faculty, and students contributes to a positive and enriching experience for students fromIndia and other international backgrounds.This research paper only provides the preliminary results. It is a definite a start point and canlead to more new findings in the future since this research could be an ongoing project. Thisresearch is an ongoing effort. The more data collection is under the way to build a larger samplefrom an international students population. As more students get involved and more precise toolsand new effective
in them, howSTEM teachers perceive their involvement, and what level of support is appropriate.Educators are also concerned that DEI work is disproportionately shouldered byunderrepresented racial and ethnic groups, which exacerbates what is known as the minoritytax [15]. It is important to acknowledge that while there are some teacher developmentinitiatives in DEI, they may not be adequate and may not address all of the fundamental needsof the environment. A DEI Model of Faculty Development in Engineering is shown in Figure1. Figure 1. DEI Model of Faculty Development in Engineering Edited figure for reference [14].The implications of all the above lead us to the urgent need for faculty development programsand initiatives on issues of
Paper ID #40031Preparing for Student Success in Global Competency and AwarenessDr. Patrick Tunno, Patrick Tunno is the inaugural Director of Penn State’s Center for Global Engineering Engagement and an Associate Teaching Professor. He has overseen and continues to lead the development and expansion of diverse international initiatives. Under his leadership, the college has established an award-winning Global Engineering Fellows Program, launched Penn State’s first 3+1+1 program for international stu- dents to pursue a one-year master’s degree, and initiated new interdisciplinary faculty-led study abroad programs
were taught in English tofemale student sections via Audio-Video link. The language barrier and cultural norms were mymain concerns like any faculty visiting a foreign academic institution on a teaching assignment.The cultural norms of the country did not allow male faculty to teach female students face-to-facewhich is why classes were taught via the Audio-Video link. However, each male faculty teachingfemale students were assigned a female Teaching Assistant to help faculty proctor exams, conductlabs, and other related activities. Although I had prior experience teaching undergraduate studentsin the same region for four years, it was, at times, difficult to maintain rigor and quality andchallenge students to make them learn the new concepts
internationalrecruitment pipeline as their reputation on securing US internships and jobs for their students ismostly guaranteed.This paper presents the preparedness for a midsize private University in growing its internationalstudent population from 7% to 16% in four years. The paper also discusses proactive andreactive actions in addressing opportunities and issues.2. Robert Morris UniversityRobert Morris University was founded in 1921 as the Robert Morris School of Accountancy inPittsburgh, PA, USA. In 1935 the school changed its name to Robert Morris School of Business.In 1963, classes began at the new residential campus in Moon Township and in 1977 the schooljoined NCAA Division I for intercollegiate athletics. Robert Morris University, sits on 230scenic
next decades, the demand for energy,food, land, water, public health care and other matters will be critical [1], [2]. For humanity, it isimportant to fulfill this demands to provide a basic quality of life for people [3]. Engineers aredeveloping sustainable solutions for the lack of access to these basic needs and are applying it incommunities around the world [4]. This is known as the Humanitarian Engineering (HE)concept. Today, HE projects are developed as a modern concept of engineering education. HEattempts to develop a new mindset in faculty advisors, students, and partners to achieve botheducation and practice, while helping students develop their skills and simultaneously addressproblems in communities [3], [5].HE programs require
Paper ID #40028Engineering Global Competencies through Study AbroadDr. Patrick Tunno, Pennsylvania State University Patrick Tunno is the inaugural Director of Penn State’s Center for Global Engineering Engagement and an Associate Teaching Professor. He has overseen and continues to lead the development and expansion of diverse international initiatives. Under his leadership, the college has established an award-winning Global Engineering Fellows Program, launched Penn State’s first 3+1+1 program for international stu- dents to pursue a one-year master’s degree, and initiated new interdisciplinary faculty-led study abroad
issues with me. Same with my managers at my workplaces... They did not understand the processes themselves, but never let that be a deterrent to helping me navigate those successfully.Programs that are not tailored to support international students generally, and internationalwomen of color specifically, can impact students’ experience significantly. Literacy education isnot a discipline that intakes the majority of international students, unlike STEM disciplines.Hence, author 2 had to navigate a very different environment related to immigration. I was the first international student in my department, hence, my department had no idea on how to support me through the academic program. International women and faculty
implement aspecific teaching approach"; "I'm unsure of how to integrate new content into my lessons";"I find it challenging to apply theoretical concepts I've learned in courses or training"; "It'seasier to replicate what I experienced as a student"; etc. These concerns have beenrepeatedly expressed during our training sessions for engineering instructors, based on ourextensive experience working within engineering faculties for over two decades. Thetraining will focus on real-world teaching scenarios and the unique demands faced by eachteacher in their respective institutions.It is not a novelty to talk about pedagogical or teacher training in engineering, since 1851,various theoretical currents related to the same subject have been raised
master students is 27, andthat of PhD students is 40. Accordingly, individuals of Generation X were born between 1965and 1977; individuals of Generation Y, also called Millennials, were born between 1977 and1993; and individuals pertaining to Generation Z were born between 1993 and 2005 [15]. As aresult, undergraduate students belong to Generation Z while master and Ph.D. students belong toGeneration Y.Indeed, some studies have analyzed the relation between age and sustainable behavior [16,17].Consequently, they have indicated that Generation Z, also known as Zoomers or Gen Zers, ismore concerned with sustainability and environmental issues than Generation Y [16]. Inaddition, Zoomers are more environmentally and socially conscious when they
issues affect problem formulation,decision alternatives, and success of solution implementation; and effectively communicatequestions, concerns and solutions to people in different cultural communities.While standard lectures explain and illustrate the appropriate use of decision-making tools aswell as the correct interpretation of their results, pedagogical approaches that make content morerelevant to students’ lives and the needs of society better motivates student learning andimproves critical thinking [17]. Case-based instruction is one form of active learning thatengages students and allows them to better relate course content to real-world problems. Studieshave shown that the use of case-based instruction in engineering exposes students to
in Engineering Education” appear with low priority or less recurrence, which mayindicate an imbalance in curricular priorities, or these topics are overshadowed by the growingattention to technological and management issues. We know that these topics were on theresearch agenda in the 1990s and the early 2000s. The need for curricular integration, transversalcompetencies, the development of critical thinking, the inclusion of new teaching and learningstrategies for the “hard” areas of the curriculum such as mathematics, physics and chemistry,among other pedagogical and didactic proposals [44], [45], [46], [47], has always been raised.However, in the data analyzed, they did not prevail as topics on the universities’ agenda.The analysis of the
, identifying elements of PIand POGIL-Like as active learning strategies for class room teaching specifically in the Indiancontext, and discussed strategies to make these pedagogies effective in the Indian context.The feedback and reflection on these strategies yielded very positive impressions from allparticipants. Indian classrooms tend to have larger numbers of students in the classroom, and oneof the potential concerns that participants voiced is the management of the small, structuredteams that POGIL-Like demands. Our discussions with the participants mentioned that one wayto address this potential issue would be to train the Teaching Assistants in helping facilitatePOGIL-Like, since most classes that our participants taught tend to have TAs in
Outcomes Following Industrial Attachment in KenyaIntroductionUnemployment is a major concern for the youth of Kenya. One important part of the solution tothis issue is the implementation of technical education programs such as the one in place atTumaini Innovation Center in Eldoret, Kenya. These programs provide the skills necessary forstudents to enter the workforce (Ohagwu et al., 2022) and give students relevant experiencethrough industrial attachment programs in which students are paired with employers and workprior to receiving their certification. However, technical education programs throughout theworld can run into several challenges such as a mismatch between student skills and marketdemands (Sang et al
steps to invite them into the classroom.The third criterion that was introduced in the survey concerned critical consciousness. Thiscriterion was difficult to unpack in the study. 100% of the respondents thought that it was their jobto help students connect the dots between the engineering concepts they taught and thesociopolitical consequences of their application. All the respondents also thought that studentsneeded to recognize through the curriculum, the relevance of historical and current issueshappening in the world outside the classroom. Furthermore, 78% thought that engineering shouldbe mixed with sociopolitical issues. However, only 17% thought that this necessarily had totranslate into students becoming activists of responsible, just
, such as living with a partner or husband andhaving children at home, to clarify the collected information.Moreover, in addition to assessing English proficiency, we included two items on interculturalcommunication to understand participants' interactions with people and media in that language.Finally, participants expressed concern that the collected information is used for capacitybuilding in the College, highlighting previous exercises that included "mental health issues" butfailed to take specific actions for graduate students. The time range used for completion wasfrom 9 to 15 minutes.Discussion and Next StepsBased on the feedback received, we expect to move quickly to obtain IRB approval to send outthe survey. After IRB approval, we will
environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives SO 6: an ability to develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to draw conclusions SO 7: an ability to acquire and apply new knowledge as needed, using appropriate learning strategiesTo satisfy Criterion 4, programs develop and implement a continuous improvement plan toensure that graduates attain the SOs. A continuous improvement plan is a cycle that includesthree main steps as illustrated in Figure 1: Assess, Evaluate, and Act. While accreditation is atthe program level, assessment of SOs is typically done at the course level with additionalassessments conducted outside of courses.Figure 1
, Texas A&M University Maria Claudia Alves Senior Director for the Halliburton Engineering Global Programs at Texas A&M University Dr. Maria C. Alves is the Director for the Halliburton Engineering Global Programs at Texas A&M University . She has been in this position since July 2012. In this position she is responsible for interna- tionalizing the research and education activities of the Dwight Look College of Engineering. Under her leadership the college has significantly increased the number of students studying abroad, established new models of study abroad including co-op and research abroad and established meaningful connection for research and attraction of funded international graduate students