Paper ID #12589An Assessment Tool to Evaluate Student Learning of Engineering (Funda-mental)Dr. Tamara J Moore, Purdue University, West Lafayette Tamara J. Moore, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education and Director of STEM Integration in the INSPIRE Institute at Purdue University. Dr. Moore’s research is centered on the integration of STEM concepts in K-12 and postsecondary classrooms in order to help students make connections among the STEM disciplines and achieve deep understanding. Her work focuses on defining STEM integration and investigating its power for student learning.Dr. Siddika
Paper ID #12561Tensions in the Productivity in Design Task Tinkering - FundamentalMs. Gina M Quan, University of Maryland, College Park Gina Quan is a doctoral candidate in Physics Education Research at the University of Maryland, Col- lege Park. She graduated in 2012 with a B.A. in Physics from the University of California, Berkeley. Her research interests include understanding community and identity formation, unpacking students’ re- lationships to design, and cultivating institutional change. Ms. Quan is also a founding member of the Access Network, a research-practice community dedicated to fostering supportive
Paper ID #12857Teachers’ Use of Argumentation in the Development of Integrated STEMCurricula (Fundamental)Corey A Mathis, Purdue University, West Lafayette Corey Mathis is a Ph.D student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received her B.S. in biology and her M.E.D. in secondary education from Northern Arizona University and is a former high school science and technology teacher. Her research interest includes improving students learning of science and engineering through integrated STEM curricula.Emilie A. Siverling, Purdue University, West Lafayette Emilie A. Siverling is a Ph.D. Student in Engineering
Paper ID #13735Urban elementary school students’ reflective decision-making during formalengineering learning experiences (Fundamental)Dr. Kristen Bethke Wendell, University of Massachusetts BostonDr. Christopher George Wright, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Dr. Wright is an Assistant Professor of STEM Education in the Department of Theory & Practice in Teacher Education at the University of Tennessee.Dr. Patricia C Paugh, University of Massachusetts Boston Page 26.1636.1 c American Society for
members,has to establish her social position with the group in different ways; in this excerpt, sheholds the notecard that the teacher had given the students to write their ideas, and remindsher group members that she has an “idea already,” referring to the Egypt Wing idea. Inthis moment, she assumes a footing that aligns with expectations for their classroom Page 26.804.10projects (i.e., filling out the notecard), and positions herself to meet those expectations(classroom-oriented). Chico makes similar moves. When Colin is describing how Jamieand Claudia will hide in the Egypt Wing, Chico corrects his description of the coffin and“sarcophagus.” Colin’s
Design Process in a Collaborative Context (fundamental)Providing young learners a foundation in engineering design practices helps them aspire toaddress major challenges of the society and environment that they will face in the decades ahead,and to interest them in pursuing higher education in STEM fields. Such a foundation shouldinclude collaborative experiences because engineering practices are highly social andcommunication plays critical roles in design processes.1-5 In particular, communication amongteam members is a fundamental aspect of engineering design.6, 7 Yet, even undergraduatestudents often fail to recognize the inherently collaborative nature of engineering.8Preparing the next generation of engineers to meet the challenges and
between theparticipants falling into categories such as music (playing instruments, making songs), literature& poetry (reading novels, writing stories or poems), outdoor activities (running, walking,playing), and video games (playing). This finding strengthens the idea of individual diversity andhighlights the fact that diversity is broader than ethnic considerations13. Moreover, educatorsmay examine this information when determining engineering design challenges they believe arerelevant to their student population. Page 26.1014.4 During the interviews students were asked about their favorite activities to partake in, aswell as, their
Paper ID #13327Informal Pathways to Engineering: Middle-School-Aged Homeschool Stu-dents’ Experiences with Engineering (Fundamental)Tamecia R Jones, Purdue University, West Lafayette Tamecia Jones is currently a doctoral student in the Engineering Education department at Purdue Uni- versity with a research focus on K-12 engineering education, assessment, and informal and formal learn- ing environments. She is a graduate of Johns Hopkins and Stanford University. Originally trained as a biomedical engineer, she spent years in the middle school classroom, teaching math and science, and consulting with nonprofits, museums
Paper ID #13986How Fifth Grade Students Apply Data Analysis and Measurement in Engi-neering Design Challenges (Fundamental)Mr. Aran W Glancy, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Aran W. Glancy is a Ph.D. candidate in STEM Education with a focus on mathematics education at the University of Minnesota. Aran is currently working on supporting elementary and middle school teachers in integrating science and mathematics through engineering design. Additionally, he is investigating modeling within K-12 mathematics classrooms, and is also interested in enhancing mathematics education through the integration of science, engineering
Paper ID #13552Investigating Middle School Students’ Perceptions of Communication Chal-lenges in Collaborative Engineering Design Learning (fundamental)Dr. Michelle E Jordan , Arizona State University Michelle Jordan earned her PhD in Educational Psychology at the University of Texas at Austin, focusing her studies on learning, cognition, and motivation with an emphasis on classroom discourse. She joined the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University in 2010. Her interdisciplinary research draws on traditions in qualitative inquiry, sociolinguistics, complexity theories, and the learning sciences
undergraduate student in the School of Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering at Purdue University, West Lafayette. He plans on pursuing an M.S. in dynamics and control of astronautical systems, but is interested in engineering education research as well.Dr. Robin Adams, Purdue University, West Lafayette Page 26.846.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 High School Students’ Ability to Balance Benefits & Tradeoffs while Engineering Green Buildings (Fundamental) AbstractThe ability to balance benefits and tradeoffs is
, larger-scale, quantitative scientific studies. Brown4points out that criteria against which to measure success of interventions or guide iterations ineducational DBR should consist of development of traits which the school system is chargedwith teaching, e.g., problem solving, critical thinking, and reflective learning.In this paper, we test the hypothesis that the flexibility and hands-on nature of a roboticsplatform will support different audio, visual, verbal (read/write), and kinesthetic learningstyles,5,6 offering teachers more versatility within lesson plans while effectively teaching STEMconcepts to students. Despite a lack of agreement7 within the education research communityregarding categories or, in some cases, the existence of
interventions.Mr. Muhammad Faiz Shams, Museum of Science Muhammad Shams is a Research Associate who has been with the Museum of Science, Engineering is Elementary team for almost 2 years. He graduated from the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth with a Bachelors of Science in Mathematics. Prior to his time with EiE, Muhammad worked as an undergrad- uate researcher in the field of applied numerical analysis. Muhammad assists the team with quantitative analysis, paper writing, and database management.Jonathan D Hertel, EiE/Museum of Science Jonathan manages the Examining the Efficacy of Engineering is Elementary (E4) project (an NSF-funded study of the efficacy of the EiE curriculum), overseeing and organizing a research effort
before theproject, but used no gendered terms after the project, or included the term “she” when referringto engineers. For example, Sara described an engineer with the following words: I feel like she would try any material she thinks would work. She would also test it out a lot. She would write a lot of notes, so when other people look at her experiments or when she tries to show it to someone, she could show she did trial and error. And be like “This is why this is the best one I did, this is why I think it’s a better material to use.”Sara changed her perception of engineering as being male-oriented to a field were females arealso active participants. Her perception of engineering included activities where women
mathematics learning in the classroom. Currently, she leads all K-8 math, reading, science, and career exploration programs at MAEF. Ms. Dean is an experienced science educator having lead for years the development of informal curriculum and programs for the Science Centers in Alabama and Louisiana. She is highly experienced in curriculum development, writing, training and implementation. She has lead teacher development programs, as well as conducted pilot engineering design lessons in the classrooms. She works closely with STEM teachers in the 60,000 students Mobile County Public School System and has the reputation as a teacher leader and change agent. Her work with K-12 students, teachers and ed- ucation administrators
etc.) are being developed to provide schools with multiple module options.318-257-2319Example ModuleFigure 1 is the engineering design process graphic that guides studentsthrough each module. Annotated by each step in the process is a Because the school mascot is the medieval knights, the 7thsample of the STEM Discover Catapult module in which students build a graders have been asked to build trebuchets to throw prizes into the crowd at pep rallies and sporting events.trebuchet. Additionally, a creative writing opportunity is included (betweenSteps 5 and 6); students
physics/pre-engineeringcurriculum.NASA-Threads integrates fundamental science and mathematics courses taught with engineeringapplications and the appropriate use of technology into a physics/pre-engineering curriculumtargeting the junior/senior year of high school. The threads of this curriculum includeFundamentals, Technology, Communication, and NASA Applications. The fundamentals, whichare grouped into blocks of similar topics, provide the backbone of the educational experience.NASA applications are strategically introduced to provide timely, hands-on reinforcement offundamentals, and the progressive development of technical knowledge and skills.The rigorous curriculum is designed to guide students through a systems-level understanding ofreal
tutorial covering programming and building the kit [7]. The followingFigure 2: Robot with whiskers installed at describes the weekly assignments and provides a the end of week 2. summary of the final projects. Schedule Week 1: Brains and Brawn. The first week is spent on the fundamental aspects of programming (Brains) and building the robot (Brawn). Students construct the robot and write a program for the robot to traverse a predetermined route. Students also do some circuit building with LEDs and resistors connected to Arduino outputs to provide signals
taken by asking the students to write down one item about gravitationthat they remember from the formal instruction and one question they have remaining aboutgravitation. For the items remembered, the assigned Bloom’s category corresponds to the levelof question for which the answer would suffice. For the students’ remaining questions, theBloom’s categories were assigned as usual as if they were assessment questions by an instructor.Although there were fundamental and obvious misconceptions about the topic in several of theresponses, a category was assigned assuming there was no misconception present. Bloom’s taxonomy is a categorization of levels of learning. Learning at higher levelswithin the taxonomy is predicated on the knowledge or
Engineering Coach at Douglas L. Jamerson, Jr. Elementary School Center for Mathematics and Engineering. She earned a B.A. in Elementary Education and a M.Ed. in Educational Leadership from the University of South Florida. Her experiences include over 23 years in early childhood classrooms and seven years as a teacher resource and trainer. Robin has curriculum writing experience, including a nationally published teacher resource book integrating science and literature with other areas of the curriculum.Chuck Parsons, Douglas L. Jamerson Jr. Elementary School CHARLES PARSONS is the Science Coach at Douglas L. Jamerson, Jr. Elementary School Center for Mathematics and Engineering. He earned a B.A. in
context.As part of the high-school outreach effort within our Electrical and Computer Engineeringdepartment, we have developed a guided-inquiry exercise which is designed to enhance theunderstanding of these two fundamental laws. This hands-on exercise enables high-schoolstudents to discover through their own efforts the essential ideas behind these laws. At the sametime, the students gain a greater appreciation for the role of engineers in society by workingthrough the steps to solve a simple design problem.In order to share this exercise with as many students and teachers as possible we have begun topresent this as a workshop to high-school teachers at regional conferences of science teachers.The primary purpose of this paper is to fully describe
AMES evolved from a variety of reasons. Initial discussion andresearch led the developers to believe that a need for high school students to be fluent in specificmathematic concepts directly connected to engineering and science existed. Beyond the desire toimprove student’s grasp of the material, the new Common Core State Standards (CCSS)necessitated a curriculum that assisted teachers in executing these standards, primarilymathematical ones but also touching on language arts.The curriculum itself contains four major threads: Coordinate Systems; Vectors and Matrices;Fundamentals of Mathematics; and Conic Sections. Within each thread, a variety of units areincluded. For each unit, the outline is as follows: introductory activity/background
electrical current, resistance and voltage. As Ohm’s law is introduced, multimeters are used to measure voltage and current in simple circuits constructed on the breadboard of the Boe-Bot. Students then build circuits containing LEDs, and they write BASIC computer programs causing the LEDs to blink with specified timings. Students then extend their skills to develop a countdown timer that utilizes a seven-segment LED number display. Fundamentals continue to be taught in this active classroom environment as projects unfold.Additionally
, and embedded controller systems. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Wyoming and Colorado. He co-wrote with Dr. Daniel Pack “68HC12 Microprocessor: Theory and Application,” Prentice-Hall, 2002; “Embedded Systems Design and Applications with the 68HC12 and HS12,” Prentice-Hall, 2005; and “Microcontroller Fundamentals for Engineers and Scientists,” Morgan-Claypool Publishers, 2006. In 2004, Barrett was named “Wyoming Professor of the Year” by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.Jerry Hamann, University of Wyoming Jerry C. Hamann received the B.S. in Electrical Engineering with a Bioengineering Option from the University of Wyoming in 1984. He then worked
. Page 26.616.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Engineering Bait-and-Switch: K-12 Recruitment Strategies Meet University Curricula & CultureAbstractThis paper uses the metaphor of engineering bait-and-switch to characterize the misalignmentbetween educational approaches of major K-12 engineering initiatives and traditional higher-education engineering programs. We argue that this misalignment is the result of divergentunderlying educational logics. While K-12 engineering education is notably inclusive, “baiting”student interest with context-driven, open-ended problem solving, higher engineering education“switches” toward an exclusive, abstract fundamentals-first
fostered a significant conceptual change in relevant physics content areas.It must be pointed out that nearly all exiting physics education efforts (such as the publishedliterature 7-12) focus on improving students’ understanding of individual concepts, but notconcept pairs. A concept pair is a pair of physics concepts that are fundamentally different butclosely related. For example, linear acceleration and angular acceleration is a concept pair.Linear acceleration, in the units of m/s2, is used to quantify the change of linear velocity (m/s)with time. Angular acceleration, in the units of rad/s2, is used to quantify the change of angularvelocity (rad/s) with time. There exists a quantitative mathematical relationship between linear(tangential
and a then using a programmable robot. Collect the distance data.Materials: b#Computer with USB interface b#Robotics Invention System 2.0; Gearbot b#LEGO pieces to build the measuring wheelIntroduction: Distance is a fundamental concept that is part of nearly everyaspect of our universe. In fact, it is so common that you may hardlytake notice of its significance in your everyday life. For example, howfar is it from this end of the room to that end of the room? In otherwords, what is the distance between the two ends of the room? Thisexperiment will allow you to measure the distance using first simple methodand then using a robot.Procedure: How to measure the distance?1. Normally the distance is
AC 2007-1857: SUPPORTING MATH AND SCIENCE THROUGH ELEMENTARYENGINEERING IN ELEMENTARY EDUCATIONCharles Parsons, Douglas L. Jamerson, Jr. Elementary School CHARLES PARSONS is the Science Coach at Douglas L. Jamerson, Jr. Elementary School Center for Mathematics and Engineering. He earned a B.A. in Elementary Education from the University of South Florida. His experiences include over 30 years teaching in Kindergarten through fifth grade classrooms and 1 ½ years as a resource teacher. Chuck has curriculum writing experience and has presented at various state and national venues.Debbie O'Hare, Douglas L. Jamerson Jr. Elementary School DEBORAH O'HARE is a 4th and 5th grade teacher at Douglas L
Credit Courses Fundamental Knowledge and Skills Primary Middle Secondary Higher School School Education Education Figure 4—Compression in middle and secondary schools While this is occurring, and to make room for these courses in the secondary educationcurriculum, algebra and geometry, as well as some science, is being moved to the middle schoolcurriculum. As more is being put into a smaller period of time
rigor. Differentiation based upon participants’background and teaching licensure area or grade level should be implemented.Assertion 2The “Fundamentals of Engineering for Educators” course met its objectives.All but one of the course participants perceived the course as meeting all or some of thecourse objectives. Participants realized that this is an overview course and that depth isnot possible for all topics. Participants appreciated some of the guest presenters but Page 22.464.17noted that some seemed surprised or ill prepared to interact with engaged teachers.Participants had mixed reviews on the merits of guest presentations by