Conference Session

Ethical and Global Concerns

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Elizabeth A. Reddy, Colorado School of Mines; Stephen Campbell Rea, Colorado School of Mines; Qin Zhu, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

controlled exposure Infusion Ongoing engagement as part of Introduction of a new technical coursework substance into an entire system High Dedicated course on ethics Large exposure often used for often used to focus students’ conditions resistant to lower attention only on ethical issues doses or with patients in especially poor conditionAs Riley et al. explain, the lowest doses of ethics might be called “micro-insertions” intoengineering coursework. They often complement technical coursework and

Conference Session

Ethical and Global Concerns

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Alison Wood , Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Robert Martello, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

first institutions with a GCSP, and was the onlyschool to adopt the premise that all students would achieve the basic GCSP competencies simplyby completing the standard undergraduate curriculum. Since 2017, a new faculty GCSP directorhas embraced the opportunity to redesign Olin’s program to provide additional scaffolding forstudents to explicitly integrate the GCSP competencies, aspirations, and learning outcomesacross their educational experiences. Objectives of Olin’s GCSP redesign included helpingstudents articulate their personal and professional values, offering support for reflection on theirpast experiences with the intention of preparing for purpose-driven future work, and providingadditional opportunities to develop the multicultural

Conference Session

Ethical and Global Concerns

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Robert S. Emmett, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Homero Murzi, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Natasha B. Watts, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

careers, as engineering educators we must also concern ourselves with how studentslearn to see themselves in a global context. Students increasingly seek out short-term globalexperiences, with a majority of U.S. students now participating in programs less than 8 weeks induration [10], a trend that has sparked a corresponding focus in the international educationliterature. A short-term study abroad experience linked to a global engineering course at our owninstitution has become the fastest-growing and largest faculty-led program. Research on theRising Sophomore Abroad Program (RSAP) has accelerated in the last three years and informedcourse redesign. Rapid growth and ongoing assessment research has created an opportunity whencombined with new

Conference Session

Professional Formation and Career Experiences

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder; Jake Walker Lewis; Madeline Polmear, University of Florida; Daniel Knight, University of Colorado Boulder; Chris Swan, Tufts University

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

significant personal concern (34% of jobs); the second most common response was that theyhad never been confronted with an ethical or moral dilemma regarding how their work impactedpeople, society, and/or the environment. It seems unlikely that there were no ethical dimensionsto their work, but rather individuals were unaware of these issues, similar to the ethics unseentheme in [26]. This points to the importance of the first step in the ethical decision makingprocess of recognizing an ethical dilemma [14]. In academic courses, this step is often trivializedsince students are told to conduct an ethical analysis of a case study. An alternative explanationas to why the survey respondents indicated that they had never been confronted with an

Conference Session

Communicating Across Cultural and Epistemological Boundaries

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto; Doug Reeve P.Eng., University of Toronto; Robin Sacks, University of Toronto; Mike Klassen, University of Toronto

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

loads when it comes to supporting social justice, inclusion and equityin their respective workplaces. Because the voices of engineers swimming against the current ofmainstream engineering culture can be difficult to detect, we have chosen to highlight theirstruggles in this paper. First, we address the communication disconnect between equity-mindedengineers and their colleagues; second, we identify structural barriers faced by junior engineersattempting to interrupt social inequities from positions of limited organizational influence; andthird, we share the concern expressed by many participants that raising equity issues would resultin personal attacks rather than positive social change. All of the names we use to identify peopleand

Conference Session

Reflective & Critical Pedagogies

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joe Tranquillo, Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

Claypool biomedical engineering book series. Joe is the author of three undergraduate textbooks. His work has been featured on the Discovery Channel, TEDx, US News and World Report, and CNN Health. He has won the national ASEE BED Teaching Award, Bucknell’s Pres- idential Teaching Award, and is currently a National Academy of Engineering Frontiers of Engineering Education Fellow and an NSF Pathways to Innovation Faculty Fellow. When not working Joe enjoys improvisational dance and music, running trail marathons, backpacking, brewing Belgian beers and most of all enjoying time with his children and wife. Page

Conference Session

Embedding Sociotechnical Systems Thinking I

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Natasha A. Andrade, University of Maryland, College Park; David Tomblin, University of Maryland, College Park

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

goal more clearly. However, the lack of social referencesis of concern and reinforced that social issues should be more intentionally and explicitlyaddressed in the course. These results, in part, led to the subsequent class activities.Activity 2 - Installation of a New Wind Energy Farm in the State of New York The main goals of this activity was to introduce the term “stakeholder” as language thatwould be used in future classes and to increase students’ awareness of the diversity ofstakeholders impacted by a technology. The instructor collected and assessed 17 groupworksheets for this activity. Students were asked four questions; however, we only focus here onone of the questions: “Choose a stakeholder (that was not easily identified

Conference Session

Social Responsibility and Social Justice I: Pedagogical Perspectives

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ricky T. Castles, East Carolina University

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

and analyze data. Students were thus able to “interact in training exercises with scholars from other disciplines.” 12. Through several activities inside and outside of class, students were encouraged to “attend scholarly presentations by members of other disciplines.” 13. While some groups had some issues with group dynamics and combative personalities and egos, the students began to learn how to “collaborate respectfully and equitably with scholars from other disciplines to develop interdisciplinary research frameworks.” Concerns noted on peer evaluations were addressed during team meetings. 14. The various deliverables throughout the course including the final course

Conference Session

Critical Thinking, Leadership, and Creativity

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael L. Jones, Faculty of Information, University of Toronto

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

24.871.11knowing organization[7]?   10   FSAE teams enter their car in competition against similar teams facing similarcontradictions (a potential quarternary contradiction among competing activity modelsand objectives). This competitive environment may lead to direct competition (e.g.,deliberately keeping some research private and confidential) but may also engenderopportunities for cooperation (e.g., sharing best practices, joint research and developmentefforts, supporting new teams with startup concerns, etc.) How do FSAE teams engagetheir competitive teams? The questions noted above have no specific “right” answer, as their effectiveresolution depends on

Conference Session

Critical Thinking, Leadership, and Creativity

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kacey Beddoes, Oregon State University; Corey M. Schimpf, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

the website http://feministengineering.org/. She can be contacted by email at apawley@purdue.edu. Page 24.934.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 New Metaphors for New Understandings: Ontological Questions about Developing Grounded Theories in Engineering EducationAbstract: Engineering education scholars have demonstrated an interest in broadening the scopeof the field in multiple ways, including issues addressed and approaches employed. Thesescholars have argued the need to broaden the epistemological and methodological

Conference Session

Revealing the Invisible: Engineering Course Activities that Address Privilege, -Isms, and Power Relations (Interactive Session)

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joel Alejandro Mejia, University of San Diego; Diana A. Chen, University of San Diego; Odesma Onika Dalrymple, University of San Diego; Susan M Lord, University of San Diego

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity, Faculty Development Constituency Committee

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education, International, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Minorities in Engineering

inclusion: Women and minorities in engineering, Handbook of Engineering Education Research ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, Ch. 17, 2014.[2] A. L. Pawley, "Universalized narratives: Patterns in how faculty members define “engineering”," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, pp. 309-319, 2009.[3] D. Riley, "Employing liberative pedagogies in engineering education," Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 137-158, 2003.[4] D. Riley, "Engineering and social justice," Synthesis Lectures on Engineers, Technology, and Society, vol. 3, pp. 1-152, 2008.[5] ABET. (2017, February 04). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs 2016-2017. Available

Conference Session

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Erin A. Cech, University of Michigan; Heidi M Sherick, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

of inequality; gender, sexual identity and racial/ethnic inequality in science and engineering; and cultural definitions of ”good work” and ”good workers.”Dr. Heidi Marie Sherick, University of Michigan Dr. Heidi Sherick has worked in higher education for over 25 years. Currently, Heidi is the Faculty Devel- opment and Leadership Specialist in the College of Engineering and the Medical School at the University of Michigan. Her primary role is to design and initiate a suite of professional leadership development ac- tivities and coaching, mentoring, and sponsoring strategies for faculty. She provides one-on-one coaching for faculty in new executive leadership roles and for Associate level faculty in Engineering

Conference Session

Advances in Communication Instruction

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech; Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech; Andrea M. Motto, Virginia Tech ; Kelly J. Cross, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

identified communication-based assignments in their own courses (e.g.reports and presentations). That is, while a small number of faculty participants did not includeassignments that they considered communication-related several claiming to not to teachcommunication explicitly still required communication artifacts or deliverables. The prominenceof communication among the faculty interviewed is reinforced by the low number of interviewparticipants who did not consider communication a matter of concern; only 3 of the 50interviewees did not consider it part of the curriculum.These results suggest important opportunities for dialogue and collaboration among engineeringfaculty within a department and between engineering faculty and technical

Conference Session

Restructuring/Rethinking STEM

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicola Sochacka, University of Georgia; Kelly Woodall Guyotte, University of Georgia; Joachim Walther, University of Georgia; Nadia N. Kellam, University of Georgia

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

interpretive research quality. Dr. Sochacka is also an active member of the Southern Region’s Water Policy and Economics (WPE) team where she lends a qualitative research perspective to ongoing projects concerning public attitudes, opinions and be- haviors regarding various water issues across the South East. In the instructional context, Dr. Sochacka’s two main interests focus on integrating the arts into undergraduate and graduate engineering education and the economics of sustainable development.Mrs. Kelly Woodall Guyotte, University of GeorgiaDr. Joachim Walther, University of Georgia Dr. Walther is an assistant professor of engineering education research at the University of Georgia (UGA). He is one of the leaders of

Conference Session

Institutional Perspectives and Boundary Work

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Donna M Riley, Smith College; Victoria Henry, Smith College; Lucia C Leighton, Smith College

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

main purpose of the survey was to discover what makes Engineering educators want toadopt new methods of teaching, specifically Engineering Education methods. We were interestedin how rewards structures, both tenure and promotion and other types of monetary rewards ornon-monetary recognition, influence the adoption of novel teaching methods. We were alsointerested in measuring the potential impact of institution type, faculty attitudes towardinnovation, faculty rank, and familiarity with the engineering education field.The survey was developed based on a literature review of factors affecting innovation in highereducation and in engineering education, with the Spalter-Roth7 report being the mostcomprehensive. The survey is original to this

Conference Session

Sociotechnical Thinking II: Interpretation, Curricular Practices, and Structural Change

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jenifer Blacklock, University of Colorado - Boulder; Kathryn Johnson, Colorado School of Mines; Randy Cook, Colorado School of Mines; Natalie Ann Plata; Stephanie Claussen, San Francisco State University

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

their own futures asengineering practitioners [7]. A key element of our research is that new concepts are thereforeneeded to help engineering students develop sociotechnical thinking, or the ability to identify,address, and account for “the interplay between relevant social and technical factors in theproblem to be solved” [8] (p. 1). For a more in-depth motivation of the need for sociotechnicalintegration in engineering education, we refer readers to [8].Developing engineering courses that address sociotechnical thinking can be challenging,especially for faculty who were themselves trained in more traditional, technically-focusedcurricula. Some faculty within the U.S. have integrated sociotechnical thinking or similarconcepts within their

Conference Session

'Diversity' and Inclusion? Pedagogy, Experiences, Language and Performative Action

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jenn Stroud Rossmann, Lafayette College; Mary A. Armstrong, Lafayette College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

Paper ID #32377”A New Way of Seeing”: Engagement With Women’s and Gender StudiesFosters Engineering Identity FormationDr. Jenn Stroud Rossmann, Lafayette College Jenn Stroud Rossmann is Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Co-Director of the Hanson Center for Inclusive STEM Education at Lafayette College. She earned her BS in mechanical engineering and the PhD in applied physics from the University of California, Berkeley. Prior to joining Lafayette, she was a faculty member at Harvey Mudd College. Her scholarly interests include the fluid dynamics of blood in vessels affected by atherosclerosis and aneurysm, the cultural

Conference Session

Social Responsibility and Social Justice II: From Classroom to Community

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Donna M. Riley, Virginia Tech; Janice L. Hall, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

opposition to Act 9 as school boards across the state felt that Act 9 wasintentionally aimed at addressing issues that primarily affected Orleans Parish, thus they wereunconcerned.16 However there was strong opposition from residents of New Orleans, themembers of the OPSD and the United Teachers of New Orleans (UTNO). 16 Those in oppositionto Act 9 were concerned that educators would lose their protection under collective bargainingand that state takeover would lead to privatization of public education. 16The criteria for state takeover were based on student academic performance, attendance, dropoutrates and graduation index which accumulated to the School Performance Score (SPS). Theperformance label assigned to schools was based on SPS and schools

Conference Session

Imagining and Reimagining Engineering Education as a Dynamic System

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janet Y. Tsai, University of Colorado, Boulder; Kevin O'Connor, University of Colorado, Boulder; Beth A. Myers, University of Colorado Boulder; Jacquelyn F. Sullivan, University of Colorado, Boulder; Derek T. Reamon, University of Colorado, Boulder; Kenneth M. Anderson, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

, and technology to include new forms of communication and problem solving for emerging grand challenges. A second vein of Janet’s research seeks to identify the social and cultural impacts of technological choices made by engineers in the process of designing and creating new devices and systems. Her work considers the intentional and unintentional consequences of durable struc- tures, products, architectures, and standards in engineering education, to pinpoint areas for transformative change.Kevin O’Connor, University of Colorado, Boulder Kevin O’Connor is assistant professor of Educational Psychology and Learning Sciences at the University of Colorado Boulder. His scholarship focuses on human action, communication

Conference Session

Imagining Others, Defining Self Through Consideration of Ethical and Social Implications

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathan E. Canney, CYS Structural Engineers Inc.

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

-based rather than an asset-based perspective. The second part of thisstudy (this paper) focuses on interviews with engineering students, faculty and professionalsfocused on understanding and defining their imaginaries of “the public.” The third part of thisstudy will focus on interviews with members of “mobilized publics” 11, people who have beeninvolved in social struggles that included engineers as advocates, opposition or both. Communitymembers who were involved in the Flint, Michigan water contamination case, the Washington,DC water contamination case and various environmental contamination cases around Buffalo,New York were interviewed about their views of the relationship between engineers and “thepublic.” The following sections detail

Conference Session

Integration of Liberal Education into Engineering

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

K.L. Jordan, Michigan Technological University; Anahita Pakzad, Michigan Technological University; Renee Oats, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

preparation9.In general, faculty are satisfied with internet-based learning, and students are successfullearning online1. Incidentally, the quality of engineers being produced by way of internet-based learning can be improved through collaboration between institutions and industry1.In terms of students’ expectations of what they should be able to produce on homeworkand exams, if instructors provide clear definitions of course objectives and expectedoutcomes, students should be able to meet those objectives regardless of their learningenvironment3. Page 22.642.3Equally important are the issues of cyber ethics and plagiarism. Plagiarism occurs oftenin the

Conference Session

Learning Outcomes and Pedagogical Strategies: Problems of Alignment

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Madeline Polmear, University of Colorado, Boulder; Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder; Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder; Nathan E. Canney, CYS Structural Engineers Inc.; Chris Swan, Tufts University

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

-Sustained, repeated exposure teach ESI increases ethical awareness and -Need widespread faculty recognition [16] support to integrate -Demonstrates the relevance of ethics cohesively to engineering [3] -Limited time to discuss -Contextualizes ESI [7] background of relevant -Engages and empowers engineering issues [16] faculty to be involved in teaching ESI -Lack depth and continuity [17] [3] -Supported by moral development

Conference Session

Socially Responsible Engineering II: Pedagogy, Teamwork, and Student Experiences

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Larkin Martini, Colorado School of Mines; Jordyn MacKenzie Helfrich, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

learn and experience. Similar discrepancies between faculty andstudents have been seen in previous studies of engineering ethics education [6]. In this paper we ask: 1) What methods do teachers choose to use most often in teaching CSR? 2) What methods are most clearly recognized by students and in what courses? 3) Given student and faculty concerns, what are previous pedagogical methods from ethics literature that may be most effective for teaching CSR? CSR is a broad term encompassing the many ways that corporations attempt to accommodate theneed for maximizing profit and taking into account the needs and wellbeing of the community andenvironment [1]. CSR can be used as a method for teaching macroethics to engineering

Conference Session

Creative and Cross-disciplinary Methods Part II

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Justin L Hess, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jessica Erin Sprowl; Rui Pan, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Melissa Dyehouse, Purdue University; Carrie A. Wachter Morris, Purdue University; Johannes Strobel, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

howto bring them to a point where they can understand…” (FG1)One participant, a faculty and engineering academic advisor, discussed the presence of empathyin a situation involving another professor and a student. The student was struggling academicallydue to medical issues that were beyond the student’s control, and according to the participant, theempathy was present here in the professor’s decision to not take the traditional path of mostengineering educators who believe that “academics and life is separate and it doesn’t matter whatthe reason is that [the student] can’t get then work done”. The participant continues, “Theimpetus was the feelings of empathy but the professor wanted to follow through with it andbringing the student to me for

Conference Session

Undergraduate Peer Educators: Mentoring, Observing, Learning

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; Catherine Anne Hubka, University of New Mexico; Eva Chi, University of New Mexico

Tagged Topics

ASEE Board of Directors

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

. Troy, R. R. Essig, B. K. Jesiek, J. Boyd, and N. M. Trellinger, "Writing to Learn Engineering: Identifying Effective Techniques for the Integration of Written Communication into Engineering Classes and Curricula (NSF RIGEE project)," presented at the ASEE, Indianapolis, Indiana, 2014.[17] M. R. Kuhn and K. Vaught ‐ Alexander, "Context for Writing in Engineering Curriculum," Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 120, pp. 392-400, 1994.[18] N. M. Trellinger, B. K. Jesiek, C. Troy, J. Boyd, and R. R. Essig, "Engineering Faculty on Writing: What They Think and What They Want," New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016.[19] N. B. Barr, "Extending WID to Train Mechanical Engineering

Conference Session

Teaching Communication I

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ronald S Harichandran, University of New Haven; David J Adams, Technical Communications Consultant; Michael A. Collura, University of New Haven; Nadiye O. Erdil, University of New Haven; W. David Harding, University of New Haven; Jean Nocito-Gobel, University of New Haven; Amy Thompson, University of New Haven

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

Paper ID #8570An Integrated Approach to Developing Technical Communication Skills inEngineering StudentsProf. Ronald S Harichandran, University of New Haven Ron Harichandran is the Dean of the Tagliatela College of Engineering at the University of New Haven. He leads the Project to Integrate Technical Communication Habits and implemented a similar program in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Michigan State University when he was the chair there. Dr. Harichandran received his BE in Civil Engineering from the University of Canterbury, New Zealand, and his MS and PhD from MIT. He was a faculty member

Conference Session

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division Technical Session 9

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cheryl Q. Li, University of New Haven; Judy Randi, University of New Haven; Jenna Pack Sheffield, University of New Haven

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

, she resigned from her faculty job and came to Connecticut for family reunion. Throughout her academic career in Australia and Sin- gapore, she had developed a very strong interest in learning psychology and educational measurement. She then opted for a second Ph.D. in educational psychology, specialized in measurement, evaluation and assessment at University of Connecticut. She earned her second Ph.D. in 2010. Li has a unique cross- disciplinary educational and research background in mechatronics engineering, specialized in control and robotics, and educational psychology, specialized in statistical analysis and program evaluation.Dr. Judy Randi, University of New Haven Judy Randi, Ed.D. is Professor of Education

Conference Session

Maps, Metaphors, Tweets, and Drafts

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Judy Randi, University of New Haven; Ronald S. Harichandran, University of New Haven; Joseph A. Levert P.E., University of New Haven; Bijan Karimi, University of New Haven

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

thestudents’ sponsors may review their work and proposals, the students’ final grade is determinedsolely by the faculty. Another issue is the confidential nature of some of the industry-sponsoredprojects. In some cases, teams will develop products or processes that may ultimately bepatented. The present study provided an opportunity to address this issue with students. Forexample, some teams were using unsecured cloud-based applications for collaborativeauthorship and communication about project activities. Some of these applications were free tothe students, but the hosting firm’s policies noted that all content uploaded by the students wasowned by the hosting firm. Teams, especially those working on innovative industry-sponsoredprojects, were

Conference Session

Community-Engaged Engineering Education Challenges and Opportunities in Light of COVID-19 Paper Presentations 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Camille Velarde, University of New Mexico; Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; Estike Kokovay Gutierrez

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division, Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

and goals and creating programming that is culturally situated and relevant increasing the potential for long term sustainability. D on the community. This project aims to address educational deficits. These educational deficits are identified through educational outcome data not driven by the community. These programs are aimed at addressing the educational shortcomings of the community as it compares to other communities. Community was not involved in prioritizing data driven educational deficits as a primary issue of community concern. Historical and social contexts have not been understood and the community voice3 is not present. This

Conference Session

Research on Diversification & Inclusion

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Brewer, University of Georgia; Nicola Sochacka, University of Georgia; Joachim Walther, University of Georgia

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, New Engineering Educators, Student, Women in Engineering

‘tell’ about engineering but, rather, their relationship to the dominant,counter-, and nonstories we identified in our prior analysis of the public discourse [12]. That said,we are acutely aware that the anecdotes and analyses below do concern real people. In order toapproach this aspect of the study in an ethical manner and minimize any risks to thoseindividuals discussed in this paper, Nicki, Jo, and/or Michael have shared this paper with therelevant parties, collaboratively addressed any issues of concern (see above), and soughtpermission for it to be presented at the ASEE conference and published in the proceedings.Structure of the remaining paperThe remaining parts of this paper are structured as follows. First, Michael introduces