, predominantly rural state could attend.Since I instructed several courses in the program, I taught the same students several times indifferent courses. For a period of about 2 and 1/2 years, I saw Cooper frequently—whether hewas attending class or studying in the classroom building before class.As the researcher, I credit my own previous experiences—as a service academy graduate, a U.S.Army veteran, and a returning veteran graduate student in mechanical engineering— for thedesire to exploring SVSM experience in engineering education, not just qualitatively, but alsorelationally. Using the relational, transactional methodology of NI, I came alongside Cooperwithin the context of a two-year, undergraduate engineering transfer program, to examine
Paper ID #30666A Systems Engineering Approach to Mentorship Program for Online Mili-taryand Veteran Engineering StudentsDr. Reza Rahdar, Embry Riddle Aeronautical University Dr. Reza Rahdar, currently a full time faculty of the College of Aeronautics, have over 25 years of expe- rience in systems design/development, and engineering systems that include telecommunication systems and networks, Radio communications, air defenses systems, avionics systems, and Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS). Dr. Rahdar developed proficiency with systems engineering principles, pro- cess, and practices. He is an expert in taking
Paper ID #18054A STEM Mentorship Program to Improve Veteran Student Efficacy at Geor-gia Southern University - Year 1Dr. Keith A. Landry, Georgia Southern University Keith Landry, PhD, PE, F.ASCE Colonel (Retired), US Army Assistant Dean for Research Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering College of Engineering & IT Civil Engineering & Construction Management Department Georgia South- ern University Statesboro, GADr. N. Mike Jackson, Georgia Southern University Dr. Jackson is an experienced Engineering Administrator, Educator, and Researcher. He has completed over $5M in externally funded research and has
technology policy. In particular, his research has recently focused on cybersecurity topics including intrusion detection and forensics, robotic command and control, aerospace command and 3D printing quality assurance. Straub is a member of Sigma Xi, SPIE, the AIAA and several other technical societies, he has also served as a track or session chair for numerous conferences. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Development of Military Friendly Cybersecurity Courses and ProgramsAbstractThe North Dakota State University (NDSU) developed a military-friendly cybersecurity graduatecertificate program, options as part of Computer Science and Software
Innovative Education, vol. 4, pp. 215-235, 2006.[5] N. Fortenberry, "Transitioning Veterans to Engineering-Related Careers: Next Steps," M. Matthews, Ed., ed. Washington D.C.: American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), 2014.[6] B. McDonald, "Benefits for Veterans Education " in Veterans Benefits Association, U. S. D. o. V. Affairs, Ed., ed. Washington D.C., 2016, pp. 1-16.[7] B. Kelly. (2016) Best Online Graduate Engineering Programs. U.S. News & World Report.[8] M. Kilduff, R. Angelmar, and A. Mehra, "Top Management-Team Diversity and Firm Performance: Examining the Role of Cognitions," Organization Science, vol. 11, pp. 21-34, 2000.[9] L. H. Pelled, "Demographic Diversity, Conflict, and Work Group
Peter Tkacik is an Professor of mechanical engineering within the motorsports focus area. His largest area of research is in the engagement of military veterans and early career engineering college students through hands-on learning activities and exciting visual and experiential research programs. Other research activi- ties are related to the details of the visual and experiential programs and relate to hypersonics, tire testing, color-Schlieren shock and compressible flow imaging, and flows around multiple bodies in tandem.Dr. Jerry Lynn Dahlberg Jr, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Jerry Dahlberg is an Assistant Teaching Professor and Chair of the College of Engineering Senior Design Committee at the
specificspecialty. Much of this training receives college level credit recommendations by the American Councilon Education (ACE) [2]. They also have all the educational benefits afforded to other members of theservices. For these reasons, warrant officers make great candidates for technical programs accredited bythe Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET).The Engineering Technology Accreditation Commission (ETAC) of ABET, Criterion 5, requirestechnical, professional and general education courses. A core of technology coursework for accreditationis required which, in addition to other obligations, must include [3]: 1. Integral and differential calculus, or other mathematics above the level of algebra and
, Mr. Kosteczko spent over 10 years working in the shipbuilding, ship repair, and maritime industry as a Project, Contract, and Program Manager. He also spent over 8 years on active duty as a US Navy Surface Warfare Officer and 3 years in the reserves. At ODU, Mr. Kosteczko supports the Director of Digital Shipbuilding Enterprise in developing programs and strategies to develop Indus- try 4.0 curriculum, upscale industry workforce and develop a center of excellence in shipbuilding and ship repair. Mr. Kosteczko’s research interest include topics concerning marine transportation and ma- rine engineering, shipbuilding and ship repair, advanced manufacturing, workforce development, veteran transitions, and maritime
nurturedtheir interest in STEM careers.13 However, an SVA survey found that only 8% of studentveterans are pursuing engineering degrees.6 This situation may be the result of several factors.Military recruits may not be informed about a rewarding career path that can build on theirmilitary experiences and allow them to continue to contribute to our country. Veteransthemselves may not perceive the engineering pathway as a good match for their military-relatedexperience, although Zoli et al. found that 43 percent of service members indicated that theirmilitary training, specialization, or job, was STEM-related.13 This same study also indicated thatmilitary personnel often did not have the requisite basic knowledge of STEM degree programs tobe able to
Paper ID #18572Veteran Students in Engineering Leadership RolesDr. Robert J. Rabb P.E., The Citadel Robert Rabb is an associate professor and the Mechanical Engineering Program Director at The Citadel. He previously taught mechanical engineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point. He received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the United States Military Academy and his M.S.E. and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin. His research and teaching interests are in mechatronics, regenerative power, and multidisciplinary engineering.Dr. Kevin C Bower P.E., The Citadel Dr
number of desired goals.These goals include attracting veterans as students to East Carolina University (ECU), increasingthe veteran population within engineering, easing the transition from the structured militaryatmosphere to the freedom associated with the collegiate environment, and ensuring the successof veteran students both during school and after graduation. Anecdotally, veteran students havebeen strong contributors to the engineering program. The students excel in both classroom andextracurricular activities, including participating in undergraduate research experiences. Gaininga deeper understanding of the characteristics of the veteran population within the engineeringdepartment, as well as the ECU’s veteran population at large, will
EngineeringAbstractDespite considerable gains made towards increasing students’ interest in STEM education, onespecific population, Veterans in engineering, suffers from disproportionally high attrition. Socialresponsibility is a motivating factor for becoming an engineer and has been identified as asuccessful intervention strategy to improve retention of first-year engineering students. Socialresponsibility is also a core value instilled by all branches of the U.S. military while activelyserving. Therefore, the objective of this research study was to examine Veterans’ perceptions ofsocial responsibility related to engineering. For this study, a survey instrument was designed,piloted, revised, and launched for instrument validation and exploratory examination of
Paper ID #22149Using Veterans’ Technical Skills in an Engineering LaboratoryDr. Noah Salzman, Boise State University Noah Salzman is an Assistant Professor at Boise State University, where he is a member of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department and IDoTeach, a pre-service STEM teacher preparation program. His work focuses on the transition from pre-college to university engineering programs, how exposure to engineering prior to matriculation affects the experiences of engineering students, and engineering in the K-12 classroom. He has worked as a high school science, mathematics, and engineering and
‘military engineering ethics.’Engineering education interfaces with the military in three key ways: (1) students being educatedto become commissioned military officers at U.S. service academies and other institutions viaROTC programs, who are majoring in engineering; (2) military veterans as ‘non-traditionalstudents’ earning engineering degrees; and (3) engineering students who will work on defenseand/or military-related technology. Key facets of these three groups are discussed below.The U.S. government’s service academies all award engineering degrees. As well, ROTCprograms are present at “over 1700 college and universities” [23]. Thus, a number of engineeringstudents are simultaneously receiving formal education for two professions. “Doctors
online engineering master’s programs enable students to receivetheir degrees 100% online [3].From the landmark study by C.A. Cate (2014) "Million Records Project: Research from StudentVeterans of America" [4], active duty personnel who are also students typically jugglecompeting responsibilities and may be forced to place their academics on hold while on fieldassignments, recovering from injuries, or performing other service-related commitments. Thepost-9/11 GI Bill has had unequivocal economic and quality of life impacts on the US marketand beyond. 36% of veterans that earn a two year degree online, go on to successfully earnadvanced degrees [4]. 64% of active duty members who initially enroll in online collegeprograms, graduate, and 51% of
Education.Dr. Anthony W Dean, Old Dominion University Dr. Anthony W. Dean has had several roles in academia. His previous appointments include Associate Professor of Engineering Technology and as Associate Director of the Institute for Ship Repair, Mainte- nance, and Operations at Old Dominion University (ODU). He is currently on assignment with the Office of the Dean for Sponsored Programs and the Engineering Fundamentals Department, Batten College of Engineering and Technology (BCET) at ODU. His research has focused mostly on control systems (in- tegration and testing) and the reliability and maintainability of complex systems. He has been selected as both a NASA and an ONR Faculty Fellow. He regularly teaches courses in
Paper ID #25720Supporting Regional Engineering Demand by Effective Transition of Veter-ans on CampusDr. Robert J. Rabb P.E., The Citadel Robert Rabb is an associate professor and the Mechanical Engineering Program Director at The Citadel. He previously taught mechanical engineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point. He received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the United States Military Academy and his M.S.E. and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin. His research and teaching interests are in mechatronics, regenerative power, and multidisciplinary engineering.Dr
recent research focuses on student veterans’ civilian transition experiences through higher education.Dr. Peter Thomas Tkacik, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Peter Tkacik is a Professor of mechanical engineering within the motorsports focus area. His largest area of research is in the engagement of military veteran engineering college students through hands-on learning activities and exciting visual and experiential research programs. Other research activities are related to the details of the visual and experiential programs and relate to race car aerodynamics, vehicle dynamics, color-Schlieren shock and compressible flow imaging, and flows around multiple bodies in tandem.Dr. Jerry Lynn Dahlberg Jr
contributing author to several books published by Oxford University Press, University of California Press, and Springer.Dr. Peter Thomas Tkacik, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Peter Tkacik is a Professor of mechanical engineering within the motorsports focus area. His largest area of research is in the engagement of student veterans through hands-on learning activities and exciting vi- sual and experiential research programs. Other research activities are related to the details of the visual and experiential programs and relate to aerodynamics, vehicle dynamics, tire dynamics, and color-Schlieren shock and compressible flow imaging. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020
., The Citadel Robert Rabb is an associate professor and the Mechanical Engineering Program Director at The Citadel. He previously taught mechanical engineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point. He received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the United States Military Academy and his M.S.E. and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin. His research and teaching interests are in mechatronics, regenerative power, and multidisciplinary engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Student Veteran Leadership Skills in an Engineering Technical Writing CourseTechnical proficiency is a
result in “greater loyalty and commitment toone’s education as well as one’s affiliated academic institution” [1, p. 3], it is essential to betterunderstand how university personnel perceive their duties as related to student veterans.Student Veterans in EngineeringRecent research suggests that students who have military experience are a good match forengineering programs of study [24]. In particular, student veterans’ high level of maturity andmotivation and their unique military experiences are relevant to engineering education. Manystudent veterans have had military-related leadership experiences, which strengthen theirpotential for success in engineering studies, including the teamwork that is often required.Between August 2009 and December
Paper ID #29167The Engineering Education Experiences of Students Serving in theReserves or National GuardDr. Catherine Mobley, Clemson University Catherine Mobley, Ph.D., is a Professor of Sociology at Clemson University. She has over 30 years experience in project and program evaluation and has worked for a variety of consulting firms, non-profit agencies, and government organizations, including the Rand Corporation, the American Association of Retired Persons, the U.S. Department of Education, and the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. Since 2004, she been a member of the NSF-funded MIDFIELD research project on
specialty (MOS) and their decision to pursue anengineering degree program; (2) the participants’ military experiences served to support theiracademic experiences in engineering; (3) the participants do not directly indicate that genderidentity is particularly salient to their military experience or in engineering; however, theirnarratives illuminate how they conceptualize engineering identity as central to their experiences;and (4) although participants did not indicate that gender was central to their identities andexperiences, nearly all of them discussed relational elements, including the significance ofrelationships and caregiving to their educational experiences. That is, family roles (e.g.,daughter, wife, sister) were central to their
Persis- tent Operations (HIPPO) II program and for the development of the DoD’s automated site planning tool, Explosives Safety Siting Software. Dr. Oesterle received his Ph.D. in Structural Engineering from the University of California, San Diego in 2009. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Leveraging DOD Relationships and Interests to Improve Undergraduate Education and Enhance the Structural Engineering Profession1. Abstract Department of Defense (DOD) organizations such as the Naval Facilities EngineeringCommand (NAVFAC), the Air Force Civil Engineering Center, and the US Army Corps
representatives residing on-site atinstitutions provide “educational assistance and support,” and help student veterans navigateeducational benefits, such as the Montgomery GI Bill, and Post-9/11 GI Bill.Academic Preparedness. How prepared are our SVEs for engineering programs? There wereseveral questions and comments related to this theme. More specifically, are SVEs ready for themath that is required for engineering? One person within the session quoted a student veteran assaying, “proficiency in math is a perishable commodity.” More broadly, one session participantclaimed that some SVEs “have forgotten how to study; do homework.” Another participant notedthat SVEs might have different expectations for their college experiences than what they
where they are encouraged to pursue arating in the nuclear field [12, p. 61]. Navy “nukes” qualify for substantial enlistment bonusesand relatively rapid promotion if they successfully complete the two years of training required[13]. The Seaman to Admiral (STA-21) program pays for an engineering degree (among others)for very highly qualified enlisted personnel who wish to become officers [14]. Marine Corpsrecruiters are ordered to present a career where “technical training, education, and other rewardsare available for those who work and desire to make their own way” [15, p. 1-6]. Marine Corpsrecruiters are not permitted to make promises related to incentives, promotions, bonuses,placement, or educational opportunities unless expressly
systems as a Visiting Researcher at Commonwealth Center for Advanced Manufacturing, Disputanta, VA. She has funded research in broadening participation efforts of underrepresented students in STEM funded by the U.S. Department of Education, focusing on computer science and cybersecurity pathways, and from the Office of Naval Research, focusing on mechatronic pathways. She is part of the ONR projects related to the additive manufacturing training of the active military. She is also part of the research team that has multiple projects funded from NSF focusing on veteran pathways and their success in engineering. She leads the team that delivers the summer program to nine graders that focus on broadening the participation
1969, combines the technical areas of “mechanical” and “electronic” [1-3]. Mechatronics refersto the integration of design, technologies, and work processes [1, 4]. Various community collegesare adding programs focused on this emerging area, mainly driven by industry requirements andtechnology changes [1]. As identified by the Employment and Training Administration within theUnited States Department of Labor, the main Mechatronics Technical Competencies are related tofour areas: Mechanical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Systems and ProcessControl Engineering, and Computer Science. There are different critical work functions related toeach one of these main areas [5]. Critical work functions of the overall job description
maintenance and problem-solving scenarios related to the mechanicaldesign, reverse engineering, and 3D printing.Workshop Objectives: The first objective is to engage active duty military personnel in a Maker environment and provide them with necessary tools to enhance the skills needed for application of additive manufacturing for in-situ ship maintenance. The second objective is to reduce the downtime in naval subsystems, which is related to waiting for the necessary part to arrive for repair, by providing the Navy with a significant number of naval personnel trained in 3D printing. The third objective is to provide an educational workforce development program for active duty sailors in additive manufacturing to support the
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Creating the Fleet Maker – Lessons Learned from the First Series of Workshops on Maker Concepts for Active Duty PersonnelAbstractThe US Navy has supported research related to the 3D printing or Additive Manufacturing areafor more than 20 years. More recently, efforts like the Print the Fleet initiative and MarineMakers are exploring ways to design and create solutions to future problems with the possibilityof reducing maintenance costs, increasing equipment readiness, and improving combateffectiveness. The Creating the Fleet Maker project is an effort supported by the Navy andMarine Corps Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education, Outreach andWorkforce Program