AC 2011-523: MEDICAL PHYSICS CURRICULUM FOR UNDERGRAD-UATE ENGINEERING STUDENTSRenat Letfullin, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Renat R. Letfullin is associate professor of physics and optical engineering department at the Rose- Hulman Institute of Technology. He has extensive academic credentials in nanotechnology and specializes in laser physics, wave and quantum optics, aerosol physics, biophotonics and nanomedicine, where he is using laser-induced explosion of absorbing nanoparticles in selective nanophotothermolysis of cancer. Letfullin served as senior researcher at the Lebedev Physics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Samara branch), 1993-2002, and research associate at Mississippi State
Paper ID #7433Adapted Physical Activity Design Projects: A Collaboration Between Kinesi-ology and EngineeringDr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University Dr Self has taught in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo since 2006. Prior to that, he worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for seven years. During the 2011-2012 academic year he participated in a professor exchange, teaching at the Munich University of Applied Sciences. His engineering education activities include collaborating on the Dynamics Concept Inventory
Wichita State University. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees from Oklahoma State University. In his 38-year teaching career, he has taught a wide range of industrial engineering courses and currently directs the department’s capstone design experience. His research interests are in systems engineering, decision analysis, and engineering education. Page 25.1263.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Team Decision Skills Development with MBTI © Step IIAbstractAs part of an Engineer as Leader course, students learn to dynamically take leadership
Award as a model program, and was also recognized by the State of South Carolina for the Service Learning Award in 2011. Dr. Ogle was also recognized in 2012 by President Obama as a Champion of Change for Women in STEM, and participates in a number of diversity-enhancement programs at the university including serving as the Chair of the Women’s Commission and as a member of the ADA Task Force.Dr. Jeffery M Plumblee II, Clemson University Jeff Plumblee, PhD, MBA is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow in online service-learning at Clemson Uni- versity. Plumblee founded the award winning Clemson Engineers for Developing Countries (CEDC) in 2009 while pursuing a doctorate in civil engineering. He has helped to grow the
Bioengineering departments, including 10 years as dean of engineering in between, before moving to Baylor in 1998. He is currently a member of the ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission, a fellow of ASEE, a senior member of IEEE, and holds PE registration in Ohio and Texas. Page 13.747.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Innovations and Experiences in an Engineering Course Called Image Formation and ProcessingIntroductionFor the past many years, the author’s favorite specialization for teaching and research has beenthe field of imaging and image processing. Imaging technology
following purposes: ● To engage undergraduate students in the research process ● To demonstrate how what they are studying, and learning can be put to practical use ● To teach the students the value of their chosen field and how it benefits society ● To evaluate the structural integrity of Maybeck Chapel, an historically significant structure that has been a campus focal point for 85 yearsThe work was performed by four undergraduate students representing each of the majorengineering disciplines. One was a sophomore majoring in chemical engineering, and the otherthree were juniors: one in civil engineering, one in mechanical, and one in combinedarchitectural and industrial, but leaning toward industrial. The project team was
Paper ID #33069Innovating Assessment: Using Innovative Impact as a Metric to EvaluateStudent Outcomes in an Innovation-Based Learning CourseEllen M. Swartz, North Dakota State University Ellen Swartz is currently pursuing a M.S. degree in Biomedical Engineering at North Dakota State Univer- sity. Her research interests include STEM education, innovation-based learning, and agent-based mod- eling of complex adaptive systems. She previously received her B.S. degree from North Dakota State University in Electrical and Computer Engineering.Ryan Striker P.E., North Dakota State University Ryan Striker is a life-long learner
Paper ID #26229Work in Progress: A Multidisciplinary Approach for Undergraduate Re-search in Augmented Reality SystemsProf. Yuzhong Shen, Old Dominion University Yuzhong Shen received his B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from Fudan University, Shanghai, China, M.S. degree in Computer Engineering from Mississippi State University, Starkville, Mississippi, and Ph.D. degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware. His research interests include computer graphics, visualization, serious games, signal and image processing, and mod- eling and simulation. Dr. Shen is currently Professor of
applicable to technical and non-technical systems[20]. A hallmark of optimization theory is decision making based on trade-offs. All three theoriesinvolve qualitative and quantitative analysis and their strengths are emphasized in the innovative course.The Systems Analysis course was selected as a teaching innovation for the 2013 Frontiers ofEngineering Education (FOEE) Symposium hosted by the National Academy of Engineering in Irvine,CA. In this paper the Systems Analysis course and how it is implemented are explained. The remainderof the paper focuses on lessons learned, conclusions and future work.Systems Analysis Course OverviewThe Systems Analysis course is the culminating engineering science course in the curriculum, and assuch, it builds off
Paper ID #22980Promoting Innovation in a Junior-level, Multidisciplinary, Electro-MechanicalDesign CourseDr. Wesley L. Stone, Western Carolina University Dr. Wes Stone is an associate professor in the School of Engineering and Technology at Western Carolina University in Cullowhee, NC. He earned his bachelors degree from the University of Texas at Austin, masters degree from Penn State, and PhD from Georgia Tech, all in Mechanical Engineering. His research interests include manufacturing processes, quality techniques, and outdoor gear manufacturing. He also serves as the program director for Engineering Technology at WCU.Dr
AC 2008-501: INTERDISCIPLINARY TEACHING TECHNIQUES ANDLEARNING IN DYNAMIC MODELING AND CONTROLRobert Rabb,David Chang, United States Military Academy Page 13.788.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Interdisciplinary Teaching Techniques and Learning in Dynamic Modeling and ControlAbstractEngineering education experiences unique challenges as well as opportunities. As the future ofengineering education emphasizes more interdisciplinary work and more work performed inteams, one logical starting point for this evolution in interdisciplinary work is with the faculty.Engineering educators cannot ignore the real world’s shifting focus
saying. Instructors are generally experts in only one discipline, and so effectively teaching agroup of students from various disciplines may require additional tools and resources. Instructorsof such courses should not be expected to teach material outside of their discipline, but shouldinstead act as guides for students, directing them towards tools for self-learning.Innovation-Based LearningThe Innovation-Based Learning (IBL) framework was designed to create and encourage aninnovative multidisciplinary learning environment [10]–[14]. The IBL model has been adaptedinto the curriculum at a research university within a cardiovascular engineering course. While thecourse is categorized under engineering, it is open to students from other colleges
processes.Students are asked questions concerning classical engineering failures, dangers of materialsubstitutions, environmental and social impact on product design and also on o materials usedin the school’s laboratories by research students and staff. Instructional knowledge forms aplatform for further inquiry.The teaching, in this subject, is presented in grand narrative form. Students are required toundertake further reading of recommended and referenced texts. The course material is alsosupported by the course material l written and compiled by this author.Experimentation and ObservationIn a traditional schema this is normally referred to as to laboratory practical session. However,as important as traditional laboratory sessions are in developing
AC 2012-5418: AN ADVENTURE IN EXTREME CURRICULUM INTE-GRATION TO STIMULATE INNOVATION AND COLLABORATIONDr. Ronald G. Kander, Philadelphia University Ronald G. Kander is Executive Dean of the College of Design, Engineering, and Commerce at Philadel- phia University. His current teaching and research interests are in the areas of design processes, materi- als selection, engineering education, and composites. He received a B.S. in chemical engineering from Carnegie Mellon University in 1980 and a Ph.D. in chemical engineering from the University of Delaware in 1987. Before becoming Executive Dean at Philadelphia University in 2011, Kander was Director of the School of Engineering at James Madison University (JMU
University of Alabama at Birmingham, in Birmingham, Alabama which includes: Ph.D. in Computer and Information Sciences, Master’s degrees in Computer Science and Biomedical Engineering and a Bachelor’s degree in Computer Science. Dr. Byrd’s research interests include: data visualization, data visualization capacity building, high performance visualization, big data, and collaborative visualization. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Innovative pedagogy for teaching and learning data visualizationAbstractThis paper describes a process for teaching and learning data visualization with the use of aseries of worksheets for each stage of the data visualization
2007. Shortly thereafter she moved to the United States to pursue graduate studies at the University of Florida. She graduated with a M.S. in CE in 2009 and a Ph.D. in 2012. Dr. Michalaka is passionate about teaching in college and K-12 levels and conducting research in both transportation engineering, focused on traffic operations, congestion pricing, and traffic simulation, and engineering education. Recently, in December 2020, she is also graduated with a Master’s of Science degree in Project Management from The Citadel. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 An Innovative Approach to Teaching Project Resource LevelingAbstractThis
Dr. John Flach is a Professor and Chair of Psychology at Wright State University. He joined WSU in 1990. Previously he was at University of Illinois from where he held joint appointments in Mechanical & Industrial Engineering and Psychology. His research interests include experimental cognitive psychology and human factors, coordination and control in cognitive systems, visual control of locomotion, interface design, decision-making, and motor control.Jeffrey Vernooy, Wright State University Jeffrey A. Vernooy is the Director of the Office of Disability Services at Wright State University. He joined the staff of Disability Services in 1977. Mr. Vernooy completed his Master of Science
regularcircuit analysis course. Additionally, since in most universities electricity and magnetismconcepts are introduced by Physics courses, the Circuit Analysis course should emphasizeapplications of engineering analysis methods.Consideration #2: The course needs to prepare students for their advanced study in theirconcentrations. The four concentrations vary slightly in terms of required electrical engineeringtopical areas. For example, like the earlier research indicates, all Systems Engineering programsinclude controls in their curricula, which can greatly benefit from instrumentation background,which in turn requires this course to cover certain electrical engineering topics. Support of thedifferent concentrations presents a bigger challenge as
andcolleagues in campus offices. In part, these elements make us good teachers. Prior to March2020, face-to-face interaction was the way we taught, collaborated, served and learned. Then,COVID-19 became real and, within a week, we could no longer be physically present with ourstudents and peers. We shifted instruction to Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT). We alsoshifted the way we collaborated in our scholarship and service. Informed by research, this paperhighlights aspects of our journey, challenges along the way and lessons learned to apply to thefuture.As educators in a predominately engineering university, the courses we teach address identifiedgaps in traditional engineering education and focus on the “soft skills” [1]. Team-based learningand team
Lecturer in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at Michigan Tech- nological University, where she teaches first-year engineering courses. Her research interests include engineering ethics, spatial visualization, and educational methods. She is an active member in the Mul- tidisciplinary Engineering and the Engineering Design Graphics Divisions of ASEE. For the Multidisi- plinary Division she has served as the Secretary/Treasurer and Program Chair and is currently serving as the Division Chair. Dr. Hamlin has also served as the Associate Editor and the Director of Publications/ Journal Editor of the Engineering Design Graphics Journal.Tori Claudette ReederJosh Chase, Michigan Technological University Josh Chase is
, knowledge, teaching skills and behavior 8. Active and engagedlearning methods have been tested and found to be more effective in enhancing teaching.However, their adoption by faculty has been very slow leading to stalled innovations in STEMeducation 9, 10.In the present work a Research and Outreach Center (ROC) was created at the author’sinstitution – Robert Morris University (RMU) that has implemented two mechanisms to enhancefaculty collaboration across the disciplines and create a platform for STEM educationinnovation. The hypothesis in creating these mechanisms was that more natural, less formalfaculty meetings would enhance common interactions of the faculty with each other promotingknowledge transfer and the development of multi-disciplinary
Physics 66, 64 (1998).13. Crouch, C. H. & Mazur, E. Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics69, 970-77 (2001).14. Shute, V. J. Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research 78, 153-189 (2008).15. Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 77, 81-112 (2007).16. Biggs, J. & Tang, C. in Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does (Society forResearch into Higher Education; Open University Press, Philadelphia, 2011).17. Boyajian, D. M. Mathematical building-blocks in engineering mechanics. International Journal of MathematicalEducation in Science and Technology 38, 749-761 (2007).18. Everett, L. J., Imbrie, P. K. &
, ACM, AAAS and Sigma Xi. His current research focuses on 3D computer vision, 3D computer graphics, and stochastic inferencing for geometric problems.James Conrad, University of North Carolina at Charlotte James M.Conrad received his bachelor’s degree in computer science from the University of Illinois, Urbana,and his master’s and doctorate degrees in computer engineering from North Carolina State University. He is currently an associate professor at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He has served as an assistant professor at the University of Arkansas and as an instructor at North Carolina State University. He has also worked at IBM in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, and
program innanotechnology through a structured curriculum”, Proc. IEEE International Conference onMicroelectronics Systems Education, 1-2 June 2003, pp. 104-105 (2003).7 Mahbub Uddin and A. Raj Chowdhury, “Integration of nanotechnology into the UndergraduateEngineering Curriculum”, International Conference on Engineering Education, August 6-10,2001, Oslo, Norway, pp. 8B2-6 (2001).8 Roco, M.C., “Nanotechnology – A Frontier for Engineering Education”, International Journalof Engineering Education, August 2002, Vol. 18, No. 5, Special Issue on Nanotechnology(2002).9 Fong Ming Lee, “Teaching Strategies For Nanotechnology In Engineering Education”, iCEER2005, Exploring Innovation in Education and Research, Tainan, Taiwan, 1-5 March 200510
Paper ID #25931Innovative Baccalaureate Degree Program in Advanced Manufacturing Sci-encesDr. Robert M. Park, Metropolitan State University of Denver Dr. Robert Park is the Lockheed Martin Endowed Director of the Advanced Manufacturing Sciences Institute at MSU Denver. He previously held executive and management positions at manufacturing com- panies and was a tenured professor of materials science and engineering at the University of Florida. He has published over 70 peer reviewed papers and has received over $2M in sponsored research support.Dr. Ananda Mani Paudel, Metropolitan State University of Denver Ananda Mani Paudel
AC 2012-4531: BEST PRACTICES IN CREATING AND RUNNING RE-SEARCH EXPERIENCE PROGRAMSProf. Mohamed Abdelrahman, Texas A&M University, Kingsville Mohamed Abdelrahman received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical engineering and engineering physics from Cairo University, Egypt, in 1988 and 1992, respectively. He received an M.S. and a Ph.D. in measurement and control and nuclear engineering from Idaho State University in 1994 and 1996, re- spectively. He is currently the Associate Dean of Engineering at Texas A&M University, Kingsville. Abdelrahman’s research focus is industrial applications of sensing and control with major research fund- ing from the U.S. Department of Energy, National Science Foundation
Paper ID #15881Exploring Innovation, Psychological Safety, Communication, and KnowledgeApplication in a Multidisciplinary Capstone Design CourseMrs. Narges Balouchestani-Asli, University of Toronto Narges Balouchestani-Asli is an M.A.Sc. Candidate with the Institute for Multidisciplinary Design and Innovation (UT-IMDI) at the University of Toronto. She is also part of the Collaborative Program in Engineering Education at the University of Toronto. She holds an Honors Bachelor in Mechanical Engi- neering from the University of Toronto. During her studies at the University of Toronto she was involved as a Teaching Assistance
the crux of the problem. Students tend to learn facts in their, inthis case Physics, classes but, like the researchers referred to in the above quote, they don’tnecessarily learn how those facts are relevant to their chosen discipline. This phenomenon wasactually observed during an internal bi-annual review of the capstone design projects in theElectrical and Computer Engineering Department at WPI where it was observed that studentswere having a difficult time synthesizing designs.3 To correct this problem, a radically differentcourse in ECE Design was developed to teach the fundamentals of designing electrical systemsto students at the end of their sophomore year. With this course we were able to reach studentsimmediately after foundational
engineering field in general.References1. J.E. Coligan, Commonly Used Detergents Appendix II, Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (Wiley)2. Y. Feng, Z. Zhou, X. Ye, and J. Xiong, Passive valves based on hydrophobic microfluidics, Sensors andActuators, A 108 138-143, 2003.3. M.A. Shoffner, J. Cheng, G.E. Hvichia, L.J. Kricka, and P. Wilding, Chip PCR. I. Surface passivation ofmicrofabricated silicon-glass chips for PCR, Nucleic Acids Research 24, 2 375-379, 1996.4. N.R. Tax, J. Haneveld, H.V. Jansen, M. Elwenspoek, and A. van den Berg, Capillary filling speed of water innanochannels, Applied Physics Letters, 85, 15 3274-3276, 2004.5. P. Griss, H. Andersson, and H. Stemme, Expandable microspheres for handling liquids, Lab Chip 2 117-120,2002.6. E
Distinguished Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Georgia Tech and a Georgia Research Alliance Eminent Scholar. He is the Director of both the VIP Program at GT and the VIP Consortium. Dr. Coyle was a co-recipient of the National Academy of Engineering’s 2005 Bernard M. Gordon Award for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education; ASEE’s 1997 Chester F. Carlson Award; and, the 2019 ABET Innovation Award. He is a Fellow of the IEEE and his research interests include reform of higher education, wireless and sensor networks, and signal and image processing.Ms. Jillana Finnegan, Boise State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020