STEM. After our experience in 2015Girls academy where we worked mostly with the latter group (girls who are already interested inSTEM) we changed our target group and worked with the former group. Our success storyresulted through this change in directions is described in our result section.ImplementationsThe Summer STEM Camp includes the following nine technical sessions. The technical sessionsare divided in two major categories, Science and Engineering. In the Engineering sessions wehave covered five different fields of Engineering as provided below.(1) Computer Engineering: Playing with Robots(2) Civil Engineering: Traffic Signals(3) Mechanical Engineering: Gears(4) Chemical Engineering: Battery and Fuel Cell Technologies(5) Electrical
well supported by government agencies, the host university,and local professional associations. Different entities play special and meaningful roles, presentingan integrated approach to stimulating high school students' interests in STEM. More specifically,participating faculty at CCSU offer their technical expertise in a spectrum of subject matters;designing their sessions with the targeted audience in mind. The FHWA Division Office providestimely guidance on implementation of the program, in addition to financial support. CTDOTliaisons provide guidance on program design, recommend activities and speakers, and assist withthe coordination of field trips, the bridge design competition session, the visit to CTDOTheadquarters, and graduation
TTU to provide a holistic design experience to expose students to a higher educationenvironment. The program consisted of interactive discipline specific lessons, a multidisciplinarygroup project, professional development sessions, and recreational activities. The goals anddesign of the summer program, Engineering – Get Into Real Learning (E-GIRL), aimed tointerest and recruit junior and senior high school females to pursue engineering by introducingsix engineering disciplines through interactive, problem-based learning. Further, the camp aimedto provide female students with a positive experience and a chance to develop personal,interpersonal and technical engineering skills. Using a flipped classroom structure, students weregiven
, medical students, andclinicians (orthopaedic surgeons, physical therapists, and general practitioners). Each programcan accommodate up to 40 students. Students are recruited through STEM non-profit affiliates,e.g., Project Lead The Way, Girl Scouts, and via social media and contacting large, urban schooldistricts. Students apply online through the program’s website and are selected based on thequality and composition of two essays. Academic performance, e.g., GPA, class rank, or APcoursework, is purposefully not considered in the application. Racial information is collected atthe time of application; however, it is blinding during the selection process and only analyzedafter students are notified of their acceptance to the program. Results of
camp.1 In designing the camp, theneeds and interests of teenage girls were identified first. Our planning team identified these topthree factors: 1) they (teenage girls) had little contact with women in engineering fields, 2) theyare flocking to professions where they feel they can make meaningful contributions to society,medicine, justice, and prosperity, and 3) they do not want to work in a cubicle, isolated fromother people. Taking into account the general needs and interests, four message themes weredeveloped as guiding principles: 1) Engineers help the world, 2) Engineers think creatively, 3)Engineers enjoy working with others, and 4) Engineers earn a good living. Finally, methods toachieve the messages were selected that included
, women and underrepresentedstudents were found to perceive a “lack of inclusion” in engineering environments23. This resultwas thought to be attributed to negative social cues by fellow students and faculty.Studies on mixed-gendered teams in freshman engineering courses also show that femalesexperience isolation and take on stereotypical roles during projects and team presentations25,26,27.In one study, males were found to take on more active, technical roles and had better outcomesthan their female counterparts26,27. On equal and male-dominated teams, male students weremore likely to answer technical questions and appear more knowledgeable. Females were foundto perform better when on all-female groups or when paired with other females than when
Experience for Girls (SEE)” at Carnegie MellonUniversity3, and “Robocamp” at University of North Texas4.Implementation of the summer STEM camp The photo in Figure 1 was taken at the camp with all the camp participants. The mainobjective of this project is to inspire female high school students' interests in STEM disciplinesand to encourage them to choose STEM as their college majors. The technical topics covered atthe camp span computer science, electrical engineering, computer engineering, mechanicalengineering, civil engineering, chemical engineering, chemistry, pharmacy and biology.Faculties of WVU Tech were the instructors at the Summer STEM Girls Camp. In addition totechnical sessions, the Summer STEM Girls Camp also included a few special
years, the University of St. Thomas School of Engineering has offered STEPScamps which stand for Science, Technology, and Engineering Preview Summer camp 1 2 3. Thissummer camp is aimed at introducing middle school students from various backgrounds to basicaspects of engineering with hands-on, engaging materials and methods. At the 2015 STEPScamp, participants were a mix of rising 7th-grade male and female students who expressed aninterest in learning science and/or engineering concepts on their application form. At each of thefive 13-hour camp sessions offered, 20 students worked in two small groups learning aboutcircuits and vector drawings, this was followed by a trip to the University of St. Thomasengineering labs. The camp educators and
have an experiential learning experience in EDP and also demonstratedhow the EDP could be applied to solve problems in a variety of contexts.26 It is important to notethat with a pilot program of 18 teachers this work has an impact on approximately 2250 students.A critically important step of the EDP is ideation. True innovation requires robust ideageneration which is a highly creative endeavor, but can also be challenging.27-30 Challenges withideation have been observed in both engineers and teachers through past NSF-RET programs asthey tried to employ the EDP for curriculum generation.27, 30 In an effort to address thischallenge, a structured ideation session was added to the curriculum development process andpiloted with the teachers. This
shows each activityand the corresponding interest rating. Figure 1: Rating of the various activities out of 100Similarly, the teachers were given a survey at the end of the workshop to gauge their perceivedlevel of knowledge gained from the professional development sessions and how they rated it.The survey question was in the form of: “Please answer the following questions about theprofessional development”. The responses were on a Likert scale from strongly agree to stronglydisagree. This is shown in Figure 2 below. Figure 2: Professional Development EvaluationResultsResults showed a very high overall satisfaction with the camp activities by the students. Thesurvey results also show the success of
time commitment for afull-semester course surfaced. We began to consider using a workshop (or short course) formatinstead, in part because in a variety of short (ca. 1 h) interactions with primary and secondaryschool teachers over the years, we had observed that significant progress could be made in shortamounts of time. Additional potential benefits of a workshop format included enabling greaterparticipation at lower total time investment of students and faculty, as well as providing insightinto how to structure a full-semester course in the future.Based on an informal assessment of our availability, as well as on knowledge of studentavailability, we constrained the short course to three half-day sessions, to be offered consecutiveSaturdays
” course offered through The Ohio State University and taught by Dr. Polasik (~45 hours),four face-to-face sessions at a local career technical school (24 hours) , and classroom mentoring (8 – 10hours depending on teacher need), and Saturday “demonstration” sessions led by materials science masterteachers (~12 hours). Through the camp teachers are immersed in materials science in inquiryexperiences, experiments, and materials science content. Throughout the program explicit curriculumconnections are made so that teachers can connect materials science concepts to the foundational sciencecontent they teach. Teachers are given opportunities to share their classroom practices, supporting oneanother as they discuss what works, how they can tweak
Approach to Robotics in EducationRobotics content can support a host of educational outcomes including electronics,programming, problem-solving, and design thinking 1. The growing number of robotics toolsfurther enables their use for education: Arduino, Raspberry Pi, LEGO Mindstorms,Fischertechniks, and new crowd-funded options are surrounded by educational tutorials andcontent. In general, robotics activities are diverse and provide solutions to many instructionalneeds. Soft robots are made from soft, deformable gels, liquids, or polymers2 and represent anemerging type of robotics design. We believe soft robotics may enhance student interest andconfidence for STEM to a greater degree than traditional “hard” robotics, made from wood ormetal
incorporated problem-based learning into her lectures, lab- oratories, and outreach activities to engage students and the community in the STEM education process.Dr. Margaret Pinnell, University of Dayton Dr. Margaret Pinnell is the Associate Dean for Faculty and Staff Development in the school of engineering and associate professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of Dayton. She teaches undergraduate and graduate materials related courses including Introduction to Ma- terials, Materials Laboratory, Engineering Innovation, Biomaterials and Engineering Design and Appro- priate Technology (ETHOS). She was director of the (Engineers in Technical Humanitarian Opportunities of Service
digital fabrication machines and maker spaces in schools can be used to teach pre-college students engineering.Mr. David Alsdorf, Tufts University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 MakerGames: A Board Game to Help Facilitators Maximize the Educational Potential of Project Based Learning (Works in Progress) I. Introduction Teachers are looking for new ways to bring engineering into their classes as they adapt their curriculum to include new content from the next generation science standards [1] and the less tangible “21st century skills” [2] . Tufts University Center for Engineering
the culturally appropriate readingmaterials.IntroductionA child’s ability to read by the end of third grade is a critical predictor of their future successincluding high school graduation, earning potential and general productivity.1 Many states havepassed legislation requiring schools to identify at-risk readers and provide interventions to helpincrease the reading scores of these students.2, 3 For example, Ohio has the Third Grade ReadingGuarantee which requires that students achieve a minimum score on the Ohio AchievementAssessment (OAA) in order to advance to the fourth grade. Schools are using a variety ofdifferent intervention strategies to improve the reading skills of at risk readers. One suchstrategy is afterschool literacy programs
. Hirsch has extensive experience conducting longitudinal research studies and is proficient in database management, experimental design, instrument development, psychometrics and statistical programming.Dr. Howard S. Kimmel, New Jersey Institute of Technology HOWARD KIMMEL is Professor-Emeritus of Chemical Engineering and Retired Executive Director of the Center for Pre-College Programs at New Jersey Institute of Technology. Dr. Kimmel has continued to provide his services, as needed, for Teacher Training, Curriculum Development and technical services with a focus on alignment of teaching practices with the Common Core State Standards and the Next Generation Science Standards. He has spent over forty years designing
attitudes towards S&E fairs on a rating scale of 1 (stronglydisagree) to 4 (strongly agree), teachers generally had strong positive attitudes (M=3.31, SD =0.28) towards S&E fairs. Of the 16 survey items, the 6 items with the highest and lowestagreement are shown in Figure 1. Among the lowest average scores: Teachers varied in theiropinion about whether S&E fairs taught lessons that could be more effectively taught by regularinstruction. They also varied in whether they believed that students would be discouraged if theydidn’t have access to the same resources as others or if the projects would be more successfulwith a scientist mentor. Among the highest average scores and most consistent positive ratings:Teachers consistently agreed
of general steps for using Git and Github to push and pull updates to code bases.They then practiced these steps by sharing each sorting method implementation. This practicebecame invaluable as development on the application began, and students worked on separatefeatures in sometimes colliding files.Implementation Phase The implementation phase consisted of design cycles, technical research, andimplementation. During this phase, the team met three times a week for group sessions. Therewere two, two-hour weekday sessions, followed by one three-hour weekend session. Together,the students and mentors created an initial design at the beginning of the phase; which served asa wireframe for the project. The basic framework of the application
undergraduate environment and curriculum.Research DesignResearch questions guiding our work included: 1) To what extent are secondary school studentsin Trinidad and Tobago exposed to engineering as part of their school curriculum?; 2) How doesthe current level of exposure relate to students’ interest in undergraduate engineering studies?;and 3) How well do current engineering undergraduates who attended secondary school inTrinidad and Tobago think their education prepared them for engineering?Participants in the study included a sample of secondary school students in Trinidad and Tobagoand students from Trinidad and Tobago who pursued engineering degrees (Table 1).Table 1. Participant Demographics Students who pursued Engineering
University of Texas at Austin (1989). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Work in Progress – Pre-college Engineering Activities with Electronic CircuitsAbstract Projects involving engineering experimentation, design, and measurement can be effectivecontent for pre-college STEM outreach. Such applications-oriented activities can promoteliteracy and interest in technical topics and careers and have the added benefit of showing therelevance of science and mathematics. Exposure to electrical engineering concepts is discussedusing the 555 timer integrated circuit. This low-cost device can be used for modular activitiesinvolving the production of light, sound, and
, vehicles, and robots.How, then, do we as an engineering education community begin to return to a broader definitionof Making? One that is not necessarily as codified by MAKE Magazine, but one that is morealigned with the creative and generative processes found within and across all cultures17? In thefirst stage of the Making Connections project, we begin to address one aspect of this challengeby seeking to better understand how people underrepresented groups perceive and define“making”, and how these perceptions may align, or not, with how MAKE Magazine defines“Making”. Therefore, the research questions guiding this early inquiry are: 1) How do people of color describe and identify making practices and products? 2) How similar or
study their preferences and therefore acquire knowledge to build age appropriate userinterfaces to control the Online Laboratory in order to make these more attractive andtherefore improve the learning experiences.Together with national and international partners we are carrying out a project that placesstudents of technical secondary schools in Austria in the role of remote laboratory developersunder the supervision and tutoring of the project staff. Students are actively involved in thescientific process and actively participate in the acquisition of knowledge.The project pursues three main objectives: 1. Studies on age-appropriate requirements for the use of Online Laboratories at secondary schools. 2. Peer feedback to improve the
directlyimpacts the number of students with disabilities that go into STEM careers. Informal learningopportunities, such as summer camp experiences, provide students an opportunity to continue togrow and reinforce their interest in STEM. Previous K-12 summer engineering and sciencecamps designed for the general education population yielded an improvement in student attitudetowards science2. Additionally, data collected from previous camps designed to make scienceand robotics accessible to students with disabilities also demonstrated that these studentsincreased their interest in science3,4. However, while a few science and robotics campsspecifically for students with VIB have emerged in the past 5 years, little data has been publishedon the efficacy of
teachers.Limitations of the study include that the current participant pool is limited to 22 participants(with only 20 data participants), all of whom self-selected participation in the two-week paid PD.The group of participants came largely from the same general STEM teaching population. Theparticipant pool, while evenly split between elementary, middle and high school teachers camemostly from the same school district. Additionally, the PD lasted two summer weeks with sixfollow-up sessions during the school year (total of 120 hours), which while desirable for a PD,was short to teach novices a new technical content area. The STEM content focused almostexclusively on CS, and further studies are required to generalize these results to otherdisciplinary PDs. The
), influenced our efforts to develop the teaching standards used for this project. In addition, a framework that articulates what informed design thinking entails – students using design strategies effectively; making knowledge-‐driven decisions; conducting sustained technological investigations; working creatively; and reflecting upon their actions and thinking – was another foundation upon which this work was built (Crismond & Adams, 2012). The final set of the design teaching standards (see Table 1 for details) created for this project is organized around three dimensions: Dimension I – STEM Concepts – Teachers’ understanding of science, technology
observation adescriptive label using one of the categories in the protocol. In order to identify the changes indesign thinking for students who improved their design qualities, we examined the group ofstudents with the highest increase in design quality from Marshmallow Challenge trial 1 to trial 2in Workshop1. Using NVivo, we generated graphs to visually present the students’ designbehaviors throughout the sessions.ResultsDevelopment in Self-efficacy BeliefsUsing paired sample t-test, we found that students’ self-efficacy beliefs in engineering sketching,design, prototyping, and collaboration changed significantly from before to after attending theworkshop. Specifically, for participants who attended the first session Workshop1, the self-efficacy
role of chemical engineering in improving the qualityof human life. Subsequent topics included the carbon cycle, chemical processes of CO2generation, and a description of technical principles dealing with capture andsequestration/conversion of CO2. The discussion of CO2 capture and sequestration technologies focused on three maintechnologies, namely, CO2 scrubbing using absorption, membrane-based gas-selectiveseparation, and adsorption8. The three technologies were described in terms of their chemicaloperations and machinery to communicate the concepts of flow, pressure, temperature andchemical reaction and the applied nature of chemical engineering design. Thereafter, the entireprocess of on-site CO2 generation and capture was explained
have taught earth science, physical science, astronomy, and chemistry. I have been married to Leslie Harris Lamberth of Elizabeth City, NC since August 2014. In the summer of 2014 I was accepted into the Kenan Fellows Program to work with and learn about Dr. Gail Jones and Dr. Jess Jur’s work at the ASSIST (Advanced Self-Powered Systems of Integrated Sensors and Technologies) Center at North Carolina State University as an RET 1 (Research Experience for Teachers.) The ASSIST Center’s goal is to create a wearable, self-powered, multi-modal health moni- toring device. The following year I was brought back as an RET 2 to work with Hannah Elliott, Dr. Elena Veety, and Dr. Jess Jur to design, market, and implement
Engi- neering Education and Energy Engineering. In addition, she has been lead mentor of FRC Team SUM #6003 for the past two years.Dr. Jenna P. Carpenter, Campbell University Dr. Carpenter is Founding Dean of Engineering at Campbell University. She is Chair of the ASEE Long-Rangge Planning Committee and the ASEE Strategic Doing Governance Team. She is a past Vice President of Professional Interest Councils for ASEE and past President of WEPAN. Currently Chair of the National Academy of Engineering Grand Challenge Scholars Program Steering Committee and an ASEE PEV for General Engineering, Dr. Carpenter regularly speaks at the national level on issues related to the success of women in engineering and innovative