], guidance counselors [8, 9], or (insome cases) current computing majors [10]. Beyond the simple choice of a major, there is alsothe issue of making informed decisions about high school coursework to better position them forearly success within an undergraduate computing major.The SCC introduced interested high school youth to three computing fields (CS, CmpE, IT).Four computing faculty delivered the lectures and facilitated hands-on laboratories, providing theprospective computing majors opportunities for direct interaction. Campers also became familiarwith current Master’s level students throughout the week, specifically during the laboratories. OnDay 1 campers received a general overview of computing and an introduction to programming.Days 2-4
Paper ID #37405Board 150: AFRL Career STREAM Implementation at NMT (Work in Progress)Destiny J. Crawford, New Mexico Tech Mechanical Engineering Department Destiny Crawford is a current graduate student at New Mexico Tech studying Chemical Engineering for a Master’s of Engineering degree. She was a pathways mentor during the Summer 2022 AFRL Career STREAM apprenticeship program in the Mechanical Engineering Department.Jett C. Emms, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Jett Emms is a current Graduate student at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology in Socorro New Mexico working towards a PhD in
Paper ID #37816Centering K-8 CS Teachers’ Experiences During a Day of Dialogue forTeachers and Researchers (RTP)Dr. Adrienne Decker, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Adrienne Decker is a faculty member in the newly formed Department of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo. She has been studying computing education and teaching for over 15 years, and is interested in broadening participation, evaluating tDr. Monica McGill, CSEdResearch.org Monica McGill is Founder & CEO of CSEdResearch.org. Her area of scholarship is computer science education research with a current focus on diversity
majors, team-building athletic activities, and military training. Eachparticipating academic department hosts several three-hour workshops during which groups of20-25 students learn about an academic discipline in which they could major. Students areallowed to select workshops in academic departments from which they are most interested. Thegoal of the Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering is to provide students abetter understanding of what it means to major in environmental science or environmentalengineering. To support this goal, our faculty developed an exercise that uses a combination oflecture material and laboratory experimentation. During the 50-minute lecture period, facultydescribe the attributes of both academic majors
some concerning safety issues that need addressed and further investigated to make P-12engineering teaching and learning safer [3-4]. One study that compared results from previous P-12 science and engineering education studies found very little improvement in national and statesafety findings reported from 2002 to 2022 [4]. Moreover, a national P-12 engineering educationsafety study published in 2022 by the International Technology and Engineering EducatorsAssociation (ITEEA), in collaboration with the American Society for Engineering Education(ASEE) and the National Science Education Leadership Association (NSELA), offered anextensive overview of the status of safety in P-12 engineering education programs across theU.S. [3]. This study
− active participation (96.3%) − sense of belonging (81.5%)Due to the method of recruitment and the distribution of application materials, results obtainedregarding the application process indicate accessibility was not an issue for campers.Additionally, feedback gathered on camp faculty/staff and camp environment show that campparticipants were comfortable with faculty/staff due to the representation and felt an overallsense of belonging. When interviewed about their opinions of camp faculty/staff, many campparticipants expressed that their favorite item about the camp was the ability to meet new people,people who were kind and supportive, had similar interests and offered new perspectives. Onecamper
, led, and managed a number of multimillion dollar federal grants for STEM teacher professional development for Baltimore County Public Schools and NAPE, with resulting publications and professional learning. She began her career as a faculty member at the Community College of Baltimore County working with smart, capable, hardworking, and appreciative minority students who had somehow fallen through the educational cracks. That was her first glimpse into the failure of the education system from teacher training to student learning. Morrell’s quest has always been to answer the question, how do we as a country improve student outcomes in STEM for all students? How do we finally recognize and close gaps in performance
service-learning engagement [15]. For engineering studentsengaged in the STEAM x S-L framework, this community engagement also allows forengagement in human-centered design. Human-centered design processes have been shown toincrease productivity, improve quality, reduce errors, reduce training and support costs, improvepeople's acceptance of new products, enhance companies' reputations, increase user satisfactionand reduce development costs [16], [17].When developing a S-L relationship, it is critical to ask 1) What does the faculty member want orneed their students to learn? And 2) What are the goals or needs of our community partners? Theintersection of these answers is the foundation of an S-L partnership [18]. This is important toensure that
(CPS) and non-profit Community-BasedOrganizations in four Chicago neighborhoods to create a new after-school STEM programknown as SUPERCHARGE. Funded by NSF, the primary purpose of the project is to increasethe number of students from underrepresented groups who pursue STEM fields at thepostsecondary level. Faculty from STEM and STEM education program areas as well as theNational Center for Urban Education at Illinois State University comprise the leadership team forthe project. Guided by the National Research Council’s STEM Learning Ecosystem Model,SUPERCHARGE will contribute to the disruption of inequities that hinder access to STEMcareer pipelines for participants by serving as a bridge between informal high school academicexperiences, STEM
., 2022). Additionally, İçen (2022) discussed the impact of the varied attitudes toward itsadoption in schools, suggesting a need for targeted efforts to build teacher confidence in using AItools. Moreover, Kim (2023) synthesizes these perspectives to reveal numerous factors thatimpact teacher readiness and attitudes toward AI, such as technological competency, institutionalsupport, and PSTs' perception of AI’s value (Kim, 2023).PSTs’ Concerns and Reservations About AIEthical and privacy concerns are widely discussed in the research. PSTs are particularlyconcerned about issues such as data privacy, the black box AI algorithms, and potential biases(Incerti 2020), proposing that AI-integrated education should be guided by explicit ethicalcriteria
). Therefore, equity work at themacrolevel of contesting ideologies and dominant ways of knowing and being acknowledgesbarriers that foster inequities in engineering participation at the microlevel, making way for allstudents to rightfully participate (Calabrese Barton & Tan, 2018, 2019).The second application of this contestation concerns conceptualizing epistemologies ofengineering for learning. For this orientation towards engineering and practice, engineering ineducation can be leveraged to engage in social justice work. Morales-Doyle (2019) argues thatcurricula constitute spaces that can invite students to interrogate and critique macro-levelsystems, increase their knowledge and understanding of the relevant issues and enact change.Bazzul
; Figard etal., 2023). A viable solution involves providing targeted professional development opportunities to facultyand staff. Special education training programs have proven to enhance faculty attitudes, knowledge, andskills in supporting students with disabilities (Dignath et al., 2022). It is crucial to extend these traininginitiatives to encompass the school’s administration and staff (Hester et al., 2020; Walker, 2016). Theestablishment of an academic culture that prioritizes inclusion plays a pivotal role in shaping the attitudesand support services provided by faculty, staff, and administrators for students with disabilities (Theohariset al., 2020). This work in progress paper presents a case study of a special education teacher
. • Day 2 consisted of campers participating in a structural truss activity in the early morning, followed by mechanical-focused activities, that included making a simple cardboard building and testing different insulation R-values using heat lamps and temperature sensors. The group then toured the construction site of the new Penn State engineering buildings. • Day 3 consisted of campers studying sustainable building by touring Penn State’s Morningstar house (ultra-sustainable tiny house), guided by a faculty member who was part of the undergraduate team who created the final design. • Day 4 centered on acoustics and lighting and electrical morning, where students
agenda). Researchindicates that transportation arrangements are sometimes associated with low participation inafter-school or summer programs [8]. Therefore, to ensure iRIDE participants do not have suchlogistical issues, they receive complimentary transportation to and from their schools in thesummer and free lunch.Figure 4: Example of Summer Academy Agenda Students spend some time working ontheir Capstone Project using engineeringdesign skills each day. The first step in theCapstone Project is the identification of theproblem. Each student determines theircommunity's concerns - this allows studentsto look at their community critically andcompare it with surrounding communities.Once all the issues are compiled, studentswork in teams
autism [4].Community of Practicee4usa also engages in building and maintaining a Community of Practice (CoP). In a CoP,individuals who share a common concern or passion join together to share ideas, increaseexpertise, and improve practice [5], [6]. CoPs vary in their format; they may be informal orformal, centrally located or geographically distributed, in-person or virtual, set within oneorganization or containing members from many different organizations [7].Previous research on university personnel in CoPs often focuses on their experiences inuniversity-level CoPs, such as CoPs for faculty development [8]–[10]. For example, Nadelson[8] formed a faculty community of practice (FCP) with the goal of supporting STEM facultywho wanted to engage in
can learn & they 100%make an effort to ensure that all participants do learn.I was given help when I didn’t understand. 100%My instructors speak about contributions that my culture has made to 100%cybersecurity & computing.Diverse identities are represented in the lessons & activities. 96%Participants are free to share concerns & pressing issues. 96%I feel that instructors use words that I understand & relate to in order 96%to teach lessons.It was inspiring to see women who looked like me in positions of 92%power & influence.I feel that participants are treated fairly. 91%It was
Paper ID #38556Board 179: The Effect of Role Models on Interest in STEM(Work-in-progress)Jack PriskeBritta SolheimDr. Murad Musa Mahmoud, Wartburg College Murad is an Assistant Professor at the Engineering Science Department at Wartburg College. He has a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Utah State University. Research interests include recruitment into STEM, diversity in STEM as well as pedagogy and instruction.Dr. Cristian Gerardo Allen, Wartburg College I graduated in 2017 from the University of North Texas with a Ph.D. in Mathematics under Dr. Su Gao. Since then I have been accepted as a tenure-track faculty at
study is a multi-year partnership between SUNY Cortland, the Officeof Naval Research (ONR), the statewide Boards of Cooperative Educational Services (BOCES),and several elementary, middle, and high school STEM teachers across New York State. Thisinitiative is aimed at improving: (i) pre- and in-service teachers’ abilities to implementengineering design-based learning experiences and (ii) students’ STEM achievement in pursuit of“Naval STEM” disciplines and careers. During the fall, participating teachers visit the NavalUndersea Warfare Center Division Newport (NUWC) and learn about related research from theresearchers and then collaborate with peers, university STEM faculty, and Naval STEM experts(e.g., research scientists and engineers). They
, 2023 Determining the Efficacy of K-12 and Higher Education Partnerships (Evaluation)Abstract Engineering students and professionals in the United States do not reflect the country’sdemographics. Women and minority students remain largely underrepresented. To help diversifythe STEM pipeline, it is essential students are exposed to and engaged in STEM active learningexperiences in K-12. This is especially effective when post-secondary institutions partner withK-12 schools. Establishing the partnership can be challenging as the institutions must havecongruous objectives, determine who is responsible for what, and define success similarly. Toaddress this set of issues, a program partnership rubric was
students to the concepts of AI can be confusing, especially when there are manypreconceptions for what AI may entail. Allowing students to use systems thinking to createdistinctions and deconstruct the parts of what makes AI both “artificial” and “intelligent”establishes a stronger foundation than introducing a traditional concrete definition. Introducingthe concept of systems thinking at the beginning of the curriculum also provides them with animportant problem-solving tool that can be used to deconstruct scenarios and digest new topicsas they progress through the sections.After this foundation was established, relevant ethical concerns of AI and the responsibilities ofits designers were discussed. Much of this section highlights the need for AI
of 60 members who reviewed the previous standards and developed thecontent for the new standards, and b) a steering committee which consisted of 17 members whoreviewed the items developed by the content committee and provided feedback. Three of themembers on the steering committee served as liaisons between the steering and contentcommittees to help communicate concerns and provide clarity about any feedback. Each selectedcommittee member was approved by the State Board of Education.During June and July of 2020 the committees met over a series of online meetings. First theyreviewed research-based articles on standards along with other standards and frameworkdocuments compiled by PDE, such as A Framework for K–12 Science Education: Practices
, which combines engineering with computerand biology knowledge, or biomedical engineering. Using this analysis, it is identified that thereis not enough research concerning new engineering careers [47], [48], which is necessary inorder to address the challenges mentioned above [49].Researchers’ Topics InterestsThe articles of this literature can group into five main categories. The Learning environment wasthe category that the research was interested in. It means that fourteen research papers developedtheir study around this topic. The second category that researchers were interested in wascurriculum; in this category, twelve studies developed a curriculum for this study. The thirdcategory that researchers were interested Students' prior
form meaning for students. Thismethod allows for a nuanced narrative that breaches the traditional concerns ofresearch from generalization across cases to generalization within a case [1]. Creswelland Creswell describe autoethnography as a research methodology that analyzes aphenomenon through the use of self-narratives, which would otherwise remain “privateor buried [2].” Autoethnography has allowed me to use my personal experience inteaching, providing professional development, and mentoring teachers to provide aframework that can one day be the subject of more data-driven research [3]. As an educator with a decade of STEM curriculum writing and teachingexperience, I have had the opportunity to work in urban Title I schools as well
Management. Diallo is a California State Credentialed Teacher in Career Technical Education (CTE) with experience in teaching aviation and engineering to high school and middle school youth.Prof. Tamara J Moore, Purdue University Tamara J. Moore, Ph.D., is a Professor in the School of Engineering Education, University Faculty Scholar, and Executive Co-Director of the INSPIRE Institute at Purdue University. Dr. Moore’s research is centered on the engineering design-based STEM integration in K-12 and postsecondary classrooms.Dr. Audeen W. Fentiman, Purdue University Audeen Fentiman is the Crowley Family Professor in Engineering Education at Purdue University.Dr. Morgan M Hynes, Purdue University Dr. Morgan Hynes is an
Education from Northeastern University (2022) where she completed her dissertation in elementary STEAM education. She also worked as a professional engineer in the athletic footwear and medical device industries for 10 years before joining the faculty at Northeastern University in 2006. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Engineering “STEAMs” Up Elementary Education: Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic (Fundamental)AbstractThe problem is that COVID-19 radically changed teaching and learning at a time when manypublic school districts were still aligning to their state’s new science, technology and engineering(STE) curriculum frameworks. When the pandemic hit the United
intersection of engineering education, faculty development, and complex systems design. Alexandra completed her graduate degrees in Aerospace Engineering from Georgia Tech (PhD) and Systems Engineering from the University of Virginia (UVa). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Preliminary Design of an Engineering Case Study for Elementary Students (Work in Progress)AbstractThe dominant stories about engineering in the media illustrate a field with a chronic shortage ofengineers and where “doing engineering” is about math, science, and building. Recent literaturereviews examining engineering practice and engineering careers provide a broader picture ofwhat engineers do
engaging supplemental design process, BID,in a way that enhanced the goals of core standards without distracting from them. In challengingenvironments with novice students, prior experience [9], literature [10], and teacher feedbackfrom summer professional learning [11], led curriculum designers to consider that studentsgravitated to physical design and prototyping activities, whereas early design process activitiessuch as problem definition and conceptual design were considered onerous for students, made itdifficult to maintain student focus, and could result in classroom management issues. Thus, thedesign team had to balance time and effort devoted to teaching core EDP learning standardsagainst the novel BID processes that would set the
Paper ID #42330Board 151: Utilizing African-Centered STEM Education to Inspire African-AmericanParticipation in STEMDr. DeAnna Bailey, Morgan State University Dr. DeAnna Bailey is a faculty member of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Morgan State University. Dr. Bailey has an academic background in Electrical Engineering (B.S. in Electrical Engineering and Doctor of Engineering). She studies African history, culture, and traditions for the purpose of re-conceptualizing engineering for African/Black people in the 21st Century. Dr. Bailey researches, develops, implements, and examines effective
and Computing Education in SUCCEED and FIU’s STEM Transformation InstituteDr. Alexandra Coso Strong, Florida International University As an assistant professor of engineering education at Florida International University, Dr. Alexandra Coso Strong works and teaches at the intersection of engineering education, faculty development, and complex systems design. Alexandra completed her graduate degrees in Aerospace Engineering from Georgia Tech (PhD) and Systems Engineering from the University of Virginia (UVa). Prior to attending Georgia Tech, Alexandra received a bachelor’s degree in aerospace engineering from MIT and a master’s degree in systems engineering from the University of Virginia. Alexandra comes to FIU
previously taught technology and engineering (T&E) courses in Maryland’s Public School System. He is nationally recognized for his work related to the safer design of makerspaces and collaborative STEM labs. Dr. Love is an Authorized OSHA Trainer for General Industry. He has also served on committees at state and national levels that developed P-12 engineering education standards. Dr. Love is the recipi- ent of ASEE’s Fall 2022 Middle Atlantic Conference Best Paper Award. Prior to his employment at the University of Maryland Eastern Shore he was a tenure track faculty member in elementary/middle grades STEM education at Penn State University’s Capital Campus.Dr. Andrew John Hughes, California State University, San