Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Danielle Nicole Carter; Rafael E. Landaeta, Old Dominion University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

Participatory Action Research Model that ultimatelyends with continual program enhancement. The structure of the initiative is not only based on the detailsof the schedule but also on the feedback of the participants. The lack of URMs in the college provokedan idea from personal experiences at other minority events. With the use of a systematic onlinedocument review of current weekend outreach programs, a plan of action was developed, and effectiveprogram designs were synthesized.Based on the systematic review of similar programs, the current plan is to implement a program inFebruary of 2020 that will target about 30 participants. Mentees will be able to connect with multipleorganizations such as the VEX robotics club, the National Society of Black

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hao Li, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Anette Hosoi, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Student

Ocean Utilization at MIT. She is a Radcliffe Institute Fellow and a Fellow of the American Physical Society. Her research interests include fluid mechanics, bioinspired design and locomotion, with a focus on optimization ofcrawling gastropods, digging bivalves, swimming microorganisms and soft robotics. Prof. Hosoi is also an avid mountain biker and her passion for sports has led her to create MIT Sports Lab, a program that is designed to build an interconnected community of faculty, students, industry partners, alums and athletes who are dedicated to applying their technical expertise to advance the state-of-the-art in sports. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 WIP: Initial

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade - Experiences Designing Courses and Communities

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aileen Tapia, University of Texas, El Paso; Jose Martinez, University of Texas, El Paso; Peter Golding P.E., University of Texas, El Paso

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

Paper ID #16707Building Professional Communities - Initiating Junior Chapters of MAES &SHPE to Increase STEM Awareness and Professional PracticeMs. Aileen Tapia, University of Texas, El Paso Aileen Tapia is an industrial engineering junior at the University of Texas at El Paso, where she gadly serves as the Region 5 Student Representative and previously served as secretary and president of the 150-member student chapter. She also helped establish a SHPE Jr. chapter at her high school alma mater. As a research assistant, she explored different techniques to effectively deliver Project Based Learning (PBL) techniques to

Conference Session

Student Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kelly Patsavas; Barrett S. Caldwell, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Student

even tacitskills (increased self-efficacy to develop and share innovations and contributions) are results ofthe lab’s activity. This is due to both the demonstrated learning outcomes by students, and theirinternalized awareness and structuring of their learning as distinct but linked products of thesystem.ConclusionMy initial experience with the research lab was intended to develop very specific pieces ofexplicit content knowledge to support career development goals. However, the process ofbecoming exposed to both the context of research, and the collaborative knowledge sharingactivities of a specific research lab, became an unexpectedly rich source of grounded learning.The goal of simulating student learning in explicit, implicit, and tacit

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University; Tobias Ortega-Knight, University of the Virgin Islands; Charles Huang Chen, Michigan State University; Danny Lynch, University of the Virgin Islands; Kathleen Anne Fitzsimons, Michigan State University; Crystal D Alton; Juan L. Mena Lapaix, Michigan State University; Joshua Drost, Michigan State University; Garrett Kohler

Tagged Divisions

Student

coordinator serving as the primary investigator, 12 studentscompleted human-subjects research training and went through the IRB (Institutional ReviewBoard) approval process in order to conduct an autoethnographical study of their own learningexperiences during the EnSURE program. Of the 12 initial students, 4 decided that that they weretoo busy with their summer research to participate in this project, and 8 contributed to the onlineconversations that generated data for this study. All of these conversations took place in aseparate Facebook group established with “secret” security settings, meaning that no one outsidethe group was able to see the existence of the group, its members, or the content of conversations.The choice of Facebook as a platform

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kelsy Ecclesiastre, University of South Florida; Robert Hogan Jr, University of South Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

attended DeLand High School for the Engineering Academy where he was introduced to different fields of engineering, which built his interest in the power field. Currently he is assisting the faculty of the Foundations of Engineering Lab course at the University of South Florida. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Research for the Improvement of the Foundations of Engineering Lab Course-WIPBackgroundMost Engineering students are not able to acquire significant experience relevant to their majoruntil their third or fourth semester in college due to College of Engineering prerequisites. TheFoundations of Engineering Lab course is designed to introduce new

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Renee M. Desing, The Ohio State University; Rachel Louis Kajfez, The Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

Q-Set. The initial Q-Set was then piloted with twopost-doc researchers using the Q-Sort process and a follow-up interview to ask about therelevance of the statements. Using the results of these pilot interviews, the researchers narrowedtheir final Q-Set down to 47 statements. Example Study. The example study followed the recommendations for selecting abalanced Q-Set as well as the pilot process by Liu, Yueh, Chen, and Sheen [8] to develop the Q-Set. To begin the analysis process, the statements in the Q Concourse were refined and smoothedinto the Q-Statement structure. For example, the statement “Having autonomy to develop newideas” was refined as “I enjoy having autonomy to develop new ideas”. Next, duplicatestatements were removes

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Garrett Thomas Burrows, University of Wyoming; Mike Borowczak, University of Wyoming

Tagged Divisions

Student

world, hands-on experience in the engineering fields. A 2017 thesissupervision clarifies that action learning can be a critical part of undergraduate engineeringlearning [4]. The student researchers approached the project in multiple stages. First, they usedpencils and paper to brainstorm and design the physical dimensions of the device. They came upwith and discarded several iterations before landing on a design that they wanted to take forward.Then, they moved from pencil and paper to the computer and "SolidWorks" CAD (computeraided drafting) software that allowed them to bring their drawings to digital 3D space. Once theywere happy with their initial prototype, printing began. They quickly learned the necessity ofcost-efficient designs and

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kevin Zhu, University of Toronto; Aoran Jiao, University of Toronto; Xinyue (Crystal) Liu, University of Toronto; Scott Ramsay P.Eng., University of Toronto

Tagged Divisions

Student

Paper ID #34114Design of a Low Cost EEG Headset for Educational ResearchMr. Kevin Zhu, University of Toronto Kevin Zhu is an undergraduate student at the University of Toronto pursuing his Bachelor of Applied Science in Engineering Science. He is interested in brain-computer interfaces and how they can be applied to various aspects of life and society.Mr. Aoran Jiao, University of Toronto Aoran Jiao is an undergraduate student at the Division of Engineering Science at the University of Toronto. He has a wide array of research interests including engineering education, software development, machine intelligence, and

Conference Session

Educating Students for Professional Success

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Devdas M. Pai, North Carolina A&T State University; Robin Guill Liles, North Carolina A&T State University; Courtney Lambeth, North Carolina A&T State University; Prashant N. Kumta, University of Pittsburgh; Harvey S. Borovetz, University of Pittsburgh; Sarah K. Pixley, University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine; Partha Roy, University of Pittsburgh; Jangannathan Sankar, North Carolina A&T State University

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies, New Engineering Educators, Student

AC 2011-2780: BOOTSTRAPPING A NEW GRADUATE CURRICULUMTHROUGH AN ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTERDevdas M. Pai, North Carolina A&T State University (Eng) Devdas M. Pai is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering and serves as Director for Education and Out- reach for the NSF Engineering Research Center for Revolutionizing Metallic Biomaterials. His research and teaching interests are in the areas of manufacturing processes and materials engineering.Robin Guill Liles, North Carolina A&T State University Robin Guill Liles is associate professor in counseling and counselor education in the Department of Hu- man Development and Services in the School of Education at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State

Conference Session

Graduate Student Experience

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janet Y Tsai, University of Colorado at Boulder; Daria A Kotys-Schwartz, University of Colorado Boulder; Beverly Louie, University of Colorado, Boulder; Virginia Lea Ferguson, Mechanical Engineering; University of Colorado; Boulder, CO; Alyssa Nicole Berg, University of Colorado Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies, Student

Paper ID #6667Am I a Boss or a Coach? Graduate Students Mentoring Undergraduates inResearchMs. Janet Y Tsai, University of Colorado at Boulder Janet Y. Tsai is a doctoral student at the University of Colorado, Boulder, whose work examines and develops initiatives to encourage more students, especially women, into the eld of engineering. Currently, Tsai’s research focuses on understanding the dynamics of how status and prestige are constructed among novice engineers.Dr. Daria A Kotys-Schwartz, University of Colorado Boulder Dr. Daria Kotys-Schwartz is the Design Center Colorado Co-Director and an Instructor in the

Conference Session

Educating Students for Professional Success

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David F. Ollis, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies, New Engineering Educators, Student

department initiated an independent research propositioncourse for all first year PhD candidates. Student performance in this spring semesterthree unit course was treated as a graduate qualifier exam, and both students and facultyhave been supportive of this requirement, as summarized earlier1. Over the last decade, our first year approach to research education hasbroadened. Peter Kilpatrick added a one unit fall course, Introduction to Research, aprofessional development course including research ethics, presentations, andpublications. While these two courses were satisfying as stand-alone efforts, recentfaculty and graduate student sentiment pushed for an earlier engagement of student withresearch advisor, PhD committee, and research itself

Conference Session

Student Division Development of Professional Skills Technical Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ana Cristina Estrada, University of Virginia; Lindsey Taylor Brinton, The Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Student

(PFF) initiative and [6] applies Communities of Practice theory to PFFprograms. Other literature describes formal training for engineering teaching assistants, such as thepros and cons [7], guidelines [8], and logistics [9]. In contrast, our Tricks of the Trade paper focuseson how graduate students can seek out and maximize training for teaching while fulfilling heavyresearch responsibilities. Our paper is centered on the question: How can doctoral students ensurethat they will not only be ready for the research aspect of a future career as a PI, but also theteaching aspect? To answer this, we give detailed advice on how to seek out teaching-centricopportunities and advice on how to make the most of them. Topics include the role of

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

VJ Tocco, University of Florida; Kevin Buettner; Madeline G Sciullo, University of Florida; Jennifer Sinclair Curtis, University of California, Davis; Jason E. Butler, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Student

-researcher transition: research initiation and professional development for new graduate students. Chem Eng Educ. 2016;50(4):221-229.4. Carpente J. Using Web-based technologies to reach and engage millennial students in calculus. ASEE Annu Conf Expo Conf Proc. 2009. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0- 69249167216&partnerID=40&md5=3b52a4590353331438821b451f02283e.5. Waters C. Teaching the millennial student, adapting the learning framework for material science. In: American Society for Engineering Education. ; 2009.6. Harrison RG, Nollert MU, Schmidtke DW, Sikavitsas VI. The Research Proposal in Bioengineering Courses. Chem Eng Educ. 2006;40(4):323-326.7. Aucoin MG, Jolicoeur M. Is there

Conference Session

Graduate Student Experience

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Benjamin Ahn, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Monica Farmer Cox, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Brenda M. Capobianco, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies, Student

Page 23.563.2relationship.11 Researchers further show that mentoring is one of the most important factors forcreating satisfying UR experiences from undergraduates’ perspectives.12-14 Indeed, researchshows that a positive mentoring experience fosters greater understanding of a research topic,personal and professional growth, and acquisition of various skills for future careers.13Many of the UR program models across the U.S. have stated that a student’s primary mentor is afaculty member.15-17 They have suggested that UR students work side-by-side with a facultymember who generally initiates the project. However, a large body of literature suggests thatmany undergraduates frequently work with graduate students or post-doctoral fellows, and

Conference Session

Graduate Student Experience

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Irene B Mena, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Sven Schmitz, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies, Student

Paper ID #6437An Exploratory Study of the Research Mentor Experience in a Novel Under-graduate Aerospace Engineering CourseIrene B Mena, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Irene B. Mena has a B.S. and M.S. in Industrial Engineering, and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education. Her research interests include first-year engineering and graduate student professional development.Dr. Sven Schmitz, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Sven Schmitz joined the faculty of Aerospace Engineering at Penn State University in 2010. He received a diploma degree in Aerospace Engineering from RWTH Aachen (Germany) in 2002

Conference Session

Student Division Development of Professional Skills Technical Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anahid Behrouzi, California Polytechnic State University - San Luis Obispo

Tagged Divisions

Student

research or using notes providedby the course instructor. Your past teaching was at the bequest of faculty, now is the time tobegin volunteering to teach. As an initial step it is worth discussing with the course instructoryour interest in a future in academia, and the value that teaching has in your professionalpreparation. Consistent with Level 2, you should be clear that the teaching experience you areseeking is different from the past because you either intend to learn material that is new to youand/or to create original lesson plans. Consider two avenues to volunteer-teach:  Couple your teaching request with one of the ideas you developed during the exercise in the previous section “Address Concept Challenges”. Perhaps you prepare a

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Karina Sylvia Sobieraj, Ohio State University; Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Student

interviewee to segregate the threesections of mentoring. These sections included individual mentoring, peer/group mentoring, andfaculty/PI mentoring. Key aspects from each interview were categorized into each specifiedsection to showcase the various mentoring experiences of each participant. With the use of theconcept map, a document was created that expanded upon the connections that were seenbetween the interviews. Final thoughts about the research question were put together with the useof the created documents.Throughout the research project, there were various limitations that became present. First, it wasdifficult to showcase each participant’s feelings and experiences in relation to mentoring basedon the initial reasoning behind the interviews

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Timothy Carl Becker P.E., Iowa State University; Joel K. Sikkema, Iowa State University; Nicole Lynn Oneyear, Iowa State University; Shashi S. Nambisan P.E., Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Student

; however, this increase will need to be evaluated in light of theothers efforts, which may also be attempting to address the same issue identified by the GSC.ConclusionsThe student-organized Graduate Student Research Showcase and Poster Competition sponsoredby the CCEE Department at ISU mimicked a conference environment, enhanced presenter’sgraphical communication and oral presentation skills and—based on initial data—catalyzeddissemination of research. By strictly following a 16-week planning schedule, other studentleaders can enhance dissemination of their research and the research of their peers within atypical semester. In the view of the authors, the event was well received by attendees andregarded as highly valuable experience for the

Conference Session

Research on Diversification & Inclusion

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Lachney, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Dean Nieusma, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, New Engineering Educators, Student, Women in Engineering

. Page 26.616.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Engineering Bait-and-Switch: K-12 Recruitment Strategies Meet University Curricula & CultureAbstractThis paper uses the metaphor of engineering bait-and-switch to characterize the misalignmentbetween educational approaches of major K-12 engineering initiatives and traditional higher-education engineering programs. We argue that this misalignment is the result of divergentunderlying educational logics. While K-12 engineering education is notably inclusive, “baiting”student interest with context-driven, open-ended problem solving, higher engineering education“switches” toward an exclusive, abstract fundamentals-first

Conference Session

Research on Diversification & Inclusion

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jane L. Lehr, California Polytechnic State University; Michael Haungs, California Polytechnic State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, New Engineering Educators, Student, Women in Engineering

   Figure  4:  Computing  Disciplines  at  CPSU  (LSE  total  vs.  LSE-­‐Computing  Disciplines  vs.  Fall  2013  incoming  class)The rest of this paper identifies and explores possible explanations for this difference as part ofan effort to initiate a research agenda in this area.Discussion: Why So Many More Women in LSE Compared to Other ComputingDisciplines at CPSU? – Initiating a Research Agenda on B.A. Programs in EngineeringStudiesOne reason that we believe women students are both attracted to and more successful in LSE ascompared to other computing disciplines at CPSU is the size of the major. LSE is a small majorwith a high level of group and one-on-one advising. To compare, within the broader College ofEngineering, the typical college

Conference Session

Research on Diversification & Inclusion

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Brewer, University of Georgia; Nicola Sochacka, University of Georgia; Joachim Walther, University of Georgia

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, New Engineering Educators, Student, Women in Engineering

what thiscareer path would look like in practice, but I’m committed to finding out.About half way through my freshman environmental seminar, my professor, Dr. Walther, askedme if I would be interested in working on a research project in engineering education. Hedescribed a study of media representations of engineering that he was working on with hiscolleague and told me that they were looking for a student who would like to help with dataanalysis. I agreed, and attended his research group’s next meeting. I was initially intimidated byworking with professors on a research project, but I quickly became comfortable after help andencouragement from my supervisors.My participation in this research group formed the context for the present

Conference Session

Student Division Innovative Research Methods Technical Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rachel K. Anderson, Clemson University; Julie P Martin, Clemson University

Tagged Divisions

Student

make decisions to adapt his or her approach aschallenges arise, additional data is needed, or when the initial process does not go as planned.Research is in fact a rather “messy” process. In my own dissertation research, I also encounteredthis inherent “messiness.” This publication is intended to communicate the challenges Iencountered during my dissertation research study as I observed and interviewed tenundergraduate students working on a cross-disciplinary project team.This manuscript is written as an audit trail 1–4 in first person, active voice, following theAmerican Psychological Association (APA) guidelines 5. By writing this paper as an audit trail,I can be transparent about decisions I made during my dissertation work as well as

Conference Session

Student Division Innovative Research Methods Technical Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anne Marguerite McAlister, The Ohio State University; Dennis M. Lee, Clemson University; Katherine M. Ehlert, Clemson University; Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University; Courtney June Faber, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Marian S. Kennedy, Clemson University

Tagged Divisions

Student

interest and coding them with a key word generated fromthe data itself opposed to using a predefined set of categories or codes (Patton, 2002; Creswell,2014).Initially, six completed survey documents from the set of 154 were selected at random and codedinductively by each of the three researchers to establish a codebook. The process of developingthe codebook through open coding was iterative and involved numerous conversations amongthe coders and other members of the research team. The creation of a codebook was an initialstep towards establishing IRR between coders within a research team by allowing each coder tocompare their work to the established definitions. The goal of this process was to develop acodebook that could be used reliably by all

Conference Session

Student Division Innovative Research Methods Technical Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cassandra Groen, Virginia Tech; Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., Virginia Tech; Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Student

difficult for noviceresearchers to recognize and employ the multiple versions of this methodology in practice. Toprovide these individuals with a starting point for conducting grounded theory research, weorganize this paper into three overarching sections: 1) introduction to the methodology; 2) acomparison between two types of grounded theory traditions; and 3) strategies forimplementation. First, we establish an initial understanding of this methodology by providing abrief introduction of the GT methodology. Second, we compare and contrast two approaches ofGT: classic GT developed by Glaser and Strauss [1], and constructivist GT developed byCharmaz [2]. Lastly, we provide strategies for methodological implementation as situated withina current GT

Conference Session

Exploring Research Methodologies in Engineering Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Charles Algeo Wilson IV, Louisiana State University; Adrienne Steele, Louisiana State University; Warren N. Waggenspack Jr., Louisiana State University; James Blake Gegenheimer

Tagged Divisions

Student

science education.Dr. Warren N. Waggenspack Jr., Louisiana State University Warren N. Waggenspack, Jr. is currently the Mechanical Engineering Undergraduate Program Director and holder of the Ned Adler Professorship in the Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering at Louisiana State University. He obtained both his baccalaureate and master’s degrees from LSU ME and his doctorate from Purdue University’s School of Mechanical Engineering. He has been actively engaged in teaching, research and curricula development since joining the LSU faculty in 1988. Over the last 12 years, he acquired funding from NSF to support the development of several initiatives aimed at improving student retention and graduation

Conference Session

Student Division Innovative Research Methods Technical Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emilia Dewi Tanu, University of Maryland, College Park; Gina M Quan, University of Maryland, College Park; Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park; Chandra Anne Turpen, University of Maryland

Tagged Divisions

Student

).Analytical ApproachOur initial research questions were centered around peer educators’ resources for teaching andhow they attend to their students’ emotions. The research team members were interested in arange of research questions pertaining to the relationships between emotion, engineering design,engineering classroom culture, and teaching goals of undergraduate peer educators. The team ispersonally committed to identifying opportunities for engineering learning spaces to valuestudent emotion. These interests and values guided what we observed in our data and what wechose to pursue for exploratory analysis.We recruited UTFs enrolled in the pedagogy seminar to participate in this study. A total of 14UTFs were enrolled in the pedagogy seminar. 6

Conference Session

Student Division Innovative Research Methods Technical Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexander Kim, North Carolina State University; David F. Ollis, North Carolina State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

transportation come at cost approximately equal to the same course load in a US summer. An additional advantage of the French program is that IPL is a combination of fourengineering schools, CPE-Lyon, ECAM-Lyon, ISARA-Lyon, and ITECH-Lyon, and thus offerssummer programs in a broad range of engineering subjects, as the following specializations ofeach IPL school indicate: CPE-Lyon: Chemistry, chemical engineering, physics, and electronics ECAM-Lyon: Energy and sustainability ISARA-Lyon: Agriculture, food and environmental science ITECH-Lyon: Materials, chemistry, cosmetics, and leather We have published two descriptions of this French IPL program, initiated in 2000. Thefirst version (1

Conference Session

Student Division Innovative Research Methods Technical Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carrie E Sekeres, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach; James J. Pembridge, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach

Tagged Divisions

Student

Paper ID #17868What’s So Funny About STEM: Examining the Implementation of Humor inthe ClassroomMs. Carrie E Sekeres, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach Carrie Sekeres graduated with a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering, with a concentration in Astronautics, from Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, where she also works as a research assistant in the Engi- neering Fundamentals Department. Ms. Sekeres interned in the Integration Engineering branch of the Launch Services Program Directorate, working to develop and implement a working online collaboration space for several of the branches at Kennedy Space Center. Ms

Conference Session

Exploring Research Methodologies in Engineering Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ryan L Falkenstein-Smith, Syracuse University; Jack S Rossetti, Syracuse University; Michael Garrett, Syracuse University; Jeongmin Ahn, Syracuse University

Tagged Divisions

Student

Paper ID #16779Investigating the Influence of Micro-Videos used as a Supplementary CourseMaterialMr. Ryan L Falkenstein-Smith, Syracuse University Ryan is a Ph.D. candidate at Syracuse University whose research interest range from carbon sequestration to engineering education.Mr. Jack S Rossetti, Syracuse University I am a second year Ph. D. student. Research interests: How students learn How to make teaching more effective and engagingMr. Michael Garrett, Syracuse University Michael Garrett is an incoming graduate student at Syracuse University. Throughout his undergraduate career he developed an interest in