Behavioral Biometrics for Human Identification: Intelligent Applications. Dr. Villani has been actively seeking funding and has been awarded funding both internally and externally to address the gender disparity in the Computing Programs at FSC and is Co-Faculty Advisor to the Supporting Women in Computing Club. Dr. Villani has presented and published in peer reviewed journals regarding initiatives and outcomes addressing the gender disparity in computing disciplines including co-moderated a Birds of a Feather Session at the virtual NY Celebration of Women in Computing at the Spring 2021 Conference entitled: Learning and Sharing from the Decade long Journey of Success and Failures on Women in Computing Initiatives
, and to take students to women in computing events. Dr. Villani has been active publishing and presenting these experiences in an effort to share within the research community and to ultimately broaden participation. Dr. Villani is the co-advisor of the Supporting Women in Computing Club where she has mentored many women students in the program. Dr. Villani is the recipient of the Chancellor’s Award for Teaching Excellence, 2012. Prior to joining FSC, Dr. Villani had a 15 year computer consulting career in the Risk Management and Insurance Industry.Dr. Lisa Cullington, Sacred Heart University Lisa Cullington, Ph.D. is an educational researcher with expertise in academic program development, learning outcomes and
Paper ID #37331Impact of an Emerging Scholars/Peer-Led Team Learning Program on theRecruitment of Undergraduate Women and Underrepresented Minorities intoComputer Science and MathematicsDr. Rita Manco Powell, University of Pennsylvania Rita Manco Powell received her Ed.D. from the University of Pennsylvania in 2005. She has worked for over 20 years in Penn Engineering, first in the Department of Computer and Information Science and recently in the Office of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, to develop programs and initiatives to recruit women and underrepresented minorities into computer science and to retain them. Powell was Co
self-efficacy [24].Self-efficacy is defined as an individual’s belief about their ability to accomplish a specific task.In essence, self-efficacy is one’s confidence in their ability to be successful for a specific task.Higher self-efficacy has been shown to increase motivation to learn [25] and to improveperformance in computing students [26]. It has been frequently used in computing diversitystudies, whose findings show that women have lower self-efficacy than their male counterparts[11].Self-efficacy can be improved in four ways [24]. First, having mastery experiences increasesself-efficacy. This means that the more an individual is successful in performing a specific task,the more confident that they will be successful on another similar
engineers by running clubs where girls grade 6 through 12 learn computer science skills from volunteer teachers. The GWC portal provides a 10-session curriculum that allows participants to program in different programming languages. It also provides meeting guides suited to the participants’ age group, tutorials, and facilitator support. According to the GWC website [14], the club has reached 580,000 students in United States, Canada, India, and United Kingdom. GWC-QU was established in 2017 and ran its first sessions in Spring 2018 [15]. It has been running every year since then except during COVID in 2019 and 2020 [16]. Running the club requires significant effort where the facilitators must visit schools around the area to
FABRIC for WiFi and cellular networking research. Dr. Aydin has been a vivid supporter of women in computing and increasing diversity in computing. She has been the co-faculty advisor for Women in Computing club at Farmingdale, contributed in Grace Hopper Celebration as a technical committee member and reviewer. Dr. Aydin has published and presented in peer reviewed venues about women in computing and broadening the participation over a decade. Dr. Aydin is the 2023 recipient of the Farmingdale Foundation Excellence Award for faculty service.Dr. Lisa Cullington, Sacred Heart University Lisa Cullington, Ph.D. is an educational researcher with expertise in academic program development, learning outcomes, and educational
address the gender disparity in the Computing Programs at FSC and is Co-Faculty Advisor to the Supporting Women in Computing Club. Dr. Villani has presented and published in peer reviewed journals regarding initiatives and outcomes addressing the gender disparity in computing disciplines including co-moderated a Birds of a Feather Session at the virtual NY Celebration of Women in Computing at the Spring 2021 Conference entitled: Learning and Sharing from the Decade long Journey of Success and Failures on Women in Computing Initiatives. Professor Villani presented a paper entitled, Solving the Gender Disparity Puzzle in Computing Disciplines at a Commuter State College at ISECON virtual conference in October 2021
International University Stephen is an Assistant Professor Engineering and Computing Education at Florida International University. He has a prior academic and professional background in engineering, having worked professionally as an acoustical engineer. He has taught a number of courses on design, sociotechnical contexts, education, and learning. He conducts research on equity and culture in engineering education and supports undergraduate and graduate student researchers through the Equity Research Group. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Student engagement with undergraduate teaching assistants (UTAs) in an introductory computer programming courseAbstractDespite
Paper ID #42874The Role of STEM Society Scholarships in Supporting the Retention andPersistence of Women in Engineering and Computer ScienceRebeca Petean, Society of Women Engineers Rebeca Petean is the Research Analyst for the Society of Women Engineers and a Ph.D. candidate in Sociology at Portland State University. Her work bridges research, advocacy, and equity in STEM education. Rebecca collaborates with educators, policymakers, and nonprofits to maximize the impact of STEM initiatives. Her dissertation focuses on the school-to-prison pipeline, specifically examining school safety strategies in K-12 school spaces
the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Wentworth Institute of Technology. Her research interests include Optical Communications and Signal Processing.Dr. Marisha Rawlins, Wentworth Institute of Technology Marisha Rawlins is an Associate Professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Program at Wentworth Institute of Technology (WIT). Her research interests include computer architecture optimizations, embedded systems and devices used in teaching and healthcare, and methods and systems for improving teaching and learning. Dr. Rawlins received her PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering from The University of Florida. Prior to working at WIT, she was an Assistant Professor in Computer
Paper ID #37733Board 191: Are female faculty role models to female students in highereducation? A study of teachers’ perceptions of their roles andresponsibilities in computer science and engineeringDr. Qian Wang, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (XJTLU) Dr. Qian ”Sarah” Wang is a Research Director, Ph.D. supervisor, and former Program Director of the MA in Global Education at the Academy of Future Education, XJTLU. Dr. Sarah graduated from Teachers College, Columbia University in New York (MA in Social-organizational Psychology; Ed.D in Education Leadership). Her research focuses on technology-enhanced education
skills and subsequently improve graduation rates in engineeringdisciplines. This study was conducted to determine the impact of increasing the number offreehand sketching training assignments using spatial visualization training software in afreshman engineering class. This paper analyzes the impact of sketch training by gender. Themotivation for this analysis was to address a gap in spatial visualization ability among femaleengineering students. The question being explored was if and in what areas additional sketchtraining helps female and male students, and if this training can help level the playing field. Toaddress these questions, a controlled trial was conducted within a freshman-level mechanicaldesign course where students learned
the camp schedule incorporates restful activities to balance thephysically demanding nature of welding. Given the strenuous nature of the hands-on work,intervals of seated activities should be included. These could involve sessions on computer-aided design with tutorials and easy design challenges or engaging in a seated art project.Providing moments of respite not only contributes to the overall well-being of the participantsbut also enhances the learning experience by diversifying the types of activities involved. 4.7 Allow time and materials for unstructured creativity It is advised to incorporate scheduled time and provide materials at the end of the camp forstudents to embark on additional projects. As students become acquainted
, creating a“community of practice” that enhances female confidence [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15],[16], [17]. Quantitative data has demonstrated a significant improvement in student performancewhen peer-led team learning was implemented into a course [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15],[16], [17]. Research in Peer-Led Team Learning (PLTL) has shown that PLTL is effective inretaining under-represented students (female and minority students) in undergraduate computerscience introductory classes [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. In addition,incorporating PLTL in computer science curriculum increases participation and retention ofunder-represented groups specifically female students [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15
.html[29] N. Akkuş Çakır, A. Gass, A. Foster, and F. J. Lee, “Development of a Game-Design Workshop to Promote Young Girls’ Interest Towards Computing Through Identity Exploration,” Comput. Educ., vol. 108, pp. 115–130, May 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.02.002.[30] C. Ashcraft, “Technology and Sexuality – What’s the Connection? Addressing Youth Sexualities in Efforts to Increase Girls’ Participation in Computing,” Learn. Media Technol., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 437–457, Oct. 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.933847.[31] D. N. Champion et al., “(Designing for) Learning Computational STEM and Arts Integration in Culturally Sustaining Learning Ecologies,” Inf. Learn. Sci., vol. 121
. She also collaborates with the local Community College to improve graduation and transfer rates. Lastly, she is currently the Principal Investigator of the Research-Oriented Learning Experiences Engineering program and the Latinidad STEM Mentoring Program, both funded by the National Science Foundation.Luis Rodolfo Garcia Carrillo, New Mexico State University Luis Rodolfo GARCIA CARRILLO received the PhD. degree in Control Systems from the University of Technology of Compi`egne, France. He was a Postdoctoral Researcher at the Center of Control, Dynamical systems and Computation at UC Santa Barbara, USA. He currently holds an Assistant Professor position with the Klipsch School of Electrical and Computer Engineering
shares knowledge, teaches, and relates whatwe have learned via metaphors and narratives. Even our own identity in the world can be thoughtof as a narrative in our minds, and to imagine our future selves we must construct a futurenarrative. It is this power of story that we believe needs to be fundamentally embraced bydiversity efforts in engineering and computing to make a significant change in our demographicchallenges. And yet, the power of story is left, mostly, unexplored in engineering as it does not fitwith our STEM-focused fields that sit strongly in the camps of quantitative evidence, testing, anddesign.We will argue in this paper, that there is convincing evidence that leveraging the power of storymight be the “holy grail” for changing
. 388-402, 2013.[8] D. M. Hatmaker, "Engineering identity: Gender and professional identity negotiation among women engineers," Gender, Work & Organization, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 382-396, 2013.[9] Y. V. M. Zastavker and L. Pag, "Women in Engineering: Exploring the Effects ofProject-Based Learning in a First-Year Undergraduate Engineering Program," in Proceedings. Frontiers in Education. 36th Annual Conference, San Diego, CA, 2006.[10] E. DaMaren, "Is Team-Based Learning Leading to Inequitable Skill-Building? Motivating a Re- Evaluation via Computer-Aided Design Education," in Mudd Design Workshop, Claremont, CA, 2023.[11] L. A. Meadows and D. Sekaquaptewa, "The Influence of Gender Stereotypes on Role Adoption in Student
quantitative data aggregation.Dr. Jamie R Gurganus, University of Maryland Baltimore County Dr. Jamie Gurganus is a faculty member in the Engineering and Computing Education Program and Affiliate Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at UMBC. She is the Associate Director STEMed Research in the College of Engineering and Information Technology (COEIT). She also serves as the Director for the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning (CIRTL) in the graduate school. Her research is focused on solving problems relating to educating and developing engi- neers, teachers, and the community at all levels (P12, undergraduate, graduate, post-graduate). A few of these key areas include engineering
Computing Education Research (CER) to advance personalized learning, specifically within the context of online learning and engagement, educational technologies, curriculum design which includes innovative and equitable pedagogical approaches, and support programs that boost the academic success of different groups of students. She teaches in active learning environments, such as project-based learning and flipped classrooms. She aims to bring EE and CER into practice.Dr. Lilianny Virguez, University of Florida Lilianny Virguez is a Instructional Assistant Professor at the Engineering Education Department at Uni- versity of Florida. She holds a Masters’ degree in Management Systems Engineering and a Ph.D. in Engineering
ofsupport such as mentorship and peer help, providing early exposure to universityenvironments and faculty [22], [23], and adopting effective teaching strategies to helpstudents learn more effectively [24], [25]. In addition to these proven strategies, theWiSTEM program includes CRP in the project modules and coursework and providesa safe space for students to talk about barriers to persistence that are specific to Blackwomen in STEM.Selection of StudentsThe WiSTEM program is open to all accepted first-year students who have identifiedSTEM as their major. Students in chemistry, computer science, engineering,environmental science, mathematics, and physics get priority given the relatively lownumbers of Black women who graduate with degrees in these
. There are four kinds of experiences that cancontribute positively to self-efficacy: mastery experiences, verbal or social persuasions, vicariousexperiences, and psychological states. Self-efficacy has proven to be a powerful predictor ofachievement in areas that range from the more general – learning, academic achievement,retention, mathematics – to the more specific – computing [15], engineering design [16],engineering modeling [17], and even tinkering [18] – just to name a few. Each of these women exhibited self-efficacy. From their stories, examples of at least twoof the kinds of experiences that engender self-efficacy are most prominent: mastery experiencesand verbal or social persuasions. The first, encouraged by her teacher, took
Publishing, 2022).Ms. Shruti Misra, University of Washington I am a graduate student in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. My research interest is broadly focused on studying innovation in university-industry partnerships. I am interesting in various ways that universitiesAlicia MullenProf. Eve A. Riskin P.E., University of Washington Eve Riskin received her BS degree in Electrical Engineering from M.I.T. and her graduate degrees in EE from Stanford. She was a professor in the ECE Department at the University of Washington for 32 years and is now Dean of Undergraduate Education at Stevens Institute of Technology.Dr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is a
variables of the first 4 items from theanalysis as learning items1. With the remaining 26 items, accuracy data and response time were fed into a1- and 2-skill-factor SEM, with an additional, orthogonal latent factor accounting for the variance causedby the test’s 20-minute time limit. In addition, the skill factors were allowed to covary. In the model, eachitem’s accuracy and response time variable were permitted to be influenced by any/all of the 3 latentfactors. (SEM was chosen because of its allowance for crossloading.)Upon computing this model, it was determined that there was not enough specification in the structure ofthe model, and that thus the model was not identified. Issues with convergence further required the use ofa more restrictive
, designing it to institutionalize the lessons learned as a diversity practitioner and engineering professor. She is a Fellow of the IEEE and ASEE and has been recognized with the PAESMEM award. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Toward a theoretical model of a successful WMEP programWith the emergence of engineering education programs, there is at last a structure and approachto train engineering professors for the university and college levels. But engineering diversityadministrators generally learn their job as they do it. The first women in engineering programwas founded at Purdue in 1969, and programs for minority engineers or multiculturalengineering in the 1970’s. The leaders of
and construction engineering. These disciplineshave a female participation of no more than 10%, both at the academic sphere and at work[13-14]. Some studies report that female students feel a low identity with their male peers,pointed out as being one of the causes of desertion at an early stage[10, 14]. While in careersrelated to computer science, Widdicks et al [15], mention that women have a lower sense ofbelonging, since these types of careers are contained within an environment of gender biasedstereotypes, affecting their self-efficacy and academic performance.In the case of engineering courses in industrial areas, current female participation is 19.2% (atthe learning center where this study was carried out). Saavedra-Acuna and Quezada
higher grade-thresholds for seeking SI and reported more factorsnegatively impacting their learning at the start and end of the semester, as well as morepessimistic outlooks towards their general studies compared to men. These differences wereobserved despite the fact that both genders entered their first-year with a similar number of pre-matriculation credits and received comparable grades. We also found that the overall number ofpre-matriculation credits did not impact the number of learning concerns students reported. First-generation and URM students enrolled with fewer pre-matriculation credits, reported a greaternumber of learning concerns, and received lower first-semester grades than their peers. Forfemale first-generation college
simultaneouslydissuade them from STEM career paths. In the example below, the respondent mentioned thatwhile the physics teacher encourages her students to study, the non-STEM teacher dissuadesthe students from this career path. “At school there were no inequalities in terms of whether you can learn subject or not. For example, my physics teacher was female, and she never favored someone based on the gender at the same time teacher who taught foreign languages used to discourage me from pursuing STEM field. When I announced that I want to be a computer scientist at first time, my English teacher said that it is not for girls. The most suitable profession for you will be a teacher or doctor.” Q19Although teachers contribute to the
Paper ID #37841Work in Progress: Connecting Engineering & Religious Identities: AWindow into One College Woman Student’s JourneyDr. Sarah Rodriguez, Virginia Tech Sarah L. Rodriguez is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and an affiliate faculty member with the Higher Education Program at Virginia Tech. In her research, she concentrates on identifying and asking urgent questions about systemic inequities such as racism, sexism, and classism that marginal- ized communities experience as they transition to and through their engineering and computing higher education experiences.Dr. Maria L. Espino, Iowa State
Paper ID #39249”Are You Sure You Know What You’re Talking About?”: Epistemic InjusticeExposed by Stereotype Threat in EngineeringKaitlyn Anne Thomas, University of Nevada, Reno Ms. Thomas is a doctoral student at University of Nevada, Reno in Engineering Education. Her back- ground is in structural engineering. Her research focus is on epistemology and systemic inequity in engineering learning environments.Dr. Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno Adam Kirn is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at University of Nevada, Reno. His research focuses on the interactions between engineering cultures, student