both its objectives and practice (laboratories, experiments, andmaterials), fulfills the aims of a sustainable curriculum on several levels. First, nanotechnologyenables innovation in the areas of renewable energy, toxic waste remediation, more efficient useof materials, substitution for scarce materials, and affordable healthcare. Smith and Granqvist59provide a survey of sustainable Green nanotechnologies for electric lighting and daylighting(luminaries), heat and electricity via solar energy, cooling devices, air sensing and cleaning,thermal insulation, and electrical storage, using nanotechnology similar to the subjects of ourproposed laboratory projects. Second, Lean approaches are predicated on waste reduction—“doing more with less.” Such
or None None 2 19 not electricity is available in a region where an electronic gadget is to be sold. 3. The average national income would be a key None 2 3 17 factor for setting a price for the product. 4. Intel’s decision to market $220 PC’s to India is 3 7 9 1 a good business decision. 5. India’s workers associated with the development of the Intel project were hired because they
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Assessment of a New Design Stem Course SequenceAbstractIn Fall 2009, the Mechanical Engineering Department at California State University, Northridgeimplemented significant changes to the curriculum by creating a new course sequence focusedon design. The course sequence is distributed throughout the four years of the program, andculminates in the traditional capstone senior design course. One of the features of the newsequence was the requirement of a team project in each course, including oral design reviewsdocumenting the projects’ progress. Enabling our students to continuously develop anddemonstrate skills related to design and communication was the main incentive behind
place.22 Such observations suggest the needfor “stepping stone” interventions to foster global competency in a broader range of engineeringstudents, and particularly those who are not as likely to self-select into global experiences.22-23How, then, might students learn to navigate their engineering career with global competencewithout experiencing a different culture firsthand? Additionally, how can we prepare students tonavigate across cultures before immersing them in a different context? A growing number ofresources and documented models make such learning possible. For example, content fromDowney et al.’s Engineering Cultures curriculum, along with many other resources, are availableon the GlobalHUB website (globalhub.org).8 Other examples
the question. Perhaps a betterapproach is a top down “how it works” presentation of electronics starting with the applications,systems, equipment then eventually delving deeper into the circuits and the components. It is amore interesting approach and can be implemented to the degree needed in each schoolaccording to local industry requirements.If it were possible to create a curriculum from scratch for today’s technician, the top downapproach would certainly be a major alternative. It starts with the application or equipment thendigs deeper into the system to identify major components such as modules or PC boards. Thecircuits are then considered. Ultimately the individual components and electrical theories wouldbe introduced.As it turns out
ofmathematical or engineering problems. The students complete software projects within ateam-oriented project-based learning environment [4]. These projects are part of therequirements of both the Computer Programming course and at least one additional coursewithin the curriculum in their second semester of study. Frequently, the EngineeringMathematics course in the second semester is that accompanying subject since it focuses onordinary differential equations and on numerical methods for solving them. For both subjects,this is a fruitful collaboration, as their mutual usefulness becomes clearly visible.It seems that a critical issue in teaching mathematics to engineering students is to find theright balance between the practical application of
his Ph.D. he began working in the Aerospace Industry where he spent over 10 years as a Stress Analyst/Consultant. At present he enjoys working on Distributed Electric Propulsion (DEP) with his students, designing, analyzing, constructing and flying Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Dr. Nader won a few awards in the past few years, among these are the College of Engineering Award of Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching (2023), Excellence in Faculty Academic Advising for the College of Engineering and Computer Science (2020). In addition, he is also a Co-PI on the NSF-supported HSI Implementation and Evaluation Project: Enhancing Student Success in Engineering Curriculum through Active e-Learning and High Impact Teaching
too far from being true in undergraduate education in the United States wherein students arememorizing their way through most of the curriculum. In an US News and World Reportarticle2, “High School Students Need to Think, Not Memorize”, an Advanced Placement biologyteacher is quoted “Students go through the motions of their lab assignments without graspingwhy, and ‘the exam is largely a vocabulary test’”.David Perkins3, co-director of Harvard Project Zero, a research center for cognitivedevelopment, and senior research associate at the Harvard Graduate School of Education, pointsout several observations in his article on “Teaching for Understanding”. (1) “The student mightsimply be parroting the test and following memorized routines for stock
undergraduate institutions(PUIs) in the second-year engineering curriculum. All students were given a lecture on bio-inspired design and asked to complete the C-K mapping template in class as part of learningactivities to understand the process of discovery, and again in their assignment to scaffoldapplication to the course project. Analysis of the student-generated templates using a rubricshows that students were able to successfully use information (knowledge transfer) to makeconnections between biology and engineering for creating solutions for design problems.Additionally, all students were asked to respond to six reflection questions regarding the content(biology) and process (bio-inspired design). Qualitative content analysis of second
technical material that thestudents need to solve the problem and the communication skills that they need to present theirsolutions. In addition, within the context of the design problem, instruction in teamworkmanagement, ethics, the role of the engineer in society, and sustainability is delivered.Most of the engineering disciplines are represented in the offerings: during the academic year2010 – 2011, students could select from course sections focusing on projects with technicalcontent reflecting aerospace, biomedical, civil and environmental, electrical and computer,industrial, materials science, mechanical, and naval engineering. In addition, one section with asignificant service-learning component was available, and one section was offered
”much negotiation, the adjunct instructor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering programwas replaced with a faculty who clearly saw the value of integration.As a result, the Mechanical Engineering program agreed to co-convene their course with themultidisciplinary course, thus leveraging a faculty they knew and trusted, and moving them onestep closer to full integration, as the lectures were co-taught. And with the transition to a newtenured faculty in Electrical and Computer Engineering, an advocate for increasing College-wideintegration of projects with more substantial departmental influence on curriculum decisions wasgained.As such, design faculty across the College have been critical players in the move towardsintegration
Page 11.1188.8 Pimmel, Russ, “Cooperative Learning Instructional Activities in a Capstone Design Course,” Journal ofEngineering Education, (July 2001), accessed online athttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=cache:mTq_X9wN5dkJ:https://www.asee.org/jee/papers/EE009-16.pdf+pimmel+capstone+cooperative+learning on December 14, 2005.5 Jenkins, S. Rod, et al., “Capstone Course in an Integrated Engineering Curriculum,” Journal ofProfessional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, (April 2002), pp. 75-82.6 US Military Academy Website, www.usma.edu/mission.asp, accessed January 17, 2006.7 Kaufman, pg. 26.8 Ibid, 28.9 Project Management and System Design, Instructional Memorandum, Academic Term 2006-2 (springsemester
engineering economy course provides an ideal environment inwhich students may demonstrate teamwork and communication skills, awareness of ethicalstandards, and an understanding of the impact of engineering solutions on society. Case studiesbased on the Challenger disaster and the Ford/Firestone controversy have direct relevance to theindustrial engineering curriculum and can be adapted to meet the needs of specific courses suchas engineering economy, project management, and quality control.IntroductionRecent revisions in engineering accreditation guidelines have raised awareness of the wide rangeof learning outcomes that comprise a modern undergraduate engineering education 1. In additionto technical competence in engineering science, students need
interdisciplinaryprogram in Marine Engineering Technology, which is compatible with current two-yearprograms in Marine Engineering Technology being offered at Thomas Nelson CommunityCollege, Tidewaters Community College, and the Northup Grumman Newport News ApprenticeSchool. In this proposed curriculum, Marine Engineering Technology will be introduced at thefreshman level with its incorporation into the colleges Freshman Engineering Program -Exploring Engineering and Technology land II. Additional courses in Basic Ship Building,Naval Architecture, Marine Electrical Systems, and Marine Husbandry and Support Facilitieswill be offered in the sophomore and junior years. The student will then take the currentlydeveloped MaET senior electives to round out the degree
engineering curriculum in Switzerland,”5th IFAC International Symposium on intelligent Components and Instruments for Control Applications (SICICA2003), July 9-11, 2003, pp. 57-59[7] Francisco Ferrero Martin, et al., “An Electronic Instrumentation Design Project for Computer EngineeringStudents,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 48, pp. 472-481, August 2005.[8] W. Lin, et al., “Integration of enterprise and industrial networks in computer engineering technology program,”Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference, 2004.[9] J. Rehg and B. Muller, “Teaching PLCs with the IEC 61131 standard languages,” Proceedings of ASEE AnnualConference, 2005.[10] J. Tapper, “Industry driven curriculum development, the key to successful courseware,” Proceedings of
instrument in a similar sense as discussedabove for the former objective: appropriate learning strategies are certainly more appropriatewhen based on real measurements than on artificial simulation. The sixth and seven learningobjectives essentially fulfill the intentions of a project-based learning curriculum such as thatdiscussed by Zhang, et al.8Learning assessment during cov-19 pandemicFigs 2 and 3 below present the fall 2019 Student Perception of Teaching (SPOT) survey resultsfor two of the first EE laboratory courses to involve remote student use of the myDAQinstrument loaned out by the university to the individual students. The SPOT surveys arecollected from the students late in the semester before they receive their semester grades. Notethat
interactive classroom alternative outweighed the technical challenges ofthe delivery method.A number of other techniques for developing better student-faculty interaction have been triedwith mixed success including the incorporation of life cycle assessment into early engineeringclasses (Weber et al. 2014); the use of incidental writing, or informal writing that students dothroughout the course (Hawkins et al. 1996); using a plant trip as a theme for an energy balancecourse (Younf and Stuart 2000); integrating thermal-fluid experiments into the classroom(Olinger and Hermanson 2002) and using problem based learning in an electrical engineeringcourse (Yadav et al. 2011). Finelli et al. (2001) present a list of activities that might improve theclassroom
typically takenduring the junior year. This course is the only place in the curriculum where topics such asdesign of experiments, measurement of engineering quantities, data analysis and selection ofsensors are covered. Beginning in Fall 2011 this course underwent an extensive redesign tomove from demonstration lab experiments to hands on, open ended laboratory experienceswhich emphasized the students’ ability to design experiments, identify the variables to bemeasured, and select the best instrumentation for a given task. Previous research by one of theauthors demonstrated measureable gains in retention of course concepts and the application ofthose concepts during a ‘design your own measurement experiment’ term project. The purposeof the current
Students recognize the potential of AI to makeapplied more practically within their curriculum. learning more efficient, improve educationalSuggestions included integrating AI into hands-on experiences, and provide hands-on applications that aretraining with tools like Building Information Modeling relevant to their future careers. However, there are(BIM) and machine learning for smarter design, significant concerns about AI's potential to diminishconstruction, and project management. This indicates a critical engineering skills such as problem-solving anddesire for AI applications that are directly relevant to analytical thinking. There is a strong call from
concepts related to the engineering habits, practices, and knowledge are explicitly taught and assessed. 2. Determining additional areas of opportunity to address the missing engineering concepts. 3. Creating more intentional areas for integrating engineering concepts within biology and chemistry courses. 4. Creating vertical maps for engineering units and projects to ensure the engineering concepts are addressed over time. 5. Developing instructional materials during common teacher planning times using the EPMs to address all of the core concepts for engineering learning.In order to analyze their current curriculum and to identify where concepts related to the threedimensions of the framework were
Standards, a chapter in Multicultural Curriculum Transformation in Science Technol- ogy Engineering and Mathematics, and her current work, Developing a Mentorship Practice Through Self-Study in the Journal of School Leadership. She is also the lead faculty for the Secondary Educa- tion department’s anti-racism webinar series and consultant for the schools of Engineering and Computer Science, Communications and Social Work at CSU Fullerton. California State University System Chancellor’s Office Center for Closing the Opportunity Gap Webinar series: Preservice Teacher Candidate Epistemic Agency: Acquiring the Professional Skills of Becoming a Science Teacher” on March 3, 2021. The webinar discussed the interconnected
processes as a means to display artifacts in theexhibit. The forensic floor was chosen to emphasize the revelation of what is normally hidden inprocesses and products – particularly laborers, their histories and their lives. Unlike ananthropological project, the artists sought neither to remain neutral nor to have everything hangtogether in a coherent manner. At the same time, the artists did not sensationalize their subject inan effort to make it as accessible as possible to a broad range of people. The project was a perfect meeting ground for all three groups, merging technology,culture, gender, activism, engineering, and art in multiple ways. The museum site itself oncehoused the Sprague Electric capacitor factory, but globalization
Education, 2023 Closing the Gap between Industry and Academia via Student Teams SupportAbstractA well-known challenge in engineering education is the attempt to balance the demands of industryrecruitment with the core needs of an already packed engineering curriculum. Due to timeconstraints, real-world examples and other learning opportunities that aim to develop andconsolidate the industry-desirable skills can be difficult to include in the curriculum. One way toaddress this challenge is to collaborate with industry (for example, on capstone projects, studentteam challenges, etc.) while the students are still studying. A place for these collaborations, whichcan provide benefit for both parties, is through student competitions. Student
) highlight the bridge that machine learning providesbetween AI technology and modern software engineering.In this paper we will present our approach, an overview of the project, and the hands-onlaboratory modules. Our preliminary experiences incorporating these modules into ourintroductory AI course will also be presented.1. IntroductionAn introductory Artificial Intelligence (AI) course provides students with basic knowledge of thetheory and practice of AI as a discipline concerned with the methodology and technology forsolving problems that are difficult to solve by other means. The importance of AI in theundergraduate computer science curriculum is illustrated by the Computing Curricula 2001recommendation of ten core units in AI2. It is believed
). Prentice-Hall, Inc., 2005.[4] Dutson, Alan J., et al. "A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project‐OrientedCapstone Courses." Journal of Engineering Education 86.1 (1997): 17-28.[5] Dym, Clive L., et al. "Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning." Journal of Engineering Education94.1 (2005): 103-120.[6] Clough, G. Wayne. "The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century." National Academy ofEngineering, Washington, DC (2004). Page 26.1102.9 8Table 1: Results from student survey (No. of responses = 76
Paper ID #40505Work in Progress: What is Ethical? A Mixed Methods Study ExaminingStudent, Faculty, and Stakeholder Views on Professional EngineeringEthicsMr. Bradley J. Sottile, The Pennsylvania State University Brad Sottile is Lecturer in Computer Science and Engineering, and Aerospace Engineering in The Penn- sylvania State University’s College of Engineering, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sci- ence. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: What is Ethical? A Mixed Methods Study Examining Student, Faculty, and Stakeholder Views on Professional
by four personteams. The project final report is developed in three stages: outline, draft, and final version. Thefirst two stages are not graded but critiqued by faculty before the final version is written by theteam. These reports must conform to the standard engineering format. Each member mustidentify their contribution to the final report. All members are required to make a technicalcontribution to the report, as well as to contribute to the written text. Guest faculty occasionallypresent relevant topics in class such as manufacturing, electrical, timing circuits, materialselection etc. These presentations serve to broaden the student appreciation of the profession asa whole. Late attendance is not tolerated and unexcused homework
Engineer- ing from the University of Virginia. Her research interests include Team Effectiveness, Collaborative and Active Learning, Engineering Education and Pedagogy, and Quality Control and Management.Rosalyn S. Hobson, Virginia Commonwealth University Dr. Rosalyn S. Hobson has been at Virginia Commonwealth University since 1996. Currently she is the School of Engineering Associate Dean for Graduate Studies, Associate Professor of Electrical Engineer- ing, and Director of the VCU/University of KwaZulu Natal International Partnership in South Africa. She received her B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from the University of Virginia. Her research interests include artificial neural networks, K-16
in Biomedical Engineering, Institution of Electrical Engineers, 1998.13. Lindell, T.J., and G.J. Milczarek, “Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues in the Undergraduate Biology Curriculum,” Journal of College Science Teaching, vol. 26, no. 5, March/April 1997. Page 10.296.1314. Brophy, S.P., et al., “BME Goes to the Movies: Developing Ethical Perspective in Bioengineers,” Proceedings, 2002 ASEE Conference, ASEE, 2002. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education15. Kitto, S.L
encourage them to pursue STEAM careers. One particularly effective approach isthrough hands-on learning and “making,” since children often have a natural affinity fortinkering and learn well through active involvement in meaningful activities [1]. Hands-on,project-based learning has been shown to get more students engaged with STEAM and help themlearn key skills for the future [2]. However, most STEAM education programs target students inupper-middle or high school [3]. Bustamante et. al write, “Since engineering education hastraditionally not been part of the general K–12 education experience (i.e., the beginning ofprimary school (age 5) through the end of secondary school (age 18)), early childhood educatorshave minimal background in engineering