correctly forinstruction.Preparation for a Virtual Classroom Server storage and access issues need to be planned before the actual delivery of a course.Some choose to use campus servers, while others choose to use Blackboard or similar coursemanagement applications operated by their schools. This research team needed the capability tohave all project faculty capable of uploading content from their institutions, plus have plans for Page 24.358.4others who might want to post materials related to microcontroller technologies onto the server.University servers have firewalls to protect their servers from outside users. This project had tohave
, STEPS I presents students with a well-defined design-and-build problem, and then leads them through the process using the concepts of guided design.The students are also given extensive instruction in the application of soft skills that areimportant to successful design, namely teamwork, project planning, and professional oral andwritten communications. Faculty advisors from engineering and communications programsserve the role as mentors for this project. During the first three years of the program’sdevelopment, the STEPS II semester was characterized by a similar format to STEPS I, but withdiscipline specific design-and-build projects. After three years the program’s new Coordinator,Dr. Jamal Ahmad, and Co-mentor, Dr. Suzanne Scott, looked
and senior design engineers take thestudent project team to the project site to collect all related information. Before Purpose andNeeds can be identified, the project team needs to contact local city for its general plan as well aslocal communities for their concerns, which often include severe traffic congestion and pooraccessibility. Throughout the whole year, the following topics are covered in various meetingsbetween faculty, senior design engineers, and the project team. 1) Caltrans Methods and Processes 2) How Caltrans Delivers Projects 5 3) Teamwork and Networking 4) Communication 5) Presentation Skills 6) Value Analysis and
strategies.Dr. Thomas A. Litzinger, Pennsylvania State University Thomas A. Litzinger is Director of the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education and a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Penn State. His work in engineering education involves curricular reform, teaching and learning innovations, assessment, and faculty development. Dr. Litzinger has more than 50 publications related to engineering education including lead authorship of an invited article in the 100th Anniversary issue of JEE and for an invited chapter on translation of research to practice for the first edition of the Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research. He serves as an Associate Editor for Advances in Engineering
courses CST 4710 Advanced Security Technologies 3with each module consisting of three sequential coursesfocusing on one specific area of computer systems. Studentsare required to complete three of the seven modules. The A. Concerns raised about the Current Curriculum:modular curriculum was innovative at the time of its inception, 1. Topics in the different modules are no longerand has served our students well in past years. The Computer independent and are more interrelatedSystems Technology department has been modifying the The topics in each module are no longer independent.curriculum by adding new modules, and by
complexities and resources neededto support good design education.Fortunately, more and more educators are becoming aware of the issues of design, and steps arebeing taken world wide, to address the concerns of industry at large. One approach has been to Page 15.999.2form “symbiotic” partnership between industry and academia through senior capstone projects.The capstone course has evolved over the years from “made up” projects devised by faculty toindustry-sponsored projects where companies provide “real” problems, along with expertise andfinancial support. In fact, design courses, in general, have emerged as a means for students to beexposed to some
]. Research can have manydefinitions: “Systematic observation of phenomena for the purpose of learning new facts or testing the application of theories to known facts; -- also called scientific research. This is the research part of the phase [2].” “Research is a careful and detailed study into a specific problem, concern, or issue using the scientific method. ... This is best accomplished by turning the issue into a question, with the intent of the research to answer the question. [3]”Research can be further broken down to two branches, depending on the purpose. "AppliedResearch” answers specific questions that can be directly applied to the world around us. It willtypically solve a specific problem. This type of
engineering program, this case study does provideexcellent examples of methods and techniques that can be used by engineering faculty asthey strive to comply with the new ABET standard by which they will eventually beevaluated. Character without knowledge is weak and feeble, but knowledge without character is dangerous and a potential menace to society. Character and knowledge together are the twin goals of true education. Boston Latin Grammar School, 17th centuryIntroductionPresent society places many demands upon classroom teachers. They are expected todeliver all areas of curriculum with mastery and ease. They are forever being called uponto incorporate one more essential piece needed for full student development
Environment;Learned Information, Inc.; Medford, New Jersey; 19952. Mayadas, Frank; “Asynchronous Learning Networks: A Sloan Foundation Perspective”; Journal of AsynchronousLearning Networks; Volume 1, Issue 1 - March, 1997; (published electronically at http://www.aln.org/)EARL A. EVANS is a faculty member at the Air Force Institute of Technology, Civil Engineer and Services School.He received his M.S. in Engineering Management from The University of Missouri-Rolla and B.E. in MechanicalEngineering from Stevens Institute of Technology. He is a registered Professional Engineer in California. Mr.Evans is currently a Captain in the U.S. Air Force with eight years of active duty experience.SUSAN L. MURRAY is an Assistant Professor of Engineering
issued a statement on sustainable development education thatstates in part “Engineering students should learn about sustainable development andsustainability in the general education component of the curriculum as they are preparing for themajor design experience” and that “…faculty should ask their students to consider the impacts ofdesign upon U.S. society, and upon other nations and cultures” [3]. Some engineering programshave used a national airport design competition in their education programs [4, 5]. Between 2007and 2017, over 40% of winning teams in the Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP)University Design Competition for Addressing Airport Needs were comprised of studentsenrolled in undergraduate and graduate level degree
high quality and competitive graduates. To ensure continued opportunitiesfor such counsel, a committee formed of industrial representatives is hereby chartered. Thiscommittee, known as the Advisory Committee for Electronics Engineering Technology atPittsburg State University, is charged with the task of advising the Electronics EngineeringTechnology faculty on such matters as the attributes of program graduates, curriculumcomposition, equipment inventory, changing industry expectations and technologies, programopportunities, and student opportunities. This committee is empowered to issue advocacystatements and opinions concerning Electronics Engineering Technology to the administration ofthe university.”To illustrate the type of productive
actively sought to modelinterprofessional collaboration. The engineering faculty member often participated in thehands-on sessions with the children. For example, if the engineering students appeared reluctantto ask the DPT students in-depth questions concerning a child’s diagnosis and medical history,the engineering faculty member would initiate a line of questioning to help uncover thisinformation. The engineering faculty member would also interact with the child and family andhold the child during the session to model respectful exchanges with the child and family.During design meetings, if the DPT students were not asking the engineering students to fullyexplain engineering concepts (the merits of brushless versus brushed motors for example
improvement transcended the strictcurricular boundaries. Many of the changes made were in the process of assessment andevaluation. The process initiated in 2016 and 2017 was improved in 2018 and 2019. The“One-Stop ABET website,” and our refined data collection and analysis tools helped thefront end of the assessment process. The efficiencies of these improvements provided moretime to the faculty to deliberate issues related to evaluation and implementation.The new assessment system defines key performance indicators (Table 2) that are related to theessential core of the computer science discipline. These indicators are used to demonstratecompliance with the SOs. A Traceability Matrix (Table 3) is used to show the relationship amongcourses
, the department provided students with physical design notebooks, whichfacilitated uniformity, met the standards for design work, and were convenient for the students tocarry and quickly present design ideas and to take notes. Unfortunately, the students were all toooften more concerned about the course notebook grade than its true purpose. Thus, many did notcomplete their notebook in real-time, but rather kept notes and sketches separately and thencopied them neatly into the notebook just before the due dates. Additionally, during thesegrading times, the students would be without their notebooks while the faculty reviewed them,thus hindering their ability to keep them up-to-date. They were also unable to ‘share’ commonnotebook entries easily
Session 1725 A Capstone Design Approach in Civil Engineering Harriet S. Cornachione, Michael A. Cornachione, and Valerie. J. Vance Oregon Institute of TechnologyAbstract Assessing student outcomes from the civil engineering program at Oregon Institute ofTechnology (OIT) identified several areas of concern. Ineffective team skills, limitedmulti-disciplinary design experience and inadequate integration of technicalcommunications with the engineering curriculum were specifically targeted forimprovement. To strengthen student outcomes in these areas, technical communicationsfaculty and civil engineering faculty at OIT developed
bituneven in his assessment of the two sides of the issue, siding with the scientists as the bearers oftruth, but he was certainly correct in noting that there was a failure to communicate. The new generation of liberal arts and engineering faculty are more aware of the blurringof disciplines, especially in the sciences and engineering, and of the increased interest in theimpact of technology on society. As a consequence, faculty are more accepting of newdirections and collaborations. The new awareness is coming from directions as diverse as anNSF study on Converging Technologies6, to the Dalai Lama7, and many points in between.8Whatever undergraduate major a student chooses, and whatever job that student aspires to, theworld demands that
from department to university• Service opportunities • Service opportunities• Faculty • University has Augustinian roots Page 26.1315.8Results of Senior Exit SurveyThe Senior Survey is administered to all graduating seniors prior to commencement. Variousversions of senior surveys have been administered by Villanova University since 1993. Thissurvey is comprised of special issue questions for our university and some standardizedquestions from national surveys. The types of questions ask students to assess their experiencesregarding
remained a difficult change foran established college was significantly easier to accomplish in a school built from scratch. Italso helped that aviation firms, for technical reasons13 as well as for reasons of a desperate labormarket, were willing to hire any and all engineers and offer them specialized training at “fullpay” on company time, as stated in the Lockheed ad. There was also the explicit expectation thatBoelter would develop a program complementary to the one at Berkeley. Finally, Boelter had nochoice but to begin with a single, unified curriculum. With but a limited appropriation, whichprovided no money for new buildings, Boelter opened the doors to his college in August 1945with a small handful of faculty and but 25 students. During
where faculty womenof color told the team they were tired of being invited to participate, then ignored. This lightbulbmoment led the team to develop new strategies to gather data from faculty women of color, aneffort led by a senior woman of color. They reported to their campus on the issues theyuncovered and met with department heads and other leaders, directly involving some of theirinformants to give their reports gravitas, and eventually secured some positive outcomes forwomen faculty of color. Other projects likewise found that collecting and communicating dataabout the experiences of women of color—often through qualitative approaches that literallyelevated these women’s voices—was valuable in expanding the change team’s understanding
where faculty womenof color told the team they were tired of being invited to participate, then ignored. This lightbulbmoment led the team to develop new strategies to gather data from faculty women of color, aneffort led by a senior woman of color. They reported to their campus on the issues theyuncovered and met with department heads and other leaders, directly involving some of theirinformants to give their reports gravitas, and eventually secured some positive outcomes forwomen faculty of color. Other projects likewise found that collecting and communicating dataabout the experiences of women of color—often through qualitative approaches that literallyelevated these women’s voices—was valuable in expanding the change team’s understanding
general, and to the use of modern pedagogicalskills in particular. The paper also argues that any meaningful change in Region’s classroompractices today (dominated by traditional lecture-based methods) must be mandated andsupported by the university administration. What is necessary to create a change, is for thedepartment or college, to have a comprehensive and integrated set of components: clearlyarticulated expectations, opportunities for faculty to learn about new pedagogies, and anequitable reward system.Introduction“To teach is to engage students in learning.” This quote, from Education for Judgment byChristenson et al, (1) captures the meaning of the art and practice of pedagogies ofengagement. The theme advocated here is that student
reformation in general, and to the use of modern pedagogicalskills in particular. The paper also argues that any meaningful change in Region’s classroompractices today (dominated by traditional lecture-based methods) must be mandated andsupported by the university administration. What is necessary to create a change, is for thedepartment or college, to have a comprehensive and integrated set of components: clearlyarticulated expectations, opportunities for faculty to learn about new pedagogies, and anequitable reward system.Introduction“To teach is to engage students in learning.” This quote, from Education for Judgment byChristenson et al, (1) captures the meaning of the art and practice of pedagogies ofengagement. The theme advocated here is that
reformation in general, and to the use of modern pedagogicalskills in particular. The paper also argues that any meaningful change in Region’s classroompractices today (dominated by traditional lecture-based methods) must be mandated andsupported by the university administration. What is necessary to create a change, is for thedepartment or college, to have a comprehensive and integrated set of components: clearlyarticulated expectations, opportunities for faculty to learn about new pedagogies, and anequitable reward system.Introduction“To teach is to engage students in learning.” This quote, from Education for Judgment byChristenson et al, (1) captures the meaning of the art and practice of pedagogies ofengagement. The theme advocated here is that
, face many challenges that influence theirpersistence to engineering. Lack of student engagement in classrooms has been one of theserious concerns that cut across most of the engineering schools. This critical concern, oftenneglected in classrooms, results in serious attention problems among students, leading to theirincompetence and poor retention rates1. This issue is more relevant in HBCUs (HistoricallyBlack College or University) where the retention rates were reported less than 50%2.A vast amount of literature shows that students’ academic engagement is correlated to theiracademic outcomes such as their grades, critical thinking and social engagement3-6. Further,engaged students are highly motivated and develop stronger capacities for
-cultural factors [1, 5, 6], and issues of confidence [7-9]. It is essential to understandnot only what factors act as barriers to persistence for underrepresented students, but also whatessential elements support the persistence of these students who are crucial to ensuring a morediverse engineering work force.Research on student persistence in higher education has revealed that once a student enters aninstitution of higher learning, social and academic factors interplay with his or her level ofcommitment to completing a degree program [10, 11]. In other words, once enrolled, students haveacademic and social experiences, including interactions with faculty and peers, experiences inthe classroom, and experiences with the curriculum which interact
performanceorientation, they tend not to take risks or try new things, because to do so might make them lookstupid or incompetent. People with a performance orientation tend to be much more concernedwith grades than with whether or not they learned anything. They may avoid seeking assistanceor working with a tutor, even if help is needed. Performance orientation can affect faculty as well Page 22.681.11as students. Faculty might be overly concerned that they not appear stupid or incompetent around 10 other faculty or administrators, and even their own students. There appears to be a connectionbetween performance orientation and lower order cognition
curriculum and inadequatetraining of teachers.” A faculty member wrote, “We have a hard-enough time to teachfundamentals in our disciplines. I am concerned we may not have enough time to incorporate AIappropriately.” How to integrate AI into school settings and the curriculum is a concern. Onefaculty stated that it is “haphazard at the high school level, while overly focused on machinelearning in our universities.” Another offered more specifics by sharing “there is not enoughfocus on problem formation and epistemology.” Student preparedness for AI is an ongoingdilemma and is due to issues such as the “lack of sufficient mathematical education (foundation)to understand AI algorithms.” For faculty, there is some concern about “attempts to
Page 3.240.1outcomes assessment for demonstrating program success. This change primarily affects thecurriculum-related aspect of EC2000, replacing the lists of specific topics which had to becovered under earlier criteria. While completion of course requirements is likely to be thedominant method for ensuring that students achieve the expected outcomes, other elements alsomay be used. Other aspects of EC2000 related to students, faculty, facilities, institutionalsupport, and financial resources are similar to earlier criteria, although it must be shown thatthese resources are appropriate to the program’s objectives.Although the specific EC2000 requirements are new, most programs and institutions are alreadyengaged in some assessment activities
Page 3.241.1outcomes assessment for demonstrating program success. This change primarily affects thecurriculum-related aspect of EC2000, replacing the lists of specific topics which had to becovered under earlier criteria. While completion of course requirements is likely to be thedominant method for ensuring that students achieve the expected outcomes, other elements alsomay be used. Other aspects of EC2000 related to students, faculty, facilities, institutionalsupport, and financial resources are similar to earlier criteria, although it must be shown thatthese resources are appropriate to the program’s objectives.Although the specific EC2000 requirements are new, most programs and institutions are alreadyengaged in some assessment activities
coloration tool was available, faculty advisers heavily relied on face-to-face meetings inscheduled classes to assess students’ progress and problems. Implementing this on-line system allowedfaculty advisors to monitor the students’ thinking processes and progress made between classes. Thus, inclasses, the students and faculty advisor were able to focus their attention on important design issueswithout spending time on trivial housekeeping issues. On the other hand, the system was also helpful forfaculty advisors in identifying teams that might need guidance because of a lack of forum activity. 100 90