aspects. The input provided by the reviewers had to be addressed before the next go around. Actual fabrication could not start till the CDR was presented and approved. Once the payload design and fabrication was finished, a final document called Flight Readiness Review (FRR) had to be completed to assess whether each payload could be operated safely without any harm to the others.Launch, Recovery and Science Presentation During the last week of the 9 week long summer program, the teams traveled to Palestine, Texas to launch their payloads from NASA’s Columbia Scientific Balloon Facility. In all there were 9 payloads, most of them developed by the student teams either from current or previous PACER programs or from LSU students. Each payload was
15.89.3ImplementationA simplified approach to documentation control is desirable in an academic setting. Asimple structure mimics the limited scope that novice engineers encounter when startingtheir careers. A simple structure also allows for a standardized list of deliverables whichfacilitate assessment of diverse project work using a common rubric.This work is targeted as an aid to those who have studied design methodology in anacademic setting, or have only been involved in design in a research and developmentcapacity. Acting as instructors for students who may be employed as field, line orapplication engineers who might interface with a purchasing department, a manufacturingfacility or an external consulting organization will require a different skill set
tool controls and gauging at GTE-Valenite Corp., started and managed the clinical engineering department at William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, and was a research associate in radiology, nuclear medicine, and bio-mechanics at Wayne State University. Ken has taught at Lawrence Tech evening programs as an adjunct instructor since 1965. His senior projects class, where students generate project ideas, research, design, manufacture, and assess the market for inventive products is the capstone course. Cook also has enjoyed a long side career in magic finding his hobby very useful in teaching. A highlight for his students each year is the two-hour magic performance he offers as a congratulatory send
and task forces examining various issues faced by geospatial industries, researchers, and educators. The 2006 report titled Beyond Mapping: Meeting National Needs through enhanced Geographic Information Science, recognizes that the supply of professionals in the geospatial fields has not kept pace with the demands of a high growth technology (National Research Council, 2006a10). This report was requested by several government agencies ( including the Census Bureau, the Federal Geographic Data Committee, the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the National Science Foundation and the U.S. Geologic Survey) to assess the current state of the mapping sciences. The
(7)where xi and yi are arbitrary raw scores and their scaled values correspond to each of the A, B, C, D, andF categories; αj and βj (j = 1, 2, …, 5) are linear transformation coefficients.Let us assume that the instructor assesses the correspondence to each LG category of raw scores so thatm1, M1 (minimum and maximum) correspond to the limits of the raw score of F LG; m2, M2 correspondto the limits of the raw score of D LG, etc.; also, on the projected scale we have F (m’1, M’1), D (m’2, M’2),C (m’2, M’2), etc. Then the coefficients αj and βj can be calculated as M 'j / m 'j m'j M j / m j M 'j χj ? ;δj ? (j = 1, 2,…, 5) (8) M j / mj
get lost and email gets incorrectlyplaced into spam folders or otherwise goes awry on the information superhighway. That said,once a submission is acknowledged, it is not necessary, nor is it professional, to contact theeditorial staff multiple times to check on the status of the submission. If the estimated deadlinehas passed, then it is acceptable to make another contact.Different journals have their own methods of providing feedback to authors, from handwrittencomments on paper copies, to comments inserted in Word documents, to filling out online forms.The members of the review board of the EDGJ are conscientious in their work and strive to givecomplete and detailed reviews based on a form that has specific criteria to assess in the
for careers as industrial engineers.The project work presented in this paper is ongoing. Future work includes expanded analysesthat will focus on assessing the impact of various factors on individual efficacy and satisfactionquestions, rather than average scores. The data will also be used to develop a predictive modelof career efficacy. Finally, the project will be expanded beyond industrial engineering, todetermine if similar conclusions can be drawn in other disciplines.Bibliography1. Hoitm, M. and M. Ohland, The impact of a discipline-based introduction to engineering course on improving retention, J. Eng. Edu., pp. 79-85, Jan. 1998.2. Courter, S., S. Millar and L. Lyons. From the students’ point of view: experiences in a freshman
annual conference. Assessment Surveys have been developed in conjunction with a PhD student in psychology and an outside evaluator. Pre-‐program surveys have been given to the supplemental instructors, peer mentors, current transfer students and students at LSU. BRCC surveyed continuing and graduating STEM students in April 2013. These surveys helped to develop topics and components for trainings and the transfer programs. Feedback after the program will also be used in the planning of the next year’s programs. Additionally, pre-‐training surveys were given to the SIs and peer tutors to obtain a baseline of their self-‐ efficacy
mathematics in technology curriculum.IMEN5335. Industrial Safety and Risk Management: An examination of risk assessment,strategies and concepts as they related to industrial and laboratory settings. Industrial safety andpersonal protective equipment will be addressed.IMEN5340. Automation and Cellular Manufacturing: Survey of current trend and approaches toautomation and cellular manufacturing. Emphasis will be both on computer driven machine toolsand integration of automated machinery to create an automated cell.IMEN5344. Lean Production: A study of the philosophy of lean production and Just-In-Timeconcept. Emphasis will be on designing strategies for lean implementation in industrial setting.IMEN5306: Thesis Research: The course requires completion
students.ResultsThe assessment was done through a rubric, developed by the author and provided in AppendixA, with a specific scoring component for dimensioning. A description of each item in the rubricis included in the appendix.This is the same rubric that was used during the summer semester and it allows for a baselinewhen comparing scores. The instructor also remained the same for both terms.There were a total of 54 students that created 26 final projects. Several projects were developedby individuals and no group was comprised of more than three members. The distribution in sizeand scores are shown in Table 1. Table 1. Final and dimensioning score distribution based on group size Group Size Number of Groups of a
on developing working relationshipthat would result in educational activities for undergraduate and graduate students. The CityEngineer introduced the UMD staff to Duluth Economic Development Authority (DEDA) staffas well as presented a few civil engineering projects that were planned by the City and DEDA tobe undertaken in next five years. Through a series of meetings with City staff as well asinternally, the faculty identified three projects that would have necessary attributes of MS projectand would enable faculty to assess the learning objective of the program. The learning objectivesassociated with the project-based MS degree are discussed later in the paper. The projects werediscussed with the MS students and after their approval the
microbial hazard in water. They were asked to become scientiststo solve the cases. The hands on experience included collecting environmental water samplesfrom a local park and teaching the girls how to use environmental equipment to test for bacterialevels in the water to learn about a real-world environmental problem – water quality and waterimpairment. The use of the “case” to teach environmental and public health showed increases inthe student’s interests in the sciences and engineering. The participants were given short pre- andpost-surveys to assess the experience by collecting qualitative and quantitative data. This paperwill discuss the cases used for the camp using the “cases in the sciences” method used during thecamp and the impact hands
communicate effectively’(ABET criterion 3d and 3g).2 However, assessing a student’s ability to work on a team and tocommunicate effectively is often difficult in traditional classroom settings. Collaborative learning, for the purpose of this paper will mirror those of Göl and Nafalskias written in their award winning paper “Collaborative Learning in Engineering Education”;“Collaborative learning is increasingly recognised as giving students an opportunity to engage indiscussion and to exercise a positive influence on the group’s learning outcomes by assumingresponsibility for their own learning. Critical thinking and reflective evaluation are implicit in theapproach.”3 While many tout the advantages of collaborative learning: “Results
transmission module for the four robots. Center: Final robotic quarterback. Right: IUPUI and Notre Dame Gold team vs IPFW and Notre Dame Blue team.Learning AssessmentA survey was conducted to 23 students to assess their experience in the project. The surveyasked students to rate each statement on a scale of 0 to 5, 0 equating to strongly disagree and 5equating to strongly agree. The following questions were asked:• Participating in the IUPUI Robotics Club allowed me to utilize the knowledge gained from my engineering classes.• Participating in the IUPUI Robotics Club allowed me to improve my communication skills.• Participating in the IUPUI Robotics Club improved my team working skills.The results of the survey show that 82% of the
2020 traits was performed. Results show thatAfrican American engineers perceive their participation in NSBE, BGOs, and MEPs assupportive of their development of six of the ten Engineer of 2020 traits: analytical,communication, business and management, leadership, professionalism, and ethical standards.The implications of this work are broad and have applications for multiple audiences: programadvisors, organization leaders, and students. Implications for program advisors includeintegrated programs, student recruitment, and an enhanced service portfolio. Organizations canuse these results to obtain feedback and assess program outcomes. For students, implicationsinclude increased job preparation and self-directed learning.Future work will
theunderstanding of the relevance of research innovations and graduate research degrees to the Page 24.943.3business environment. Although the TEC seminars took place during the first four weeks of theprogram, the students were required to discuss their progress with the TEC faculty mentor toguide them in getting their product to “market.” The outcomes of the program were assessedthrough the EngiPreneur Competition where each student presented his/her work (and product)and gave an assessment of its market potential and pit falls suggesting what needs to be done tosuccessfully take the product to market. A panel of entrepreneurs and industry productchampions
like those run by the CSC, they willdevelop and acquire knowledge for more complicated problems connected to computer science ingeneral. We plan on running additional outreach programs under the CSC in more schools and youthorganizations in the near future. Page 24.950.117. REFERENCES[1] Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New Frameworks for Studying and Assessing the Development of ComputationalThinking. Proceedings of the 2012 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada.[2] Cuny, J., Snyder, L., & Wing, J.M. Demystifying computational thinking for non-computer scientists
C.O.Swift, “An examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty and workplace dishonesty: A multicampus investigation.” Journal of Education for Business. 77(2), 69-77, 2001.19) Passow, H.J., M.J. Mayhew, C.J. Finelli, T.S. Harding, and D.D. Carpenter," Factors influencing engineering students' decisions to cheat by type of assessment", Research in Higher Education Vol. 47, No. 6, pp. 643-684, 2006.20) Sims, R.L. “ The relationship between academic dishonesty and unethical business practices.” Journal of Education for Business. 68(4), 207-211, 1993.21) Standler, R. (2000) Plagiarism in colleges in the USA. Available online at: www.rbs2.com/plag.htm22) Whitley, B.E.," Gender differences in cheating attitudes and classroom
. Although we made a comprehensive comparisonbetween two boards and we used the tower as the primary board, I should emphasize that we areteaching principles. The platform we have is sufficient to teach everything the students need toknow at this point in time...Unless there is a compelling reason to change the platform, we should stick with what we havefor a significant amount of time.References1. L. J. McKenzie, M. S. Trevisan, D. C. Davis, and S.W. Beyerlein, “Capstone design courses and assessment: A national study,” in Proceedings 2004 ASEE Annual Conference and Expo., Salt Lake Page 24.1012.10 City, Utah, USA, 2004, pp. 1-14.2. http
of their position; akin to gamessuch as Bioshock Infinite and Dead Space.Educational guidance refers to assisting the player with difficulties experienced when solvingproblems throughout the game. In Solaris One, as well as all Sustain City games, we seek tofirst assess the student’s skill to ascertain the amount and type of help to provide. Before eachgame, a set of multiple-choice questions are presented to find out what the student knows andwhat they may need help with as exemplified in Figure 5. In this way, the student can beassigned both a ranked proficiency as well as knowledge of specific topics in which theystruggle or excel. Testing and feedback from previous systems developed within Sustain Cityhas shown that when presented with
into the Honors College. This will provide additional academic support activities andenhance access to research and internship opportunities. S-STEM Project Management PlanThe PI and Co-PIs are responsible for coordinating, planning, implementing, and evaluating the project.The overall management plan will incorporate assessment and evaluation and will rely uponobservational feedback for adjustment. Summary and ConclusionsThe CSET-STEM program is in its first year and we have recruited five STEM scholars to our program.The scholars participated in the bridge program and completed various activities as mentioned above.The scholars are progressing well in their studies and we
Revenue $42,000AssessmentStudents were evaluated using quantitative and qualitative data. Students completed surveysbased on the National Engineering Students’ Learning Outcomes Survey at the start and end ofthe program. Each year the survey questions varied slightly to reflect unique changes made to theprogram or new labs that were introduced. Student’s grade point averages (GPAs) and retentionrates were also used as a form of assessment. The program participants GPAs and retention rateswere compared against women and minority non-participants and with College of Engineeringstudents as a whole.Program OutcomesProgram ParticipantsIn year one (2011) 18 students participated in the program. 14 of these were women, and
into mentalsilos. The goal for any engineering student should of course be to become technically proficient, but,also, to graduate with the skill of practicing their profession amongst a world of non-technicalprofessionals. This means smearing the lines between the technical engineering knowledge and the non-technical knowledge and skill relevant to the practice of their engineering.Industry partnerships for the development and execution of case studies are a viable method to achievethis balance of technical application with the non-technical understanding. ABET EAC student outcome(h) is therefore well suited for assessment by industry-led case studies. Many discover with highereducation the following maxim, “the more you know, the more you
in electrical engineering from the University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, in 1998, 1999, and 2001, respectively. In 2008, Dr. Xu joined the College of Engineering at California Baptist University. Between 2001 and 2008, he was an assistant professor and subsequently an associate professor in the Department of Electrical, Computer and Soft- ware Engineering at Penn State Erie, Erie, PA. His research interests include systems and control, hybrid and embedded systems, digital design, software/hardware enabled control applications, algorithms and optimization. He has published 18 journal papers, 38 conference papers, and 4 book reviews in the above areas. Since 2008, Dr. Xu has been serving as the assessment
study is necessary to assess if thistype of teacher professional development affects students’ decisions to enter STEM fields afterhigh school graduation.In June of 2013 the “Engineering Applications in the Physical Sciences” course was offered.During the first half of the course, students built and tested wind turbine blade designs using a kit Page 24.1242.6that required them to solder a circuit board to convert AC to DC and double the voltage (seeFigure 4). A box was required to protect the electronics from the environment and instead ofpurchasing commercial version at a cost of $5-$10 USD, a customized potting box model wasdeveloped using
Engineering Technology for Purdue University at their satellite campus in Columbus, Indiana. Since then, Dr. Fuehne has taught twelve different classes in the MET department and authored papers on real world applications in thermodynamics, assessment practices targeted at ABET accreditation and K-12 outreach programs. He has also received several grants that have supported the K-12 outreach programs and is part of a team that’s offering a graduate education class to elementary school teachers that aims to improve science education at the elementary school level. Page 24.1244.1 c American
session. WSU uses a math placement assessment administered through Assessmentand LEarning in Knowledge Spaces (ALEKS) and is a fully automated, adaptive system thatcovers material from basic Mathematics through Precalculus. Most students targeted were thosefound to be on the border between Prealgebra and College Algebra. During this recruiting phase,students who were Pell Grant Eligible were especially encouraged to participate in the program.By the first day of classes, 33 students were identified and enrolled in the program. Half of thesestudents were Pell Grant Eligible and all were placed at the same level in math resulting in a Page
courses in reading, writing, math and study skills as well as a math and writing labthat are open on a drop-in basis including evening hours. It has an array of programs and servicesthat teach students how to improve their study techniques and how to assess and make the mostof their individual learning abilities. Faculty and staff of ASC work closely with universityfaculty members to determine how they can best provide support for academic courses. Thiscollaboration has led to team-teaching, specialized labs, and effective referral systems. ASC alsomaintains liaisons with other support programs on campus such as Women in Engineering (WE)/ Technology (WIT), Multicultural Center for Academic Success (MCAS) to provide acomprehensive network of
. The inclusion of transfer students in thiswork, unlike our previous work, is also critical since transfers potentially draw from a morediverse pool. Page 24.1289.6Impact on physical resources that form infrastructureBecause of its ability to characterize students entering engineering from multiple pathways, thestickiness metric designed in this work holds great promise for both simplifying research andeducational assessment and making it more authentic.Impact on information resources that form infrastructureOur methodological innovations affect diverse fields. Our “stickiness” metric has application toall disciplines.8 The methodological