that, while there is someup front time required to convert existing labs, it can cause less time to be spent later andtherefore may be worthwhile for instructors, independent of the advantages to students.Finally, an additional advantage is that it could be easier to understand for someone who is notfamiliar with the lab at all. When student work is being gathered for accreditation purposes, sucha lab could be easier for evaluators to read and understand what the students were being requiredto do as well as how they performed on the task.The major disadvantage seen by the instructors was simply the time required to convert apreviously existing lab to this format. Given the advantages to both faculty and students, thisstudy suggests that all
Paper ID #37037Board 79: Course Improvement of An Introduction to Programming CourseinECE: Customizing Learning Paths for Parallel Computing TopicsIsabel Alviar, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Isabel received her B.S. in Computer Engineering from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign in 2023. She is currently attending University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign pursuing her M.S. in Computer Sci- ence.Dr. Ujjal K Bhowmik https://ece.illinois.edu/about/directory/faculty/ubhowmikProf. Yuting W. Chen, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Dr. Yuting W. Chen received the B.S. degree from University of Illinois at
holistic experiences of multiply marginalized students or considerthe intersecting systems of marginalization that these students must contend with. Intersectionality has gained recent traction in engineering education research as a theoryand means to center the lived experiences of multiply marginalized students in engineering.Rooted in critical post-Civil Rights Era scholarship, intersectionality developed alongside criticalrace theory to further theorizations of multiply marginalized people’s, particularly Blackwomen’s, experiences of oppression and push for radical liberation [1], [6], [7]. However, as ithas entered mainstream academic parlance, some intersectionality scholars have argued that ithas been used, misused, coopted, and
given aslectures in class. The first course which I developed was “Introduction to Aerospace EngineeringI” which included course content on aerodynamics with some fundamental flight dynamics.The basis for the project discussed in this paper grew from some initial first year PBL softwareexplorations with a MATLAB® [3] Vortex Panel Code where the students described theaerodynamic characteristics such as coefficient of lift and drag for various airfoils in the“Introduction to Aerospace Engineering I” course. The type of analysis that was done with thecode was typical of what would have been found using an experimental wind tunnel to find thelift-drag polar for an airfoil. Knowing that these were simply simulations, the students wereasked to
Cycle to Enhance Undergraduate Research Experiences – a Work in ProgressAbstractMuch work has been done to assist engineering faculty in higher education as they work toenhance their classroom teaching. While some of this work might be applicable to facultyleading undergraduate research teams, it is unclear which “enhanced teaching methods” mightapply in this research setting. Kolb’s cycle is a method that has been used widely in pedagogicalwork. This current effort is intended to provide a method to facilitate its use with undergraduateresearch teams. The Kolb cycle represents a set of four learning activity categories where, if thefull slate of these activities is engaged, learning is enhanced. In addition
Paper ID #33214Entrepreneurial Intent in Commuter-school StudentsDr. David G. Novick, University of Texas at El Paso David G. Novick, Mike Loya Distinguished Chair in Engineering and Professor of Engineering Education and Leadership, earned his J.D.at Harvard University in 1977 and his Ph.D. in Computer and Information Science at the University of Oregon in 1988. Before coming to UTEP he was on the faculty of the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at the Oregon Graduate Institute and then Director of Research at the European Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Engineering. At UTEP he has served in a number of
. Ann D. Christy P.E., The Ohio State University Ann D. Christy, PE, is a professor of Food, Agricultural, and Biological Engineering and a professor of Engineering Education at the Ohio State University (OSU). She earned both her B.S. in agricultural engineering and M.S. in biomedical engineering at OSU, and her Ph.D. in environmental engineering at Clemson University. She worked for an engineering consulting firm before entering academia and continues to collaborate with the consulting industry. She has taught courses in bioenergy, biological en- gineering, capstone design, HVAC, thermodynamics, waste management, professional development, and engineering teaching. Her research interests include energy, the
current research interests include student resistance to active learning, faculty adoption of evidence-based teaching practices, and the use of technology and innovative pedagogies on student learn- ing and success. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students.Dr. Harry Courtney Powell, University of Virginia Harry Powell is a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering in the Charles L. Brown Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Virginia. After receiving a Bachelor’s Degree in Electrical Engineering in1978 he was an active research and design
Paper ID #29720WIP Adopting the Entrepreneurial Mindset in an Upper Level EngineeringElectromagnetics CourseDr. Matthew Garett Young, Arkansas Tech University Matthew G. Young received his B. Sc. in Electrical Engineering from Arkansas Tech University in 2009. He obtained his M. Sc. in Microelectronics-Photonics at the University of Arkansas in 2012. For his M. Sc. studies, he focused on the growth of silicon nanowires via plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition. In August of 2016, he joined the faculty at Arkansas Tech University as an Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering. His Ph.D. was completed at the
individual and institutional factors that contribute to a ”culture of disengagement” from the ethical dimension of engineering work among students in the engineering profession. His Ph.D. project is funded by the NSF and is concerned with promoting and im- proving engineering students’ ethical behavior and sensitivity through on-campus student organizations. His academic interests include mental health, international development, human rights, and engineering ethics. Currently, his ambition is to work within an international organization such as UNESCO and to be an advocate for promoting science and technology as critical tools of sustainable development as well as to participate in the dialogue between scientists, policy
automatic alerts that are integrated with the visualizations.References:[1] Z. T. Siti Khadijah Mohamada, "Educational data mining: A review," in The 9th InternationalConference on Cognitive Science, Malaysia, 2013.[2] R. S. Baker, "Data Mining for Education," in International Encyclopedia of Education (3rdedition), Oxford, 2012.[3] C. G. Merrett, "Using Textbook Readings, YouTube Videos, and Case Studies for FlippedClassroom Instruction of Engineering Design," in Proc. 2015 Canadian Engineering EducationAssociation (CEEA15) Conf., Canada, 2015.[4] D. N. A. G. M. S. Kenneth A. Connor, "Faculty Development and Patterns of StudentGrouping in Flipped Classrooms Enabled by Personal Instrumentation," in 2017 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition
affectstudent course evaluation responses. A recent study found use of IFAT forms has a positiveimpact on course evaluations when compared to traditional Scantron forms [9]. This is especiallynoteworthy for pre-tenure or other faculty in positions where course evaluations are of highimportance. While online quizzing reduces the time required for grading, it may introduceavenues for potential academic dishonesty and has spawned research efforts to investigatemethods to minimize ‘cheating’ in online course offerings [10], [11]. It is also worthwhile toconsider the bias that computer requirements in the classroom may bring. Data show that P-12student performance on computerized testing was positively correlated with socioeconomic statusand at-home
Objectives Description Devise an experimental approach, specify appropriate equipment and procedures, 3) Experiment implement these procedures, and interpret the resulting data to characterize an engineering material, component, or system Demonstrate the ability to collect, analyze, and interpret data, and to form and 4) Data support conclusions. Make order of magnitude judgments and use measurements Analysis unit systems and conversions Design, build, or assemble a part, product, or system, including using specific methodologies, equipment, or materials; meeting client requirements; developing
tightly packed four years of a typical engineering curriculum. Whilemany church-related, independent, and state-supported institutions mandate courseworkin theology, religious studies, or philosophy2, engineering ethics coverage seems to be hitor miss at a time when its importance is magnified by rapid technological, societal, andenvironmental changes occurring at the current time.Catalano reviews the current state of leading engineering societies’ codes of ethics and Page 12.847.2what it means to be an “ethical engineer in a morally deep world.” Development of thisethical framework is important not only for the needs and wants of the client but also
. Page 12.652.2Most members of the engineering education community believe that mathematics is bothimportant and helpful for students in designing and developing systems (e.g. Moussavi5 ), as “amedium of knowledge representation”6 and in developing the ability to reason (e.g.Underwood7 ). Many educators continue to devote attention to how to structure classes to teachmathematics engineering students (e.g. Venable, McConnell and Stiller8 ,Aroshas, Verner andBerman9 ; McKenna, McMartin and Agogino10 ).At the same time, however, there is a prevalent belief among practicing engineers that themathematics they learned in college is not applicable to their daily work. Pearson11 estimates thatof the thousands of engineers he knew, only three out of ten
. This number is almost a 10% increase from the year before. • The overall growth rate for higher education student population is about 1.5%, while for online enrollments it is 9.7%.Seeing these numbers gives a definite strong motivation for institutions to join in the online Page 14.238.2lerning experience.Asynchronous, Synchronous or Blended:Designing an online program requires selection of adequate development and deliverytechniques among many other important considerations. In an online environment the delivery ofthe class material can be done asynchronously, synchronously or a blend of both. In some cases,the
developed the game for use in acomputational methods course. In that coursestudents devise algorithms for driving the car as fast as possible around the track. In addition tosteering, the driving programs needed to calculate optimal times to shift gears; to determine themaximum speed it could navigate corners; to compute the best time to begin braking beforeentering a turn; and much more. When the game was first introduced in the computational Page 14.844.2methods course in 2005, we saw immediate and dramatic improvements in learning outcomes.While teaching the game-based computational methods course, we recognized the DynamicSystems &
, Page 14.1274.8 education and information science,” Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, vol. 12, no. 2, April 2003, pp. 199-221.27. D. Oblinger, Introduction to Multimedia in Instruction, An IAT technology primer, Chapel Hill, NC: Institute for Academic Technology, Report No. IAT-TPR-03, 1992, p. 4.28. J.D. Fletcher, Effectiveness and Cost of Interactive Videodisc Instruction in Defense Training and Education, IDA Report R2372, Arlington, VA: Institute for Defense Analysis, July 1990.29. E. Gohmann, “Materials I: creating a common ground of basic skills,” Proc. 1997 ASEE Annual Conference, Milwaukee, WI.30. J.T. Bell, H.S. Fogler, “Ten steps to developing virtual reality applications for
of daylighting systems isnecessary to optimize the use of energy in buildings. The use of engineering principles in thedesign for daylight may overcome the current barriers to effective incorporation of daylightingsystems in buildings; in academia and in practice. That is why more emphasis should be given toexperimental research in the field of daylighting systems in order to establish a set of rigorousengineering principles for the design of daylighting systems. In the end, the paper gives a briefdescription of a new model of an artificial sky dome that is designed by OSU faculty. Thisartificial sky dome is now under construction and will be used by undergraduate and graduatestudents to perform experimental research in the field of
2006-434: ANIMATION AS THE FINAL STEP IN THE DYNAMICS EXPERIENCEThomas Nordenholz, California Maritime Academy Thomas Nordenholz is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the California Maritime Academy. He received his Ph.D. from the University of California at Berkeley in 1998. His present interests include the improvement of undergraduate engineering science instruction, and the development of laboratory experiments and software for undergraduate courses. Page 11.215.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Animation as the Final Step in the Dynamics ExperienceAbstractA
. Page 11.1392.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Using Just-In-Time Teaching in Dynamics and Mechanics of MaterialsAbstractOver the last 8 years, the physics educational community has developed a new learning strategyknown as Just-in-Time Teaching (JiTT). In this approach, students are required to answer shortquestions posted on the web at least two hours before class. Questions are typically open-endedand conceptual, rather than mathematical. The instructor then reads through the student answersbefore class and tailors the classroom experience based on student understanding. For newtopics, many students will appreciate some aspects of the idea, but different students will
Paper ID #18362Philosophy and Engineering Education; should teachers have a philosophy ofEducation?Dr. John Heywood, Trinity College-Dublin John Heywood is professorial Fellow Emeritus of Trinity College Dublin- The University of Dublin. He is a Fellow of ASEE and Life Fellow of IEEE. He has special interest in education for the professions and the role of professions in society. He is author of Engineering Education. research and develop- ment in Curriculum and Instruction. His most recent book is The Assessment of learning in Engineering Education. Practice and Policy. c American Society for
Paper ID #18864Problem-based Learning Module for Teaching Thermodynamic Cycle Anal-ysis using PYroMatDr. Christopher Reed Martin, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Martin received his PhD in mechanical engineering from Virginia Tech, where his research focused on reduced order modelling of combustion instabilities. He worked for ESAB Welding and Cutting in plasma torch research and development, and has taught at four drastically dissimilar universities over ten years. His primary area of research is in the area of research is thermal fluid control.Dr. Joseph Ranalli, Pennsylvania State University, Hazleton Campus Dr
aclass exam. The paper also discusses the misconceptions that students showed in their responses,issues with the lack of availability of FE Exam passing rate data, and ideas for future work. Theauthor hopes that this paper will stimulate discussion among educators of Hispanic engineeringstudents who, perhaps, have noticed similar patterns in their engineering courses.Introduction The Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) Exam lies in the path to obtain professionallicensure in engineering. The National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying(NCEES) develops and scores the exam. NCEES provides exactly the same exam in Puerto Ricoas in the mainland USA. It is offered exclusively in the English language. The FE Exam is anattractive and
on topics including: interactions in systems and design; incorporation of end-user models and simulations in design; preference represen- tation and communication; the arts in systems engineering; and integration of new system and design processes in government and industry practice. He is currently the University Lead of the NASA Systems Engineering Research Consortium, leading efforts on the development of systems engineering principles and the integration of modelling techniques.Prof. Amy Guerin, University of Alabama in Huntsville Amy Guerin is a faculty member in the University of Alabama in Huntsville Theatre Program. She pre- viously taught at Texas A&M University. In 2009, Amy’s production of A
and another portion feeling bored. The primary concern with requiring Physics I as aprerequisite is that the insistence on placing every force at a single point in Physics can lead topoor FBD habits in Statics, and these habits may be difficult to correct. To address this issue,Statics instructors may choose to place more emphasis on the correct approach to drawing FBDsfor rigid and deformable bodies in the first few weeks of the course. They may also pair withPhysics faculty to develop an approach to teaching FBDs that will work well for both courses.References[1] Hu, Y., Montefort J. and Tsang, E. “An analysis of factors affecting student performance in astatics course”. In 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings.[2
Paper ID #23529A Comparison of Learning Outcomes and Learner Satisfaction in a CADDCourse with Flexible and Rigid DeadlinesDr. Joel Peterson P.E., University of Wisconsin, River Falls Dr. Peterson is a faculty member in the Agricultural Engineering Department at the University of Wis- consin - River Falls. Dr. Peterson strives to bring the real-world lessons he learned in industry to students in the classroom. He is a registered civil engineer and teaches a variety of classes ranging from to project management to fluid mechanics.Dr. Matthew Francis Digman, University of Wisconsin, River Falls Dr. Digman received
. XP was developed in 1996 by the programming industry to respondquickly to rapidly changing customer demands [1]. It is comprised of multiple practices designedto decrease time-to-market for programming solutions and was among the first majordevelopments to introduce pair programming. Several universities have considered the use of XPin an academic setting, though there is some concern as to whether it truly applies. XP isprimarily for increased efficiency in code development and does not necessarily include animprovement in skill proficiencies.However, pair programming has been found to provide significant improvements to teachingsoftware in the past. Many previous examinations of pair programming have shown that itimproves program quality
Paper ID #23654A Study of Voluntary Problem Sets on Student Interest, Motivation, and Per-formanceDr. Philip Jackson, University of Florida Dr. Philip B. Jackson earned B.S. degrees in Aerospace Engineering and Mechanical Engineering as well as an M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering, all from the University of Florida. He is currently a faculty member at the Institute for Excellence in Engineering Education at the University of Florida. There he specializes in implementing innovative methods of instruction in undergraduate courses on dynamics, heat transfer, and thermodynamics. His research interests include
male, 67 female) participated in the study and generated 2,630 entrieswithin the Pattern application, amassing 5,000 hours (over 200 days) of logged study activitiesover the four week data entry period.Pattern Pattern is a mobile and web application students used to log their study activitiesthroughout the semester. It was developed and released in 2015 as a student success tool and isavailable for all students for free at Purdue University. Pattern enables the logging, tracking, andanalyzing of student study behaviors. Specifically, students record their study activities withinthe application and the application provides: 1) a main dashboard (see Figure 1) that displaysaggregate study statistics, like total time studied, and also