of Technology. Baxter leads CIESE research and evaluation efforts and manages a program to support faculty adoption of evidence-based teaching practices in the core courses in the School of Engineering at Stevens. Before joining CIESE, Baxter was a Senior Survey Researcher at Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., Senior Research Scientist at Educational Testing Service, and an Assistant Professor in the Graduate School of Education at the University of Michigan. In addition, she served on National Academy of Sciences Committees on Foundations of Educational and Psychological Assessment and Evaluation of National and State Assessments of Educational Progress. She earned a PhD in Educational Psychology from UC Santa
psychologist whose research examines how thoughts of ”what might have been” affect emotion, motivation, and behavior. While on the faculty of Miami University, she was the PI of a grant from NSF’s EEC division investigating new interventions in engineering education that utilize social cognitive psychology.Dr. Brian P Kirkmeyer, Miami University Brian Kirkmeyer is the Karen Buchwald Wright Senior Assistant Dean for Student Success and Instructor in the College of Engineering and Computing at Miami University in Oxford, Ohio. His background includes BS, MS and PhD degrees in Materials Science and Engineering (specialization in polymers), the former from Purdue University and the latter two from the University of Pennsylvania
experience in industry as a software engineer, and three years as a full-time faculty in the departments of computer science and engineering. Her interests focus on broadening participation in engineering through the exploration of: 1) race, gender, and identity in the engineering workplace; 2) discipline-based education research (with a focus on computer science and computer engineering courses) in order to inform pedagogical practices that garner interest and retain women and minorities in computer-related engineering fields.Dr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Matthew W. Ohland is Associate Head and the Dale and Suzi Gallagher of Professor of Engineering Edu- cation at Purdue University. He
Paper ID #34283Work in Progress: Wrappers vs. ExpertsProf. Carl F. Lund, University at Buffalo Carl Lund earned a B.S. from Purdue University and a Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin, both in chemical engineering. He worked at the Exxon Corporate Research Labs prior to joining the faculty of the Chemical Engineering Department at the University at Buffalo. He is currently a SUNY Distin- guished Teaching Professor in the Chemical and Biological Engineering Department and the chair of the Department of Engineering Education. American c Society for Engineering
PhD and BS in Electrical Engineering from the University of Kentucky. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Full Paper: Integrating the iPad Into the Engineering ClassroomAbstractBeginning in 2016, Norwich University (NU) embarked on the Digital Citizen Initiative with thegoal of including an Apple iPad as standard issue for all students and faculty. From 2016 to2019, pilot programs were conducted to test the use of the iPad in both classroom and laboratorysettings. In the Fall of 2019, all incoming first-year students at NU were issued an iPad alongwith an Apple Pencil. The authors performed a pilot study on the use of the iPad in multipleECE courses
Paper ID #241812018 ASEE Zone IV Conference: Boulder, Colorado Mar 25Impact of Oral Exams on a Thermodynamics Course PerformanceDr. Yitong Zhao, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Dr. Yitong Zhao is an Assistant Professor at the Mechanical Engineering Department of Cal Poly Pomona (California State Polytechnic University Pomona). After gained her B.S in MEMS from Tsinghua Uni- versity in China, she joined in Dr. Chih-Ming Ho’s lab at UCLA in 2009. Later she completed her Ph.D in Biomedical Engineering there in 2014. She was engaged in the project of biofuel and later developed a unique cell-free system from
, how to establish an effective partnership that college students are advised to preparefor the potential transfer towards the Bachelor study, it may be critical for ET program to takeadvantage of the abundant minority human resources to enhance its enrollment. Except for the traditional approach of transferring-in, some co-enrollment programs havebeen developed between university and community college. For example, Houston CommunityCollege is now offering Texas A&M-Chevron Engineering Academy class. The enrolledstudents take most courses same as the other college students, meanwhile Texas A&MUniversity may send their faculties to the community college to teach several certain courses forco-enrolled students. The students just need
project director in various STEM education grant programs sponsored by Department of Education and National Science Foundation. He has extensive experience in curriculum assessment, undergraduate curriculum development, and student mentoring.Dr. Ronald Hughes, CSU, Bakersfield ACADEMIC RESPONSIBILITIES: (2017-Present) Associate Professor for the STEM Affinity Group, School of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, California State University, Bakersfield. Duties included teaching responsibilities in Undergraduate Biology. Additional duties included grant writing, manage- ment, and evaluation. RESEARCH INTERESTS: Include teaching and learning cognition skills, informal learning environ- ments and strategies, and
Paper ID #23273Trending Mistakes in Signals and Systems coursesDr. Farrah Fayyaz, Concordia University Farrah Fayyaz has recently joined Concordia University, Montreal, Canada as a Lecturer in the Center for Engineering in Society in the Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science. She got her PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University in December 2014. She holds Bachelors and Masters degrees in Electrical Engineering from University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan. She has taught Electrical Engineering related courses for almost eighteen years now. Her area of research is investigating
Paper ID #24579Assessment of working memory utilization improvement strategies for engi-neering and technology ESL students learning physicsDr. sunil Dehipawala, Queensborough Community College Sunil Dehipawala received his B.S. degree from University of Peradeniya in Sri Lanka and Ph.D from City University of New York. Currently, he is working as a faculty member at Queensborough Community College of CUNY.Prof. Tak Cheung Tak Cheung, Ph.D., professor of physics, teaches in CUNY Queensborough Community College. He also conducts research and mentors student research projects.Prof. Vazgen Shekoyan Dr. Vazgen Shekoyan is a
at the same University.BAILEY WALKER is a senior in the Industrial Engineering Technology program at Northwestern State University.He is was an athlete here on the basketball team, and is employed at the Sabine River Authority.JASON CHURCH is a materials conservator in the Materials Conservation Program. Church coordinates and worksto further develop the Center’s national cemetery training initiative and related research. His experience is incemetery conservation with special attention placed on cemetery ironwork. Before joining NCPTT, he was aconservator and historic metals expert for the City of Savannah, Ga., Department of Cemeteries. He earned hisM.F.A. in Historic Preservation from Savannah College of Art and Design.DR. MARY STRIEGEL is
essentially ended any previous iteration.[1] This iteration, in lieu of studentsfurther contact time with the material, resulting in students turning in their work in pairs to receive one grade, eachquickly dumping a good percentage of what was learned. student would turn in their individual work and DesignTo make matters worse, most faculty would agree that Review sheet. This was done to hold all studentsundergraduate students often skip the reading prior to class, accountable for the work they completed. In addition, theand studies have shown that almost half of all students do instructor provided Design Review sheet was modified fornot pay attention to material presented during a lecture. clarity and the
] Often, teams consist of people with different or similar personalities.Organizational behavior researchers have developed multiple guidelines for assigningpeople to teams. For the projects with a very challenging nature, teams with diversepersonalities and complementary skills work more effectively. Teams with similarpersonality are more efficient when the projects require high team cohesiveness. Whenwe take a look at the term projects in engineering courses, it is not well known which oneis more effective. This paper aims to explain how team formation using studentpersonality influences the team’s project outcomes in material engineering term projects.2. Four dimensions in personality: DISCThere are a number of personality classification
AC 2008-838: VIRTUAL INSTRUMENTATION INTERFACES FOR REAL-TIMECONTROL AND DISPLAY OF ELECTRIC MACHINE DRIVESRamakrishnan Sundaram, Gannon University RAM SUNDARAM received his B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from I.I.T., New Delhi, India, the M.S. degree and the E.E. degree from M.I.T., Cambridge, MA in 1985 and 1987, and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Purdue University in 1994. He is currently a faculty member in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at Gannon University.Fong Mak, Gannon University FONG MAK, P.E. received his B.S.E.E. degree from West Virginia University in 1983, M.S.E.E. and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Illinois in 1986 and 1990
promotingwhat they have been taught and mastered in their schooling.But unfortunately, these 19th century developments are not needed by technicians and mostengineers and are not required for the licensing exams. Even the engineers who work with highlydiscontinuous functions first need to study the elementary functions. A definition in terms ofepsilons requires a proof in terms of epsilons. The function definition provided in almost all highschool and college texts used in differential calculus courses includes nowhere differentiablefunctions. In no way is this logical. In a differential calculus course, functions should beintroduced as mostly smooth curves. This would naturally lead to all the concepts needed byengineers. The functions of calculus
assessments are based on either written reports or oral presentations.IntroductionThere is a void area in the toy market for pets. No interactive devices that can autonomouslyengage pets in outdoor play exist. In order to fulfill the requirement of outdoor operation, the toyshould also be waterproof for situations such as rain or falling into a pond. It also needs to beable to move over grass and slopes with a certain amount of incline. To fill this gap, amultidisciplinary senior design team in the Department of Engineering at Indiana University –Purdue University Fort Wayne (IPFW) designed and built an autonomous system that can beused as a development platform for devices that will engage dogs into playing. This is a two-semester multidisciplinary
stronglybelieves that the new technique is beneficial for both the instructor and the students. Themethodology has been effective and the students are very involved in the learning process. Theauthors strongly believe that teaching is a learning process for the faculty. The authors arecontinuously evolving and improving the technique to ensure that the students stay current withthe latest developments and have a fruitful learning environment. Page 13.455.8Dynamics Course Assessment InstrumentPlease rate the effectiveness of this course in the following areas.1) To improve your ability to take simple concepts to solve complex problems Poor Below
understandand follow the rules of “netiquette”. Another possible drawback of online classes is thatsome students might have a fear of technology, which probably stems from notcompletely understanding how the material can be efficiently delivered online. Onlineeducation is not without challenges from the educator point of view either. For example,teachers in an online learning environment not only have to understand the material verywell but they need to have some technical expertise on the tools available in an onlineenvironment. In addition, online learning requires a significant amount of preparation,organization, and additional communication, especially when a new course is developed,thus brings additional work burden to the instructors.As Alvear et
AC 2009-1884: INTERESTING DIFFERENT DECISION PROBLEMSJane Fraser, Colorado State University, Pueblo Jane M. Fraser is chair of the Department of Engineering at Colorado State University-Pueblo. She was formerly on the faculty at the Ohio State University and Purdue University. She has a BA in mathematics from Swarthmore College and MS and PhD in industrial engineering and operations research from the University of California-Berkeley.Ray Tsai, Taiwan Ray Jui-Feng Tsai received a BS in Industrial Engineering & Engineering Management from National Tsing Hua University in Taiwan and MS in Industrial Engineering from Colorado State University-Pueblo
course format (TL or DPS) might best match their individuallearning style, students were instructed to use the Index of Learning Styles (ILS) on-line survey2(developed by Felder and Soloman). Specifically, students with some combination of active,visual, and/or global preferences3,4,5,6,7 were encouraged to consider choosing the DPS option.While allowing students a choice of course format may have introduced a non-quantifiable bias Page 14.608.2in the exam performance results obtained, an important finding of this study was the fraction ofeach cohort that elected the non-traditional option (and the rationale for doing so, based on exitsurvey
Recayi “Reg” Pecen, Ph.D. Dr. Pecen holds a B.S.E.E. and an M.S. in Controls and Computer Engineering from the Istanbul Technical University, an M.S.E.E. from the University of Colorado at Boulder, and a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Wyoming (UW, 1997). He has served as graduate assistant and faculty at the UW, and South Dakota State University. He is currently an associate professor and program coordinator of Electrical and Information Engineering Technology program at the University of Northern Iowa. He serves on UNI Energy and Environment Council, CNS Diversity Committee, University Diversity Advisory Board, and Graduate College Diversity Task Force Committees
of Engineering Mechanics at the U.S. Air Force Academy.James Baughn, UC Davis James W. Baughn is a graduate of the University of California, Berkeley (B.S.) and of Stanford University (M.S. and PhD) in Mechanical Engineering. He spent eight years in the Aerospace Industry and served as a faculty member at the University of California, Davis from 1973 until his retirement in 2006. He is a Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineering, a recipient of the UCDavis Academic Senate Distinguished Teaching Award, and the author of numerous publications. He completed an assignment to the USAF Academy in Colorado Springs as the Distinguished Visiting Professor of Aeronautics for the 2004-2005
approach to learning,especially in the context of requiring a student to adapt to a different language because of thenature of our department's introductory programming sequence. This provides students with apractical, real-world skill not commonly found in a computer science or engineering curriculum.Additionally, certification preparation often delves into some of the more esoteric areas of alanguage; one is forced to develop a more detailed knowledge of the material in order to dealwith these aspects, and that in and of itself is a benefit as it leads to a greater understanding ofthe language. The concept of certification definitely hits upon the attributes of what one wouldexpect of an IT professional, as certification serves as proof that the
,most institutions evolved to having these courses taught by engineering faculty(Gottfried, 1996).Traditionally, high-level programming languages were used such as Fortran or C. Withthe development of computational tools, many institutions are moving towards usingspreadsheets, VisualBasic for Applications or mathematical computation tools such asMATLAB, MATHCAD, and Maple (Howard, 2005).In addition to learning computer programming as an essential skill, students can improvetheir logical reasoning and quantitative problem solving abilities. Additionally, thisintroductory class has the capability to introduce students to different engineeringdisciplines. Yet, several studies show that these courses often fall short of expectations(Gottfried, 1996
baccalaureate, mastersand doctoral levels with emphasis on engineering, science, technology, business, education,agriculture, and other academic areas. Basic and applied research is conducted by faculty inuniversity centers of excellence, in inter-institutional relationships, and through significantinvolvement with several public and private agencies. The university also conducts majorresearch through engineering, transportation, and its extension programs in agriculture.In order to assess the impact of this program, an experimental study needs to be conducted.2. MethodAs part of the assessment effort, a longitudinal study is being and will continue to be conductedat NCA&T4. In this study, five separate cohort groups from NC A&T will be tracked
2006-1144: MATHEMATICAL CHALLENGES OF TEACHING A GRADUATEFLUIDS COURSE FROM BOTH THE CLASSICAL AND NUMERICALSTANDPOINTPhillip Smith, New Mexico State University Phillip Smith is currently an Emeritus Professor of Mechanical Engineering at New Mexico State University in Las Cruces, New Mexico. He received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering and his M.S. in Aeronautical Engineering from Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. In 1966 he received a Ph.D. in Engineering Mechanics from the University of Kansas. Dr. Smith has been actively involved in teaching and research in fluid mechanics, applied mathematics, and computational methods since joining the NMSU faculty in 1964
University. His primary teaching responsibilities are electronic communication and advanced circuit analysis courses. He has won four outstanding teaching awards in ECET.James Jacob, Purdue University James Michael Jacob, the current George W. McNelly Professor of Technology, is an award-winning teacher. He has received numerous outstanding teaching awards at both the department and college level including the Joint Services Commendation Medal (for excellence in instruction) from the Secretary of Defense. In 1999 he was listed in Purdue University’s Book of Great Teachers, which holds the top 225 faculty ever to teach at Purdue University. Professor Jacob’s contributions in scholarly
. He is Founding General Chair of the IEEE International Electro Information Technology Conferences. Hossein served as 2002/2003 ASEE ECE Division Chair. He was IEEE Education Society Membership Development Chair and now serves as MGA Vice President (2013/2014) and Van Valkenburg Early Career Teaching Award Chair. Dr. Mousavinezhad received Michigan State University ECE Department’s Distinguished Alumni Award, May 2009. He is recipient of ASEE ECE Division’s 2007 Meritorious Service Award, ASEE/NCS Distinguished Service Award, April 6, 2002, for significant and sustained leadership. In 1994 he received ASEE Zone II Outstanding Campus Representative Award. He is also a Senior Member of IEEE, has been a reviewer
in the context of project-based learning (PBL). When properlyimplemented, PBL can greatly increase the sense of engagement among students, while alsoimproving retention of course concepts and the development of related soft skills[5].Incorporation of PBL techniques has been successfully demonstrated for a wide variety ofprojects and settings in thermal and fluid engineering courses, including the design of abrewery[6], HVAC equipment[7], and thermal insulation devices[8]. In addition, the inclusion of“real-world” clients has been shown to have positive impacts on student engagement in courseprojects[9].The course had been taught in a traditional lecture format in the previous year (Fall 2015). Theintent for 2016 was to restructure the course
are aprimary factor inhibiting gender parity (De Cohen 2009). In other words, the problem beginslong before women students enter university.Numerous theories help explain women’s decision not to enroll in engineering. Supply sidetheories assume a mismatch between women’s perceptions of the field and their ability toachieve their life goals (Ceci, Williams, and Barnett 2009). In particular, women may come tothe conclusion that a highly demanding engineering career would be too constraining on theirability to birth and raise children—a perception that may be exacerbated in national contextswhere public childcare systems have not been developed. Other theories suggest that there is areduced demand for women based on institutionalized attitudes