; Exposition, 2018.[16] NCEES, “Using the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) examination as an outcomes assessment tool,” NCEES, Tech. Rep., 2014.[17] L. A. Riley and E. Conley, “Mechanical and industrial engineering: Multidisciplinary partners in the freshman design experience,” Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, vol. 6, p. 1, 2001.[18] G. Tryggvason, M. Thouless, D. Dutta, S. L. Ceccio, and D. M. Tilbury, “The new mechanical engineering curriculum at the University of Michigan,” Journal of Engineering
NASA project ahead of the SAE formula competition project. To that end, we considermotivation when investigating students’ selection of projects and the changes of motivationthroughout the year. Studies have shown a relation between student’s beliefs about themselvesregarding skills they possess in engineering and their future career decisions.9,10 To measuremotivation, we utilize the MSLQ.11,12 The MSLQ is a robust survey that has been used in varioustypes of learning contexts outside of engineering such as medicine.11 The instrument measuresfive major factors of motivation through self-assessment by the participants. The instrument usesa 7 point Likert scale where students self-identify their motivation level by rating between “nottrue to me
Transportation Engineering in the School of Civil and Construction Engineering at Oregon State University and is the Director of the OSU Driving and Bicycling Simulator Laboratory. Dr. Hurwitz conducts research in transportation engineering, in the areas of traffic operations and safety, and in engineering education, in the areas of conceptual assessment and curriculum adoption. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Factors Contributing to the Problem-Solving Heuristics of Civil Engineering StudentsIntroductionProblem solvers vary their approaches to solving problems depending on the context of theproblem, the requirements of the solution, and the ways in
help formulate future research assessing the development ofengineering identity (1) within specific engineering disciplines, and (2) over time throughout collegiatestudy. If commonalities can be found in past experiences, influencers, etc for students with strongengineering identities, it may become possible to tailor information sessions and activities for middle andhigh school students, to assist in the development and/or realization of stronger engineering identities atan earlier age.2. Literature/BackgroundEngineering identity has been identified as a way to improve recruitment, retention, and persistence inengineering programs [1-7]. Kendall, Choe, Denton, and Borrego created a table in their engineeringidentity paper, showing many
: An Empirical Look at the Impact of Academic Makerspaces,” in Proceedings of International Symposium on Academic Makerspaces, 2018.[10] M. Lagoudas, J. Froyd, J. Wilson, P. Hamilton, R. Boehm, and P. Enjeti, “Assessing Impact of Maker Space on Student Learning,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016.[11] R. Morocz et al., “Relating Student Participation in University Maker Spaces to their Engineering Design Self-Efficacy,” in Proceedings of the 123rd Annual American Society for Engineering Education Conference, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[12] L. F. Rosenbaum and B. Hartmann, “Making Connections: Project Courses Improve Design Self-Efficacy and Interdisciplinary Awareness
-ranked programs (top 10 percentiles), mid-ranked programs (11th - 100thpercentiles), and not ranked programs—for each engineering discipline.1 To assess the role of postdoc training in engineering PhDs’ long-term career trajectory,we gather employment outcome information from the 1993-2013 National Science FoundationSurvey of Doctorate Recipients. The SDR is conducted every two to three years and providesdemographic, education, and career history information of a sample of U.S.-trained doctoralscientists and engineers. In many cases, survey respondents completed the SDR survey acrossmultiple time points from when they received their PhD until they reached the age of 75.Therefore, for a subset of the survey respondents, we have
and information sought. One well documented purpose of a scavenger huntmay be to build team comradery1. In academics, team-building scavenger hunts can be useful toacquaint students to one another and encourage healthy communication through an enjoyableactivity. Dyrud suggested that a scavenger hunt be used early in a course if the purpose is aimedat building teaming skills1. The process of participating in a scavenger hunt forces individuals tocommunicate their findings to others, encourages creativity, and provides an avenue for teamwork. Scavenger hunts can also be used to teach students or to assess their abilities. Hollar,Dahm, and Harris documented a scavenger hunt to teach lab safety within a short 15-minute timeperiod2. In this
the pre- and post-surveys, and there was a total of five 4-pointLikert scale questions and four short answer questions in both surveys. As an example, studentscould choose from the following Liker scale responses: “Very Useful” (1), “Useful” (2),“Somewhat Useful” (3), or “Not Useful” (4).The following two questions were used to assess students’ understanding and confidence in theirengineering identity: • Q1: Based upon your description of your field, how confident are you that an engineering professional would agree with your description? • Q5: How prepared are you to facilitate a STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) outreach activity to younger students?The following three questions captured students’ sense of
andgraduate work. High level skills in scientific and academic argument and analysis requirestudents to make inferences from their data, relate their data to previously published results, anduse their data in order to justify their conclusions.5 Since lab reports typically require tasks suchas statistical data analysis, graphical presentation of results, and uncertainty analysis, theybecome an excellent medium to assess the development of these high level skills.A variety of methods have been employed to teach writing skills and related data analysis skills.The Science Writing Heuristic6 is a method of guided inquiry that leads students to reflect onwhat they are learning and ask a series of standard questions about their data and observations.This
order to evaluate the effectivenessof CONSIDER on actual learning in comparison to existing tools like Piazza.We are performing the study using the pattern of design-based-research 21 . This will have us en-gage in multiple, iterative formative assessments, and additional questions are likely to emerge asresearch questions are iteratively refined. This approach blends well with our software develop-ment pattern which is intended to follow an Agile process where features and functionality will bereleased and feature-by-feature testing will be done with end-users/learners.Our tool is available as an open source software, which other educators can download and configureto use in their courses. It is highly customizable in terms of features such as
process to the next level of detail. Alternatives mustultimately be judged subjectively by the customer. Accordingly, Arrow L depicts the passing ofevaluated candidate designs to the customer as well as stakeholders for review and decision.Alternatives that are found to be unacceptable in performance terms can be either discarded orreworked with new alternatives sought. Alternatives that meet all, or the most important, functionalcriteria can then be evaluated based on estimations and predictions. This should be accompaniedby risk assessment, another capability of Engineering Economy.Engineering practice requires systems thinking more than ever before. Instead of offering systemsor system elements per se, Engineering Economy properly linked
series of presentations ofprojects by industry professionals in the final semester of the curriculum not only exposedstudents to a variety of different types of problems that taught them how to model real-worldsystems, but also helped them to integrate the knowledge that they have acquired over the courseof their studies prior to graduation, thereby helping them transition into the professional world.Finally, increased networking opportunities for both students and employers constituted a fringebenefit to the recommended modifications.References1. Drew, Christopher. “Why Science Majors Change Their Minds (Its Just So Darn Hard).” New York Times. 4 Nov. 2011.2. Nassersharif, B., and Rousseau, Carl-Ernst. "Best practices in assessing capstone
then administered a pilotsurvey created from this data to assess construct validity and reliability. In both phases, Renataused Yosso’s Community Cultural Wealth (CCW) framework [13] to guide the study.Renata collected twenty semi-structured interviews, which comprised the main data collection inthe qualitative phase of the study exploring the influences of SHPE on Latina/o students. Sheused purposeful sampling to achieve intensity and variation in the data [18], identifyinginformation-rich participants from those who attended SHPE’s 2013 national conference. Sheconducted interviews, which were an average of fifty minutes in length, using videoconferencingcapabilities such as Skype. While these interviews were the primary means of data
campus. Figure 4: The Invention Studio is Open to Anyone on Campus for Personal, Class and Research Projects163.3.1 Makerspaces as Industrial Environments for Study of 3D Printing Waste and EnergyThis fifth example demonstrates how equipment used for extracurricular activities can also beused for collecting research data (equipment in the model from Figure 2). One faculty at GeorgiaTech is working with the student makerspace to collect data for assessing environmental impactsof 3D printing, resulting in shared equipment, shared student resources, and ample real worlddata on manufacturing.Motivation & BackgroundFused deposition modeling (FDM) is a prominent technology for additive manufacturing offunctional parts. FDM is the
skills were reported in critical thinking, engineering design andapplications, and mathematics. Women reported somewhat higher improvements in writtencommunication, oral communication, and leadership than men. There are some differences in theskills reported by underrepresented minorities and other minority groups (e.g., other minorities b Note that the survey did not ask about how strong students felt their skills were at the beginning or end of theirstudies, instead asking them to assess their level of improvement. reported slightly higher gains in written and oral communication skills), but these differences arenot significant due to the small sample sizes of survey respondents in these groups.The survey also asked students for their
available only in the “gray”literature of think tanks, where validity is often assessed through critical readings by peers afterpublication, with responses issued from other think tanks. Compounding this difficulty is the factthat Louisiana carefully controlled the data from charter schools, releasing it only to a smallnumber of favored researchers, in violation of public records laws. The courts only sorted thisout in fall 2014.33Those who had privileged access to data touted success of charter schools: increasedstandardized test scores, increased graduation rates, and increased diversity (interpreted as ahigher number of white students enrolled).34,35 However, critics have pointed out methodologicalflaws in these studies, to the point where one
discovered through research,students can experience the enlightening and transformative potential of strategically focusingnew design efforts, on the pathway to potentially new, useful and non-obvious solutions.Reflections, Lessons, Student Assessment, Improvements - Future Work and Next StepsAssessment of Learning Objectives: Survey Reflections from Workshop Participants 1. “It was informative and interesting. I liked the idea of building a narrative before presenting the story behind a patent.” 2. “Upon reflection, I think a portion of the workshop could be an exercise of creating a provisional patent. Perhaps a sample provisional could be derived from the design exercise of the workshop.” 3. “Provide explanation of
Page 26.756.1 areas of Systems and Product Design Methods, Medical Devices, Regulations, Complexity Assessment, Decision Support Systems, Manufacturing, Automation, Real-Time Process Control and Engineering Ed- ucation. Dr. Medina is the IDEAS (Improving Design Decisions in Engineering and Applied Systems) Research Group Leader. This group is dedicated to innovating the development process of products and c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Paper ID #12765 processes. Dr. Medina has been the recipient of several fellowships such as the GEM Ph.D. Engineer- ing Fellowship, NASA
of teaching and assessment—creative, synthetic design problem solving is out, differentialequations, free-body diagraming, and equation balancing are in.The logic of exclusion operating within higher engineering education has two majormanifestations. The first is most obvious: the exclusion of those students who, over time, aredeemed not to have what it takes to be an engineer. These students either prove themselveswithout the necessary aptitude or discipline (e.g., poor performance in calculus, physics,chemistry, etc.) or they opt out of engineering willfully when it turns out not to be what theyexpected. The second manifestation of the logic of exclusion is less obvious, involving the waysin which various facets of a student’s identity are
Institute integrated the 50 students into their regular summer session while creating atailored TOEFL preparation class for the group and designating conversation partners that wouldaddress each student’s English weakness. Students took an assessment test at the beginning andwere placed in classes appropriate to their levels addressing their needs. The goal was not only toimprove their English language skills, but also prepare them to take the TOEFL and meet theminimum required by the university, which is a score of 80 on the iBT TOEFL.The program was also designed to provide students with GRE training and research immersion.The GRE training took place during the first five weeks of the program. It was two hours twice aweek (Mondays and Wednesdays
Paper ID #13327Informal Pathways to Engineering: Middle-School-Aged Homeschool Stu-dents’ Experiences with Engineering (Fundamental)Tamecia R Jones, Purdue University, West Lafayette Tamecia Jones is currently a doctoral student in the Engineering Education department at Purdue Uni- versity with a research focus on K-12 engineering education, assessment, and informal and formal learn- ing environments. She is a graduate of Johns Hopkins and Stanford University. Originally trained as a biomedical engineer, she spent years in the middle school classroom, teaching math and science, and consulting with nonprofits, museums
Page 26.1006.8perceived by others. I have been incorrectly called out before by others who feel that I amsimply being politically-correct and not really a believer in equity issues. Because I have lookeddeep within myself and assessed my words and actions, I have been able to readily counter thoseclaims.Dr. Kokini: Some of the barriers to individual-level advocacy are bias, culture, and a lack ofunderstanding on the part of the majority on how it feels to be part of an underrepresented group.Dr. Lopresti: Engineers and scientists often behave as though we exist in a perfect meritocracy,and hence we should not have to worry about discrimination or gender equity. An unwillingnessto acknowledge reality is part of the problem. Also, what passes as