Conference Session

Classroom Engagement

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brianno Coller, Northern Illinois University; David Shernoff, Northern Illinois University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

David Shernoff is an Associate Professor in the Department of Leadership, Educational Psychology, and Foundations at Northern Illinois University, where he teaches courses in adolescent development, motivation, and educational psychology. He received his Ph.D. in education at the University of Chicago, and served a postdoctoral fellowship at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. His areas of research specialization are student engagement, positive youth development, and mentoring. Page 15.157.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 An Initial Analysis of Student

Conference Session

Professional Identity

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Tech; Brock E. Barry, U.S. Military Academy; Kerry Meyers, University of Notre Dame; Rachel Louis, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

AC 2011-290: A MULTI-INSTITUTION COMPARISON OF STUDENTS’DEVELOPMENT OF AN IDENTITY AS AN ENGINEERHolly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Holly Matusovich is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education. Dr. Matusovich has a PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University. She also has a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and an M.S. in Materials Science with a concentration in Metallurgy. Additionally Dr. Matusovich has four years of experience as a consulting engineer and seven years of industrial experience in a variety of technical roles related to metallurgy and quality systems for an aerospace supplier. Dr. Matusovich’s research interests include the role of motivation in learning engineering as

Conference Session

Persistence and Retention I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Qu Jin, Purdue University, West Lafayette; P.K. Imbrie, Texas A&M University; Joe J.J. Lin, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Xingyu Chen, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

AC 2011-1608: A MULTI-OUTCOME HYBRID MODEL FOR PREDICT-ING STUDENT SUCCESS IN ENGINEERINGQu Jin, Purdue University, West Lafayette Qu Jin is a graduate student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received a M.S. degree in Biomedical Engineering from Purdue University and a B.S. degree in Material Science and Engineering from Tsinghua University in China. Her research focuses on modeling students’ outcomes, which include placement, retention, and graduation.Dr. P.K. Imbrie, Purdue University, West LafayetteJoe J.J. Lin, Purdue University, West Lafayette Joe J.J. Lin is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research interest includes: student

Conference Session

Digital Technologies and Learning

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Chen, California Polytechnic State University; Christine A. Victorino, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Charles Birdsong, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Unny Menon, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Marilyn Tseng, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Tyler Scott Smith

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

’ attitudes and performance between atreatment group (online textbook) and a control group (printed textbook only).Background and Literature ReviewThe implementation of online textbooks is an emerging area in both higher education and in therelated scholarly research. The available research results should be viewed in light of the rapidlychanging products being developed and offered by the various major publishers. That caveatnotwithstanding, we review the available recent literature that studied digital or online textbooks.In a recent review of the research on e-books (i.e., digital or PDF versions of traditionaltextbooks), researchers found that the greatest barrier to the e-book format was “culturalacceptance”1. That is, individuals who grew up

Conference Session

Modeling and Problem-Solving

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Morris M. Girgis, Central State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

AC 2011-2038: AN ACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT FOR ENRICH-ING MATHEMATICAL, CONCEPTUAL, AND PROBLEM-SOLVING COM-PETENCIESMorris M. Girgis, Central State University Morris Girgis is a professor at Central State University. He teaches undergraduate courses in manufactur- ing engineering. He recieved his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Hannover University, Germany. His current research in engineering education focuses on developing and implementing new educational tools and approaches to enhance teaching, learning, and assessment at the course and curriculum levels. Page 22.159.1 c

Conference Session

Assessment Instruments

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Syed Helmi Syed Hassan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia; Khairiyah Mohd-Yusof, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia; Mohd Salleh Abu, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia; Shahrin Mohammad, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

AC 2011-2720: AN INSTRUMENT TO ASSESS STUDENTS’ ENGINEER-ING PROBLEM SOLVING ABILITY IN COOPERATIVE PROBLEM-BASEDLEARNING (CPBL)Syed Ahmad Helmi Syed Hassan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Syed Helmi is an academic staff in the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and is currently a Ph.D. in Engineering Education candidate in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Khairiyah Mohd-Yusof, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Khairiyah is an associate professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. She is presently the Deputy Director at the Centre for Teaching and Learning in UTM. Her main research areas are Process Modeling, Simulation and Control, and Engineering Education. She has been implementing

Conference Session

K-12 Students and Teachers

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tirupalavanam G. Ganesh, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

AC 2011-2655: ANALYZING SUBJECT-PRODUCED DRAWINGS: THEUSE OF THE DRAW AN ENGINEER ASSESSMENT IN CONTEXTTirupalavanam G. Ganesh, Arizona State University Tirupalavanam G. Ganesh is Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Arizona State University’s Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering. He has bachelors and masters degrees in Computer Science and Engineering and a PhD in Curriculum and Instruction. His research interests include educational research methods, communication of research, and k-16+ engineering education. Ganesh’s research is largely focused on studying k-12 curricula, and teaching-learning processes in both the formal and informal settings. He is principal investigator of the Information Technology

Conference Session

K-12 Students and Teachers

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robin Guill Liles, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University; Courtney Lambeth, North Carolina A&T State University; Cindy Waters, North Carolina A&T State University (Eng); Devdas M. Pai, North Carolina A&T State University (Eng)

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

AC 2011-1610: ARE WE GROWING THE NEXT GENERATION OF BIO-ENGINEERS? AN ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF ONE BIOINSTITUTESUMMER CAMPRobin Guill Liles, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University Robin Guill Liles is associate professor in counseling and counselor education in the Department of Hu- man Development and Services in the School of Education at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro. Liles is a Licensed Professional Counselor and National Certified Coun- selor. Liles’ is also Associate Director for Educational Assessment for the NCA&T Engineering Research Center Education and Outreach program, and she is co-principal investigator for research on the NSF Con- tent

Conference Session

Innovative Teaching and Assessment Tools

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sean Brophy, Purdue University; Sensen Li, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

AC 2010-1869: A FRAMEWORK FOR USING GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATIONSAS ASSESSMENTS OF ENGINEERING THINKINGSean Brophy, Purdue University Sean P. Brophy, PhD. is an assistant professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Dr. Brophy is a learning scientist and engineer; his research focuses on the development of learners’ development of adaptive expertise needed to solve complex problems in engineering, mathematics and science contexts. He uses results from his work with learners to inform instructional design methods with and without advanced technology.Sensen Li, Purdue University, West Lafayette Sensen Li is a graduate student in Engineering Education program at Purdue University. She

Conference Session

Special Session: Next Generation Problem-Solving

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ronald Miller, Colorado School of Mines; Tamara Moore, University of Minnesota; Brian Self, California Polytechnic State University; Andrew Kean, California Polytechnic State University; Gillian Roehrig, University of Minnesota; Jack Patzer, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

AC 2010-1900: SPECIAL SESSION: MODEL ELICITING ACTIVITIES --INSTRUCTOR PERSPECTIVESRonald Miller, Colorado School of Mines Ronald L. Miller is professor of chemical engineering and Director of the Center for Engineering Education at the Colorado School of Mines where he has taught chemical engineering and interdisciplinary courses and conducted engineering education research for the past 24 years. Dr. Miller has received three university-wide teaching awards and has held a Jenni teaching fellowship at CSM. He has received grant awards for education research from the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Education FIPSE program, the National Endowment for the Humanities, and the

Conference Session

ERM Potpourri

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephen Snyder, Taylor University; Joshua Gates, Taylor University; Lydia Kilmer, Taylor University; Emily Paladin, Taylor University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Researchers. Journal of Chemical Education, 84, 1744-1745.3. Henry, C. (2005). REU Directors put heads together. Chemical & Engineering News, 83(43), 99. Retrieved from Academic Search Premier database.4. Hartmann, D. (1990). Undergraduate research experience as preparation for graduate school. American Sociologist, 21, 179-188.5. Sabatini, D. A. (1997) Teaching and research synergism: The undergraduate research experience. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education & Practice, 123, 98-101.6. Susan H., R., Hancock, M., & McCullough, J. (2007). Benefits of undergraduate research experiences. Science, 316(5824), 548-549. doi:10.1126/science.1140384.7. Gijbels, D., Dochy, F., Bossche, P.V. (2005

Conference Session

Conceptual Learning

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bill Brooks, Oregon State University; Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

currently has research activity in areas related to thin film materials processing and engineering education. He is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. Dr. Koretsky is a six-time Intel Faculty Fellow and has won awards for his work in engineering education at the university and national levels. Page 15.1226.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 The Effect of Peer Instruction on Students’ Construction of Conceptual Understanding in

Conference Session

New Learning Paradigms I

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kendra Seniow, Oregon State University; Eric Nefcy, Oregon State University; Christine Kelly, Oregon State University; Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

enzymes in biomass deconstruction for bioproducts and biofuels manufacture. She also has interests in developing tools to promote the use of higher cognitive skills in engineering coursework. Dr. Kelly recently earned OSU's Austin-Paul Engineering Faculty Award for mentoring students.Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He currently has research activity in areas related to thin film materials processing and engineering education. He is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. Dr

Conference Session

Innovative Teaching and Assessment Tools

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tristan Utschig, Georgia Institute of Technology; Judith Norback, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

focused on workforce communication skills needed by practicing engineers. She has also co-taught Senior Design, Technical Communication, and Introduction to Statistics; coordinated activities in the Workforce Communication Lab and authored communication instruction for undergraduate engineers. Her research has been sponsored by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, NSF, the Engineering Information Foundation and other sources. Page 15.1021.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Refinement and Initial Testing of an Engineering Student Presentation Scoring

Conference Session

Engineering Design: Implementation and Evaluation

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cameron Denson, Utah State University; Matt Lammi, Utah State University; Kyungsuk Park, Utah State University; Elizabeth Dansie, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

using a modified verbalprotocol approach in which the unit of study was the pair of students rather than individualstudents. Significant discoveries with implications for design education have been made in the pastdecade which has provided a foundation for changes in undergraduate education. It was our hopethat this methodology and these findings will contribute to the research foundation of secondaryeducation design thinking which may lead to pedagogical improvements. Fundamental toeducational philosophy is the requisite potential to improve students’ critical thinking abilities.Through a study of freshmen and senior engineering majors, Atman and colleagues 7 concludedthat the students’ ability to generate quality designs improved. This

Conference Session

Student Learning

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ricky Castles, Virginia Tech; Vinod Lohani, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, rather than mathematical ability with questions on the inventory designed to beconceptual in nature rather than computational. Since the pioneering work of Hestenes et al. several other groups of educators have goneon to develop concept inventories for a variety of fields. The National Science Foundation’sfoundation coalition [9] tracks the development of concept inventories. In October 2000, workbegan on concept inventories in the areas of thermodynamics [10], strength of materials [11],signals and systems [12], and electromagnetics [13]. At this time, researchers from multipleuniversities began collaborating to develop these inventories. In October 2001, researchcontinued in this arena and the development of concept inventories in

Conference Session

Special Session: Impacts of Service in Engineering

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kurt Paterson, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

. Journal of Engineering Education. 95(2): 1-16.[15] Bringle, R.G., M.A. Phillips, and M. Hudson. 2004. The Measure of Service Learning: Research Scales toAssess Student Experiences. American Psychological Association. Washington, DC. 227 pp.[16] Abes, E., G. Jackson and S. Jones. 2002. Factors that motivate and deter faculty use of service-learning.Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 9(1): 5-17.[17] Glemon, S.B., B.A. Holland, A. Driscoll, A. Spring, and S. Kerrigan. 2001. Assessing Service-Learning andCivic Engagement. Campus Compact. 154 pp.[18] Shuman, L.J., Besterfield-Sacre, M.E., and J. McGourty. 2005. The ABET “Professional Skills” – Can They BeTaught? Can They Be Assessed? Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1): 41-55

Conference Session

ERM Potpourri

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Leticia Anaya, University of North Texas; Nicholas Evangelopoulos, University of North Texas; Uyi Lawani, University of North Texas

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

AC 2010-2137: OPEN-BOOK VS. CLOSED-BOOK TESTING: ANEXPERIMENTAL COMPARISONLeticia Anaya, University of North Texas Leticia Anaya, M.S. is a Lecturer in the Department of Engineering Technology at the University of North Texas College of Engineering. She is currently working in her PhD in Management Science at the University of North Texas. She received her M.S. in Industrial Engineering from Texas A&M University. Her research and teaching interests include Thermal Sciences, Statistics, Quality Assurance, Machine Design, Simulation and Educational Teaching Methods. She has published previously in ASEE Conferences and has developed three laboratory manuals in the following areas

Conference Session

Special Session: Impacts of Service in Engineering

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Linda Barrington, University of Massachusetts, Lowell; John Duffy, University of Massachusetts Lowell

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

AC 2010-2149: MAXIMIZING BENEFITS OF SERVICE-LEARNING INENGINEERINGLinda Barrington, University of Massachusetts, LowellJohn Duffy, University of Massachusetts Lowell Page 15.858.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Maximizing Benefits of Service-Learning in Engineering  AbstractAre engineering educators maximizing the benefits of service-learning to students, community,faculty, and institutions? Are we collectively converging on desired goals of service-learning asa pedagogy/philosophy that take full advantage of the benefits elucidated by research?A commonly utilized definition of service-learning is “a credit-bearing, educational experiencein which

Conference Session

Modeling Student Data

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gisele Ragusa, University of Southern California

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

School of Education Abstract There is a growing concern among universities that students in undergraduate andgraduate engineering and business programs will be unprepared or underprepared to work inglobal workforces. In their 2005 publication, Engineers for 2020, the National Academy ofEngineering (NAE) urged university engineering schools nationwide to embed curriculum andassessment measures into academic programs that provide opportunities and associatedassessment metrics to meet this international challenge. Specifically, the NAE chargesuniversities and colleges to prepare engineers that are leaders in global engineering fields withstrong communication, leadership and interdisciplinary research

Conference Session

Innovative Teaching and Assessment Tools

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cheryl Willis, University of Houston; Susan Miertschin, University of Houston

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

AC 2010-2153: CENTERING RESONANCE ANALYSIS AS A TOOL FORASSESSMENTCheryl Willis, University of Houston Cheryl Willis is an Associate Professor of Information Systems Technology at the University of Houston. She received her Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction from the University of Florida. Her teaching focus is primarily on applications development and database management. Her research interests include curriculum revision processes for career and technology programs; service learning in information technology undergraduate programs and the use of emerging technologies in undergraduate teaching. She has developed curriculum for business education and information technology at the secondary

Conference Session

New Learning Paradigms I

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gary Behm, Rochester Institute of Technology; Jeanne Behm, Rochester Institute of Technology; Scott Bellinger, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Joseph Stanislow, Rochester Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

), or Bachelor of Science (BS) degrees.Because of challenges with reading comprehension and writing skills, deaf people face otherchallenges in learning mathematics word problem solving. Many NTID STEM students have tostart with entry-level mathematics as a pre-requisite before they can begin their major intechnical or engineering programs. The findings from one source of educational research showthat regardless of instructional settings, deaf students are not being sufficiently engaged in acognitively challenging word problem situation.5A Structured ApproachThe StepWise procedural method was developed as a general step-by-step guideline for studentsto follow in solving a scientific, technological, engineering, or mathematical word basedproblem

Conference Session

Knowing our Students, Faculty, and Profession

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tershia Pinder-Grover, University of Michigan; Chris Groscurth, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

examines individual and collective communication practices that strengthen relationships, organizations, and communities. He is particularly interested in promoting learning, leadership, and social justice through research-based interventions. Page 15.948.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Perceptions of Millennial Student Learning: The Future Faculty PerspectiveAbstractIn order to promote student learning, instructors must understand who is in their classroom andhow those students learn. Currently, many engineering courses are composed of “Millennial

Conference Session

Student Attitudes and Perceptions

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dazhi Yang, Purdue University; Aidsa Santiago Roman, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez; Ruth Streveler, Purdue Universtiy; Ronald Miller, Colorado School of Mines; James Slotta, University of Toronto; Michelene Chi

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

AC 2010-1826: REPAIRING STUDENT MISCONCEPTIONS USING ONTOLOGYTRAINING: A STUDY WITH JUNIOR AND SENIOR UNDERGRADUATEENGINEERING STUDENTSDazhi Yang, Purdue University Dazhi Yang is a postdoctoral researcher and an instructional designer in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. She obtained both her master’s and Ph.D. degrees in Educational Technology from Purdue in 2004 and 2008, respectively. She has taught a variety of subjects at the K-12, undergraduate, and graduate levels. She also has worked on various instructional deign and technology-supported learning projects across disciplines. Dr. Yang’s research interests are instructional design and strategies

Conference Session

Modeling Student Data

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

George Ricco, Purdue University; Ida Ngambeki, Purdue University; Russell Long, Purdue University; Matthew Ohland, Purdue University; Demetra Evangelou, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

. She currently serves as the President of the Purdue Student Chapter of ASEE. Her research interests include engineering thinking, motivation and vocational choice in engineering, and sustainability policy.Russell Long, Purdue University Russell A. Long is Associate Director of MIDFIELD and Director of Project Assessment in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has twenty years experience in institutional research, assessment, strategic planning, and higher education policy. He is a SAS expert and manages the MIDFIELD database.Matthew Ohland, Purdue University Matthew W. Ohland is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University

Conference Session

Innovative Use of Technology and the Internet in Engineering Education

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Erin Shaw, University of Southern California; Jihie Kim, University of Southern California; Jaebong Yoo, Samsung Electronics

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Paper ID #9765Mediators of Participation in Online DiscussionsErin Shaw, University of Southern California Erin Shaw is a Computer Scientist at the University of Southern California’s Information Sciences In- stitute, a research center at the USC Viterbi School of Engineering. Her research focuses on modeling and assessing student knowledge in the areas of science and mathematics, experimenting with new tech- nologies for aiding assessment in distance learning, and studying computer mediated social dialogue and team collaboration in post-secondary engineering education. She received an MA in Online and Distance

Conference Session

Student Learning, Problem Solving, & Critical Thinking 1

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Micah Lande, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Advanced Practicing Professionals. Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education Conference. Portland, Oregon. June 12-15.11. Atman, C.J., M.E. Cardella, J. Turns & R. Adams (2005). Comparing freshman and senior engineering design processes: an in-depth follow-up study. Design Studies, 26(4).12. Atman, Cynthia J, Jennifer Turns, Monica E. Cardella & Robin Adams (2003). The Design Processes of Engineering Educators: Thick Descriptions and Potential Implications. Design Thinking Research Symposium VI Proceedings, Sydney, Australia.13. Adams, R, J Turns & C J Atman (2003). What could design learning look like? Proceedings of the Annual Design Thinking Research Symposium VI, November, Sydney, Australia.14

Conference Session

Student Learning, Problem Solving, and Critical Thinking 1

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Natasa S. Vidic, University of Pittsburgh; Nur Ozge Ozaltin; Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Assistant Professor, Department of Industrial En- gineering Sept 2010 - present Center Associate Director of Operations, Engineering Education Research Center Jan 2011- Sept 2013 Visiting Assistant Professor Sept 2008 – Sept 2011 Graduate Research Assis- tant Sept 2002 – Sept 2008 Port Authority of Allegheny County, Pittsburgh, PA Project Manager/Planning Department Aug 1992- Oct 1994 University of Delaware, Delaware Transportation Center, Newark, DE Graduate Research Assistant Aug 1990 - May 1992 University of Novi Sad, Institute for Traffic and Transportation Eng., Serbia Research Associate /Lecturer Aug 1987 – Aug 1990 Selected Publications • Bursic K., Vidic N., Yildrim T. P., Besterfield-Sacre M., Shuman L., (2013

Conference Session

Pedagogy and Learning 1

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Waddah Akili, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

. Page 24.949.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 On Implementation of Classroom-Based Pedagogies of Engagement: Relevant Measures and General OutcomesAbstract: Educators, at all levels, as well as policy planners have advocated student involvementas an essential aspect of meaningful learning. Learning “about” things through conventionalmethods (low interaction lecture–based) does not necessarily enable students to acquire theabilities and understanding they will need for their future studies and or careers. Research hasshown that interaction among students and interaction between faculty and students- carried byfar the largest weights and affected more general education

Conference Session

Innovative Use of Technology and the Internet in Engineering Education

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julian Ly Davis, University of Southern Indiana; Thomas McDonald, University of Southern Indiana

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

; Practice Vol. 131, No. 4, 2005, pp. 10p.[3] Beichner, R., and D. Deardorff," Online Homework: Does It Make a Difference?", Physics Teacher Vol. 39, No. 5, 2001, pp. 4p.[4] Drelick, J., Z. Henry, and J. Robertson-Honecker," Online Homework, Help or Hindrance? What Students Think and How They Perform", Journal of College Science Teaching Vol. 40, No. 4, 2011, pp. 13p.[5] Bowen, W.G., and K.A. Lack, "Current Status of Research in Online Learning in Postsecondary Education. ", Ithaka SandR, 2012.[6] Davis, J.L., "Frustration with minor errors in online homework software", 2012.[7] Dillard-Eggers, J., T. Wooten, B. Childs, and J. Coker," Evidence of the effectiveness of on-line homework", College Teaching Methods