from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU.Dr. Jana Bouwma-Gearhart, Oregon State University Jana L. Bouwma-Gearhart is an associate professor of STEM education at Oregon State University. Her research widely concerns improving education at research universities. Her earlier research explored en- hancements to faculty motivation to improve undergraduate education. Her more recent research concerns organizational change towards postsecondary STEM education improvement at
misunderstanding concerning expectations. Page 2.256.2 Session 1275 One issue for this instructor was whether the participation of the engineering students inthese interdisciplinary miniprojects should be voluntary (for extra credit in the course) r arequirement of the course. In the spring 1995 semester it was voluntary. The following year itwas first announced that it would be a requirement of the course. However a request for studentfeedback revealed student dissatisfaction with that policy, with some students concerned that anout-of-class joint project would
and professional work environment will allow the constructionindustry to better compete for the talented and experienced people that will be needed in thefuture. The industry has growing concern about ethical behavior of new employees andprospective employees. The industry typically states that one of their most valuable assets is theirreputation and that their reputation is directly related to their ethical behavior. The constructionindustry as a whole will be better off when the majority of the employees will become aware oftheir ethical responsibilities to the people, the workers and the industry. This article describes theimportance of ethics in the AEC profession; how it can be integrated into the undergraduatecurriculum; and how it can
still be investigated. One factor may be the strength of the programs that supportwomen in engineering, discussed in the next section.IV. Programs Supporting Women in EngineeringThere is no formal department program that supports women in industrial engineering. Based onthe survey results the IE faculty seem to be very encouraging and receptive toward the females,already providing a climate of encouragement and belonging that will serve as a sound basis fordeveloping new programs. The WES student group is not highly publicized and not all of thewomen in the industrial engineering program are aware of its existence. The college sponsors amentoring program and two of the female students in industrial engineering have been assignedmentors who are
through until the final laboratory work that can test a hypothesis that addresses thelab exercise in the course. By beginning the project at the start concern. This carries them into the analysis area where theyof the semester students can bring in their fresh ideas for the question, compare or contrast different situations that will helptopic of the course and develop these ideas prior to being them to more clearly understand the problem they haveswayed by the context of the course. New ideas and 3defined he work is still by the individual and the output the development of their
inthe ME Department. The authors provide an insight of how corporate culture and academia canresolve differences in procedures and address issues of mutual interest.The authors infer that highlighting the benefits of industry and academia collaboration providesincentives to sustain for sustaining long term industry involvement with academic programs. Page 7.895.1 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American society for Engineering EducationI. IntroductionBefore discussing possible new incentives for Industry/Academia cooperation, it
collected inputs related to Course Topics from both faculty and students. We initiated adiscussion among the RBE faculty by sharing course survey results with them soliciting theirinput. For students feedback, it was in the form of listening sessions. For this part, we specificallyaimed at finding answers to the following questions: 1) Are all necessary Topics/Skills covered inthe curriculum?, 2) Are there any gaps in the curriculum?, and 3) Are topics in the correct order?FindingsBased on the collected data, we were able to find the sources of the problem of students not beingprepared for courses in terms of programming and software engineering. Issue 1: The order inwhich Recommended Backgrounds are suggested contribute as part of the source of
. Page 26.1126.5 Table 1: Project Outcomes Adopted from the ASCE Body of Knowledge Educational Outcomes Personal Outcomes Application Knowledge Create a new “green” Recognize the importance of building utilizing sustainability issues in their alternative energy systems personal lifeTwo different levels of achievement specified in the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge of“application” and “knowledge” were considered. Also
the discipline) is critical for retention andcompletion of the degree (graduate and undergraduate). As part of the retention aimed at femalestudents, the CIS department has hired a female faculty with extensive experience in theadministration field in addition to her expertise in the Computer Science and InformationTechnology fields. Besides one current female faculty who advises CIST (Computer InformationTechnology) majors and BAT (Bachelor of Applied Technology) majors, the new faculty has anMBA degree, worked extensively in the industry in Europe and the US, and has additionalbackground in Aeronautics Engineering from the University of Texas A&M. The new facultyhas half-time load dedicated for advising students in general, and females
their initial impressions after having used mobile hands-on learning inthe classroom in a few class sessions. The workshop concluded with more hands-on activities.The workshop was divided into an introductory session (for first-time users that were not in thefirst workshop), and an advanced session for the other faculty members. By the end of theworkshop the participants had answered some of their concerns and were in position to includeadditional mobile hands-on pedagogical activities in their classroom. All five institutions agreedthat there was merit to write a second proposal to NSF to continue working as a group to advancethis innovation in Puerto Rico.Assessment Results – 1st Workshop A survey was conducted at the end of the
importance of licensure, and the basics of business, law, publicadministration, public policy, and globalization as related to the professional practice of civilengineering.” The primary issue in this outcome is related to the addition of law andglobalization. Faculty noted that since these subjects were not included in the formal outcomestatements until the Fall 2009 term, they may not have included sufficient course work to supportstudent learning and eventual documentation of achievement. The faculty will develop modestcourse-level modifications to assure the subject matter was covered in key courses.Outcome P1 is unchanged for the new BOK2-conforming program outcomes and states thatstudents must “Analyze a situation involving multiple
§ Understand the § Understand and mindset diversity issues “values” of compare the education§ Understand global aviation § Increase sensitivity, concern, and certification business drivers and issue awareness systems for North America, Canada, and§ Placement of § On and Off-campus
degrees offered by NMAA are in Civil and GeneralEngineering.As part of its rebuilding efforts in Afghanistan, the U.S. military has been heavily engaged inoutreach, support and mentorship to the NMAA faculty. In the summer of 2009, the authorsdeployed with a joint Army/Air Force team as part of this on-going mission. The team membersused Bloom’s Theory of cognitive development and Joseph Lowman’s model of college teachingin assessing levels of student and faculty development, as well as formulating and executingplans for continuing engagement.This paper gives a brief overview of NMAA, its current status, what the authors did while there,what is still needed, and what issues must be considered when conducting this type of globaloutreach. It
businessoccupancy for first-floor spaces, the program supports attraction and retention of collegegraduates through civic engagement and new internships with local professional services firms.Community college internship coordinator and faculty managed the student portion of theprogram, which provided students with real-world experience assessing conditions, creating as-built drawings, performing code analysis, developing estimates, and generating designs thatincorporate LEED elements. The grant funded student wages, while the architecture andengineering firms provided mentorship pro bono. The Downtown Dayton Partnership serves asfiscal agent for the project and facilitates the interface between professional firms and buildingowners, as well as developing
throughcomprehensive, affordable education based on intimate interaction with the creators andpractitioners of new technologies. The local, regional and distance members of ourdiverse community of students, faculty and staff are actively engaged in all segments ofindustry, government and academia. Our students experience strongly interactivelearning in a vibrant physical, intellectual and cultural environment. The Missions of theDepartment of Civil Engineering at UNM are to provide high-quality learningexperiences for students and lifelong education for practicing professionals, and todevelop and disseminate new knowledge to meet the engineering and construction needsof New Mexico, the nation and the world. In addition to the Mission Statement, theDepartment
Technology Development (CAWMSET), 2000. Land of Plenty. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. 3. P251130, US Census Bureau, Population Division, Populations Projections Branch, p. 1 4. The Chronicle of Higher Education, “Almanac Issue 2003-04”, Vol., L, No 1, August, 2003, pp. 2. 5. Goodlad, J., “School-university partnerships for educational renewal: Rationale and concepts”, School- university partnerships in action: Concepts, cases, and concerns, New York: Teachers College Press, 1988, pp. 3-31. 6. Knight, S. L. and Wiseman, D. L, “Examining the Sustainability of Three School-University Partnerships”, Meeting of American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, April 23-27 2000, pp.1-27. 7
andASEE Chemical Engineering Division newsletters and posted on social media. Fifty-eightinstitutions responded and are listed in Appendix B. Of those 58 institutions, 93% are on thesemester system, and the others are on quarters. Canadian institutions also responded, but theirresults will be presented at another conference in Fall 2023.FacultyCapstone design has special instructional needs. The survey asked a series of questions about thefaculty in general, the design faculty, how the design faculty spend their time, industrialcollaborators, and other faculty-related course issues. This section of the paper reports oncapstone design from the faculty point of view.One way of categorizing departments is by the faculty size. The most common faculty
achieved.EC2000 Criteria 2 and 3 cause the most concern for programs contemplating their firstaccreditation review under the new criteria. They require that programs give formal Page 7.239.2consideration to issues that may not have received such attention before. The third criterion, “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”which requires the identification of specific desired outcomes and appropriate assessment tools,will be the focus of this paper.The Experience of the NJIT Chemical Engineering
-level history, ethics, and identity curricula in other aerospace engineering programs.Structurally, our seminar was implemented to complement an existing, required lecture series;there were therefore few administrative barriers given that no new course was created, there wasno added workload for faculty or teaching assistants, and there were no additional curricularrequirements for students. While we present the framework within an aerospace engineeringcurriculum, we believe that the same questions are applicable more broadly to engineering andscience curriculums, and will discuss our current work to develop shared or parallel programs inother fields. Results of our student feedback surveys and focus group sessions providing lessonslearned will
presumed universality, its application isinevitably situational, developed in response to needs and aspirations of communities of learners,as well as to institutions’ norms and expectations (Jurkiewicz, 2014). This is especially true forresearch ethics pedagogy in higher education. Ethical concerns and actions in research arelargely dependent on the field of research, the kind of research methods employed, the nature ofresearch partnerships, and the configuration of research infrastructure (Askins, 2008; Löfström &Tammeleht 2023; Schrag, 2008; Singh, 2023; Swazey & Bird, 1995). A robust culture ofresponsible research thus needs facilitators and connectors who do the work of translation amongvarious actors including students, faculty, staff
about diversity and inclusion policies useslongitudinal data and asks study participants to journal about their experiences in STEM fields over aperiod of time (Burger 2018). While this prior research is important in identifying and understandingthe student experience and lays the foundation for understanding these issues, this pilot study movesthe research forward. This project looked at how diversity programming operates in conjunction withother elements of the student collegiate experience. Interactions with faculty, access to a variety ofcurricula, and availability of resources (financial aid, parking, etc.) are just some of the primaryinfluences on the student collegiate experience (Burger 2018, Pawley 2017; Robertson and Mason,2008
workenvironment that does not resemble the academic “look and feel” of a traditional computer lab.Reflection and ConclusionAs with any new venture there are bound to be a plethora of setbacks as well as successes. Thedescribed laptop initiative is no different. Each week provides varying feedback from studentsand faculty alike concerning favorable outcomes as well as the occasional technological issuesthat may arise. After seven months, it is clear, however, that an overwhelming majority ofstudents prefer this new model of academic technology, moreover the learning environment itcreates. The freedom this model presents, the level of instruction it supports and the overall actof individual ownership has helped build a progressive program that will
integrate writing assignments effectively into engineeringcourses. Wheeler and McDonald17 state that “engineering faculty members have a common“discomfort with their ability to assign, and especially evaluate prose” as many engineering Page 14.1042.2faculty members may feel that it is the responsibility of the English department to teach studentswriting. Another legitimate concern of faculty members is the time required for developing,assigning and evaluating writing assignments. Engineering students also have some unique needsand issues when it comes to effective writing. Many engineering student may view writing as a“flat representation of facts
cutting edge thinking that both the STScommunity and the advocates of technological literacy have in mind.Much Ado about Nothing? This concern over terminology may well come across as classic “wet blanket” behaviorin the eyes of advocates of technological literacy who have designed exciting courses and feel astrong sense of urgency about moving forward. It is exciting to see the NAE take such an activeinterest in technological literacy, and the overall interest seems to be growing, as witnessed bythe development of the technological literacy constituency committee. Many excellent courseshave been taught under the title “technological literacy,” and the faculty who teach them bringgreat enthusiasm to the effort and generally find that their
students knew the classes were paired, they were notparticularly proactive in making the connections—even when it was obvious to the faculty howmuch overlap we had created. We found that we needed to reinforce the connection constantly—if we didn’t, the students paid little or no attention. For example, even though most of the contentin week 2 concerned ethical dilemmas faced by engineers, students did not transfer theiranalytical framework from RLC 110 to the issues raised by the guest speaker in ES 141. Page 6.609.3Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright 2001, American
: 32.6% statedless engagement, 12.8% less communication between classmates and faculty, 9.3% moreresponsibilities, and the rest stated to be unsure, students were happy with the online classes, andconnection and technology issues. The following direct quotes from faculty exemplified howstudents were less engaged and struggled with more outside problems:"Students were suddenly required to self-manage their time and were expected to succeed usingresources that were not reliable. This included internet access, home printers/computers andblackboard knowledge.""They managed well, but the external stresses (family member concerns, etc.) were a bigproblem.""Less enjoyment, less engagement, less participation, more disconnection from other students,more
addition, engineering and building design students gain familiarity with managerialdecision making and business ethics concerns by analyzing this case study. Even though thiscourseware targets students of higher education, application at the high school level is attainable.High school students could use this software to familiarize themselves with issues related toglobal engineering projects.Development Team CompositionBoth the case study and multimedia courseware were compiled by an international team ofgraduate students, undergraduate students, and faculty members spanning two universities ontwo continents. Executives and engineers at L&T also provided interviews and materials fordeveloping the case study and courseware.Deliverables: Case
this program tackled the issue to the best oftheir ability, but the pandemic exacerbated preexisting, much larger issues.Our initial cohort was intentionally part of a Community of Practice, and we found that thisarrangement allowed teachers to help and support each other, even with vastly differentchallenges at the local level. The entire cohort of nine teachers stated unequivocally that theywould have taught this new curriculum, even considering the disruption. This implies a value ofthe community support and a value of the class as viewed through the lens of the teacher.The e4usa teachers were able to inform the development of our online professional developmentprogram as a result of their own remote teaching experiences.Further work
do students, employers, governments, employers in industry and other stakeholders arekeeping their edge in quality terms? The main commitment of the universities with all thesechanges and new role is towards quality, not as general concept but as something that evolvesover time. New quality assurance systems are emerging.Quality in the context of the European Higher EducationThe issue of quality assurance has risen very high on the Bologna agenda and is seen now as oneof the key instruments to promote the attractiveness of European Higher Education. It was madeclear that in defining common criteria and methodologies in the European Higher Education isnecessary to take into account the diversity of the various systems and traditions that will
level.Participating countries must give equal protection to citizens of their country aswell as to citizens of participating member countries. In addition, the DMCAaddresses other copyright related issues. The objective of this article is to addressthe impact of the DMCA on educational institutions. The analysis focuses on themovement toward webcasting of material by institutions and their faculty. Morespecifically, as more faculty utilized the capability of the Internet a possibilityarises that copyrighted material is broadcast without the copyright owner’spermission. And the age-old question of whether an exception exists must beanswered. Does fair use apply in light of DMCA? If so, to what extent and whathurdles must one overcome.I. IntroductionThe