on their preconceptions about engineering and about engineering ethics.While many students initially perceive ethics as tangential to their larger education, engagingtheir emotions about this assumption allows for the possibility to reframe ethics as a core part oftheir curriculum.IntroductionEngineering students have identified ethics as central to engineering1 but it often remains at theperiphery of a curriculum that is focused on technical knowledge.2 The challenge is to makeethics explicit and central, especially to advanced students who are in the process of definingtheir societal roles.3 To do this, our approach embraces the interdependency of emotions, values,and ethics and builds on recent research that shows emotions are
technology choices for emerging technological re- quirements. His current technical focus is threefold: nanotechnology, energy, and semiconductors. His business focus is on strategy development and technology insertion into the organizational structure. He is involved with a number of state and local organizations and committees focusing on economic devel- opment through business creation. Dr. Trybula is active in disseminating information on the importance of the appropriate insertion of Page 24.941.1 emerging technologies into the communities. He authored the State of Texas teaching module on ”Nan
sessions in Fall 2019.Table 1. Student and Alumni Mentorship Session Participation Fall 2018 Fall 2019 Alumni Participants: 15* Alumni Participants: 25* Student Participants: 53 Student Participants: 99 Sessions Completed: 80** Sessions Completed: 123***Each alumnus met with several students in one-on-one meetings.**Some students elected to interview more than one alumnus.All other mentoring opportunities presented in Assignment #6 and Assignment #7 were availableto students through existing College of Engineering resources and therefore students arrangedthese independently.Research Questions & MethodsResearch
STEM Scholars developing and conducting an open house for youth in the communitythat is centered around engineering design. In essence, the LION STEM Scholars serve asmentors for children in grades 5-11 who run a canned food drive and then compete to build thebest structures out of their sourced food. All food is then donated to the local food bank. Themathematics faculty member from EA and FYS also runs SPS, but with help from severalengineering faculty members who take the lead with the undergraduate research component ofthis course. The engineering faculty members provide several sessions on the basics of researchand then each LION STEM Scholar is paired 1-1 with a faculty research mentor. Over the courseof the semester, the scholars
Foundation CAREER Award focused on characterizing latent diversity, which includes diverse attitudes, mindsets, and approaches to learning to understand engineering students’ identity development. She has won several awards for her research including the 2021 Journal of Civil Engineering Education Best Technical Paper, the 2021 Chemical Engineering Education William H. Corcoran Award, the 2022 American Educational Research Association Education in the Professions (Division I) 2021-2022 Outstanding Research Publication Award, and the 2023 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Award for Excellence in Engineering Education Research.Charlie D´ıaz, University of Pittsburgh Charlie Diaz is a PhD student studying
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Growing Assessment Capacity of Engineering Educators through ASSESSAbstractThe Appraisal System for Superior Engineering Education Evaluation-Instrument Sharing andScholarship (ASSESS) is a web-based information repository and search engine for locatingassessment and evaluation instruments relevant to engineering education. The ASSESS databaseis populated with instrument names and both technical and nontechnical characterizations ofeach instrument. It identifies outcomes for which an instrument is applicable, target audiences,administration conditions, and availability of evidence for score reliability and validity. Eachinstrument also is described by
between the two.In the sociological context, Wang and Kaye13 use the terms user modification and modder. Thisis more aimed at the hobbyist side of making where existing products are modified to fit one’sown needs rather than inventing something entirely new.How Do You Define Making?Definitions were also captured via an ad-hoc, grounded, in-situ approach at a recent Maker Faireevent. At the September 2012 World Maker Faire New York,2 respondents were provided withpost-it notes, asked How do You Define Making? and contributed their definitions to a sharedwall shown in Figure 1. Figure 1. Wall of post-its offering definitions of makingThe method of putting out post-its as an open forum for responses to How do You Define
illustrates a general compression concept: 1) Convert color image tograyscale image; 2) Read image in 8x8 blocks; 3) Apply forwardDCT ( ) to perform DCT .Storethis result in temporary matrix; 4) Apply quantization; Then reconstruct the image in thefollowing sequence 5) Apply de-quantization; 6) Run Inverse DCT; 7) Apply Normalization.Two quantization techniques are included in this toolkit: 1) Quantization by dividing DCTmatrix by a factor and round off to nearest integer. This logic is implemented and is ready to useas shown in Table 1; 2) Quantization retains the low frequency coefficients and nullifies to zerohigh frequency ones (zonal thresholding). (a) (a) (a
Questions or statements that convey helplessnessNovice (C4) “Yeah I’ve never actually lived with snow” or general confusion Metalevel statements or questions that facilitateFacilitator (C5) “Should we move on to the matrix thing?” the discussionFigure 7 - Distribution of positioning moves (C1-C5; see Table 1) among members (S1-S4) ineach team from manual coding. S4 in team F22 had no coded utterances.FindingsCongruence among the different analyses suggested that the GCA measure of social impact(figure 5) and the group-level LIWC measure of
career interests.MethodsInterventionPreviously, we implemented soft robotics curricula in a variety of K12 contexts [9], [10], [11],[12], [13], [14]. After a small pilot study, we updated a four-day version of the curriculum andresearch study [15], [16]. Additionally, to increase utility of the classroom modules for teachers,we aligned the curriculum activities with the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) ,shown in Table 1. As part of Aim 1 of our NSF RIEF project, we updated our curriculum torepresent a broad range of identities of scientists, roboticists, and engineers working in softrobotics with the goal of students being able to see themselves represented in the field. Inaddition to working with classroom science teachers, we worked
Director and PI. With weekly assignments,the teachers are given timely milestones to make progress on their projects and to uncover anyissues that can be addressed quickly. Table 2 lists some of the workshop topics and activities. Inaddition, the teachers create and maintain their own webpage of their research journey with weeklyupdates.Table 2. Topics of the research “coffee session” workshops to guide the research projects Week 1: Research Proposal with timeline; Posing a research question; Defining research goals & objectives Week 2: Background literature reviews; Creating webpages to document research journey Week 3: Ethical and Responsible research; Elevator pitches; Creating research posters Week 4: Presenting data results; mid-summer
to her work in her technical area, she focuses on research related to neurodiversity in engineering education and workforce development for the Navy.Prof. Arash Esmaili Zaghi P.E., University of Connecticut Arash E. Zaghi is a Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Connecticut. In 2009, he received his PhD in Civil Engineering from the University of Nevada, Reno. After he was diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) at age 33, he began engineering education research aimed at highlighting the importance of neurodiversity for the creativity of our nation’s engineering workforce by promoting a fundamentally strength-based perspective toward
preliminaryresults led to the hypothesis that students with weak debugging skills are mainly due the isolationprocess. This hypothesis will be tested in a future experiment. Results from such an experimentwill be significant to those who are designing intervention strategies to integrate computationalthinking in science and engineering curricula.BackgroundIn STEM education, computational thinking (CT) has become a critical component in preparingstudents for the technical workforce [1]. Computation is fundamental to science because itrenders rich contexts for solving complex problems in the real world. The overall goal of thisproject is to equip practitioners with the ability to enhance students’ computational skills inSTEM courses, especially in
, and directed many interdisciplinary projects related to design. Dr. Pidaparti’s research interests are in the broad areas of multi-disciplinary design, computational mechanics, nanotechnology, and related topics. Dr. Pidaparti has published over 250 technical papers in refereed journals and conference proceedings. Dr. Pidaparti received a Research Initiation Award from the National Science Foundation and the Young Investigator Award from the Whitaker Foundation. He is a member of Tau Beta Pi, Sigma Gamma Tau, and Who’s Who societies. He is a member of professional societies including AIAA (Associate Fellow), AAAS (Fellow), ASME (Fellow), RAeS (Fellow), and ASEE (member). Dr. Pidaparti will move to University of
engineering education explicitly state the need for a shift in cultural norms(e.g. [1]), yet the adoption of evidence-based teaching practices, including instructionaltechnologies, and instructor engagement in teaching communities have historically beendifficult to change. Under normal circumstances, it has been found that an instructors’ personalattributes (i.e., self-efficacy and innovativeness), their network (supportive community,professional social system, etc.), and their thoughts regarding teaching (place value on teachingin addition to research) can support or deter adoption of educational innovations [2]. Intrinsic(e.g., satisfaction) and extrinsic (e.g., rewards) motivations have also been found to support ordeter adoption of new practices
inform the development of evidence-based interventions to promote retention and student success in engineering. Her fields of technical expertise include process modeling, simulation, and process control.Dr. Keith B. Lyle, University of LouisvilleDr. Jason Immekus, University of Louisville Dr. Immekus is associate professor in the Department of Educational Leadership, Evaluation, and Orga- nizational Development. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Introducing desirable difficulty in engineering mathematics with spaced retrieval practice NSF Award #1912253
sustained impact on LU, Southeast Texas and the Gulf Coast. The RET support isespecially critical to the education and outreach in the large surrounding school districts whoseminority populations averages 72.5%, and 64.8% of students are considered to be economicallydisadvantaged.AcknowledgmentThe project is sponsored by the National Science Foundation grant #1608886. Their support isgreatly appreciated.References [1]. Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills for Career and Technical Education. In: Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics at TEA. Available at: http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/rules/tac/chapter130/ch130o.html [2]. Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills for Science. In: Science, Technology, Engineering, and
Biomedical Engineering consultant in Philadelphia, PA. Her research interests include iden- tity development through co and extra-curricular experiences for engineering students.Dennis M Lee, Clemson University Dennis M. Lee is a doctoral student in the Engineering and Science Education Department and Grad- uate Research Assistant in the office of the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies in the College of Engineering, Computing, and Applied Sciences at Clemson University. He received his BA and MS in bacteriology from the University of Wisconsin, Madison. Prior to his studies at Clemson University, he taught introductory biology at Tri-County Technical College in Pendleton, SC. His research interests include the
1: Academic status of FMMI REU applicantsProgram ActivitiesThe REU students work on focused research project with the designated faculty mentors as wellas be integrated into the program activities, which include professional development, field trips,social events, research presentations and seminar attendance. In the research projects, the REUparticipants first collect and assimilate information towards generating an innovative solution forscaling up or enabling a useful process. They learn and apply principles of design ofexperiments, collect and analyze data, perform simulations and contribute to the dissemination ofresults, such as via conference presentations, journal articles and patents. In combination, all ofthese research and
assignprimary and secondary codes to each of our perceptions. The results illustrated how we viewedboth labs as committed to providing employees with a good work-life balance, as well asopportunities for both personal and professional growth. The insights from our study can provide organizations and higher education institutionswith a deeper understanding of how this generation of engineering graduates makes sense ofengineering career pathways. These results can also aid engineering programs in helping studentsnavigate post-graduation planning. Future work on students’ perception of engineering careers isnecessary for furthering potential employers and institutions understanding of their workforce.Motivation Over the past thirty years
. 1, pp. 43 – 52, 2010.[14] M. Nowparvar, X. Chen, O. Ashour, S. G. Ozden, and A. Negahban, “Combining immersive technologies and problem-based learning in engineering education: Bibliometric analysis and literature review,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2021.[15] D. H. Jonassen, “Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm?” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 5–14, 1991.[16] R. C. Anderson, “The notion of schemata and the educational enterprise: general discussion of the conference,” in Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge, R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, and W. E. Montague, Eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1977.[17] S. B
for Body Struc- tures Design Group at General Motor Corporation in the Warren Technical Center from 1984 to 1989. Dr, Brown was also an engineering principal engineer for a number of engine, and structural design groups at Ford Motor Company from 1977 to 1984. He was a research engineer at Eastman Kodak Corporation from 1974 to 1977. Dr. Brown received both his M.S. and his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Connecticut at Storrs, CT in 1970 and 1974 respectively. He earned his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University at West Lafayette, Ind. in 1966. He is currently the PI at the Univer- sity of the Pacific for the four-year collaborative National Science Foundation TUES DUE grant
with aninstructor that is acting as an industry supervisor and project coach to discuss their progress.Students must work together to define an optimal set of process parameters (e.g., temperatures,flow rates, and times) while managing a set of applicable measurement tools and a self-generated, coach-approved budget. In order to complete the process optimization process, thestudents must develop their own strategy for all aspects of the project and produce fivedeliverables. The major components of the Virtual Laboratory project and details aboutopportunities for feedback are summarized in Table 1.Table 1. Overview of the Virtual Laboratory project structure with feedback opportunities Timeline Key Project Milestones Student
natural inclination todesign and build things, and to take things apart to see how they work3. Beginning in elementarygrades is also important since it is before students develop many of the stereotypes that so oftendiscourage girls and minorities from pursuing courses and careers in technical fields4. It is duringprimary school that students establish first impressions of possible career options5. Finally, at alleducational levels, technology projects can help make mathematics and science content relevantto students by illustrating these subjects’ application in real-world projects6.To build the foundation for the next generation of technicians and engineers, we need elementaryteachers who are introducing their students to technology and
completing studies in the Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics (STEM) disciplines.1,2 There are two primary tasks that are needed for this Page 24.183.3goal to be accomplished. First, more students need to be attracted to pursue college-levelstudies in the STEM fields. Second, once those students are attracted to a STEM field,the colleges and universities must provide an attractive, nurturing environment designedto allow a wide range of students to succeed, while still providing a rigorous technicaleducation.The College of Engineering and Applied Science (CEAS) at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UWM) has generally been able to attract as
andprocessing. In particular, fundamental foundational concepts about atomic bonding and crystalstructure do not generally connect in the class textbook with macroscopic properties or processing orreal-world contexts technological components, systems, processes, or real world events. Thus, thesetopics tend for students to lose relevance and their interest. As such, this issue was addressed with slidesets for the Atomic Bonding Topic and the Crystal Structure Topic being modified by incorporatingactivities, real-world contexts, and clearly articulated models of bonding and structure to address theissues described. Overall, these changes addressed the "Materials Course Issues" of: 1. Connecting macro-properties & micro-structure at different
2013, respectively. Prof. Dutta is an elected Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). He current serves as an Editor for the Electrophoresis.Prof. Bernard J. Van Wie, Washington State University Prof. Bernard J. Van Wie received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D., and did his postdoctoral work at the Uni- versity of Oklahoma where he also taught as a visiting lecturer. He has been on the Washington State University (WSU) faculty for 36 years and for the past 22 years has focused on innovative pedagogy research as well as technical research in biotechnology. His 2007-2008 Fulbright exchange to Nigeria set the stage for him to receive the Marian Smith Award given annually to the most innovative teacher at
Award at the Scientific Interface. She is an expert in the development and use of novel techniques for the nanoscale characterization of biological materials. Her current research focuses on how molecular motors and cytoskeletal polymers generate force and sustain tension in cells. In addition to her research, she directs the Internships in Nanosystems Science, Engineering and Technology (INSET) program at UCSB, an NSF-funded Research Experiences for Undergraduates program that brings Calif. community college students to UCSB each summer for an intensive program of research and professional development
necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.Appendix: Questions for Administrators 1 A number of BSU policy documents related to evaluation of faculty members, to include promotion and tenure and workload policies, use the phrase, “teaching effectiveness” or similar terms. In your estimation, what constitutes “teaching effectiveness?” 2 One way that “teaching effectiveness” has been and continues to be measured is via student evaluations. Can you speak to the strengths and weaknesses of student evaluations in general? [in fact, in the COEN Volume 1 binder, this is all that is required for evidence of teaching effectiveness]. 3 The Student
University of Louisville, Kentucky in 2008 and joined Tennessee Tech University in 2009 to pursue his Ph.D. in Electrical (Power) Engineering. He completed his graduate study in August 2013. He served as the WVU Tech IEEE student branch advisor between 2014 and 2018. He has been the IEEE West Virginia section chair/vice-chair since 2018. He served as Technical Committee Program Chair of the 49th North American Power Symposium (NAPS 2017) held in Morgantown, WV. He was a WVU IDEA (Innovation, Design, Entrepreneurship, Applied) Fellow and WVU TLC Faculty Associate for Assessment. He is currently a WVU Faculty Senator. He was a DoE visiting faculty member at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in the Summer of 2018 and 2019. He is