for completion of the program. Each college and department withinthe university may have different rules and requirements concerning its graduate students—everything from admission to funding to degree completion. In some cases, standards andrequirements may even vary among students within a program or department. A study by MaryFrank Fox showed that this decentralization can be even more pronounced in engineering andscience departments, where funding is dependent upon research grants awarded to individualfaculty. Because of a university’s dependence on this income, faculty are given a great deal oflatitude in advising their graduate students.6Strategy: Because of the freedom that advisors may have in interpreting thesis- or degree-completion
into the future. The IF Program supports the University’sStrategic Plan (2016-2025) [7] in multiple ways. As part of the Foundations of the Strategic Plan,the academic units have a responsibility to Engage Our Students. The IF Program providesstudents with access to meaningful experiences to enhance their educational journey in areasincluding research and professional development to grow beyond the classroom. To DriveEconomic Development, the university will accelerate the transfer of new ideas and knowledgeinto useful products and processes. In an effort to Transform Education, the university andcolleges support and empower the faculty and staff so they can be known as exemplary researchmentors, instilling the value and discipline of research
helpreduce the technical communication gap between computing and engineering professionals in theindustrial world.As a first step in this direction, the computer science/physics/engineering faculty at ourinstitution in spring 2009 decided to conduct a pilot test of this new approach to cross-disciplinary activities by incorporating electro-mechanical engineering-based projects in thecapstone course, Senior Seminar.Senior Seminar ProjectsThe projects in Senior Seminar course are traditionally related to standard business environmentand research in emerging technologies. Prime examples include database system developmentand research, artificial intelligence, computer networks, computer games, and informationsecurity. Students in this course are
to their performance ina normal semester. The main issues faced by the faculty were 1. Struggling to keep up with the lecture posting deadlines. Video recording and processing took an average of twice the amount of time it would take to present the lecture in a classroom times a typical classroom lecture took 2. Designing the quizzes and homework on the online learning management system. While one of the instructors used WileyPlus, the other instructor used CANVAS. Since Wiley Plus has a test development suite inbuilt, in which the questions need to be selected, the CANVAS involved manually entering the question pool. Both the quizzes and the homework were automatically graded. 3. Developing the
established disciplines, graduate students are brought into relativelydefined and stable ideas about research (even though new knowledge is constantlyemerging) that may be so tacit and deeply embedded in practice that it can be difficult togain access to and learn about the principles that guide professional work. Havingopportunities to discuss and interact with faculty on their research publications and hearthe behind-the-scenes “backstory” of the decisions that motivated the research andshaped the research design can ease the transition into new modes of inquiry. It can alsohelp students understand the landscape of a professional community and envision futureroles within that profession.Future engineering education professionals should also be able
Education, 2006 Solar Energy Education for Engineering Students in a Middle Eastern Context-an approach.1. IntroductionThe purpose of this paper is to describe a currently ad-hoc approach to teaching United ArabEmirates engineering students about alternative sources of energy. In tertiary institutes in theUSA, Australasia, Europe and elsewhere, such a focus would be a given in the curriculum as theissue is a well-established one. In this region, it is relatively new, as the concept of inexhaustibleoil has long dominated. Awareness (not interest) among the student body and the broader societyhas consequently not been substantially developed.In the context of depletion of non-renewable energy sources, increasing concern about
a Peer Leadership Model in a Large Scale Peer Mentoring ProgramAbstractRetaining students in engineering and the sciences depends largely on the availability ofresources for first-year students, and as a result, mentoring programs have evolved to guide andsupport new engineering students1. In the past, a peer mentoring program at a large researchuniversity on the east coast was led by one administrative faculty member. A major structuralchange to the program was made this year, to incorporate six peer leaders, all veteran mentors,who assumed many of the tasks of the original coordinator. Along with expanding leadership,other changes included shortening the program length from a full semester to ten weeks
weaknesses while simultaneously reinforcing and sustainingstrengths. Participants during this phase of the plan developed an appreciation for the potentialbenefits possible through an application of the principles of continuous processimprovement. Faculty from each of the three targeted programs returned to their campus Page 9.314.2with a clear vision of the intent behind ABET’s shift to the new criteria and a keen “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Education”perception of the potential gain of a program
find employment with healthcare consulting firms. Each of thesecareer paths involves the management of healthcare technology. Engineers in industry managethe development of technology from the conception to commercialization stages. Engineers inthe clinical environment manage the selection, implementation, utilization, and assessment ofhospital based technologies.Typically, new graduates with no work experience possess solid technical skills but lack trainingin business, management, and regulatory issues. Their background in product development andproject management tends to be weak, and they lack an understanding of the economic andregulatory environments of healthcare delivery. Engineers working in industry advance alongtheir career paths
in the professions class and will bring a stronger understanding ofsocietal issues to the course.Lecture ComponentThe lecture portion of the program includes four lectures over the course of the semester.The primary lecture audience consists of all seniors registered for the CEE 463 Professions classand undergraduates in CEE; additional participants included graduate students in CEE,undergraduates in other science and engineering disciplines, faculty, and guests from thecommunity.An important facet of developing the lectures is collaborating with the presenters to ensure thatthe topics are general enough to be of interest to a broad audience, and include sufficient contenton the global and societal aspects. Lectures emphasizing only
characteristics of the most efficient engineeringcolleges independent of their unique objectives. The underlying premise is that any program canthen identify the most direct path from its position to the efficient surface. This path then can beinterpreted in terms of specific strategies with the accompanying measures of improvement. Thefew “elite” schools as general models for emulation may not address the unique nature of eachinstitution.There are numerous issues with this approach, the first being the relative accuracy of the data.Although attempts are made for standardization in the ASEE database, the self-report processraises concerns. There is no assessment of the “quality” inputs or outputs. Are all faculty
Paper ID #32735Evolution of a Traditional Classroom Teaching Workshop to Support RemoteDeliveryDr. Charles Riley P.E., Oregon Institute of Technology Dr. Riley has been teaching civil engineering structures and mechanics for over 12 years and has been honored with both the ASCE ExCEEd New Faculty Excellence in Civil Engineering Education Award and the Beer and Johnston Outstanding New Mechanics Educator Award. While he teaches freshman to graduate-level courses across the civil engineering curriculum, his focus is on engineering mechanics. He values classroom demonstrations and illustrative laboratory and field
students may persist. Others focus on management ofphysiological aspects (symptoms) of anxiety rather than root causes.6 Efforts to discern thecauses of anxiety and to propose practical near-term solutions are less commonly undertaken.This research aims to identify some of the prevailing sources of anxiety among engineeringstudents and to test the efficacy of measures to mitigate the resulting anxieties within a givenacademic year.This paper discusses work that has been done to identify sources of anxiety as reported by acohort of engineering and engineering technology students. Student perceptions of theirindividual vulnerabilities and concerns with regard to their degree programs and their outsidepersonal lives are presented. Actions by faculty
] Hurtado, Sylvia, et al. "Improving the rate of success for underrepresented racial minorities in STEM fields: Insights from a national project." New Directions for Institutional Research 2010.148 (2010): 5-15.[7] Hurtado, S., Eagan, M. K., Tran, M. C., Newman, C. B., Chang, M. J., & Velasco, P. (2011). “We do science here”: Underrepresented students’ interactions with faculty in different college contexts. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 553-579.[8] Eagan, M. K., Hurtado, S., & Chang, M. J. (2010, October). What matters in STEM: Institutional contexts that influence STEM bachelor’s degree completion rates. In annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education
environment as possiblewithin the confines of the classroom.Because the students are already taxed with travel and on-site industrial projects, gettinginto the “real world” of business seemed an unmanageable burden on all involved:students, faculty searching for projects, and local business within a reasonable commute.Understandably, too, many businesses are reluctant to hand over managerial aspects oftheir concern to undergraduate students as a one semester project. Thus, the decision toconcentrate our efforts on recreating the work environment within the University was aneasy one.In fall 2002, the initial class was organized as a training class of new-hires in amanagement training program. Students were handed a folder of employmentinformation
arrival of new projects, may be involved with asingle project or parts of two different projects. For a two-semester project, the first semesterincludes research into the problem, design of a solution, validation of the design using appropriatesoftware tools or calculations, and a report to the industry partner detailing the proposed design.The second semester includes fabrication of a working prototype validation of the prototype, anda presentation of the final design and prototype to the industry sponsor. Each student submitsmonthly progress reports and the team is responsible for a comprehensive report each semester aswell as a poster and oral presentation to ME faculty and the departmental Industry Advisory Board(IAB). Examples of past ISP
Accreditation Commission (EAC), the body responsible foraccreditation of engineering programs, changed the criteria for Civil Engineering programs toinclude a requirement that graduates of those programs “can . . . apply knowledge of . . . at leastone additional area of science, consistent with the program educational objectives”.1 This newrequirement appears to have its origins in the Body of Knowledge (BOK), and the desire to makethose ideals and the ABET requirements for Civil Engineering programs become one in thesame. However, for many programs across the country this became an issue of concern andconfusion. Taking its cue from the BOK the “one additional area of science” shortly becamedefined to mean a physical science, as opposed to a social
argued that short-termstudy abroad programs do not provide as significant of benefits as longer programs, they havefound that “shorter, well-planned programs” can achieve the same goals as longer programs.In 2007, Stanitski and Fuellhart (2) provided recommendations for faculty at other institutionsinterested in developing short-term study abroad courses for geographic studies. Theyhighlighted the need to integrate the offered study abroad courses into the overall geographycurriculum. They highlight the primary issues associated with course development as coursecontent, scheduling, integration into the department curriculum and cost. They highlight that thedevelopment costs, particularly the time for development of them, are borne by faculty
-op, even as an unpaid volunteer, with SCD-related institutions such as Water for People (WFP), International Development Enterprises (IDE), or Mercy Corps. Make sure that the organization you are volunteering with has an institutionalized program to recruit, train and mentor volunteers so as not to become a burden to the organization.≠ Develop and enhance your ability to listen beyond basic listening.For faculty involved in SCD-related program, courses or initiatives, we recommend to≠ Use our book early in design engineering education, preferably in introductory design courses, so students have time to assimilate the questions and issues that we raise about senior design.≠ Consider using specific chapters for specific
to beanswered, which constitutes the inquiry for the next session. From this list, each student choosesan area that s/he will research and report back to the group. This self-directed learning phaseinvolves tracking down the resources necessary to answer the identified questions, digesting thematerial and bringing information back into the group. This cycle of finding and developingknowledge, bringing it into the problem space, identifying new learning issues and research isrepeated until a solution is reached. Undergraduate students, however, rarely have sufficientexperience in locating appropriate materials to answer the evolving questions. Their search skillsare generally poor; they have no experience reading journal articles and they
. The prevalence of quality media richcontent related to course material has produced an increasing expectation among students thatlearning should be easy and is primarily the responsibility of the instructor. Additionally, accessto report writing services and vendors who will sell homework solutions manuals presents manychallenges to students. Addressing these issues can be frustrating and time consuming forfaculty. This paper presents the experiments conducted in four mechanical engineering coursesspanning from freshman to graduate level courses that lead the authors to discover that manystudents enjoy partnering with the faculty in addressing these issues, the benefits to studentsthrough involvement in the process, and the practical issues
Kettering Foundation on several research projects concerning the civic mission of higher education. A higher education advocate and voice for collaboration, he posts regularly at creightoncollaborative.com. Sean holds degrees from Marist College and New York University, and earned his PhD from Antioch University. He lives in the charming vil- lage of Yellow Springs with his wife, Leslee, and his five fun children, Liam, Maya, Quinn, Audrey, and Juliette.Lt. Col. Jeremy Paul Stringer, Air Force Institute of Technology Dr. Stringer received his BSEE from USAFA in 1998, MSEE from AFIT in 2000, and Ph.D. from AFIT in 2013. He is currently an Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering at AFIT and specializes in RADAR
focused on underrepresented populations, specifically women and minorities, whileothers are implemented for the entire engineering student population. Mentoring efforts include:demographic-specific advisors, faculty advisors, peer mentors, faculty mentors, and engineeringindustry mentors. The School has taken a four-year approach to its mentoring efforts. Overallobjectives of the mentoring program are multifaceted: 1) to help new students transition to highereducation and identify with their particular program; 2) to help students who are struggling inupper level courses and in leadership positions or conducting undergraduate research; and 3) tohelp students with their transition to the engineering profession.This paper describes how one
discrimination concerns in engineering design.We suggest that one potential resolution for addressing Erin Cech’s concern about moraldisengagement could be to further integrate and expand discussions of these issues in subsequentscience and engineering courses after the first year.It is interesting, and yet unsurprising, to see that quite a few typical concerns in engineeringcodes of ethics, such as loyalty, only working in areas of competence, conflict of interest, and 8bribery, did not appear in students’ examples about unethical behaviors. In future studies inengineering programs, it is critical to cultivate students’ awareness of and sensitivity to
during the first semester in which theyare appointed. The TA certification workshop is based on research and best practices ineducation – it takes a hands-on and interactive approach in covering the following topics:understanding undergraduate students and the culture of higher education in the United States,principles of student success, fundamentals of pedagogy, student learning styles, questioningstrategies to increase student engagement, and managing the practical aspects of a TA position,such as working with faculty, grading, office hours, and resolving student issues. TAs are eitherobserved during their classroom/laboratory session or are required to participate in a teachingpracticum session, where they are evaluated by their peers. These
new Department of Engineering at Arizona State University’s Poly-technic Campus. The team of founding faculty has been given a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity todesign a totally new engineering program from the ground up. Given no constraints on its design– other than that it be responsive to the changing needs of the nation at the dawn of the 21stcentury – this new BSE in Engineering program is designed around three core values: learningthrough engagement, agility and focus on the individual. These values are the focal points of athorough and innovative redesign of the traditional Bachelor of Science in Engineering degreewith the goal of creating a unique and highly effective learner-centered program. The curricu-lar structure is based on
given by professors in the humanities. As the newFYS director in 2012, the second author inherited the challenge of a program staffed primarily bythe faculty in the college of the arts and sciences. In 2011-12 there were 74 sections of the then-equivalent of FYS 112;b only three of those sections were taught by faculty from the professionalschools (one from the college of engineering and two from the college of education and healthsciences). The second author was concerned that students perceived this lack of participation inFYS by the faculty of the professional schools as a lack of endorsement for the value of liberaleducation.c She wanted the lecture to emphasize the significance of FYS as a foundation for allareas of study at the University
-plagiarism in Australian scholarlypublications, defining the term as “10% or more textual re-use of any one previous publicationby the author without attribution.”23 Opinions vary among university faculty and administrators.At one end of the opinion continuum, there are those who defend re-use of a reasonable amountof one’s own previous data and verbiage without attribution for several conference presentationsand multiple published articles. In contrast, there are those who claim that self-plagiarismpresents old research as new, misleading readers. In reviewing 269 published articles by 10different authors, Bretag and Carapiet found that 60% of the authors had self-plagiarized in atleast one paper and called for the academic community to develop
increases the likelihood of the program receivingaccreditation. Conversely, concerns about the assessment plan or the evaluation of assessment datacan jeopardize accreditation. It is crucial to show that the program’s objectives and outcomes arebeing effectively measured and achieved. ABET requires that the program's educational objectivesalign with the university’s mission and be periodically reviewed to ensure ongoing consistency.These objectives must be communicated to all stakeholders and mapped to the curriculum andlearning outcomes to enhance awareness. After several rounds of revision and discussions with theIndustrial Advisory Council and feedback from faculty, these prior objectives were revised.Within three to five years after graduating
reflect such issues as technological advances and thegrowth of the engineering team in the workplace. Over the past decade the CEAB increased therequirements for complementary studies (soft skills) and moved from a proportional measure ofcurriculum to an absolute measure. Changes under consideration at the present time include: · refining the curriculum content requirements for Basic Science and Mathematics, · including morale and commitment of faculty, support staff and students as a component of the qualitative evaluation, and · including the requirement for students to be exposed to the concepts of project management.The engineering profession expects of its members competence in engineering as well as anunderstanding of the impact of