Citadel Dr. Simon Ghanat is an Assistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at The Citadel (Charleston, S.C.). He received his Ph.D., M.S., and B.S. degrees in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Arizona State University. His research interests are in Engineering Education and Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. He previously taught at Bucknell University and Arizona State University.Dr. Kevin C Bower P.E., The Citadel Dr. Kevin Bower is a Professor and Head of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at The Citadel, Charleston, South Carolina. Dr. Bower’s teaching research interests are in improving active learning environments and the development of classroom pedagogy to improve moral
engineering students in 10 different majors, working with a staff of six professional advisers and two graduate student advisers. Amanda has been at MSU since 1997 and has experience in the Department of Residence Life, the Law College and most recently as an academic adviser in the College of Education. She is a PhD candidate in the Higher, Adult and Lifelong Education program at MSU, focusing her research on women's colleges that have had to pursue coeducation in order to survive.Carmellia Davis-King, Michigan State University CARMELLIA DAVIS-KING is the Co-Curricular Director for the Engineering Residential
IEEETransactions on Engineering Management, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 345-359, Aug. 2000, doi:10.1109/17.865903.[10] Moakler, M. W., & Kim, M. M. (2014). College Major Choice in STEM: RevisitingConfidence and Demographic Factors. The Career Development Quarterly, 62(2), 128142.[11] UC Berkeley Center for Studies in Higher Education (2010). Re- Imagining CaliforniaHigher Education. Research and Occasional Paper Series. [online] Berkeley CA: CSHE.Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3px8x5qv [Accessed 30 Jan. 2019].[12] Besterfield-Sacre, M., Moreno, M., Shuman, L. and Atman, C. (2001). Gender and EthnicityDifferences in Freshmen Engineering Student Attitudes: A Cross-Institutional Study*. Journal ofEngineering Education, 90(4), pp.477-489.[13
research in engineering technology education and the understanding of engineering technology students. She teaches in an active learning style which engages and develops practical skills in the students. Currently she is exploring the performance and attributes of engineering technology students and using that knowledge to engage them in their studies. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Study of Organizational Knowledge Retention Practices in the UtilitiesOne key to the successful and long-term survival of an organization involves knowledge captureand retention. The knowledge may include company secrets
Western Washington University, Bellingham. His research is in the field of manufacturing and repair of fiber reinforced com- posites.Sunni Shoepe Page 26.528.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Developing a Lab Scale Solvent-Based Prepreg Treater Engineering and Design Department Western Washington UniversityAbstractA lab scale continuous process solvent-based prepreg manufacturing machine (prepreg treater) isa useful tool for small-scale production runs carried out by research teams involved in variousprojects
Paper ID #5757Gender Differences in Motivation to Perform K12 OutreachDr. Sara A. Atwood, Elizabethtown College Sara A. Atwood is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Physics at Elizabethtown College. She obtained her B.A. and M.S. from Dartmouth College and her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California at Berkeley. Her research interests include material failure in medical devices and the recruitment and retention of women in engineering.Mr. Joshua M Frey, Elizabethtown College Page
beginning. In addition, the paper includes historical mechanical engineering retentiondata from 1998-2003, a discussion of freshman performance in math and science classes, athorough description of the survey, analysis of the survey results, and a discussion of futureefforts to improve the department’s freshman retention.introduction In recent years, many engineering programs have focused on improving freshman Proceedings of the 2005 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 2retention and identifying the factors that influence it. Since many College of Engineering (COE)programs have similar
Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain; David McKay Company: New York, NY, USA, 1965. 7. Airasian, P.; Cruikshank, K.A.; Mayer, R.E.; Pintrich, P.; Raths, J.; Wittrock, M.C. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives; Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Eds.; Allyn and Bacon: Boston, MA, USA, 2001; ISBN 978-0-8013-1903-7.8. Hadzigeorgiou, Y.; Garganourakis, V. Using Nikola Tesla’s story and his experiments as presented in the film “The Prestige” to promote scientific inquiry: A report of an action research project. Interchange 2010, 41, 363–378.9. Hadzigeorgiou, Y.; Klassen, S.; Froese-Klassen, C. Encouraging a
Paper ID #40555Wind farm acoustics course: Use of a real-world case study to addressABET student outcomesDr. Heather Lai, State University of New York at New Paltz Heather Lai is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at SUNY New Paltz, NY where she teaches courses in dynamics, system dynamics, finite element analysis and computer simulation. Her pro- fessional background and research interests include automotive vibration (Motorola Inc.), musculoskeletal biomechanics (BME, Wayne State University), room acoustics, wind farm acoustics and the dynamic be- havior of 3D printed multi-materials. Over the past 8 years
communication skills andprofessionalism.Edgar C. ClausenDr. Clausen is a University Professor in the Ralph E. Martin Department of ChemicalEngineering at the University of Arkansas. His research interests include engineering education,teaching improvement through hands-on experiences and enhancement of the K-12 educationalexperience. Professor Clausen is a registered professional engineer in the state of Arkansas. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022
. Talesnick, B. Amadei, and T. Tal, “Integrating Sustainable Development into a Service-Learning Engineering Course,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 140, no. 1, p. 05013001, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000169.[6] D. Bourn and I. Neal, “The Global Engineer: Incorporating global skills within UK higher education of engineers,” Engineers Against Poverty/Development Education Research Centre, 2008.[7] A. A. Stukas, E. G. Clary, and M. Snyder, “Service Learning: Who Benefits and Why,” Social Policy Report, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1–23, Dec. 1999, doi: 10.1002/j.2379- 3988.1999.tb00039.x.[8] J.-L. Bertrand-Krajewski, S. Barraud, and B. Chocat, “Need for improved methodologies and measurements for sustainable
, I., Pezeshki, C., and Roberts, T. (2005) “Citizen Engineers: Why and How We Engage City, State and Federal Governments On behalf of Engineering Education and Research,” Proceed- ings of the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference, June, CD-ROM.4. Paushke, J. and Ingraffea, A. (1996) “Recent Innovations in Undergraduate Civil Engineering Curricu- lums,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 122(3), 123–133.5. Chan, S. (2005) “A Bridge Too Bulky,” The New York Times, February 18, 2005, p. B1.6. National Academy of Engineering (2004) The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Cen- tury, National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.7. Friedman, T. (2005) The World is Flat: A Brief History of
Integrated Projects Curriculum. His on-going project interests include improving flight track- ing and messaging systems for small planes in remote locations and developing assistive communication technology for those with cognitive and behavioral challenges such as high-functioning autism or PTSD. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Telemetry Project For an Introductory Communications Systems Course Harold R. Underwood1 1 Associate Professor, Engineering Department at Messiah College, Mechanicsburg, PAAbstractAdvances in electronic communications technology require corresponding innovations in
expressed his intent to read it for the rest of his career, a clear allusion to life-long learning(outcome I) that was inspired by a simple article search in an engineering journal. Anotherstudent said that doing research for the current events helped him understand how engineeringaffects and improves society, providing support for our assertion that outcome H was addressed.After a discussion on various international power issues, yet another student expressed his desireto eventually return to his native country of Nigeria to help improve the power infrastructurethere – a clear expression of intent to actually use his engineering education to make an impact ina global context (outcome H). Finally, at least half of the students said at the end of
’ thought processes, while still meeting the needs of fundamental course content. Thesuggested modules provide an avenue that could expand new practitioners experience with amultiscale universe providing them with a richer set of opportunities for problem solving in thatenvironment.Acknowledgement - The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the NationalScience Foundation under Grant No. 0536126.References Page 12.983.71. Steering Committee, Special Report: The Research Agenda for the New Discipline of Engineering Education, Journal of Engineering Education, 95(4), 2006, pp 259-2612. DF Radcliffe, Shaping the Discipline
abilities and, perhaps most important of all, were better self-critics of their own drawing abilities.As a result of these conclusions several specific recommendation are made which mayimprove the ability of some students to work more effectively in groups. However, theseconclusions and recommendations are based on very limited data, and further study isneeded. IntroductionWith all the interest in having our engineering student become good “team players”, thereis a surprising lack of information in the engineering education literature on how to formgood teams, e. g., what are the characteristics of these good “team players.” There areseveral methods and/or criteria used (See Dutson1 for a short review
AC 2009-1436: ENERGY AUDITS AND SUSTAINABLE ENGINEERINGJess Everett, Rowan UniversityPeter Mark Jansson, Rowan UniversityKrishan Bhatia, Rowan UniversityWilliam Riddell, Rowan UniversityChris Moore, Rowan UniversityChris Baralus, Rowan University Page 14.533.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Energy Audits and Sustainable EngineeringAbstractUndergraduate Engineering majors are introduced to Sustainable Engineering by conductingenergy audits at farms, office buildings, and industrial facilities. These projects provide realworld experiences where the students are called upon to use all their book knowledge, commonsense and resourcefulness to make a
. Page 14.257.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Assessment of Mechanical Engineering Study Abroad programs in Germany: Experiences and Lessons LearnedAbstractThis paper discusses the continued developments and the current status of study abroadprograms for the mechanical engineering students at Kettering University. In particular, thispaper outlines the study exchange with schools in Germany in which there is an equal numberof students in exchange over two or three year span between the Kettering University and theparticipating schools in Germany. Programs at other countries such as Australia, China andMexico are also available to the Kettering University students, while efforts are under way toexplore
design a system that can achieve the desired transformations5,14. Learning occurs by the execution of a well-planned sequence (a "strategic sequence") of subsystems.Each subsystem is designed to accomplish an incremental goal, ultimately leading to the attainment of theoverall course goals6. Research applying the concept of general system theory to the specialized problem ofinstructional design has been conducted8,9,15. In order to control progress through a strategically sequencedcollection of subsystems, feedback is required2. In educational systems, the feedback is obtained bycomparing the actual progress with the expected progress towards the system goals. Bloom's taxonomy will serve as the basis for the metrics used in
Science Foundation’sSoutheastern University and College Coalition for Engineering Education (SUCCEED).1 Projected data based on 1990 through 1994 graduation statistics. Institutional Research andPlanning Analysis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University2 Virginia Myers Kelly, ‘Briefings’, ASEE Prism, American Society for Engineering Education,11/95.3 LeBold, ASEE 1993 Proceedings....FILL IN THE REST4 Wadsworth, 1993 ASEE page 12755 Dr. B. M. Vetter, ‘Women in the Engineering Workforce: Progress in Century I’, 1993 ASEEAnnual Conference Proceedings.6 Ibid.7 ASEE PRISM, March ‘96, ‘Briefings’, pg 158 Dr. B.M. Vetter, op.cit.9 Dr. R.B. Landis, Studying Engineering, A Road Map to a Rewarding Career, p. 76.10 Ibid.11 Dr. J.B
Workshop, Committee on New Directions in Manufacturing, National Research Council, 2004. Page 14.64.8[4] Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2008-09 Edition, Engineering Technicians. Retrieved December 21, 2008 from http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos112.htm.[5] Aerospace Industries Association press release. Retrieved September 6, 2005 from http://www.aia-aerospace.org/aianews/press/press.cfm[6] Anderson, J., Advanced Aerospace Manufacturing Education Project, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education, June 2007
AC 2009-13: BENCHMARKING TWO URBAN MET BACHELOR PROGRAMSBrian Vuksanovich, Youngstown State UniversityJames Higley, Purdue University, Calumet Page 14.273.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Benchmarking Two Urban MET BS ProgramsAbstractSince the change to outcomes based accreditation in 2000, most engineering technologyprograms have adapted to the change and have implemented program outcomes and theaccompanying assessment and evaluation techniques. TC2K created significant change in theengineering technology world, change that still has lasting effects eight years later. While thechange to outcomes based assessment has not always been welcome
2006-864: ENGINEERING EFFECTIVE MIDDLE SCHOOL TEACHERPROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENTM. David Burghardt, Hofstra University Dr. M. David Burghardt is Professor, Chair of the Engineering Department, and co-Director of the Center for Technological Literacy at Hofstra University. He is the author of 11 engineering and technology education texts, numerous publications, and is Principal Investigator of the NSF MSP grant, Mathematics, Science and Technology Education Partnership.Maryann Llewellyn, Uniondale School District Dr. Maryann Llewellyn is Deputy Superintendent of the Uniondale School District and oversees the curriculum and instruction in the district
Paper ID #17946Project Activities in Electronics to Spark Interest in STEM from PK-12 throughLifeDr. Ramakrishnan Sundaram, Gannon University Dr. Sundaram is a Professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at Gannon Univer- sity. His areas of research include computational architectures for signal and image processing as well as novel methods to improve engineering education pedagogy. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Work-in-Progress: Project Activities in Electronics to Spark Interest in STEM from PK-12 through LifeIntroductionThis paper
Paper ID #31392Engagement in Practice: A Second Year Project-Based Learning SequenceDr. Melissa Morris, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Worldwide Melissa is an assistant professor at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in the Department of Engi- neering and Technology of the College of Aeronautics. She is specialized in mechatronics and robotics and also has a deep interest in promoting STEAM education rounded with professional skills and ethics. She earned her PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Florida International University, MS in Mechanical Engineering with Bionengineering from Florida Atlantic University, and
AC 2008-625: THE VIRGINIA TECH FIRST ROBOTICS PROGRAMPARTNERSHIP: TECHNOLOGICAL LITERACY THROUGH SELF-EFFICACYMary Kasarda, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBrenda Brand, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityMichael Collver, Montgomery County Public SchoolsGabriel Goldman, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Gabe Goldman is a Ph'D candidate in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech Page 13.1282.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 The Virginia Tech FIRST Robotics Program Partnership: Technological Literacy through
Engineering Education. 85(2) 1996: 93-96; Muskavitch, Karen M.T. “Cases andGoals for Ethics Education.” Science and Engineering Ethics. 11(3) 2005: 431-434.2 Weil, Vivian. “Ethics in Engineering Curricula.” Research in Philosophy and Technology 8, 1985: 243-250;“Teaching Ethics to Scientists and Engineers: Moral Agents and Moral Problems.” Science and Engineering Ethics1(3), 1995: 403-416.3 Kymlicka, Will. “Rawls on Teleology and Deontology.” Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol 17, No.3 (Summer1988), pp173-190. This article is also good for framing ethical discussion by distinguishing duty and utilityapproaches through a discussion of ‘the right vs. the good’ or ‘deontology vs. teleology.’4 Brittan, Samuel. “Two Cheers for Utilitarianism.” Oxford
AC 2010-1462: PROPOSED FRESHMEN EXPERIENCE COURSEThomas Dobrowski, Purdue University-North Central Page 15.1006.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Proposed Freshmen Experience CourseAbstractThere are many college campus’s moving towards Freshmen Experience courses as part of aGeneral Education. While at first glance this may appear appropriate “on paper”, a one size fits allapproach does not seem logical for such varied plans of study. Each college places academicemphasis in different areas. This makes a “one size fits all” approach to a freshman experiencecourse weak as the expectations that the faculty will have of their students will vary with
AC 2010-1770: BUILDING A COLLABORATIVE K12 PARTNERSHIPHeath Tims, Louisiana Tech UniversityJim Nelson, Louisiana Tech UniversityGalen Turner, Louisiana Tech UniversityMissy Wooley, Ruston High SchoolMarvin Nelson, Benton High School Page 15.247.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Building a collaborative K12 partnershipAbstractTechSTEP, Cyber Discovery, and NASA-Threads are partnerships between K12 schools andLouisiana Tech University that lead to an improvement of high school student achievement inmathematics and science. These partnerships result in better prepared students entering science,technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM
cite the exposure to the audience of the expert use ofvery sophisticated investigative tools: from advanced computers, to finger printcomparatives to mass spectrometers and the ability to derive logical solutions to crime-related problems. The reality is that these T.V. programs exhibit the talents of intelligent,technically adept staff using state-of-the-art technical tools. No advanced theories orindebt research need be considered here; the solution to the problem-at-hand lies in theexperienced use of tools-of-the-trade and the inherent intelligence of the user. But isn’tthis a description of the charter for Engineering Technology programs and the studentswho we teach?This paper describes the use of the CSI1-type plots to appeal to and