Research paper examines well-being of six consecutive first-year engineeringstudent cohorts at a large research-intensive university. Academic pressures and personalchallenges negatively affect well-being for all students, but first-year students face additionalstressors as they transition into an unfamiliar environment with large classes, a new socialsetting, and increased self-responsibility. Data were collected through weekly surveys includingthe Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS), Perceived Stress Scale(PSS-10), and a stressor selection and ranking activity. Results show a slow, steady decline inwell-being over the academic year, strongly correlated to feelings of stress. Stable year-to-yearpatterns also show academic
particular course but also fit technical coursesin engineering. Future work might detail specific functional, learning, and attitudinal coursegoals. For example, we suggest that after taking this course students should: • Be able to identify and model effective personal and team storytelling. • Have experienced an interaction design experience. • Communicate effectively about real and fictionalized stories. • Develop abilities to analyze diverse and complex problems during and beyond the academy. • Qualitatively and quantifiably define engagement by approaching and co-building methods. • Engage through a shared vision on a team and develop ways to
students completed PhD programs in life science, engineering, and physical andmathematical sciences in seven years4. To accomplish our aim of increasing the number of URMstudents pursuing a graduate degree and preparing them for success in the application processand graduate school, it is imperative to begin to cultivate the skills they will need as theyprogress through their programs. This will include providing intentional professionaldevelopment and active mentorship. To ensure our participants were entering an inclusiveenvironment and positioned to receive support and effective mentorship, all faculty mentorscompleted our 8-hour mentor training workshop. This training was designed to prepare faculty tobe more effective at creating inclusive
how to improve as well as an understanding of how to make animprovement10.Because quality feedback is important, investigating the traits of good feedback is critical. Theaim of this study is to examine how students perceive and respond to feedback received from aGraduate Teaching Assistant (GTA) and their peers. This study is part of a larger project thatfocuses on the feedback that students receive as they iterate through multiple drafts of theirsolutions to MEAs. In addition, this study is part of a greater research endeavor to developpedagogical approaches around feedback on open-ended problem solving that enhancesinstructor and peer feedback and facilitates students learning to interpret and respond to feedback.II. MethodA. SettingThree
PsyD from George Fox University. She has taught, supervised, and mentored PsyD students for the past 10 years. She also provides therapy through her private practice. Her research interests include teaching and mentoring, assessment and management of suicidal ideation, trauma, grief, and integration of faith, learning, and practice. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 A Mixed Methods, Longitudinal Evaluation of Problem-Based Learning and Inquiry-Based Activities in a Heat Transfer Course and LabAbstractThis paper describes 10 years of pre/post assessment data from a heat transfer course taughtusing problem-based learning and an
private discussion with theProgram Evaluators (PEVs), followed by a joint luncheon with the entire ABET visiting team,faculty members, select students, alumni, and administrators.Preparing the ABET Self Study Document The next step in the ABET assessment process was to begin developing the self-studydocument, which would serve as the primary review document, leading up to the site visit itself.This document had to be submitted to ABET not later than July 1st, to enable the ProgramEvaluators (PEVs) and Team Chair to review the program prior to their site visit, typicallyscheduled during the September through December timeframe. The TAMUC IndustrialEngineering self study document was modeled after the Engineering Self Study
Survey of Undergraduate Engineering MajorsAbstractAs evident from several products recently analyzed in research and legal hearings, ethicalconsiderations of products’ influence on user behavior, choice, and well-being may be eclipsedin favor of business outcomes. Persuasive design, a unidirectional process through mobile appsand other digital-enabled products, may translate to consumer risk or inadvertent outcomes. Inthis study, we examine utilization of ethical safeguards and psychological competencies inundergraduate engineering capstone courses, to inform innovative product design with studentconsideration of user well-being. To this end, we propose a research collaboration betweenengineering technology and psychology to promote
Paper ID #16107Engineering Faculty on Writing: What They Think and What They WantNatascha Michele Trellinger, Purdue University, West Lafayette Natascha Trellinger is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She graduated with her B.S. in Aerospace Engineering from Syracuse University where her interest in the teaching and learning aspects of engineering began. At Purdue, Natascha is a member of the Global Engineering Education Collaboratory (GEEC) and is particularly interested in graduate level engineering education and faculty experiences.Prof. Brent K Jesiek, Purdue University, West
plasma turbulence and plasma jets. His research has also included fluid physics and electric propulsion using Lattice-Boltzmann methods, spectral element methods, Weighted Essentially Non-Oscillatory (WENO), etc. Past research includes modeling single and multi-species plasma flows through ion thruster optics and the discharge cathode assembly; computer simulations of blood flow interacting with blood vessels; modeling ocean-air interaction; reacting flow systems; modeling jet engine turbomachinery going unstable at NASA for 6 years (received NASA Per- formance Cash awards). Dr. Richard is involved in many outreach activities: e.g., tutoring, mentoring, directing related grants (for example, a grant for an NSF REU
. Kristi works to improve the undergraduate engineering experience through evaluating preparation in math- ematics and physics, incorporating non-traditional teaching methods into the classroom, and engaging her students with interactive methods. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Engaging Freshman Enrolled in Pre-Calculus in Engineering Projects in Community ServiceAbstractThis work-in-progress describes a novel approach to support freshman engineering studentsentering college with low math competencies in pre-calculus. Institutions across the nation aremaking significant efforts to develop K-12 programs and summer camps to recruit more ethnicminorities into
the many educators and scholars focusing oninnovations in teaching writing specifically within engineering design courses, freshman-through senior-level.6 7 Instead of offering one custom writing course for engineers, a growingnumber of universities are boasting series of two or three. University of California at SantaBarbara offers a particularly impressive 3-course series that incorporates a unique mixture ofstudying engineering literature, doing in-class product autopsies and writing about electro-mechanical devices purchased at thrift stores, and studying standardized report and proposalforms.8Moreover, educators have been developing rubrics to make the evaluation and grading ofengineering reports more efficient and effective.9 10
cell cyclingtest methods presented an ongoing need to extensively train and educate the students in theelectrochemistry theory, related laboratory techniques and safety requirements. Since the initiation of this project the authors have had numerous informal conversationswith faculty at other academic institutions, as well as Li-ion cell and battery manufacturers,automotive battery suppliers, and electric vehicle manufacturers. From these conversations itbecame evident there is a serious shortage of knowledgeable, and trained engineering talent inthe entire Li-ion battery process ranging from pure research, through cell manufacturing, tobattery pack and module assembly, and ultimately to end user applications. Frequently theseother
the words,“Now that you have answered the question” to the beginning of the two questions.The intent of the writing exercises is to encourage students to go beyond simply recitingmemorized equations and rather to reflect on the meaning and implications of the equations,models, and concepts that are used in circuit analysis. In addition, various prompts are insertedwithin the writing exercises to spur metacognitive activity. For example, the two self-ratingquestions of Figure 4 are asked both before a student responds to an exercise’s Question Statement(Pre-Response Self-Rating in Figure 1) and after their response to the exercise’s QuestionStatement (Post-Response Self-Rating in Figure 1).Broadly speaking, the concept of metacognition refers
Hewitt.11 Seymour and Hewitt found that students who leave STEMfields do not differ significantly on measures of performance, motivation, or study-relatedbehavior. In interviews with leavers about departing STEM, the students most often citefrustration with the experience in the discipline including criticism of the quality of teaching,advising, and curriculum design. Further students expressed frustration with uninteresting andcontent-laden courses that led to an increasingly negative perception of STEM careers and anoverall disinterest in the subject matter. As a result, much of the focus in engineering educationhas focused on developing engaging classroom experiences through curricular and pedagogicalinnovations.12,13,14,15 This focus has
(including their administration, faculty, and students), government, and industry to optimize thesystem for preparing and ramping up freshout engineers in the workplace. This initiative alsogoes beyond existing efforts to provide cooperative learning experiences and internships. Whilethese learning experiences are valuable, they are only one component of a larger system todecrease rampup time to competent workplace performance.MissionThe mission of this coalition is to reduce the time to competent performance and reduce thedropout rate for new freshout engineers by fostering collaboration among academic, government,and industry stakeholders in ways that create, implement, maintain, and continuously improvesystemic solutions
faculty anddepartments with the change process. Oftentimes, educational initiatives are instigated by just afew members of a department, which leads to challenges for wider adoption by other departmentalfaculty. Faculty developers can work with the department to identify practices that could lead togreater adoption of the innovation beyond just the project initiators. Faculty developers workingin these centers can be change agents (Patrick & Fletcher, 1998), by guiding projects to align with 2research on transformation. For example, if a department is interested in curricular reform, facultydevelopers can work with the department head and
Application: An Investigation of CommonMisconceptions Associated with Vector Analysis in an Undergraduate Biomechanics Course," 2010Annual ASEE Conference, Louisville, KY, June 20-23, 2010.[32] A. Appova, T. Berezovski, "Commonly identified students' misconceptions about vectors andvector operations," Conference: International Conference Proceedings of the Special Interest Group ofthe Mathematical Association of America on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education(RUME). January 2013 Denver, CO.[33] K. Junus, "Assessing Students’ Mathematical Misconceptions through Concept Maps and OnlineDiscussion Transcripts: Inner Product Spaces," Proceedings of the 26th International Conference onComputers in Education. Philippines: Asia-Pacific Society for
industry experts to create several new programs, such as Histologic Technician, Computed Tomography, Cardiovascular Technology, Massage Therapy, and Dental Hygiene. In 2015, she worked with faculty and industry experts to create the Insurance Associate/Specialist program to train students for the insurance business. Most recently, Dr. Perez worked with the HCC Manufacturing Center of Excellence and Texas A & M University in the development of a new certificate, High Value Manufacturing, made possible through an NSF Grant initiative. This initiative also involved the manufacturing industry representatives to ensure that the certificate curriculum would meet the needs of the industry. c
transitioning from industry to academia, based upon the recent experiences of surveyedfaculty who have completed this transition successfully. This preliminary work is intended toseek feedback that will be helpful for expanding this work to a more extensive survey of facultythat fit this category. The most obvious challenge is the adjustment to teaching rather thanworking in an engineering production, design, or consulting environment for industry. However,the information presented here includes a myriad of challenges beyond teaching, includingdeveloping an academic research program through direction of graduate work, and satisfying thevarious professional development, service, and research requirements expected of universityprofessors [1, 2].The three
next step2. Research inengineering education is supported through funding from organizations such as the NationalScience Foundation (NSF) and is published in journals such as the Journal of Engineering Page 25.269.2Education, the results of which are not often put into practice in classrooms across the UnitedStates3.Organizations such as the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and the NationalAcademy of Engineering (NAE) agree that we must produce engineers today and into the futurewith competencies well beyond those expected of past engineers and prepare our new engineersto work in a global society4, 5. Engineering education
be used in education in a creative and ethical way.Dr. Kristi J. Shryock, Texas A&M University Dr. Kristi J. Shryock is the Frank and Jean Raymond Foundation Inc. Endowed Associate Professor in Multidisciplinary Engineering and Affiliated Faculty in Aerospace Engineering in the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. She also serves as Director of the Craig and Galen Brown Engineering Honors Program. She received her BS, MS, and PhD from the College of Engineering at Texas A&M. Kristi works to improve the undergraduate engineering experience through evaluating preparation in areas, such as mathematics and physics, evaluating engineering identity and its impact on retention, incorporating
. Orr, S. M. Lord, R. A. Long, and R. A. Layton, “Introducing ‘Stickiness’ as a Versatile Metric of Engineering Persistence,” Proceedings of the 2012 Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference, Seattle, WA, October 2012.[15] S. M. Lord, M. W. Ohland, R. A. Layton, and M. M. Camacho, “Beyond Pipeline and Pathways: Ecosystem Metrics,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 108, no. 1, 2019. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20250[16] M. W. Ohland, M. K. Orr, V. Lundy-Wagner, C. P. Veenstra, and R. A. Long, “Viewing access and persistence in engineering through a socioeconomic lens,” in Engineering and Social Justice: In the University and Beyond, C. Baillie, A. L. Pawley, and D. Riley, Eds., Purdue University Press
Mathematical Society, Mathematical Association of America, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, and the Honor Society of Phi Kappa Phi. Page 25.1212.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Summer Enrichment Workshops for Promoting Engineering EducationAbstractThe paper describes the two summer enrichment workshops that were conducted during in thelast two years. The workshops provided high school and middle school students with a realisticand engaging introduction to engineering. The participants had the opportunity to 1) learn aboutengineering fields through hands-on problem-solving
. Lord, R. A. Long, M. W. Ohland, M. K. Orr, and R. A. Layton, “Work in Progress: Exploring student pathways among academic fields,” 2023 Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference Proceedings, College Station, TX, October 2023.[7] M. M. Camacho and S. M. Lord, The Borderlands of Education: Latinas in Engineering, Lexington Books, Lanham, MD, 2013. ISBN 978-0739175583[8] M. W. Ohland, M. K. Orr, V. Lundy-Wagner, C. P. Veenstra, and R. A. Long, “Viewing access and persistence in engineering through a socioeconomic lens,” in Engineering and Social Justice: In the University and Beyond, C. Baillie, A. L. Pawley, and D. Riley, Eds., Purdue University Press, January 15, 2012, pp. 157-182.[9] C. E. Brawner, R. Brent, J. Manning, M
AC 2012-5438: ETHICAL ISSUES AWARENESS FOR ENGINEERS INPRACTICEDr. A. Dean Fontenot, Texas Tech University A. Dean Fontenot directs a professional development center for K-12 teachers as part of the Texas STEM (T-STEM) initiative in order to bring about educational reform in secondary schools. The Texas Tech T-STEM Center focuses on project-based learning with the integration of the engineering design process. As Senior Director, she has brought together three Texas Tech professional development centers that have a history of training teachers, and built partnerships with five Educational Service centers as well as other organizational and industry partners who help implement the professional development training
’1. It has also been described by some with a ‘survival of the fittest’analogy2. Regardless of the term used, the end result is the same – investments in research aremade, but research often gets lost and never gets transferred to practice when the intermediarystep is ignored.This concept is true for product innovations – many products and inventions never evolvebeyond the inventor’s desk, though many lack only funding to progress to that next step2. This isequally true for engineering education innovations. Research in engineering education issupported through funding from organizations such as the National Science Foundation (NSF)and is published in journals such as the Journal of Engineering Education, yet research results arenot often
mentors do for their students can increase students’ self-efficacy inteaching STEM [3]. Overall, the literature supports mentor’s positive contribution to students’ development.At the college level, students having a mentor is essential to their success at the college level.Mentoring is found contributive to, at least in part, leadership development, first-year collegestudents’ transition into a new environment, student retention and their college attitudes,and learning effectiveness in general [4, 5]. Beyond the educational purposes, having amentor is critical for students’ personal and professional growth [6]. Traditionally, mentor-mentee relationship is unidirectional and it emphasizes onone to one skill building through active
Very clear and linear curriculum – orientation around real world events made the curriculum easy to follow. The brad [sic.] topics that effect [sic.] our current world of technology was [sic.] greatly helpful to know. It kept me updated in this fast moving world I learned about society through taking this course. It forced me to be more aware of the world that I live in. Assignments/projects had real-world applicationsThe emphasis in these comments on the course’s orientation toward the “real world” points tothe role the SDGs played in presenting a realistic and compelling scenario that helped studentsappreciate how engineering design can help “achieve a
so-called“soft skills” (Cech, 2014; Faulkner, 2007). As a result of this dualism, engineering students aremisled into thinking that engineering exists within a vacuum (Johnson et al., 2019; Trevelyan,2014). If their engineering courses focus solely on building their technical skills, students mayenter the professional field with little experience in addressing bigger problems that affectmembers in society beyond the traditional stakeholders they were exposed to in their engineeringprograms, who are often those who hold the most power in society (Leydens & Lucena, 2017).Efforts to introduce the social dimensions of engineering are typically sprinkled into design andcapstone courses (Leydens & Lucena, 2017) or designated to standalone
toolsor in traditional contexts such as art studios. Finally, the DSEI may be used for pre/post assessmentto measure effects of drawing skill development using intelligent tutoring systems.AcknowledgementsThis research was supported by National Science Foundation, ”Collaborative Research: FosteringEngineering Creativity and Communication through Immediate, Personalized Feedback on 2D-Perspective Drawing” : 2013612 (Texas A&M University), 2013504 (Georgia Tech), 2013575(San Jose State University) and 2013554 (Purdue University).References [1] K. G. Short, G. Kauffman, and L. H. Kahn, “” i just need to draw”: Responding to literature across multiple sign systems,” The Reading Teacher, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 160–171, 2000. [2] K. Ernst daSilva