2006-2067: ASSESSMENT OF HANDS-ON INTRODUCTIONS TO INDUSTRIALENGINEERINGDurward Sobek, Montana State University Durward Sobek is an Associate Professor in Industrial and Management Engineering. He holds an AB degree in Engineering Science from Dartmouth College, and MS and PhD degrees in Industrial and Operations Engineering from The University of Michigan.Susan Freeman, Northeastern University Susan Freeman is an Associate Academic Specialist in the College Of Engineering. She holds BS, MS and PhD degrees in Industrial Engineering from Northeastern University. Susan worked at Eastman Kodak Company for 9 years as an IE, and has been teaching in the Mechanical and Industrial Engineering
. Collected data allows for demographic analysis of visitorpopulation, user performance assessment, and provides game-play perspective useful foreffective game design. Presented results are based on a year-long study involving about17,000 museum visitors.1.0 Outreach in the Form of a Museum Exhibit: Overview of the ProjectGovernment funding supports research work on the cutting edge of manufacturingtechnologies, but the general population’s understanding of manufacturing processes,equipment, and careers lags far behind that edge. To bridge the gap, the NSF EngineeringResearch Center for reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems (ERC/RMS) at theUniversity of Michigan invested in the creation of a museum exhibit to be installed at theAnn Arbor Hands-On
Assessment of Teaching and Learning in Dynamics Julie Y.-Z. Wang and Oguz Soysal Frostburg State UniversityAbstractThis paper presents a process to directly assess the 1ABET learning outcomes at a courselevel in Dynamics. The outcomes from the student performance show that themathematics and physics preparation is an important factor to succeed the Dynamicscourse. The interactive activities in the class improve the quality of teaching/learning.The standard lecture/tutorial format of traditional instruction in the class is replaced by aseries of two-hour active-learning sessions involving short lectures and demonstrations,problem solving, classroom questioning and
. Page 12.880.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Independent Student Design Competitions and the Assessment DilemmaAbstractOne of the most difficult assessment problems for faculty is student design competitions whereonly one or maybe two teams participate for independent study. Students are excited andfocused on the possibility of winning. The faculty is usually concerned with process andassessment in the context of a project and program not of their design. The issues are multipliedwhen you combine the problems of team assessment with a small sample pool of participants.This paper presents a case study in process and assessment for a single team of four independentstudy students that entered the 2005-2006 Airport Security
AC 2007-399: ASSESSMENT RESULTS OF A SENIOR DESIGN CAPSTONECOURSEMysore Narayanan, Miami University DR. MYSORE NARAYANAN obtained his Ph.D. from the University of Liverpool, England in the area of Electrical and Electronic Engineering. He joined Miami University in 1980 and teaches a wide variety of electrical, electronic and mechanical engineering courses. He has been invited to contribute articles to several encyclopedias and has published and presented dozens of papers at local, regional , national and international conferences. He has also designed, developed, organized and chaired several conferences for Miami University and conference sessions for a variety of organizations. He is a
, thestudents initially do a test plan written report and presentation early in the course to get thenecessary background for the project. This enables the students to purchase required materialsand begin fabrication, if necessary, for the final project. The course ends with a final projectreport and a formal final briefing. While the workload on the part of the professor is demanding,the course was highly praised during the last two ABET accreditation visits. Student feedbackfrom industry also confirms the usefulness of such a course. The assessment tools used in thiscourse will be discussed in the context of the three ABET outcomes to be measured.IntroductionAssessment is an important process that must be accomplished for all mechanical
Paper ID #6365Experimental Assessment of Higher-Level Data Analysis SkillsCapt. Julie Ann Layton, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute CPT Layton is a master’s degree candidate in the RPI Dept. of Industrial and Systems Engineering.Prof. Thomas Reed Willemain, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Page 23.572.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Experimental Assessment of Higher-Level Data Analysis
Paper ID #8170Integrating Risk Assessment in the Unit Operations LaboratoryDr. Maddalena Fanelli, Michigan State University Dr. Maddalena Fanelli is a Teaching Specialist in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science at Michigan State University. Dr. Fanelli teaches or coordinates a number of undergraduate lab- oratory courses, helping students gain hands-on experience that is critical to making theoretical learning more understandable and concrete. Before joining the department, she worked in the research and devel- opment groups in a number of industrial sectors, developing chemical processes for bio
and stimulate student interest. This paper describes a three weekmodule on active circuits that incorporates circuit design, analysis and testing. Thelectures are integrated with the laboratory component and all appropriate concepts inmathematics are covered. Assessment results are based on running the project at threeuniversities, namely, Rowan, Bucknell and Tennessee State. Quantitative results based onstudent surveys, a concept inventory test and faculty formulated rubrics demonstrate theaccomplishment of the learning outcomes. Page 24.132.3INTRODUCTION AND MOTIVATIONA course on the principles of analog circuits is fundamental in the early part of
Paper ID #7537Engineering Ethics Survey for Faculty: An Assessment ToolProf. Frank E Falcone, Villanova University Professor Falcone is a member of the faculty of the Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering at Vil- lanova University. His primary fields of technical interest and experience are in Hydraulics, Hydrology, Fluid Mechanics and Water Resources. He has also taught Professional Practices in Engineering and En- gineering in the Humanistic Context which is a course focused on exploring a wide range of ethical issues confronting engineers and engineering students on a day-to-day basis. Falcone is registered
Paper ID #7121An Assessment Approach to Project-Based Service LearningMs. Antonette T. Cummings, Purdue University Antonette Cummings is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds an M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin.James Huff, Purdue University James L. Huff is a Ph.D. candidate in Engineering Education at Purdue University as well as the assistant education administrator for EPICS. He earned his B.S. in Computer Engineering at Harding University and an M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He is currently on an academic
Education, 2013 An Evolving Capstone Course used in ABET AssessmentAbstractThe Department of Engineering and Technology at Western Carolina University (WCU) hasdeveloped a capstone design course sequence that provides students with industry-relevantprojects, while generating an excellent opportunity to assess many of the ABET (AccreditationBoard for Engineering and Technology) student outcomes, commonly called “a through k.” Inits sixth year the two-semester course sequence sees a healthy list of projects that provide cross-functional opportunities for teams composed of undergraduate students in EngineeringTechnology (ET), Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology (ECET), and ElectricalEngineering (EE).Each of the capstone projects
Session 3550 Design, Implementation, and Assessment of WebCT-based CNC Ismail Fidan§, Lauren L. Neal¶, Robert J. Clougherty, Jr.¶ § College of Engineering/¶The Institute for Technological Scholarship Tennessee Tech University Cookeville, TN 38505Abstract In the 21st century, the Internet has become the dominant distribution system for distanceeducation and training. Many faculty members are expanding their traditional delivery methods(lecture, laboratory, face-to-face discussion) to include educational options ranging from web
Session 1360 ESTABLISHING AND ASSESSING EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES FOR ENGINEERING PROGRAMS Nashwan Younis Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering Department of Engineering Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne Fort Wayne, IN 46805-1499AbstractChanges are often very difficult. The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET) has changed the criteria for accrediting engineering programs. This paper describes theprocess for developing and assessing an engineering
Session 2549 Assessing Group Learning Courses in Construction Management Technology Amitabha Bandyopadhyay State University of New York, FarmingdaleIntroductionThe need for college students to be actively involved in their own learning has received wideacceptance1. The value of teamwork and ability to solve problems in group environment forengineering and technology students is undeniable. Specifically construction is an interconnectedprocess. The construction engineers and managers work cooperatively with many professionalsand workers to implement design into reality. So it is logical to
Session 2526 COURSE ASSESSMENT ON ORAL COMMUNICATION INTENSIVE LABORATORY Hyun W. Kim Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Youngstown State UniversityAbstractThe Mechanical Engineering Program at Youngstown State University requires its students totake four physical laboratory courses directly related to mechanical engineering. Fluid DynamicsLaboratory and Thermal Fluid Applications Laboratory are the two laboratory courses that coverthe area of fluid thermal sciences. The TFA Laboratory deals with topics in the areas
AC 2012-4512: EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF TRIZ EFFECTIVE-NESS IN IDEA GENERATIONDr. Noe Vargas Hernandez, University of Texas, El Paso Noe Vargas Hernandez researches creativity and innovation in engineering design. He studies ideation methods, journaling, smartpens, and other methods and technology to aid designers in improving their creativity levels. He also applies his research to the design of rehabilitation devices (in which he has various patents under process) and design for sustainability.Dr. Linda C. Schmidt, University of Maryland, College Park Linda C. Schmidt is an Associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Maryland. Schmidt earned B.S. (1989) and M.S. (1991
AC 2012-4389: INTEGRATED DESIGN ENGINEERING ASSESSMENTAND LEARNING SYSTEM (IDEALS):Prof. Michael S. Trevisan, Washington State University Mike Trevisan is a professor of educational psychology at Washington State University and the Associate Dean for Research in the College of Education. For more than 17 years, he has worked with engineering educators across the country to develop engineering design curriculum and assessments for a variety of engineering disciplines. His key collaborator is Dr. Denny Davis, Washington State University.Dr. Denny C. Davis P.E., Washington State University Denny Davis is professor of bioengineering at Washington State University. He has led numerous educa- tional research projects
AC 2010-1003: ASSESSMENT OF A COMMON FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSISCOURSERaghu Echempati, Kettering UniversityEnayat Mahajerin, Saginaw Valley State UniversityAnca Sala, Baker College Of Flint Page 15.212.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 ASSESSMENT OF A COMMON FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS COURSEAbstractThis paper discusses the outcome of the common assessment of a sample introductoryundergraduate/graduate level course on finite element analysis (FEA) taught at three differentlocal four-year engineering colleges, namely, Baker College and Kettering University (Flint,MI), and Saginaw Valley State University (SVSU, Saginaw, MI). The
AC 2010-1314: ASSESSING A PROJECT-BASED PROGRAM AFTER A DECADEMark Cambron, Western Kentucky UniversityStacy Wilson, Western Kentucky University Page 15.197.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 ASSESSING A PROJECT-BASED PROGRAM AFTER A DECADEIntroductionThe Department of Engineering at Western Kentucky University (WKU) was given the rareopportunity to develop entirely new engineering programs. On July 17, 2000, the Council onPostsecondary Education (CPE) approved the Strategy for Statewide Engineering Education inKentucky. This strategy is intended to address two primary issues: 1.) the need to increase thenumber of baccalaureate engineers in the
AC 2010-1378: COST OF ASSESSMENT IN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGYPROGRAMSAlberto Gomez-Rivas, University of Houston-Downtown Alberto Gomez-Rivas is Professor of Structural Analysis/Design Engineering Technology. Dr. Gomez-Rivas received Ph.D. degrees from the University of Texas, Austin, Texas, in Civil Engineering and a Ph.D. from Rice University, Houston, Texas, in Economics. He received the Ingeniero Civil degree, with Honors, from the Universidad Javeriana in Bogotá, Colombia. He also served as Chief of Colombia’s Department of Transportation Highway Bridge Division. Dr. Gomez-Rivas has published over 40 journal articles and is a Registered Professional Engineer.Lea Campbell, University of
AC 2010-1457: ASSESSMENT-DRIVEN EVOLUTION OF A FIRST-YEARPROGRAMRick Williams, East Carolina UniversityWilliam Howard, East Carolina University Page 15.210.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Assessment Driven Evolution of a First year ProgramAbstractThe general engineering program at East Carolina University (ECU) was established in 2004. Inthe fall of 2007, a major curriculum change was initiated that introduced three new courses intothe first year. These courses are Engineering Graphics, Introduction to Engineering, andComputer Applications in Engineering. Each of these courses contains projects or assignmentsthat directly assess the achievement of
Session 1532 Engineering Education Assessment System Using Fuzzy Cognitive Maps Renato Lucas Pacheco, Renato Carlson, Lúcia Helena Martins-Pacheco Universidade Federal de Santa CatarinaIntroductionThis paper presents a new methodology for the study, plan and formative assessment of ateaching/learning environment. Formative assessment is that frequently informal assessment,aimed at improving some process, and usually beginning before the process has beencompleted1.The methodology involves course and student accompaniment, aiming to improve theteaching/learning process of a course
Session 2149 Capstone Courses and Program Outcomes - TC2K Assessment Paul I-Hai Lin, Hal Broberg Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne AbstractThis paper discusses course objectives, student learning outcomes, teaching strategies,assessment techniques, and continuous improvement used in conducting a two-semestercapstone course. It leads the students from the conceptual stage in senior project design tothe actual implementation stage. The course is intended to enable students to succeed
Session 2158 Sur vey Builder : A Tool to Suppor t Assessment Mar c Hoit 1, Rick Sayer s2, Bill Lewis2, Akhil Kar ker a 2, Nar en Kamat 2 1 -Associate Dean, College of Engineer ing, Academic Affair s/ 2 -Car eer Resour ce Center Univer sity of Flor ida, Gainesville, FLAssessment is a critical component of all educational programs. The need to develop andadminister surveys to a wide variety of audiences is one of the standard techniques used in allassessment programs. One of the major
Session 2425 Assessment Opportunities in a Capstone Design Course Karen C. Davis University of CincinnatiAbstractThis paper describes activities related to ABET EAC assessment that have beenimplemented within a senior design capstone course sequence. The activities andinstruments address Criterion 3, Program Outcomes and Assessment, and Criterion 4,Professional Component (specifically the major design experience). A variety ofassessment techniques are used to obtain both quantitative measurements and qualitativeindicators that can be used to demonstrate achievement of outcomes
Session 2149 Assessment Rubrics for TAC-ABET Interpersonal Skills Elaine M. Cooney, Kenneth Reid Purdue School of Engineering and Technology Indiana University Purdue University IndianapolisIntroductionMeasuring non-technical skills (sometimes called “soft skills”), such as the ability to function onteams (ABET Technology Criteria 2000, Criterion 1.e.), or the ability to communicateeffectively (Criterion 1.g.) can be a challenge to technology faculty trained in engineeringtechnology, but not necessarily experts in communication or leadership. These skills
Session 2533 Outcomes Assessment in an Energy Systems Course Mark Schumack Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Detroit MercyI. IntroductionStudent performance has been traditionally measured through homework assignments, projects,and examinations, with final course grades based on weighted averages of scores in each of thesemeasurement categories. Driven by the EC 2000 criteria, many instructors have revised theircourse syllabi to list course outcomes and associated linkages to program outcomes. The linkageby itself
% O Arts Liberal Recruiter survey Colleges Colleges 15.00% Type Factor I(Bachelor's) GRE-quantitative 4.50% (Bachelor's) P Peer assessment survey I 25%GRE-analytical 25% 4.50% I Acceptance rate I 1.5% Acceptance rate 1.5%1.00% I High school class standing—top R PhD
Session 2225 Capstone Design Courses and Assessment: A National Study Larry J. McKenzie, Michael S. Trevisan, Denny C. Davis, Steven W. Beyerlein Duke Energy/Washington State University/University of IdahoAbstractABET EC 2000 Criteria 3 and 4 specifically focus on student learning objectives and associatedassessment and evaluation practices that are often integral to capstone design courses. This paperreports findings from a two-phase study conducted to better understand the nature and scope ofassessment practices within capstone design courses across engineering disciplines, and in particular,the extent to