forbusiness opportunities, improve efficiency, reduce costs, increase revenue or market share andinspire a vision for the organization [4][5]. The CEO is concerned about organizational success,financial issues, operational processes, and business risk. The CEO position must view theorganization from a bird’s eye view to determine why the organization exists and what theultimate goals are. When it comes to information security, however, the CEO is typically only apart of a team that makes final business and information security decisions and asks questionssuch as, “Should the information security project be funded? Is this information security strategya good fit for this organization? Are the costs (i.e. time, money, resources) for the
general, to “let George do it” and thereby, destroy the team morale. TheEngineering faculty has addressed this condition by making time logs a grading criterion.The corporate sponsor is not local and recognizes that his absence has been a definiteshortcoming. Electronic communications have been increased between the sponsor’sCEO and the student interns to mitigate the distance problem because many students havea propensity to be non-proactive on their own volition (possibly a maturity issue). TheCEO now comes to the Engineering College for student work sessions rather than forformal presentations. Saturday-morning four-hour work sessions (including attendanceby several of the professional disciplines and all the student interns) have
engineering disciplines, service-learning applications aremost frequently implemented in biomedical engineering, mechanical engineering, environmentalengineering, and civil engineering. As formalized in ABET 2000, many engineering educatorsare committed to cultivating among our students a sense of professional responsibility andsensitivity to the complex social and ethical dimensions of engineering practice. We are thuslooking for opportunities to more explicitly connect our students’ learning with the importantcommunity issues that engineers help to address and with the people whose lives are affected byour profession. As with any discipline, service-learning presents unique challenges and opportunities toengineering students and faculty. Many of
goal of the training is to support the UGTFs and enable themto be as effective as possible. The first meeting is a joint “Kick-off Meeting,” with faculty and UGTFs present fromSTEM departments across KU designed to get instructors and UGTFs on the same page abouthow UGTFs can be most effective, and has been iterated on to include breakouts sessions onseveral topics such as inclusivity, sexual harassment and reporting requirements, video analysisof the UGTF role, a LEGO communication activity, and a faculty break-out session. The secondmeeting is held about one month into the semester and is focused around common issues thatcome up in team-based learning or cooperative group active learning activities. The peer reviewhappens during the
curricular designs to integrate and enhance educational experiences common to all students, Creation of a context (i.e., calendar conversion) serving as a catalyst and galvanizing agent for sweeping change throughout the institution, New approaches to instructional delivery from the perspective of pedagogy as well as multi and inter-disciplinary student projects, and Better alignment of student and faculty availability with other academic institutions and industry needs for hiring and cooperative education. Better alignment of student and faculty availability with other academic institutions for internal experiences such as study abroad.Risks:Equally important in a decision to
aboutlearning and being in their classes. Although negative emotional engagement had an internalreliability that was less than the standard 0.7, there is evidence that reliability between 0.6 and0.7 is adequate [36]. Therefore, both engagement variables were retained for analysis. Table 2: Emotional Engagement (Dependent) VariablesPrimary Scale Sample ItemPositive Emotional Engagement (α = 0.75) I enjoy learning new things in this class.Negative Emotional Engagement (α = 0.67) In this class, I feel discouraged.The independent variables used to represent the behaviors of faculty in this study were adaptedfrom previous measures of academic support, teaching practices, faculty contact
andlegal issues, environmental factors, and ethical dimensions. The proposal requires students tothink in terms of engineering as social experimentation. 6 In other words, they are asked to think ofthe introduction of any new technology and their project in particular as an experiment on a socialscale that is characterized by a certain element of risk and uncertainty. The proposal also requiresthe students to use moral imagination both to critique their own mental models and to appreciatethe perspectives of a variety of stakeholders who may view the project quite differently than theexperimenters and to anticipate potential risks and negative impacts.7All undergraduate theses are written for a combined readership of expert and non-expertaudiences
majors, team-building athletic activities, and military training. Eachparticipating academic department hosts several three-hour workshops during which groups of20-25 students learn about an academic discipline in which they could major. Students areallowed to select workshops in academic departments from which they are most interested. Thegoal of the Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering is to provide students abetter understanding of what it means to major in environmental science or environmentalengineering. To support this goal, our faculty developed an exercise that uses a combination oflecture material and laboratory experimentation. During the 50-minute lecture period, facultydescribe the attributes of both academic majors
. Recommendations of the New Millennium Engr Colloquium on the Future of Civil and Envir. Engr.Twenty-four participants from across the country attended the workshop, representing a wide- Page 6.852.2variety of institutions (public vs. private and large vs. small). Participants and their affiliations areProceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering Educationshown in the Appendix in Table 1.3. Session I - Pedagogical IssuesAs faculty members and colleges of engineering attempt to improve
: environmental, political and security issues Hydroelectric energy systems Introduction, Hydroelectric energy basics Bio-energy Introduction, the Biomass feedstock resource base, agriculture- derived Biomass resources, potential concerns and impacts Geothermal power generation Geothermal basics, Geothermal systems, Geothermal electricity generation System Integration Case studies from literature using HOMER Lab: There will be different lab assignments; using the Hybrid Optimization Model for Electric Renewables
engineering and science majors at Colorado School of Mines. At itscore, the Nature and Human Values course centers on ethical issues and cases in order to fostercommunication, writing, and research skills for incoming freshmen. It has undergone extensiverevision over 25 years of existence and faculty have participated in national initiatives toimprove ethics education in engineering in recent years. The National Academy ofEngineering’s Infusing Ethics into the Development of Engineers workshop brought togetherprofessors and curriculum designers from around the country to share strategies and brainstormabout ways to design and teach ethics curriculum for engineers. I participated with colleaguesfrom Colorado School of Mines and published our course
from faculty orstudents. In the 2000-2001 academic year, the engineering and communications facultycollaborated in teaching a series of four workshops to give practical advice on the Page 7.851.2communications topics of greatest concern to graduate students: communications in Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ã 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationteaching, writing the thesis or dissertation, writing for publication, and career-relatedwriting. The sequence of topics was designed to fit the typical timelines in graduate work,with teaching
requirements, course selection degree or certificatecompletion, and career planning. Faculty advising is a shared responsibility between the student,student services, and the faculty mentor. All ET students develop a learning contract with theirfaculty mentor that lays out the program and the requirements to successfully complete theiracademic goals in the new OEOE format. The ET program created a guidance sheet to share withall student services advisors so that they can discuss the ET degree with students seekingprogram and career guidance. Students interested in ET complete online college orientation andare then directed to the Engineering Technology department to develop their learning contract,complete program orientation, and the registration
. During each lecture two faculty members from the department will present their interests Page 12.1347.4and research areas. In addition to scientific research topics, lectures are included that deal withethics, entrepreneurship, industrial relationships and socioeconomic issues. Listed below is thetopics list for the 2007 class:• Blood Substitutes and the Design of Oxygen Non-carrying and Carrying fluids.• Medical Devices: Saving and Improving Lives.• Introduction to Stem Cells.• The Nanoscale Nervous System and Engineering Approaches for Interfacing with it.• Network Biology.• Finding the Origin of Inflammation: The Key to Disease
that the engineer of the 21st century must bemore than a skilled technician. This course uses transportation and environmental engineeringprojects to bring into focus the many historical, societal, legal, ethical, business, environmental,and cultural issues that impact engineering projects.Educational ObjectivesBucknell’s civil engineering ABET accredited program includes a program educational objectivewhich states: Graduates of the Civil Engineering program will demonstrate professional responsibility and sensitivity to a broad range of societal concerns such as ethical, environmental, economic, regulatory and global issues.In addition to on-campus activities used to enable our students to meet this objective, thedepartment recognized
, praised a membership drive that resulted in over 1,000 new members in a singleyear.[3] By the beginning of the 1970s, ASEE membership stood at 12,157 individual membersand 562 institutional members, which is close to current (2016) totals.The early 1960s saw growing public interest in science, engineering and technology in thecontext of the Cold War rivalry between the U.S. and Soviet Union. The U.S. government,concerned about recent Soviet achievements in science and engineering, especially in space andmilitary technologies, greatly increased funding for research and education. Federal funding forR&D increased from $74 million in 1940 to $12 billion in 1963, or about 13 percent of totalfederal expenditures.[4] In July 1964, the National
think about new and innovativeways to increase the number of students in any electronics area without regard to whetherit is in electrical engineering, electronic engineering technology, or electronicstechnology. This means we are not concerned with the particular degree to whichstudents aspire, as long as they select a specialization within electronics (this approachbenefits electronics all levels – local, state, and national).We also need to be able to differentiate our programs from the vocational, the AAS andthe B.S. degrees in engineering. We need to design a vertical integration plan that invites Page 13.221.2students that are most suited to
same can be said for teacher professional developmentand continuing education programs that were disrupted in the first half of 2020. In the monthsthat followed, the education community rallied and instructors in almost every discipline andgrade level became familiar with new technology for distance learning. This paper reports on theshift to virtual instruction for a series of renewable energy professional development workshopstargeting STEM faculty, and summarizes some of the lessons learned from the experience.Background on the two collaborating organizationsFor many years, the CREATE Energy Center (CreateEnergy.org) and KidWind(www.KidWind.org) have delivered faculty professional development programs in solarphotovoltaics and wind energy
incorporated in other sections of the Introduction toEngineering Course. In addition, new modules are being developed, some of which are being ledby faculty teaching other sections which is aiding the institutionalization of the effort. Interestratings from past semesters are informing the choice of topics. Over the next few years data willbe collected to evaluate effects on retention in engineering and STEM fields in general. Themodules are also being used as part of outreach efforts such as engineering summer camps forhigh school seniors and recent graduates. Acknowledgements:This project was funded by the National Science Foundation, NUE # 1446060 with Dr. VirginiaDavis as PI.Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in
THE GLOBAL AND SOCIETAL CHALLENGE – AN INNOVATIVE APPROACH TO ABET CRITERION 3.H AND BEYOND* Larry J. Shuman, Bopaya Bidanda, Katherine Thomes and Lawrence Feick School of Engineering/Katz Graduate School of Business University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA 15261AbstractThe new ABET criteria combined with an increasing concern about engineering jobs moving“off shore” are causing some engineering schools to seriously consider an internationalexperience as part of their educational program. These could involve a range of alternatives from“teaser” trips of two or three weeks, an international co-op or internship opportunity
by Dr. B. Samuel Tannenbaum, Professor ofEngineering and former Dean of Faculty at Harvey Mudd College.The National Advisory Council was created so that the Rowan Engineering Programs wouldincorporate the most successful innovations in engineering education and facilities, and meet allof the accreditation criteria of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET).Within CEE, two separate options were developed – general civil engineering and environmentalengineering. After the engineering faculty began to arrive at Rowan University in the Fall of1995, changes in the original curricula were made based on the input of the new faculty. Thesechanges were carefully considered and much of the original curricula developed by the
-section disparity was a common concern raised by the studentsthroughout the semester, since several faculty members are required to handle the highenrollment. A course coordinator was tasked to organize and oversee the multiple sections, butinconsistencies in pace and depth of the material presentation were inevitable and common.Some instructors chose to introduce some form of active learning problems during lecture wherethe students worked on their own or in informal groups on an example problem, while otherslectured the entire period and worked example problems directly. Increased exposure to exampleproblems was another common student request considered in the course revision. Course RevisionThe plan to improve the course involved arranging
questions formed into a report can clearly indicatewhat the work experience has meant to them. Instead of just being comfortable with a goodpaycheck, students have some very tangible reasons to make intelligent judgements on the value ofthe experience.An additional issue that is discussed with the students before they begin work is the level of theirtechnical experience. Many faculty express concern regarding the extent of the technicalexperience. Since the students coming from the College of Engineering at Michigan StateUniversity will ultimately graduate as engineers, it is important that the experiences that theyencounter reflect work in the engineering world. The questions that require reflection on the level ofengineering performed by the
hasreached a new high.Using research on contextual learners, student retention, and the 21st Century workplace, a newcurriculum has been designed that focuses on an integrated, problem-based approach. Two majorinstructional components are completed: Technology Gateway and the first-year engineeringtechnology core, called the ET Core. Both curriculum components model the workplace throughthe use of industrial-type problems in the curriculum and student and faculty teams in theclassroom. The general education requirements of physics, mathematics and communications aretaught concurrently with technology in the context of solving workplace-related problems. TheET Core consists of eleven courses. The Technology Gateway serves as a pre
engineering activity. A new 30,000 sq.ft. building was nearingcompletion and two issues were being addressed: an outdoor art piece needed to be placed in frontof the building as per requirements by the university to provide 1\2 percent of the building’sconstruction cost to visible public art work. This was accomplished through the purchase of avibrant sculpture created by Charles McGee, a prominent artist from the Detroit area and shown inFigure 1. As with the artwork placed across campus since the mid 1990s, the McGee sculpturepresented a clear statement that there were definite ties between various disciplines across campus,especially with engineering and art. The visible nature of the art displays made it clear to allentering non art oriented
. Herzog, University of Indianapolis Joseph B. Herzog is an Assistant professor in the R.B. Annis School of Engineering at the University of Indianapolis. He chose to come to the University of Indianapolis because he is passionate about teaching, is excited about the direction of the new R.B. Annis School of Engineering, is glad to return to his engi- neering roots, and is happy to be close to his extended family. Previously he was an Assistant Professor in the Department of Physics at the University of Arkansas. He is truly grateful for his time at the University of Arkansas, and enjoyed his department, students, and the campus. While in Fayetteville, he also served as a faculty in the Microelectronics-Photonics
the second semester of the sequence. The TATteam is composed of three individuals: the instructor of the senior design course, a facultyadvisor who has expertise germane to the project, and a “sponsor” who focuses on deliverablesand the quality of the final product. Using weekly, thirty-minute TAT meetings the studentsreport progress through a presentation of deliverables, discussion of issues and concerns, andcreation of action items. The results of this new process have been excellent. The quality andsuccess of senior design projects has increased dramatically. The results of most of the projectsare now a source of pride for the students and often lead to funded projects within the programs.In this paper, details of the new process will be
, theprogram faculty consist of members from chemical engineering, electrical engineering,mechanical engineering, industrial and systems engineering, civil engineering, andenvironmental sciences and policy. Program faculty worked the remainder of 2011 and into 2012to develop a curriculum that integrated technical fundamentals and some advanced topics fromexisting courses, economic analysis from existing Engineering Economy and Economics ofEnergy courses, a revived Engineering and Public Policy course, a new Applied SystemsEngineering course, and a few Energy Engineering specific courses on Fuel and EnergyConversions. A flowchart of the current curriculum is included as an Appendix to this paper.It is important to note that the program is substantially
andengineering provides the necessary perspective and a solid credibility - “It’s nice to be taught byan education Ph.D. who knows what she’s talking about.” A staff of seven additional TAFellows are selected each year and are assigned, along with the Head TA Fellow, as pairs to workas co-facilitators for the training workshops. The program began as a lecture series run by theengineering faculty with little involvement of graduate students, but with evaluations like, "Weneed more practical advice from current TAs...In general, administrative type speakers were outof touch with our concerns," graduate students became involved as TA Fellows who could speakfrom recent experience and provide a less intimidating environment than faculty. Initially
the most controversial one to address. If technology orengineering-related topics are to be included in the general education curriculum, one will findmany objecting voices to the replacement of traditional fields of study with the new materials. Acompromise on this issue is hard to achieve. An unconventional way to solve this problem is tostructure a technical section of freshman preceptorial that can be taken by those who desire it. Asthese technology and engineering-related topics gain acceptability and popularity, it can become apermanent fixture in the general education curriculum.The third concern is somewhat problematic because it may involve “turf battles”. Theconventional fields of general education are traditionally taught by