synchronized AC power goinginto the building. A data acquisition system was also incorporated with the inverters using theSunny Boy Control Plus which also provides extra analog and digital channels for increased datamonitoring. The Sunny Boy Control Plus provides communication between the Sunny Boyinverters and the Sunny Boy Control through a RS485 cable we installed and routed to a PC datastorage system.System Installation and Start-upFaculty encouraged a practice trial-assembly of some PV modules to the mounting framing.This was done in the Alternative Energy Laboratory prior to system installation on the roof toassure the function and assembly of the mounting system. This also helped students working onthe installation understand the system set-up
” section. Also, students completed a survey on site usage and impact onlearning. The paper concludes with recent developments in the site and future directions.II. Course Topics and Motivation for Web Based InstructionThis course prepares he student to consider the economic dimensions in the evaluation ofengineering alternatives. Hence it is particularly useful in the analysis and decision stages of theengineering design process. Emphasis is on the analytical consideration of money and its impacton the areas of system operations and acquisition.The course is taught in 4 related lesson blocks. Block 1, The Time Value of Money, providesstudents with the quantitative methods for economic analysis of engineering alternatives. Block2, Analysis Methods
technology seems to be increasingly central in theeducation process. The U.S. Department of Education reports that “Used to support bothteaching and learning, technology infuses classrooms with digital learning tools, … courseofferings, experiences, and learning materials; … this technology infusion builds 21st centuryskills; increases student engagement and motivation; and accelerates learning.”[2]Increased use of technology by students has expanded opportunities to enhance student success.Today’s students are technologically literate as indicated by their ownership and extensive use oftechnological devices. Based on the 13th annual College Explorer survey administered andanalyzed by the marketing agency re:fuel, “Technology is facilitating
Native American PacificIslander-Serving Institutions Program.” Accessed: Jul. 31, 2023. [Online].[20] L. Whiting, “Semi-structured interviews: guidance for novice researchers,” NursingStandard, vol. 22, no. 23, pp. 35–40, 2008.[21] S. Secules et al., “Positionality practices and dimensions of impact on equity research: Acollaborative inquiry and call to the community,” J of Engineering Edu, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 19–43, Jan. 2021.[22] J. A. Leydens, K. E. Johnson, and B. M. Moskal, “Engineering student perceptions of socialjustice in a feedback control systems course,” J Eng Educ, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 718–749, Jul.2021.[23] M. E. Cardwell, “Examining interracial family narratives using critical multiracial theory,”Review of Communication, vol. 21
bettersupport undergraduate engineering students from all backgrounds and preparations to succeed?” Guidedby the educational literature on teaching through Inquiry, the investigators of the ITL training planunpacked their current understandings and pedagogical practices in collaboration with their colleagues. Toanswer their inquiries, new tools were developed to elicit student prior knowledge and learningexperiences and to illuminate data trends. Instructors were able to theorize on how students learn andstudents were able to communicate and explain their level of learning engagement and study habits. Fromthis ITL approach came proof-of-concept processes that are the foundation for ITL, as well as timelychanges to how CSE12 is taught, a shift from
equipment requirements (bothfilming equipment and equipment used in the video lesson). A typical day on-set included 1-2hours of transportation and setup, 2-5 hours of filming, and 1-2 hours of teardown. Multiple takesand incremental re-shoots were done for each video, with the GMU-TV team coaching theperformers on delivery techniques, and faculty/subject matter experts on hand to clarify anycontent issues that arose.Figure 1: Venue 1 – Engineering building electronics laboratory during build video with on-screengraduate student talent and GMU-TV team (left); engineering building atrium during videodemonstrating impact of helium purity on forces on a balloon with undergraduate student talentand GMU-TV team (right).Figure 2: Venue 2 – Two settings
of the Linear Algebra and Quantum Mechanicsconcepts.The objective of homework assignments 3, 4, and 5 is to integrate theoretical concepts withhands-on applications, facilitating a better understanding of quantum computer concepts andchallenges.In Homework 3, the question emphasized the exploration of quantum principles, analysis ofquantum states, understanding the impact of parameter change engaging in simulation on theQuantum Spice tool developed by IBM. The objective of this homework was to provide studentswith practical insights into the behavior of superconducting qubits and their interactions withmicrowave resonators. To assist the students in navigating through this simulation tool, a step by-step guide was provided by the
on Science and Technology.Tallon, A., Head and heart: Affection, cognition, volition as triune consciousness. 1997: Fordham Univ Press.Vescio, Vicki, Dorene Ross, and Alyson Adams. "A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning." Teaching and teacher education 24.1 (2008): 80- 91.Zhao, Chun-Mei, and George D. Kuh. "Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement." Research in Higher Education 45.2 (2004): 115-138. Page 26.915.10
learning strategies9. Also, APAscan be designed to simulate social interaction that may facilitate learners to engage in thelearning task and to enhance learning in computer-based environments10. Several studies havetested the persona hypothesis which posits that the visual presence of an APA in an interactivelearning environment promotes students’ learning and positive perception of the learningexperience11,12. A few experimental studies found that the presence of an APA improveslearning compared to no-agent conditions13,14,15,16,17, and that an agent improves studentattitudes18. Even though studies reported a positive effect of the presence of an APA on studentlearning and attitudes, the gender, age, and appearance of the APA remain open
countries. As these newlearning platforms are the price of a textbook or less, thousands of students each year are beinggiven the opportunity to learn in this exciting new pedagogical environment. In all cases inwhich hands-on learning has been studied, the pedagogy has been successfully implemented,even in traditionally theory-only based courses, with more engaged students and instructorshands-on learning as one of the results. Although the initial assessments of this new approach toSTEM education argue for broad application, the definitive case for its adoption has yet to bedocumented so that all STEM educators can fully appreciate its merit. Thus, the most effectiveapproach to STEM education is still in question in the broader community and best
the desktop prototyping process, students will be able to explore multiple designsand experiment with newly developed manufacturing techniques. As a result, we believe studentswill gain confidence and motivation toward engineering product design. Using these lower-costdesktop CNC machines, the science and engineering of modern prototyping and manufacturingwill be presented, thereby allowing students to experience an integrated, hands-on, design-oriented environment with the aim to engage students’ critical thinking abilities.2 Desktop CNC TechnologyComputer Numerical Control (CNC) machines are used extensively in modern manufacturing toenable the fabrication of complex parts. These machines were introduced in the 1940s, usingpunched tapes
Ebony O. McGee is an Assistant Professor of Diversity and Urban Schooling at Vanderbilt University’s Peabody College and a member of Scientific Careers Research and Development Group at Northwestern University. She received her Ph.D. in Mathematics Education from the University of Illinois at Chicago; and she was a National Academy of Education/Spencer Foundation Postdoctoral Fellow and a National Science Foundation Postdoctoral Fellow. As a former electrical engineer, she is concerned with sci- ence, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) learning and participation among historically marginalized students of color. Her research focuses on the role of racialized experiences and biases in STEM educational and
fellows, withmetro-Atlanta area high schools. STEP is funded by a National Science Foundation(NSF) grant that aims to improve STEP fellows teaching-related communication andleadership skills by providing teaching and leadership training via a one-year teachingassistantship in a metro-Atlanta area high school1. This study was conducted by a currentSTEP fellow (2008-2009), a STEP fellow alumni (2005-2006), and a GaTech staffmember.Structure of After-School Engineering ClubThe after-school engineering club is a sub-program, Pre-College Initiative (PCI), within alarger international engineering organization. The goal of the PCI program is toencourage students in grades K–12 to attend college and pursue technical degrees. ThePCI program was designed
the communication of informationabout the locality, and the elaboration of projects to contribute to local development. Besidesplacing value on local actors’ rights, they also seek to generate commitments andaccountability in them to achieve sustainable solutions [11].There are three stages for the development of projects with participatory methodologies: 1.Reconnaissance of the space, its problems and possibilities; 2. Dialogues, agreements,consensuses and commitments; and 3. Development of an urban project. These stages are notsequential and can be revisited during the process.2.- A baseline assessment of the Civil Engineering students ability for multidisciplinaryand participatory workIn order to create a baseline, an exit survey was
collaborations issparse, the nature of the problems reported with this type of activity indicates that studentsare likely to be subject to some adverse effects. The potential impact that such problemscould have on the education of students, particularly given that student research andrecruitment opportunities are among the much vaunted benefits of collaboration, suggestedthat further study in this area was warranted. The case study research reported belowconsiders university-industry collaborative projects primarily from the perspective of thepost-graduate students engaged in them. By approaching collaboration from this littlerecognised perspective, this exploratory research has lead to the development of somepreliminary guidelines designed to aid in
national PreK-12 science curriculum. Career and TechnicalEducation (CTE) programs often collaborate with community colleges to offer dual credit engineeringcourses. Additionally, some universities offer for-credit, engineering summer school courses to highschool students. Two Advanced Placement (AP) computer science courses are currently taught in highschools and plans are underway for an AP engineering course. As these dual credit programs develop, itis important to understand how they prepare the pathway to an undergraduate engineering major,particularly if they are designed to replace the on campus introduction to engineering course. Universityengineering first-year programs are critical to the retention and success of engineering students in
impact of engineering solutions on society (ABET EC2000 Criterion 3h). The ability to acquire new knowledge and capabilities on their own (ABET 9 EC2000 Criterion 3i). Knowledge of contemporary issues facing society (ABET EC2000 Criterion 10 3j). The ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary 11 for engineering practice (ABET EC2000 Criterion 3k). The ability to use computers effectively as a tool in engineering practice for analysis, design, research, and communication (ABET EC2000 Criterion 12 3k). A significant exposure to a foreign culture to provide a better awareness of 13 the global context of engineering practice (ABET EC2000 Criterion 3h
undergraduateswere enrolled in Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs)—institutions with at least 25% HA studentenrollment. In Tennessee, these statistics are close to the national rates; as of 2022, 21.9% of HAaged 25 or older had earned a bachelor’s degree, compared to the statewide rate of 31%. Whilenot being an HSI, the University of Tennessee, Knoxville (UTK), was the institution in the statewith the second-largest HA undergraduate enrollment during the 2021–2022 academic year, witha total of 1,375 students, representing about 6% of the student body [1]-[4].When the deep desire to make an impact on the HA community in East Tennessee emerged inthe summer of 2019, UTK hosted approximately 29,000 students23,000 undergraduate and6,000 graduate students, 4.4
many more organizations with missions regardingBlack culture as well as events and programs geared toward Black culture13. It may be intuitivethat Black students at HBCUs are less likely to rely on the “prove them wrong syndrome” whenthey are not in proximity to individuals who may hold negative stereotypes about them; however,stereotype threat theory suggests that even these students are aware of negative stereotypes aboutBlacks and academic achievement and might therefore be afflicted with the “prove them wrongsyndrome.” It is also possible that attending an HBCU might make students aware of the valueof social responsibility towards the Black community and that this notion may supersede that of“proving them wrong”.PurposeThe purpose of this
NIH proposal on a new project. Thisassignment serves a different goal with the student’s clinical mentors taking on the role of keyopinion leaders in the field. While this guidance is one source of data for the assignment, thestudents also make their own observations bringing their own expertise; and additionally, otherinfluences from the scientific community are also consulted. The course is completed with thelast assignment with students authoring a mock R21 grant proposal, including project summary,biosketch for the student, budget, specific aims, research strategy, and references. This serves asa culmination point for the program with the student really bringing together all components oftheir immersion into a high impact exploratory
(SES) is a measure of anindividual or family’s relative economic and social ranking6.While SES research relative to education is abundant, SES research relative to students’experiences in higher education is not3. That which does exist is often inconsistent3, no doubt inpart because of the difficulties in defining student SES. Walpole3 investigated high and low SESstudents at American universities in a longitudinal study focusing on their collegiate experiencesand their “outcomes of college”: income and graduate school aspirations and fulfillment. Shefound differences in grade point averages, types of activities the students engaged in – and theirpost-undergraduate incomes and educational attainment. Ethington and Smart7 similarly foundthat
dimension, you are guidedthrough multiple questions or suggestions that stimulate your mind and that may lead tosolutions.”6 The dimensions are 1) Uniqueness, 2) Dimensionality, 3) Directionality, 4)Consolidation, 5) Segmentation, 6) Modification, 7) Similarity, and 8) Experimentation. Amajor portion of the lectures is devoted solely to this method, which include solving 3-D puzzlesand engaging in team-based games and tasks that relate to each dimension. Students use thismethod to solve several problems, including “how to improve a sprinkler system” and “create anideal neighborhood”. For more information on this method, readers are encouraged to refer to aprevious paper written by the first author 9.Class ActivitiesBesides simply teaching
the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at USAFA initiated aninnovative concept in higher education: The Field Engineering and Readiness Laboratory, morecommonly referred to as FERL. FERL is a direct result of the vision and dedicated effort ofRetired Brigadier General David O. Swint to improve the learning of students in this uniquecourse. The course is described in general by Wambeke (2022) while Meade et al. (2000)describe the geotechnical activities and Kuennen and Barrett (2003) give a detailed descriptionof the concrete beam activity.FERL is a three semester-hour course where engineering practice and education are uniquelycombined in a hands-on construction environment. Each summer, rising civil engineeringjuniors engage
havenow become common place. As an assessment approach a simple scoring rubric issuggested to facilitate instructor scoring and to encourage more engaged thinking on thepart of the students.Exercise and Assessment MethodThis work reports a student activity and assessment method which aims to promotecritical thinking in a sociotechnical context linking ABET Criterion 3 Outcome (h) to thethree dimensions of technological literacy envisioned in Tech Tally.To promote and measure the extent to which students in Introduction to Engineering“understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context,”students are be asked to predict some possible impacts of an engineering solution. In thiscase, understanding will be equated with an
collective resources, including the languages practices and culturalunderstandings of their communities. The social dynamics involved in peer interaction, andmediated through language, have the potential to create a supportive atmosphere where learnersfeel safe to take intellectual risks in STEM-related concepts and practices. Research on peerinteraction in informal learning environments, where students may engage in self-directedexploration and experimentation, is critical for understanding the role of everyday activities inengineering education in multilingual and multidialectic contexts. Our work focuses on howlanguage-minoritized learners engage with one another in informal engineering learningenvironments to make sense of the world around them
board. Thereare eight different criteria applicable for the baccalaureate programs and of those eight, Criterion3 focuses on student outcomes. The seven student outcomes put forward by ABET are as follows[1]: 1. an ability to identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems by applying principles of engineering, science, and mathematics. 2. an ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors. 3. an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences. 4. an ability to recognize ethical and professional
of paper reviews. I did use active learning techniques and the students responded veryfavorably to this. These techniques included individual quizzes followed by group quizzeson selected reading assignments, small group consensus building activities on selected topics,etc. It was very rewarding to watch the students interact and become cohesive, especiallysince they spanned a range of ages and academic levels from pre-diplome to post-doctorate.My intensive short course was on a technology we are developing at my home universityknown as Surfactant Enhanced Soil Remediation. This course was taught as a two-dayintensive course to make it available to both the university community and the private sector.A total of sixteen participants were in
environment. The course is divided into four modules: 1) Societal Impacts of Technology,2) Privacy and Surveillance, 3) Data & Algorithms, and 4) Ethics. This study focuses on theSocietal Impacts of Technology and introduces Ethical decision-making concepts. The contentassigned each week included assigned readings, including both journal and news articles,discussion posts, and homework assignments to scaffold learning, leading up to the goal of creatingan individual concept map. Toward the end of the module, the group role-plays activity served asa culminating experience to synthesize all the material covered in the module and allow studentsto engage with several roles and the perspectives therein. Students were given several resources toallow
outcome is evaluated based on astudent survey collected over an academic year, which compares traditional teaching methodswith active learning methods in terms of ethical understanding and team collaboration. Thesurvey indicates that 92% of students strongly agree that learning ethics through role-playingleads to a better understanding of ethical responsibility, the impact of biased perceptions andsocial upbringing. Additionally, the survey suggests that to enhance students’ ethical awareness, astudent-centered active learning workshop focusing on the NSPE and IEEE code of ethics wouldbe more effective than quizzes or case studies assignments.Introduction:In the modern world, engineers design and contribute solutions to many of the world’s
Universityas a result of research, attendance at workshops and conferences resulting in adopting newpractices that include active and engaging learning methods.7,8,15,33 Some of these are describedby Marshall and Marshall in “Crucial Teaching Strategies for Engineering Educators”.18 Thefocus is on learning-centered teaching, with Problem Based Learning, Group Learning andproper teaching preparation. The teaching techniques include the “Seven Good Practices” forTeachers, presented in different ways over the last decade, along with teaching with hospitality,listening, and assessment of the students’ learning. These strategies with a ‘learning notteaching’ focus have permeated teaching philosophy and practice. In research that includedstudent feedback