years and has worked in both manufacturing and construction. He has served on a multitude of committees and has been recognized for his service with such awards as the Association of Texas Technology Education Hall of Honor in 2001 and the International Technology Education Association’s 1999 Leader to Watch.Pam Newberry, Project Lead The Way Pam B. Newberry is the Director of Pre-Engineering Curriculum for Project Lead The Way, Inc. PLTW is a non-profit 501 (c)(3) organization that provides pre-engineering curricula for schools in 47 states and over 1600 schools. Prior to joining PLTW in July 2002, she served as the Associate Director for the International Technology Education
of structures, and engineering education.Dr. Akinyele Oni, Morgan State University Dr. Akinyele Oni is a faculty in the department of Biology at Morgan State University, Baltimore, Mary- land. He earned academic degrees in the Biological Sciences, Chemical Sciences, Criminal Justice (Foren- sics), and Bio-Environmental Sciences at B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. levels respectively. Having worked in the c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #31691 Industrial and Manufacturing sectors of food processing, brewery, and ink manufacture for two decades, the combined knowledge from
, respectively. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Implementing Agile Methodologies in Project-Based Learning LaboratoryIn this study, students at Engineering Dynamics, a distance-learning course offered toengineering technology students, were engaged in a design-based laboratory assignment. Teamsof students from multiple campuses worked on design, manufacturing, and testing of a dynamicmechanism. Due to the cross-campus collaborative nature of this project and in the absence oflittle to no face-to-face interaction between team members, a key factor in success of the teamwas to manage team effort through an effective project management strategy. As a solution,ideas from agile way of thinking were
provide I- O & HR services and third-party grant evaluation. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Two-Year College and External Project Manager: An Innovative Partnership for Implementing a Federal Grant ProjectAbstractThe objective of this paper is to share a case study of a rural community college who partneredwith an external project manager to implement a large grant project. The project was funded by athree-year federal grant, with a budget over half a million dollars. The external projectmanagement partnership, though not planned in the original project proposal
criterion 2 and criterion 3, respectively. Starting in the 2008-09 evaluationcycle, some changes were made to the general EAC requirements. The requirements for evaluationof PEOs and POs were removed from criteria 2 and 3 and became a part of requirements for anadded criterion 4-Contineous Improvement. The title of Program Outcomes and ProfessionalComponents were changed to Student Outcomes (SO) and Curriculum, respectively. Since 2008-09 accreditation cycle, the EAC general criteria included the following eight (8) components: (1)students, (2) Program Educational Objectives (PEO), (3) Student Outcomes (SO) (4) ContinuousImprovement, (5) Curriculum, (6) Faculty, (7) Facilities, and (8) Institutional Support.3During 2012-13 evaluation cycle, ABET
Moscow, 117829 Russia ABSTRACTNon Destructive Testing (NDT) is a technology of significant importance for determining theintegrity of engineering materials in a myriad of applications. NDT has become inherent tovirtually every process in industry where the condition of parts and assemblies need to beevaluated in order to determine their usefulness and serviceability. The testing of materials playsa significant role in design and manufacture of engineering equipment and, therefore, it is anessential ingredient of engineering education and training. This paper presents a simple,inexpensive and effective method to convey the underlying science of penetrant
spreadsheetUse of the data 1) Graph and tabulate to support A thru K subject mastery 2) Comparison of pass rate with national averageCorrelation to program and department goals 1) Demonstration data for TC2k Criterion I: a, b, f, h, k 2) Program Educational Objectives: Not Yet Available 3) Department Goals: Not Yet AvailableAlternate exams 1) GRE 2) NICET MET or MFET exam 3) CEI exam (SME) 4) Quality 5) Fluid power 6) CPIM, etc. (APICS) 7) FE (EIT) 8) AutoCAD certification examEvaluation and Assessment of Data Data on the last SME exam results comes from the Manufacturing Engineering Certification Institute (MECI) 4
, prototyping, program development, crafting interactive curricula, and bringing ideas to fruition. With over 8 years of experience in Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, Anand possesses a solid background in Innovation and Entrepreneurship education, Additive Manufacturing, and Digital Fabrication technologies. His academic credentials include an M.S. in Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering from New York University and a B.E in Mechanical Engineering from Anna University.Dr. Curtis Abel, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Curtis Abel, PhD, MBA is the Executive Director of the Innovation and Entrepreneurship Center (I&E) at WPI. He is responsible for the I&E eco-system, Value Creation Initiative, Maker Space &
EML is a promising candidate forintegrating entrepreneur and industry-oriented thinking into engineering education, rigorousdesign and careful distribution of the content is necessary to successfully instill EML outcomes[4], [11], [12]. EML modules have been developed across multiple engineering programs, mostnotably for BME due to a particularly dense curriculum requiring equal parts basic biology andengineering courses.Figure 1: Flowchart illustrating entrepreneurial mindset (EML) strategy. Curiosity towards asubject motivates the discovery of connections between problem solving and building knowledge.Societal value can be created using this feedback loop and motivate additional improvements ofdesign opportunities. We previously
Exam 25 %Course Objective:The objective of this course is to introduce students to the history and heritage of civil,environmental, mechanical, electrical, industrial, manufacturing, and chemical engineering.Expected Outcome:Students will be able to discuss history and heritage of civil, environmental, mechanical,electrical, industrial, manufacturing, and chemical engineering.Engineering Program Outcomes;ABET general outcomes:(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility(g) an ability to communicate effectively(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a globaland societal context(i) a recognition of the need for, and an
assignment in the student’s area of interest. Upper-division generaleducational requirements may be accomplished by completing a minor in EngineeringManagement. Table 1 – Senior Electives within MET Curriculum Manufacturing Systems Mechanical Systems Design MET 400, Computer Numerical Control in Production MET 440, Heat Transfer MET 410, Advanced Manufacturing ProcessesMET 460, Refrigeration and AC MET 415, Introduction to Robotics MET 450, Energy Systems MET 430, Mechanical Subsystem Design MET 430, Mechanical Subsystem Design MET 445, Computer Integrated Manufacturing EET 360, Elect. Power &
in 2009 for excellence in mechanical engineering technology education, serving as a member of the Vision 2030 Task Force, serving as chair of the Committee on Engineering Technology Accreditation, serving on the Board of Directors of the ASME Center for Education, and as a member of the Mechanical Engineer- ing Technology Department Head Committee. He has been a program evaluator for both the Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME) and ASME, served on the Engineering Technology Accreditation Coun- cil (ETAC) of ABET, representing ASME, and will begin serving on the ETAC Executive Committee in July 2013. He also serves on the SME’s Manufacturing Education and Research Community steering committee. Before
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Robotics Engineering as an Undergraduate Major: A 5 year RetrospectiveAbstract:In 2007 Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI) launched a degree program in RoboticsEngineering to educate young men and women in robotics. At that time, there were only ahandful of universities in Asia, Europe, and Oceania offering undergraduate Robotics programs,although many universities in the United States and elsewhere included robotics within adiscipline such as Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, or Mechanical Engineering. WPItook a decidedly different approach. We introduced Robotics as a new multi-disciplinaryengineering discipline to meet the needs of 21st century engineering. The curriculum
a new level, integrating the strengths ofthe two institutions and creating fully, a new option in baccalaureate education for students fromArizona and around the world.ASU relocated the School of Agribusiness and the School of Technology, their programs, labs,courses, faculty, staff and students to the new site. CGCC init ially designated the Williamscampus as a satellite campus to offer its aviation and semiconductor manufacturing programs.However, rather than merely working side-by-side, ASU East and CGCC have converted thesimple fact of co-location into a zestful reality of co-operation through the innovative NewPartnership in Baccalaureate Education. Thus, the new partnership formalizes what studentshave been doing informally for years
Engineering at East Carolina University. She received a MS in Chemical Engineering from NC State University. Her research interests focus on biomaterials and bioprocessing. Educational efforts include the development of a bioprocess engineering laboratory, engineering program outreach, as well as curriculum development.Gene Dixon, East Carolina University Gene Dixon is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering at East Carolina University. He received a BS in Material Engineering from Auburn University, an MBA from Nova Southeastern and a PhD in Industrial and System Engineering and Engineering Management from the University of Alabama – Huntsville. His professional experience
]. Much engineering design is done in the senior-level capstonedesign courses. However during the sophomore and junior years, a typical engineering curriculumis packed with courses that are heavy in theory but light in design and hands-on related activities.Integrating design experience into engineering curricula has been a long standing ABETaccreditation concern and an active research subject. A practice-based curriculum “theory meetspractice” enhanced by students’ access to advanced manufacturing facilities was created byconsortium of engineering colleges, national laboratories and premier US industries namedManufacturing Engineering Education Partnership (MEEP) [4]. A Northwestern UniversityInstitute for Design Engineering and Applications
SoutheasternLouisiana University (SLU) have initiated a joint project to build computing facilities and curricular programswhich will provide outstanding educational opportunities for computer science and industrial technology majors.Among the aims of this collaboration is to create a model computer integrated manufacturing facility, built onexisting and recently acquired equipment and facilities. Moreover, this project is a part of an IntegratedUndergraduate Technology-Rich Curriculum. In its publication Report on the National Science Foundation Disciplinary Workshops onUndergraduate Education [2] the National Science Foundation had this to say about undergraduate computerscience laboratory facilities: “The laboratory infrastructure is not in
, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. New Directions for Chemical Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26342. 2. Davis, S.N., Jacobsen, S.K. Curricular Integration as Innovation: Faculty Insights on Barriers to Institutionalizing Change. Innov High Educ 39, 17–31 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-013-9254-3 3. S. Brooman, S. Darwent & A. Pimor (2015) The student voice in higher education curriculum design: is there value in listening?, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52:6, 663-674, https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.910128 4. Campbell, F., Beasley, L., Eland, J., & Rumpus, A. (2007). Hearing the student voice: Promoting and
May 23, 2019]9. B. Ropers-Huilman, L. Carwile, and M. Lima. Service-learning in engineering: A valuable pedagogy for achieving professional standards. European Journal of Engineering Education, vol.30, pp. 155-165, 2005.10. L. Petry, M. Pinnell, M.S. Franco, B. Doudican, A. Mian, and R. Srinivasan. “Collaborated community-based research experiences in materials and manufacturing,” in Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2017.11. J. Eyler and D.E. Giles. Where’s the Learning in Service-Learning?, San Francisco: Jossey- Bass, 1999.12. I. Basolo, J. A. Toft-Nielson, and S. D. Evans. “Engagement in practice: Academic service in a sophomore-level mechanical engineering measurements lab”, in Proceedings of ASEE
," J. of Engineering Education, ASEE, Vol. 87. NO.2, 1998.4. Shaeiwitz, " Classroom Assessment," ," J. of Engineering Education, ASEE, Vol. 87. NO.2, 1998.5. McKenna and Agogino, " Integrating Design, Analysis, and Problem Solving in an Introduction to Engineering Curriculum " ASEE proceedings, 19986. West Point Bridge Designer, Dept. of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, USMA, West Point, NY 10996Biographical InformationISMAIL I. ORABI, Professor of Mechanical Engineering at University of New Haven. He received his Ph.D. fromClarkson University, and his MS degree from the State University of New York and B.S. from Cairo Institute ofTechnology, all in Mechanical Engineering. In the past 10 years, He has established three
consented with theinterviewer that the course content would apply to their career goals, Stephanie declared, “Notfor me.” Interviewer: So does this (the course curriculum) apply at all to your career goals? Kirk: Yes. (Other two male students also nodded in approval). Stephanie: Not for me. Interviewer: No? How come? Stephanie: I think I’m going on into manufacturing. Unless I’m manufacturing some military technology which I don’t plan on it. Because I couldn’t live with myself if I manufactured guns or something like that. Kirk may think differently. But unless I go into some military class, it wouldn’t really apply to me. It was very interesting though. Selena, a female student in 2017
Engineering and a Doctor of Science in Pedagogy degree from Moscow State Pedagogical University. His research interests include functional analysis, topology, ap- plied mathematics, nanosciences, psychology of mathematics education, using technology in teaching mathematics, training mathematics teachers and curriculum development. In each of these areas he has publications including 6 books and 60 peer reviewed papers. Though his scholarly work is related mostly to theoretical and applied mathematics as well psychology of mathematics education, he has extensive experience working with and supervising engineering and computer science programs, including success- ful ABET accreditations for both engineering and CS programs
State of New Jersey and has over 19 years of experience in the design, testing, manufacturing, and inspection of Medical Devices. Dr. Lieber has worked directly as a Product and Process Development Engineer in New Jersey’s Medical Device Industry and continues to consult on Advanced Manufacturing and Design projects.Dr. Ashish D Borgaonkar, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Ashish Borgaonkar works as Asst. Professor of Engineering Education at the New Jersey Institute of Technology’s Newark College of Engineering located in Newark, New Jersey. He has developed and taught several engineering courses primarily in first-year engineering, civil and environmental engineer- ing, and general engineering. He has won
reconfigurable microwave cir- cuits, microwave applications of additive manufacturing and 3D printing, electromagnetic sensors, passive microwave circuit design, planar and 3D electrically-small antennas, and equivalent circuit modeling. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Project Connect – A Model for Immersive Professional Development of Future EngineersIntroductionProject Connect (PC) is an immersive professional development program designed to increasethe number of students from underrepresented groups in engineering who pursue careers in themicrowave engineering and related fields. Most of the professionals in this area have
rigorouscurriculum demanded by an engineering degree. Page 26.1147.4TABLE I – FEOC LECTURE SECTION AND TEOC CURRICULUM Week FEOC Schedule TEOC Schedule 1 Course Overview Course Overview 2 Student Organization Representatives Student Organization Representatives Mentoring Day 3 Alumni Panel of Industry Professionals -Resume Assignment Mentor Breakout Group Meeting Internship Panel Discussion with 4 -Meet your Mentor
development and delivery of manufacturing curriculum, conducting applied research, and engagement with Indiana industry. While at Purdue University, Dr. Tomovic served as W. C. Furnas Professor of Enterprise Excellence, University Faculty Scholar, Director of Digital Enterprise Center, and Special As- sistant to Dean for Advanced Manufacturing. He has co-authored three books on hydraulic systems, product lifecycle management, and manufacturing processes. In addition, he has authored or co-authored over 140 papers in journals and conference proceedings, focused on applied research related to design and manufacturability issues, as well as issues related to mechanical engineering technology education. Dr. Tomovic made over
This is always kind of the same. Calc one, curriculum (1, 3, curriculum advised to first- 8 chem for engineers, whatever that ... 167, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9) year AE students is it not?” Did well “I’ve I got a 3.86. I think I only had one A- academically first Academically did well in their . It was this class that was A- but the rest 7 semester (2, 4, 5, first semester (self-reported) of
Project Labs. Page 10.473.5Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education C P M S D M E o C M r e M t i e l M D C P m o a o c a A B C r D f c e a i e o p r t c
Respondents RespondentsComputer Science & Software Engineering (CSE) 2.9% 6Introduction to Engineering Design (IED) 43.8% 91Principles of Engineering (POE) 33.2% 69Digital Electronics (DE) 21.6% 45Civil Engineering and Architecture (CEA) 15.9% 33Aerospace Engineering (AE) 5.3% 11Biotechnical Engineering (BE) 1.9% 4Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM) 3.4% 7Engineering Design and Development (EDD) 13.5
© 2002, American Society for Enginering Educationprogress made on these various distinct systems. Experience shows that they could benefit froman integrated methodology which would encompass traditional mechanical engineering,mechatronics and software engineering specifics.It was then decided in early 2001 to initiate an internal Educational Improvement Project (led bya team of professors) to correct that situation; by the end, the project had broadened its scope. Ithas now become a project to unify Mechanical Engineering design approaches. The elements ofthe curriculum concerned with this improvement project are:! The Mechatronics components5: The IMC 325 Mechatronics I course introduces students to the problem of controlling