– it’s like a divine mission. Table 4: Student Attitudes Before and After REU Participation* Before** After # agree # agree (9 responses) (8 responses) I am confident that I will be able to obtain the job I want after graduating 9 8 from college. I am interested in attending graduate school in engineering. 8 5 I feel that the Engineering curriculum at my current university contains 6
Student LearningOutcomes (SLO). Students learn the basics of ARM Cortex M4F architecture, fundamentalconcepts of Thumb assembly programming, and basics of C programming in an embeddedsystems context, and later address various processor modules and embedded protocols inconjunction with the manufacturer-supplied board/chip support libraries – a typical commercialsoftware development approach in product design. Students can learn: 1. Basics of embedded systems 2. A broader view of an ARM Cortex M4F architecture Proceedings of the 2023 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2023, American Society for Engineering Education
Mechatronics. The average annualenrollment in the 13-years old program is about 300 and the average annual number of graduatesis about 30. The enrollment and graduation numbers are listed in Table 1 [1]. Fig. 1. Engineering Technology Program at Southeastern Louisiana University.There are only 33 credit hours dedicated for each ET concentration, 31 common ET credit hoursshared among the 5 concentrations, in additions to 10 hours of Math, 15 hours of natural science,17 hours of general education, 12 hours of English, and 6 hours of technical electives, totaling124 hours for the ET degree. Fig. 2 shows a sample ET curriculum sheet for the mechanical ETconcentration. Because of these limitations, many industrial standards are not taught or
, product development, electrical engineering, and the history oftechnology. Two thirds through the course, they were better educated than a majority ofSwedish technology teachers. Most of them were originally educated as science teachers, buttwo came from a crafts background and two from the social sciences.During the course, each of the students was assigned one of four systems or system types:sewage systems, nuclear power plants, car manufacturing, and the Internet. Each of thesecorresponded to a system or system type that was studied during the course through literatureand field trips. The students’ task was to design a sequence of teaching and learning activitiesintended to teach their own pupils about the system or system type in question
Science Foundation Engineering Education Program for fundingthis research through Innovations in Engineering Education, Curriculum, and Infrastructure(IEECI) grant (Award number 0935202).Bibliography1. World Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, 1987.2. Davidson, Cliff I.; Matthews, H. Scott; Hendrickson, Chris T.; Bridges, Michael W.; Allenby, Braden R.; Crittenden, John C.; Chen, Yongsheng; Williams, Eric; Allen David T.; Murphy, Cynthia F.; and Sharon Austin. “Adding Sustainability to the Engineer’s Toolbox: A Challenge for Engineering Educators.” Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, pp. 4847-48503. Vest, Charles. “Context and Challenge for Twenty-First Century
’ curriculum innovation award and in1997 IPD won the Newcomen Society award for the promotion of America’s free-enterprise system. Dr. Ochs holds a MS and Ph.D. from The Pennsylvania State Page 10.803.9University. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ø 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationJune 2005 ASEE Conference Entrepreneurship Division #54TODD A. WATKINSTodd A. Watkins is Associate Professor in the College of Business and Economics andDirector of the Institute for Regional Political Economy at Lehigh. He
Technology in Newark, NJ, and Associate Vice President for Academic Affairs. He has been Executive Driector for the Center for Pre-College Programs at NJIT for over 30 years. Dr. Kimmel has had numerous NSF grants and State grants focusing on professional development, curriculum, and assessment.Linda S. Hirsch, New Jersey Institute of Technology LINDA S. HIRSCH is the Program Evaluator in the Center for Pre-College programs. She has a doctoral degree in educational psychology with a specialty in psychometrics and a Masters degree in statistics. She has been involved in all aspects of educational and psychological research for almost 20 years. Dr. Hirsch has extensive experience conducting longitudinal research studies and
engage in the engineering designprocesses are different from the thinking and ways of working in most high school classrooms.Therefore, teachers were scaffolded to develop curriculum to implement in their classrooms thatmirrored much of the engineering design process that they experienced over the summer. Thetraining deliberately connected to the frameworks of education systems (standards, high-stakesassessment, realities of public, urban classroom infrastructures) to promote a deepening ofSTEM concepts to enhance the ability of teachers to apply these concepts to real worldapplications.ParticipantsOver the three years of the program, we have worked with three cohorts of teachers representingfour distinct school districts in and around a medium
Paper ID #39625Ethical Implications of COBOT ImplementationC.J. Witherell, Grand Valley State University CJ Witherell is a graduate student studying Product Design and Manufacturing Engineering at Grand Valley State University. Their undergraduate minor in philosophy inspired them to promote deep thinking, ethical reasoning, compassion, diversity, and equity-focused design within the engineering field. As the 2022 Wisner Engineering Fellow, they are developing a new product for Gentex Corporation in Zeeland, Michigan. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Ethical
Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationThe power of simulationSimulation can provide a number of advantages to an engineering management class. It canprovide experiential learning for the students in areas in which they might not have anyexperience. It can provide a common base of experience to all the students in a class, even if theyhad not prior exposure to an area such as manufacturing. This helps the students understand howquality engineering tools can be introduced into the manufacturing process. Simulations canprovide another channel of learning that can motivate students since it is more realistic
. Page 13.833.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Laboratories Enhancement with LabVIEW-Based Graphical Development ToolsAbstractWith the rapid development of Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology, there is a lagfor the traditional laboratories to keep up with the modern industry requirement. Although thereare many applications of new technologies such as MultiSim, Xilinx, and etc. that have beenintroduced to classroom, they may only influence one or two courses. The lack of consistent inlearning creates new problems in the curriculum. To address this concern, four faculty membersin the Engineering Technology department at Prairie View A&M University proposed to revampthe current
Engine s Lab Experience (graduate level) (graduate level) Figure 1. Interdisciplinary I.C. Engines International Curriculum Course Sequence Experience Page 5.343.4The curriculum involves an Industrial Experience. Students have an option of visiting variousengine and engine component manufacturers for extended periods for the purpose of gaining realtime experience in the field. The Industrial Partners (an industrial advisory board) are encouragedto offer temporary positions for students, in a co-op
Stanford University in Mechanical Engineering Design, where he also received a Post Doctoral fellowship. He taught engineering courses and served in department and college administration at BYU- Idaho (then Ricks College) before spending 10 years in industry in senior engineering and management positions with both the General Motors Corporation and the Michelin Tire Corporation in both the U.S. and Europe. His research and teaching interests include manufacturing process machine design, product design and the improvement of engineering education in a global setting. Since coming to BYU in 1989, he has been the senior author of two manufacturing processes books, one, Manufacturing Processes Ref- erence Guide, a best
Session 2354 Technology Based Entrepreneurship … an effective tool for promoting teamwork, creativity and innovation in students José A. Cruz, Jaime A. Pabón, Miguel A. Torres, Jorge I. Vélez-Arocho University of Puerto Rico at MayagüezI. IntroductionTraditionally engineering and business education has been oriented towards preparingprofessionals for the private sector. Today this sector demands from the universities a newgraduate with skills that go far and beyond the traditional skills and competencies. Today’sgraduates should be able to communicate their ideas effectively both orally and
seeks to identify best practices and develop assessments methods that assist faculty and teachers with student engagement, helping them to navigate the various pathways in STEM. A few of these key areas include engineering identity and mindsets, first year experiences in engineering, integrating service learning into the engineer- ing classroom, implementing new instructional methodologies, and design optimization using additive manufacturing. Dr. Gurganus collaborates with a number of industry partners and consults throughout Maryland in STEM education initiatives. In 2019, Dr. Gurganus received the Northern Maryland Tech- nology Council Leader Award in STEM education. She has written curricula and published a
solutions is dependent upon their ability to manipulate objects (either physically orvirtually). In this paper, we offer preliminary evidence on the comparison of tactile to virtuallearning as perceived by our students and share instructional issues that students feel either helpor hinder their ability to learn.1 IntroductionGiven that there are numerous ways to define engineering design, it follows that there are manypedagogical approaches to teaching design. While most agree that “design, above all else,defines the difference between an engineering education and a science education” 1, design Page 23.1105.2experiences in the curriculum are
. Page 23.786.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 INTEGRATION OF GREEN CONCEPTS INTO TECHNOLOGY CURRICULUM FOR WORK FORCE DEVELOPMENT IN THE RENEWABLE ENERGY INDUSTRIESAbstractWith green industries poised for rapid growth, universities and workforce development centersare striving to develop a workforce that is well trained in renewable energy technologies. Thispaper describes the latest advances in an educational project, sponsored by the Texas WorkforceCommission, to integrate renewable energy technology principles into the technical curriculum.This project has engaged faculty from technology programs in the College of
can be applied to any process.”The major tools of SPC are the histogram or stem-and-leaf plot, check sheet, Pareto chart, cause-and-effect diagram, defect concentration diagram, scatter and control charts. This research willpresent a method for teaching engineering students the use of SPC tools for processimprovement.Another important gap in engineering education is the pedagogy used to teach quality controland process improvement using SPC in many engineering curriculums. It is the authors’experiences that most engineering instruction is still conducted in a lecture format. Whilelecturing is an excellent method of communicating large amounts of information, students areexperiencing passive learning and the amount of learning that occurs is
a wide range of partners including industry,Professional Institutions and other Universities. The course delivery involves new methods ofteaching, learning and communications that range from text-based to internet-based. There is astrong emphasis on employment-based project work.The paper will also cover:• The key features of course and curriculum development and the role of partnerships• The most effective methods of teaching, learning and communication Page 7.1181.1 “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for
-based mocap with infants. The proposedsolutions involve using multiple Kinects to record motion data and a graphical user interface(GUI) that enables the user to interact with the system. The GUI also synchronizes multiplevideo recordings and integrates them with the mocap data. The goal for the Phase III is toassimilate an EMG system with the Phase I and II. The Phase I was completed during the fall Page 23.1388.2semester of 2012.2. Iron Range Engineering ProgramThe Iron Range Engineering (IRE) program is an innovative engineering education model and aproject-based program, where students learn and practice engineering in the context of
. Usingthe learning strategies exemplified in concept mapping, this approach focuses on adding links inthe concept map. Additional links make it easier for students to learn and retain information3.Although different in scope to traditional interdisciplinary research efforts, this could be used asthe basis for organizing interdisciplinary faculty teams for pedagogical research.Within the engineering curriculum, engineering economy educators have noted a lack ofsignificant change in engineering economy courses and textbooks over many decades4, the needto decrease emphasis on rote calculations4,5, and the corresponding need to increase the attentiondevoted to design and/or decision-making4,5,6. Instructional methods that decrease the timerequired for
Paper ID #6350Programmable Logic Controllers: Essential and AffordableDr. John Marshall, University of Southern Maine John Marshall received his Ph.D. from Texas A&M University and is the Departmental Internship Co- ordinator at the University of Southern Maine. His areas of specialization include Power and Energy Processing, Applied Process Control Engineering, Automation, Fluid Power, and Facility Planning. Page 23.989.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013
Electrical Engineering at IUT Bethune, France. Dr. Anwar is serving as the Production Editor of the Journal of Engineering Technology and an Associate Editor of the Journal of Pennsylvania Academy of Science. Page 12.41.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 20071.0 BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION Globalization of the economy has impacted the workforce education and training needs inmost of the major industrial nations. In the United States, there has been a steady transition froma predominately production/manufacturing based economy to an economy in which servicesaccount for more than 50% of the GDP. The World
-collar trade institutions[5]. To bridge this gap, HBCUs are promoting entrepreneurial training and mindset throughchanges in engineering education programs and curriculum. For instance, federally fundedprograms like the National Science Foundation (NSF) Center of Research Excellence in Scienceand Technology (CREST) and NSF I-Corps promote the education and training of innovators oncommercialization of innovations at HBCUs [6], [7]. The I-Corps program has promotedinnovation commercialization by educating faculty members and students in innovationcommercialization using the customer discovery process [8], [9]. However, little research hasbeen done to investigate the level of awareness of engineering graduate students aboutinnovation
Mechanical Engineering, “BSME Curriculum Requirements,” Clemson University, June 2021.[5] K. Del Re, S. Yun, E. Kozikowski, T. Fuerst, and J. Camba, “Integrating a Product Lifecycle Management System into a Freshman Level Classroom Environment”, ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Engineering Graphics Division, Technical Session 2 – Design & Manufacturing, Tampa, FL, June 2019.[6] E. Fielding, J. McCardle, B. Eynard, N. Hartman, and A. Fraser, “Product Lifecycle Management in Design and Engineering Education: International Perspectives”, Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 123-134, June 2014. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X13520316. [7] N. Hartman and M. Springer, “A Distance
were; the software did not efficiently support follow-on coursecontent and activities (structural analysis, computer aided manufacturing); industry was rapidlyadopting 3-D, parametric modeling software; there were 3 other software packages being used inindustry, CATIA, Pro/Engineer and Solid Works.Like any other technology trend, there are several software packages to consider when decidingwhat is best for your curriculum. This brings up many questions when trying to decide what isbest for your Engineering Technology program: Who are the constituents? What software isbeing used in industry? Is it important for students to graduate with knowledge of more than onetype of software? Are software certifications important? This is the scenario we
. Sigmund and K. Maute, “Topology optimization approaches,” Structural and Multidisci- plinary Optimization, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1031–1055, 2013. [3] C. Li, I. Y. Kim, and J. Jeswiet, “Conceptual and detailed design of an automotive engine cradle by using topology, shape, and size optimization,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 547–564, 2015. [4] C.-H. Chuang, S. Chen, R.-J. Yang, and P. Vogiatzis, “Topology optimization with additive manufacturing consideration for vehicle load path development,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 113, no. 8, pp. 1434–1445, 2018. [5] P. D. Dunning, B. K. Stanford, and H. A. Kim, “Coupled aerostructural topology optimization
Benchmarking the Innovations Capstone Course at Oklahoma State University: Lessons learned and changes made Angel Riggs1, Kirby Smith1, Cindy Blackwell1, Paul Weckler2, Dan Tilley3, Rodney Holcomb3, Shelly Sitton1 and Ron Delahoussaye4 Department of Agricultural Education, Communications and Leadership 1 Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering 2 Department of Agricultural Economics 3 School of Mechanical And Aerospace Engineering 4 Oklahoma State UniversityAbstractBeginning January 2010, through April 2010, an evaluation was conducted regarding theInnovations Process course at Oklahoma State
the humanities and social sciences with STEM education to create a unique learning experience for students.Cheryl A Bodnar (Associate Professor, Experiential Engineering Education) Dr. Cheryl Bodnar is an Associate Professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University and is currently serving as the Provost’s Fellow for Student Success. Recently, the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Kern Family Foundation have funded her research. Her research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques such as game-based learning in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested
broad andvague nature of the requests to improve these skills as part of an undergraduate curriculum. Aresearch study conducted over five years by the first author compared the specific skillsrequirements provided by industry practitioners to the published perceptions of engineeringeducators regarding the desires of industry practitioners.1 The resulting lists of skills from thetwo cohort groups (industry practitioners and engineering educators) were then compared to theobserved behaviors of nine different semesters of a senior engineering design course.Summary of the ResearchPurpose. At the onset of the study, the researcher observed that educators and practitioners wereengaged in activities to improve the skills with which engineering