andcollaboration. Active and constructive learning experiences engage the learner’s attention andrequire them to produce outputs containing new ideas [6], while collaborative learningexperiences involve students working in groups to achieve a common goal [7].Project-based learning is technically different from PBL, often requiring the solution of severalproblems and with a greater focus on the development of an end product instead of theknowledge acquired during the educational exercise [4]. However, the activity described in thisstudy possesses features of both project- and problem-based learning, and so will continue to bereferred to as PBL, hybridizing “project” and “problem” without further differentiating betweenthe two methods.One of the most common
content.This paper presents a structured design methodology, using standard design tools likecustomer needs analysis, Quality Function Deployment and quantitative decision making[13,15], for designing improved hands-on experiences. One notable innovation in thisdesign methodology is the use of pedagogical theories and learning style information inwhat would normally be the “analysis” phase of the design process. In particular, this“analysis” phase of design incorporates the learning style information as identified throughthe use of students’ Myers Briggs Type Indicator [16-19] and integrates pedagogicaltheories such as the Kolb cycle [20], Bloom’s taxonomy [21], inductive vs. deductivelearning [22,23] and scaffolding theory [24,25]. This design
include any activity made available or required by the course designer with the intent of engaging student learning. These can include passive (e.g., lecture) or active (e.g., student presentations); graded (e.g., homework) or non-graded (e.g., showing of a video); individual or team activities. 3. A matrix of objectives vs. activities has been generated. While such a matrix is extremely useful in course planning and development, helping to ensure a match between the outcomes and the activities, in this paper we will focus on its use in course and instructor evaluation. An illustrative example for a fictional technical communication course is given in Table 1, below which shows the course
that whether they understand the material inan interactive manner. Researchers have linked quality of reflections with student learningoutcomes [31]–[33] and indicated that with a higher quality of self-reflection, students performedbetter and were able to achieve better learning outcomes [34], [35]. SRL is also fostered with the use of collaborative team working [36], [37]. It allowsstudents to evolve with one another continually and foster a sense of community in the classroom[38]. The benefits of teamwork include motivating students to engage, staying focused on thetask, sharing their ideas, getting involved in the decision-making process [39], and learning thecompetencies better [40], [41]. Further teamwork facilitates self
Programming with Python, a Multimedia Approach, Prentice Hall, 2006.[4] Freudenthal, Eric, Roy, Mary K. and Ann Q. Gates, Work in Progress – The Synergistic Integration of an Entering Students Program with an Engaging Introductory Course in Programming, Proc, Frontiers in Education, Fall, 2009.[5] Freudenthal, Eric, Roy, Mary K., Alexandria Ogrey, Tanja Magoc, and Alan Siegel, IMPACT – Page 22.1159.12 Media Propelled Computational Thinking, Proc. Annual Symposium of the Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education (ACM SIGCSE), 2010.[6] Freudenthal, Eric, Ogrey, Alexandria N., Mary "Kay" Roy, Sarah Hug, and
, Discover Design Delight. At the intersection of these two fields, Pa- terson leads several national initiatives for learning engineering through service, recently taking the reins for the American Society for Engineering Education’s newest division startup, Community Engagement in Engineering Education. He is PI, or Co-PI, on several large projects assessing the impacts of learning through service on students, faculty, and communities around the world.Dr. John J. Duffy, University of Massachusetts, LowellSean Mcvay, James Madison Univeristy Page 25.635.1 c American Society for Engineering
experienced BEAM mentor.In the Fall of 2010 there were a total of about 150 mentees participating in our after schoolprograms. We maintain a high mentor-to-mentee ratio (usually 1:3 or 1:4) at our sites. Ourmentors are assigned to a few students with whom they will work with personally for the entiresemester.We design lessons and activities that tap into kids' natural inclination to tinker and explore,making sure that every lesson plan has a hands-on component, which allows the mentees todesign and build something and/or engage in an active exploration. Most of our activities arecompleted in teams, emphasizing communication and joint problem-solving. Lesson plans fallinto three categories: module-based, project-based, or challenge-based. Table 1
effective approach to both teaching and assessing students’ knowledge of these topics. Thisapproach involved formal collaborative learning incorporated into a multi-modal assignment thatincluded library and first-person research, case study examination, and presentation developmentcentered around either business, leadership, public policy, or management. In the course of thisassignment, students conducted one-on-one interviews with professionals, from both the privateand public sectors; researched case studies for both positive and negative examples; performedliterature reviews on the nature of these topics as they relate to civil engineering; preparedpresentations on their topic to instruct fellow class members; and engaged with faculty members
retain quality science and mathematics teachers. Teacher shortages, in turn, affectSTEM education because teachers specializing in other fields are required to teach STEMsubjects for which they are unprepared to teach. 9 A review of literature on rural schools revealsthe need for research about (a) effective strategies for building teacher content knowledge andpedagogical skills to achieve the greatest impact on student achievement and (b) alternativeorganizational structures, such as regional cooperatives, that minimize costs and maximizestudent achievement. 44, 45Context Framed as an issue of social justice for rural communities, prior research in teacherprofessional development in Oklahoma indicates rural teachers face a high degree
, design, evaluate, prototype, testand tool-up for various product concepts using the Internet. Faculty, their students along withindustry partners now have access to a vibrant and evolving virtual product design anddevelopment environment.The VIP model is a virtual product development environment that replicates Global ProductDevelopment, a high tech value-added network1. From a regional perspective, policymakersaround New England increasingly are beginning to recognize the contribution of high techmanufacturing networks and their impact on local and regional economies. A recent Deloittereport outlines how high tech businesses are highly integrated, encouraging economicdevelopment and global competitiveness2. The authors point out that for
students’ perceptions of theconnection between their courses and the impact of the group project on their learning outcomes.Taking an average value of the percentage of students who either “agreed” or “strongly agreed”across the 3 courses surveyed, 86% felt the project assignment helped them learn the coursematerial, 83% felt working in a group helped them learn, and 80% recommended using theproject again in the future. Most of the students in the two senior courses (72% and 82%) felt theproject helped them understand the connection between their chemical engineering courses. InMaterial and Energy Balances, 95% of students felt the project helped them understand theconnection between the topics taught within this first chemical engineering
possible in the curriculum. The new revolution of the industry 4.0paradigm, which refers to the intelligent networking of machines and processes for the industrywith the aid of information and communication technology (ICT), continues to require moreexperienced experts [13]. Meanwhile, academic institutes might not necessarily be able to providethat skill due to reliance on solely traditional teaching methods, also known as teacher-centerededucation, in which students passively listen through lectures [14] [15] [16].Some challenges of traditional teaching approaches often mention distraction, low collaboration,and lack of critical thinking as detractors. Since the teacher is the only person to be active, studentslack the enthusiasm to learn. There
courses, particularly in first-year engineering programs, to enhance student engagement and retention. Her teaching emphasizes providing students with practical, real-world experiences that foster critical thinking, innovation, and problem-solving skills. Through her teaching and research, Dr. Belfadel is dedicated to inspiring and preparing the next generation of STEM professionals, with a particular emphasis on increasing the representation of women and underrepresented groups in the field. Her contributions to both undergraduate and graduate education continue to have a significant impact on her students and the broader academic community.Danushka Bandara, Fairfield University DANUSHKA BANDARA received the
, at rates that are likely higher than the general populationin the United States [14], [15]. While some of the causes may be situational (e.g. isolation,economic insecurity, family issues, etc.), others may be related to their developmental stage,especially the social limitations imposed on traditionally-aged (18-24 year old) college students[16]. Both disorders are associated with changing patterns of activity, such as more sleep, lessexercise, and decreasing engagement in social activities. Nearly all studies of the student experience under COVID-19 conditions have relied onself-reported survey data. There are several likely reasons for this, including both expediency(surveys can be implemented relatively quickly) and reliability
from thecourse homework.After analyzing students' preferences and comments, it can be concluded that most studentspreferred the two-part scaffolded exam and metacognition was the aspect that was most takeninto consideration by them. The majority of students who did not prefer the two-part exam modelreasoned their choice on logistics concerns. The main objective of implementing a scaffold exammodel was to promote metacognition, which was successfully attained. Employing moretransparent communication with students about the format and objective of this exam format is away to address some of the students’ concerns regarding the exam’s logistics.ConclusionIn this study, we investigated the impact of a scaffold exam model with the combination ofin
real-world experience in FPGA logic design and provide with the necessary training indesign tools widely used in industry. Tools used will include Altera’s Quartus® II developmentsoftware and FPGA design implementation on Altera’s DE2 FPGA evaluation board. The long-term objective of this course is to provide a learning opportunity that will result in researchactivities focused on FPGA design. This research will provide more in-depth training for seniorstudents and engage undergraduate students in applied research opportunities. Page 25.658.5The academic objectives of the FPGA logic design course are to provide students with skills andexperience
Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering. He is Tooker Professor in the School for Engineering of Matter, Transport, & Energy. His research interests include educational research methods, communication of research, and k-16+ engineering education. Ganesh’s research is largely focused on studying the impact of k-12 and undergraduate curricula, and teaching-learning processes in both the formal and informal settings. He is also studying entry and persistence in engineering of first generation, women, and under-represented ethnic minorities.Connor Sonnier, Arizona State University Connor Sonnier is an undergraduate researcher and a BS student in Computer Science at Arizona State University. He is also a student in
measure, the impact of formal training on the Fellows, isdone somewhat informally. During the Fellows initial summer instruction period they are givensmall scale teaching assignments (10-15 minute lessons) in order to familiarize them with theclassroom atmosphere. The instructor gauges their effectiveness in communication andinformally interviews the Fellows to assess their comfort and confidence. Further training isapplied to the students based off of perceived weakness from both instructor and Fellows. Afterthe initial summer instruction, it becomes difficult to differentiate the impact of the weeklypracticum course and the weekly in-class experience, as the source of Fellow development. Ourcurrent model uses the practicum class as a way to
Ensure policies, and space for community of demonstrable practices (un)learning practice result of participationAgain, our approach is to center the people, policies andpractices that impact marginalized students. We provide aclosed and safe space for both learning and unlearning,while building a community of practice. And we don’tstop with this. Every participant is required to produce amodule, course, or policy solution in order to complete theprogram. 10 2-year, Virtual Format Spring Y1 Fall Y2 Spring Y2
is to engage undergraduate students in order for them to excel their competencies with21st Century skills.NSF TUES funding was used to develop CLICS’ computational and educational framework,pilot the methods at Clarkson University and assess its impact on students. CLICS has beendeveloped with data specific to Clarkson’s integrated greenhouse and digester project (describedbelow). This data-rich infrastructure provides a wealth of opportunities for understanding andevaluating engineered systems from diverse disciplines and perspectives. Formative assessmentof the pilot and initial testing of CLICS during the F13 and S14 semesters led to significantimprovements in the computer interface that is used to access and interpret data from
currently active professional surveyors, and introduction to theworking environment in their firm. Overall, students gained experience that may stimulate Page 23.118.3interest to acquire skills towards pursuing a career in engineering. Details of the course andreflections on future improvements will be discussed in the paper.Introduction to the ContextThis paper will focus only on the rationale for the choice of, details, and impact of the surveyingcourse that was offered to the tribal college students as part of the summer camp component ofthe Pre-Engineering Education Collaborative (PEEC) project. The choice of a surveying courseas a summer
project to active participation under the mentorship and guidance fromtrained professionals. Elevating the role of the community from simply project beneficiary toactive contributor and leader was an approach for keeping the project focus on the community,building local capacity, allowing the students to be engaged at a level deemed appropriate by thecommunity, and avoiding issues of White Saviorism [21].Comprehensive student preparation was viewed as a way to improve the impact of a project andenhance student learning. This includes technical training, but also cultural training, for examplehow to avoid stereotypes and a “deficit” mindset. The preparation can include student-to-studentmentorship (for longer-term projects) and mentorship from
student engagement andincreases student understanding of opportunities in engineering.11,12 If one-on-one mentoringrequires more time and resources than are available, group mentoring with faculty in which fiveor six students meet with one mentor is another option.Educate faculty about stereotypes and their impact: Seventeen percent of women surveyedindicated that they were unfairly singled out in classes because they were women. Additionally,slightly more than 22 percent of female students indicated that they had heard faculty expressgender stereotypes. Stereotype threat impacts students when a particular part of their identity isnamed salient. Research has shown that women score lower on math tests when reminded oftheir gender prior to the exam
, and skills on a scalethat will meet the need. Although some traditional engineering faculty workshops havehad positive results as reported by Felder and his colleagues, 2, 7, 8 several investigatorshave identified some important issues with the short-term, face-to-face model. 6, 9, 13Specifically, such workshops do not allow time for faculty members to go through thetransitions from awareness to action, 9 can cause an adversarial relationship between thepresenter and the participants, 6 and do not encourage participants’ motivation andcommitment.13 The inadequacy of existing faculty development models is reflected in: 1)the slow adoption of engaging, active-learning methods that have been systematicallytested and shown to improve student
course changed from year one to year two. Overall, we find that whilescaling-up presents unavoidable challenges to the instructional team with regards to resourceconstraints, logistics, and engagement of a larger audience with a wider distribution of incomingpreparation levels, the larger size of the course also presents some unexpected benefits tostudents. Mainly, the research team was surprised to find that even students who dropped thecourse derived substantial benefits from the informal social relationships forged during the firstfew weeks of classes. We share our findings with the first-year engineering education audienceto continue the conversation about how to meaningfully create learning environments – at-scale– which can support the
from computer science, mechanical,civil, environmental, chemical and industrial engineering that focused on a unifying underlyingtheme. The theme for 2016 was CO2 capture, in contrast to the 2015 theme based on hydraulicfracturing11. Throughout the week, teams of program participants worked together to complete amajor project (in this case, the design of a CO2 capture facility) where each group memberplayed the role of a specific kind of engineer, and groups presented their designs at the end of theweek. These presentations represented the requirements of an engineering career where properand clear communication of technical knowledge is expected. Students also attended classes andparticipated in campus tours, recreational activities, and
realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility g) an ability to communicate effectively h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning j) a knowledge of contemporary issues k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for
Engineering Ambassadors to provide role models for futuregenerations and encourage a representative workforce and (3) connects the EngineeringAmbassadors with a diverse group of middle and high school students to show them thepossibilities within engineering. The Engineering Ambassadors Network helps to support andunify these programs by offering training opportunities, creating platforms for continuedcommunication among the schools, leveraging resources among the members, and raisingvisibility for this important cause. The EAN has had successful impact, both in terms of outreach numbers and the impact ofthe program on the Engineering Ambassadors themselves. Some of these successes are detailedin a companion paper “From Undergraduates to
– StrengtheningHispanic Serving Institutions grants. Estrella Mountain reached this designation in 2001 with aHispanic student population of 31 % and currently serves a Hispanic population of 34%.Intel CorporationIntel Corporation is not only a world technology leader but also a good corporate citizen whostrives to create positive relationships with the community where lntel operates. One of Intel’sfocuses is to contribute to important social issues or communities to enhance and prepare youthfor their futures in the science and technology fields.The Intel Latino Employee Support Group and the Latina Women’s Outreach team’s desire tomake a focused and direct impact on the community youth by providing interaction withprofessional Latina women in the science and
foundational level, we are establishing empirically informed conceptualframeworks and associated survey instruments that help educators and resources understand (a)what knowledge gains result when students engage in specific reflection activities and (b) whattypes of reactions students have when they engage in the activity. On a practical level, we areexploring ways to distribute our conceptual frameworks alongside relevant information. With ourwork, we aim to advance conversations about potential impact of reflection and conversationsabout how to leverage reflection in teaching. In the paper and poster, we will focus on both thefoundational insights and practical resources that are emerging from this work.IntroductionEducation involves identifying