Ph.D. in Civil/Structural Engineering from New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey. His research interests include fracture mechanics of engineering materials, composite materials and advanced construction materials, computer applications in structural analysis and design, artificial neural network applications, knowledge based expert system developments, application based software developments, and buildings/ infrastructure/ bridges/tunnels inspection and database management systems. Page 11.1435.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Visualization in Construction Science and
, including biomaterials. She was awarded the 2012 ASEE NCS Outstanding Teacher Award, 2013 Gannon University Distinguished Faculty Award and 2013-2014 Gannon University Faculty Award for Excellence in Service-Learning. Vernaza does research in the area of alternative fuels (biodiesel), engineering education (active learning techniques), and high-strain deformation of materials. She is currently the PI of an NSF S-STEM and ADVANCE-PAID grants.Dr. Davide Piovesan, Gannon University Davide Piovesan was born in Venice, Italy on October 10 , 1978. He is currently Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering department at Gannon University and the director of the Biomedical Engi- neering Program. He received his M.S.M.E in
2006-1441: SPACE DEBRIS AWARENESS IN AEROSPACE ENGINEERINGEDUCATIONKarl Siebold, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-PrescottPhillip Anz-Meador, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-PrescottRon Madler, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Prescott Page 11.1143.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Space Debris Awareness in Aerospace Engineering EducationAbstractThe authors have taught many space related classes for different universities and distancelearning programs at the NASA Johnson Space Center and at Embry Riddle’s Extended Campus(Houston) and its residential campus in Prescott, Arizona. The student clientele were aerospaceprofessionals in Houston
emerged over the years: the publication now servesas a research aid to members of the engineering technology community. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Page 9.1258.1 Copyright 82004, American Society for Engineering EducationTrendsIn addition to providing an annual snapshot of engineering technology scholarship, thebibliography also reflects changes within the discipline. The first bibliography, which listed1986 publications, included just a few entries for computers and electronics: SPICE was the ragefor teaching electronics, and computer-aided
: A Dynamic Framework for DevelopmentAbstract Following up on its 2009 research, the National Center for Manufacturing Education(NCME) continues to explore trends in manufacturing education programs. This paper presents acompilation of results from the “Question(s) of the Week” framework designed to preface the2011 study and move the trends report towards an ongoing, dynamic source of relevantinformation for engineering technology educators engaged in the design and delivery ofmanufacturing education.Introduction The National Center for Manufacturing Education (NCME) housed at SinclairCommunity College, Dayton, Ohio published Trends in Manufacturing Programs1 in 2009. TheNCME acknowledges support from the National Science
Paper ID #37110Accredited Undergraduate Environmental Engineering Education at PUIsDr. Stephanie Laughton, The Citadel Stephanie Laughton is an Assistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at The Citadel. She received her Ph.D. in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University. Her bachelor’s degree, in the same field, is from Duke University. Laughton’s research interests include environmental nanotechnology, sustainability, and engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Accredited Undergraduate Environmental Engineering Education at PUIs
Paper ID #28865Outcome-Based (Engineering) Education (OBE): International AccreditationPracticesProf. Junaid Qadir, Information Technology University, Lahore, Pakistan Junaid Qadir is an Associate Professor at the Information Technology University (ITU)—Punjab, Lahore since December 2015, where he directs the ICTD; Human Development; Systems; Big Data Analytics; Networks (IHSAN) Research Lab. His primary research interests are in the areas of computer systems and networking, applied machine learning, using ICT for development (ICT4D); and engineering education. He is the author of more than 100 peer-reviewed research papers
university to determine. In addition, overall exchange flows need tobe balanced by the central administrators. This means that weak participation fromone side (or in one year) could affect all the partners by limiting the ability of allinstitutions to send and receive students.2) Graduate Summer InternshipExample: CESRIThe Central Europe Summer Research Institute (CESRI) is administered by theInstitute of International Education and was funded by a grant from the NationalScience Foundation. Enrolled graduate and doctoral students in six fields (biology,chemistry, computer science, environmental science, engineering, and mathematics)can apply for a two-month fellowship in one of six Central European countries(Austria, Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary
Paper ID #26242Model-building in Engineering EducationDr. Tobin N. Walton, North Carolina A&T State University My research is focused on developing interdisciplinary theoretical frameworks and methodological de- signs capable of modeling the social and psychological drivers of behavior, decision-making, and infor- mation processing across multiple domains (e.g., health, education, the workplace).Dr. Stephen B. Knisley, North Carolina A&T State University Stephen B Knisley completed the BE degree in biomedical engineering at Duke University and the PhD degree in biomedical engineering at the University of North
aestheticallypleasing to homeowners. Through this approach, homeowners are more likely to continuemaintaining their system when it is one that provides pleasing, effective, and energy efficientlighting. Students then educate homeowners in the effective selection of lamps, considering costand characteristics, as well as maintenance strategies to keep lighting optimally functional.Students apply a foundation of lighting education to ever-changing lighting technology and howit can effectively apply to the consumer. Literature reviews of consumer education efforts in newlighting technologies combined with student research of LEED standards in Habitat forHumanity construction address the need for consumer-friendly lighting education.With upcoming U.S. legislation
student perspective in anStudent Platform for Engineering Education (SPEED) presents international and comparative context is a voice that providesa paper that takes a broad look at the differences between user feedback on engineering training.engineering education systems from the perspectives of thestudents being trained within them. II. RESEARCH QUESTIONS The authors first present an overview of some How can we characterize the student experience ofcommon models and characteristics for undergraduate training undergraduate engineering training from the students’ ownstructures. We note differences along the dimensions of
importance ofproviding undergraduate students open-ended, loosely defined projects, and allowing projectteams to assume responsibility for design and innovation.2. INTRODUCTIONEngineers, clinicians and patients often struggle to find balance between innovative technologyand the human side of medical care. Graduate level educational programs dedicated to teachingbiomedical innovation have seen significant growth in the last decade [1-7]. In addition, the fieldof biomedical engineering has seen a dramatic escalation in activity over the past 20 yearsleading to innovative medical devices and procedures. Due to the multidisciplinary characteristicof the field, biomedical engineering has a diverse research impact, often serving as a bridgebuilder between
of Pittsburgh, we have been addressing the retention issue from several perspectivesfor the past six years. Our efforts have been augmented by three research grantsa, which haveenabled us to focus on the retention of freshman engineering students. As a result, we havedeveloped several tools, which are being implemented both by us and by colleagues at otheruniversities. We also have introduced a number of promising initiatives.While our efforts offer the potential of reducing attrition, in the long run we believe that we mustdo much better in fulfilling the expectations and needs of our students. To do this means seriouslyaddressing the “structure” and “culture” of the engineering educational experience, anddeveloping additional creative
Paper ID #41281Board 178: Educational Infographics, A Review PaperAsefeh Kardgar, Purdue University, West Lafayette Asefeh Kardgar is currently a PhD Candidate in Technology at Purdue University, West Lafayette.Dr. Anne M Lucietto, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Lucietto has focused her research in engineering technology education and the understanding of engineering technology students. She teaches in an active learning style which engages and develops practical skills in the students. Currently she is exploring student choices.Dr. Jennifer Winikus, Lehigh University Dr. Winikus is an Associate Teaching Professor with
number of graduates from the HBCUs.2. ObjectiveThe primary objective of this study is to research ways of improving the education of AfricanAmericans by significantly increasing the number of college graduates from Historically BlackCollege and Universities (HBCUs) using object-oriented software analysis and designmethodologies. HBCUs are institutions of higher learning, whose principal mission is to educateAfrican Americans. Based upon this objective, there are two significant questions to beaddressed by this research: a) Is it possible, through innovative measures, for the current set of HBCUs throughout the United States to educate African Americans on a massive scale? b) What is the best way to design the format and presentation of
to the adult and experientiallearning literature for research to guide the development of a pedagogical framework forenhancing and accelerating learner proficiency in two-year technician education.In their recent publication “Effectiveness and Efficiency in High Education for Adults”, Keeton,Sheckley, and Griggs13 outline eight key principles, grounded in empirical research, forachieving effectiveness and efficiency in learning that focus specifically on the development ofadult learner proficiency. Keeton et al. maintain that proficiency can be achieved when learnersare presented with clear learning goals and objectives and a clear path to attainment, a rich bodyof experience centered on solving genuine real-world problems, opportunities to
fear- and incentive-based controlmechanisms to achieve desired educational goals and outcomes. These control mechanisms canachieve results but may also undermine classroom cohesion, encourage an adversarialatmosphere, and be less effective than alternate approaches such as those based on leadershiptraining and research. This paper reconsiders engineering education through a leadershipperspective where teachers voluntarily relinquish control, seek influence over authority, nurturecooperation over compliance, pursue projects and activities in partnership rather than inisolation, and work to establish an environment of mutual trust. These characteristics ofleadership-based education are highly compatible with many current trends in
Paper ID #17386Enabling Affordable Industrial Robotics Education through SimulationProf. Scott A Kuhl, Michigan Technological University Scott Kuhl is an Assistant Professor of Computer Science and an Adjunct Assistant Professor of Cognitive & Learning Sciences at Michigan Technological University. He received his Ph.D. in Computer Science from the University of Utah in 2009. His research interests include immersive virtual environments, head- mounted displays, and spatial perception. A link to his web page can be found at http://www.cs.mtu.edu/.Prof. Aleksandr Sergeyev, Michigan Technological University Aleksandr
University of Pittsburgh. Dr. Needy’s research interests include engineering management, engineering economic analysis, integrated resource management and sustainable engineering. She is a member of ASEE, ASEM, APICS, IIE, and SWE and a licensed Professional Engineer in Kansas. Page 15.50.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 A Look into the Engineering Economy Education LiteratureAbstractApproximately ten years ago a two-part survey of how engineering economy was taught in U.S.universities was conducted. This survey, conducted in 1995 and 1997, collected data fromengineering economy instructors
associated with collaborationbetween PD21schools, suggest a number of benefits. Companies are able to develop leadersfrom within their organizations in a shortened timeframe, educated leaders for the growthengine of the firm. As mentioned above, PD21 provides a forum for sharing acrosscompanies and industries. Students gain access to the latest thinking and practices in systemsdesign and product development, for both immediate and long-term impact on job andbusiness performance. Universities, in addition to benefiting from state-of-the-art courses,have the opportunity to build research partnerships, to leverage tools and metrics across theconsortium, and to build brand recognition. Likewise, faculty have an established mechanismto improve their
to gather, there is also the need tostrike a balance between excessive information, which may overwhelm the evaluator, andinadequate information, which may result in an unfair assessment. This paper serves tointroduce the new engineering educator to the teaching portfolio. In doing so, the author looksat issues to consider, worthy materials to include, an approach to developing a portfolio, and theneed to update the portfolio on a regular basis.IntroductionIn many institutions of higher learning, the requirements for a faculty person to obtain tenurehave been defined under the broad headings of teaching, research and scholarship, and service tothe profession and community. Some institutions have established rules for evaluatingachievements
AC 2011-2740: A REVIEW OF ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN EDUCA-TION IN AUSTRALIA:David Dowling, University of Southern Queensland Professor David Dowling is passionate about helping engineering students learn and achieve their ca- reer goals. As Professor of Engineering Education at the University of Southern Queensland (USQ) his research and development activities are focused on enhancing curricula, and teaching and learning envi- ronments. Professor Dowling was Associate Dean (Learning and Teaching) from 1995 to until January 2009. He was a President of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education in 2005-2006, and was awarded an Australian Learning and Teaching Council (ALTC) Citation in 2008. David was the
Laboratory for Complex Systems .KIM B. BLAIRKim B. Blair is a Lecturer and Research Engineer in the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics andDirector of the Center for Sports Innovation at MIT. He teachers the Experimental Projects Laboratoryand courses in structures and dynamics. His teaching interests lie in the application of hands-on learningin the classroom and laboratory. His research interests include nonlinea r structural dynamics and sportsproduct development. Page 7.940.8 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for
cutting edge research activity in corporate and university settings; firsthand knowledge of business and entrepreneurial practices; philanthropic spirit; confidence. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Page 7.2.3 Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering Education A “holistic” view is exactly what the concept of Converging Technologies is all about. Withit we continue to emphasize the basics in the traditional engineering majors, while broadeningstudent horizons and giving them the ability to see the “big picture.” What is
-wageworkers around the globe, and leading edge scientific and engineering work is beingaccomplished in many parts of the world. Thanks to globalization, driven by moderncommunications and other advances, workers in virtually every sector must now facecompetitors who live just a mouse-click away in Ireland, Finland, China, (and) India . . .” Thecommittee also determined that multinational companies choose the locations of theirmanufacturing facilities based on the availability of qualified workforce, innovation talent, andthe quality of research universities. They concluded that the remedy to this emergingcompetition is to focus national attention on the development of Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) educational programs. In
successful designs, discover biomimetic projects that are currentlyunderway, and experiment with biomimetic strategies to better solve the problems by achievingthe benefits without the issues. This curriculum helps change the mindset and foster creativity inthe next generation of engineers who will be tasked with solving the problems of the future. Thispaper will explain the course in greater detail, and how its approach differs from conventionalengineering education. It will provide perspectives from students of different disciplines who havetaken the course, co-instructed in the course, and are currently applying their changed mindset totheir research and jobs.IntroductionTeaching the next generation of engineering students to solve problems
of the key areas for scientific education and research atthe national level. Nationally, few universities offer courses in signal integrity (SI), and there arenone in the immediate area. Therefore, there is a critical need for signal integrity training andsupport. This is especially important in the Harrisburg metropolitan area given the highconcentration of electrical connector companies.In this paper, the authors describe the implementation of a signal integrity course that include up-to-date topics, modern laboratory experiences and speakers from industrial settings. The topicsinclude: basics of simulation tools to visualize time and frequency domain signals as well astransmission line modeling using PSPICE; introducing a Time Domain
Laboratory at Georgia Tech. Farrokh’s current research focus is model-based realization of complex systems by managing uncertainty and complexity. The key question he is investigating is what are the principles underlying rapid and robust concept exploration when the analysis models are incomplete and possibly inaccurate? His quest for answers to the key question are anchored in three projects, namely, Integrated Realization of Robust, Resilient and Flexible Networks Integrated Realization of Engineered Materials and Products Managing Organized and Disorganized Complexity: Exploration of the Solution Space His current education focus is on creating and implementing, in partnership with industry, a curriculum for
K. Eason Keri Eason is a PhD student in Sociology at the University of Cincinnati. Her research interests include Asian American Identity, Higher Education, and Pop-Culture. Keri received her B.A. from Northern Kentucky University in 2010. She earned her M.A. in English from Northern Kentucky University in 2013. Keri began her career at Gateway Community & Technical College as an Academic Advisor for the Nursing Program. She worked as an Academic Advisor for the University of Cincinnati’s Center for Exploratory Studies between 2015-2017. Keri has taught College Success Skills and Discovering UC. She began the Sociology PhD program at University of Cincinnati in the Fall of 2018
Paper ID #7753Enhancing K-12 Education with Engineering OutreachDr. Cheryl D. Seals, Auburn University Dr. Cheryl Seals is an associate professor in Auburn University’s Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering. She graduated with a B.S. C.S. from Grambling State University, M.S. C.S. from North Carolina A&T State University and a Ph.D. C.S. from Virginia Tech. Seals conducts research in Human Computer Interaction with an emphasis in visual programming of educational simulations, user interface design and evaluation, and educational gaming technologies. Dr. Seals also works with computing outreach