drawings or computer-rendered drawingsand conceptual solid models” [1]. In engineering, sketches have a variety of uses, in that they canbe used for brainstorming ideas or for social and communicative practices, which differs slightlyfrom that in other fields. Sketching in engineering is used for field-related practices as well as forexploratory and ideation purposes. Each of these purposes offers a critical piece of learning thatmay need to be used in conjunction with one another. With the versatility of sketching practices,there are inevitable challenges when determining the appropriate times and contexts to employthese methods as well as the distinctions in defining the term. Additionally, for students who donot consider themselves artistic
undergraduate education through hands-on learning. As a volunteer for Tau Beta Pi, the Engineering Honor Society, Luchini-Colbry facilitates interactive seminars on interpersonal communications and problem solving skills for engineering students across the U.S. Page 24.1068.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Scaffolded Structuring of Undergraduate Research Projects Dirk Colbry, Katy Luchini-Colbry Michigan State University East Lansing, MI, USAIntroductionMentoring
? 3. Students’ Financial Profile More than 76% of the students at Morgan State University receive some sort of financial aid, scholarship and/or loans without which most of them would not be able to pursue college or higher education. Those who do not receive aid, or receive partial aid, have to work long hours to pay for their education and living expenses. The negative impact of working hours on student performance [4] is well established and documented in educational research. Although the studies are mixed[1] regarding the impact of work on students’ academic performance based on motivation, our experience has indicate that working students demonstrate different levels of
University of Colorado, College of Engineering and AppliedScience’s Integrated Teaching and Learning (ITL) Program has been involved in K-12engineering outreach. One component of the ITL’s outreach initiative is engaging engineeringundergraduate and graduate engineering students in K-12 science, math and technology classesto serve as engineering role models.Partially funded by the National Science Foundation GK-12 and U.S. Department of EducationFIPSE grants, the ITL outreach program refined the focus of its engineering initiative in 2000 totarget the student populations of the Lafayette, Colorado, schools due to their diversity and lowacademic performance. This endeavor led to the TEAMS — Technology and Engineering toAdvance Math and Science
theeffectiveness of a simulation as compared to the use of an actual piece of equipment. Ourdesigned and developed tensile strength simulation has the foundational elements to improvelearning, enhance user engagement, and motivate learners while improving learning rates andknowledge retention. This project can provide fundamental improvements in teaching andlearning with technology through a comprehensive assessment of student learning. Although ourmodel focuses on a specific tensile test activity, the impact for the mechanical engineeringeducators is far reaching. Additionally, a framework would be established for materialsdevelopment for other types of engineering testing.Development | virtual online tensile testing simulationThe tensile strength
contribute to their educational experience, goals, and campus engagement. • Develop and apply skills that contribute to building positive relationships with peers, staff, and faculty. • Examine how their background and experiences impact their values and assumptions and explore the influences these have on their relationships with others. • Develop, adapt, and apply strategies to support overall wellnessThese learning objectives have guided the initial design of the course and subsequent changes tocontent and delivery.Selection of appropriate peer advisers (PAs) to lead the program was crucial to the success of thefirst-year engineering seminars. New Student and Family Programs, which has had a well-established process
development of the broader engineering pipeline due to the organization’s pre-collegiate, collegiate, and professional membership.National Society of Black Engineers Overview One engineering student organization that targets students from Black or African-American backgrounds is the National Society of Black Engineers whose mission is to “increasethe number of culturally responsible engineers who excel academically, succeed professional,and positively impact the community”. It is a non-profit, student-led, US-based organization witha global membership of approximately 30,000. Its membership spans a demographic of 6th – 12thgrade students, university students (undergraduate and graduate) and working engineeringprofessionals. The organization is
© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Teaching Historical Perspective using a Term Project on an Influential Structural EngineerAbstractDetails are given on a class project that requires students to prepare a written report andoral presentation on an influential structural engineer. The project includes an extensivepeer assessment process completed by the students. The project helps to fulfill the “Con-temporary Issues and Historical Perspectives” outcome of the newest version of the Bodyof Knowledge. The project also seeks to improve student communication skills, thushelping to fulfill the “Communication” outcome. Assessment was conducted to deter-mine the impact of the project in fulfilling these outcomes
mentors also participate fully in the research project, workingclosely with other members of the project staff--two communications specialist co-PIs, twoEnglish graduate students, and engineering faculty research advisors--to study the ways thatengineering students use language in learning to design and conduct research.Training for the graduate student mentors includes a weekly seminar on key concepts of learningtheory, discussion of ways that these theories explain the learning and progress of theundergraduate researchers, and development of theory-based teaching and coaching methods tobe used in subsequent Studio sessions. In this presentation, the co-PIs and four graduate studentsdescribe their RCS participation and its role in furthering
video game players has found that they use language ofagency and power when describing their role and feelings while engaging in gameplay [6].FLEET’s design is intended to use some of these same game-based levers to allow students toimprove their agency in considering a STEM career and becoming a naval engineer.Data Analysis from 2016-2017 and 2017-2018 CohortsAt the end of the 2016-2017 and 2017-2018 school years, researchers collected data on twocohorts of students to ascertain FLEET’s impact to date. At this point two of the four missionswere complete, so researchers engaged in formal and informal data collection to evaluateFLEET’s impact on students and to steer future development. Formal data collection efforts usedanonymous, optional
% ofstudents felt they expanded their cultural competency (Figure 3A). This reported increase inconsideration of end-users also extends to self-reported changes in overall design perspective,with approximately 40% of students stating the importance of collaborating with end-users whendesigning (Figure 3B). Furthermore, when students were polled on whether this workshop had animpact on their plans going forward, approximately 57% of students reported that they wished tolook into researching or working abroad, and 29% of students planned to study abroad (Figure3C). Overall, across open-ended survey questions, there were strong trends in being able toeffectively communicate and work with end users to solve complex global engineering problems,as well as
andimplemented strategies in each of the four areas in one of their engineering courses. Monthlymeetings of the FLC during implementation allowed faculty to share their experiences andsuggestions for refinements in their teaching strategy.The paper examines the faculty member choice (why they chose to use particular strategies intheir course) as well as their reflections on how well the strategy worked (impact on studentlearning vs ease of implementation). In addition, the paper examines in-class observations andstudent survey responses to determine if they felt a particular strategy was useful. The researchseeks to identify strategies that faculty members chose and are viewed as effective by both thefaculty and students. The presentation will seek
thefreshman-level engineering design and communications courses, principally about 2/3 through thefirst semester at the University.2. Our Adaptation and Use of Manufacturing SimulationsIn the fall semester of 1996, three of the authors (RJ, MAS, JPO’C), became interested in usingclassroom simulations as one experience in the UVa Professional Development Program 4 forbeginning students in Engineering Design. We approached Aviat, a subsidiary of ORIONInternational in Ann Arbor, MI, about trying their manufacturing simulation, Paper Planes, Inc.,which was created by W.C. Musselwhite for business use. We were attracted to it because itcould involve as many as 30 participants simultaneously (about the size of our classes), requiredthe production of a
,facilitating a strong mentorship dynamic between graduate and undergraduate students, as wellas cultivating a sense of empowerment for younger students contributing at an elevated level.Most graduate students naturally fell into this role, contributing to specific tasks while delegatingresponsibilities and providing advice on project management to younger students, fostering asense of comraderie and community. All but one team had at least one political science student toensure interdisciplinary dynamics [11], [14]. Moreover, problem sponsors were similarlyinterdisplinary, comprising both State Department policy-level actors and engineers withintimate knowledge of the systems teams were studying.The teaching team was interdisciplinary to ensure
impact of these flipped classrooms for hands-on experiences with open-source lectures wasfocused on enabling students to handle higher levels of complexity than related courses as well asincreasing student confidence in their experimental tools and techniques. Handling higher levelsof engineering complexity, such as analyzing, designing, and verifying larger transistor circuitswithin a semester, was both seen through the submitted project reports as well as responses tostudent surveys at the end of the course. Most students felt comfortable (agree to strongly agree)engaging with circuits with 5 to 20 transistors (the 3rd year analog circuits, Analog IC design)where similar ECE courses (through individual discussions) would have students
studentswere required to understand all facets of the project and teach unclear concepts to theintroductory students when necessary. End of semester surveys revealed that both the upper leveland introductory level students benefited from the exchange.IntroductionThe rapidly changing profession of engineering calls for the education of life-long learners,individuals who can adapt and thrive through change [1]. This call must be met with a balancedemphasis on process skill development (thinking, integration, discovery, communication) andproduct (knowledge) [2]. Engineering instructors understand very well the adage one neverreally learns a subject until one teaches it. The process of teaching and preparing to teach buildsprocess skills, e.g., discovery
with SME. Since 1974 he has held various positions leading the professional development of manufacturing practitioners, the development, advancement, and quality of manufacturing curriculum in engineering and technology programs, workforce development, and attracting students into manufacturing. He plays a key role representing SME and advancing the Society’s agenda in education through the SME Center for Education, the Manufacturing Education and Research Community, the Accreditation Committee and the North American Manufacturing Research Institution of SME. He is involved in the Manufacturing Division and the Corporate Member Council of the American Society for Engineering Education and is a graduate of Eastern
explained. This paper also discusses how participating in nationalcompetitions could potentially benefit student self-confidence, as well as their professional andacademic growth. The impact of these practices is evaluated through an analysis of students’project reports, feedback, and survey results.IntroductionOne Airport Administration course is provided in the aviation administration program in aMinority Serving Institution (MSI). The majority of the students enrolled in the AirportAdministration course come from underserved community who face numerous barriers thatimpede their academic success. As one part of the course redesign in 2022, the AirportCooperative Research Program (ACRP) University Airport Design Competition was added intothe
to provide diverse perspectives on pressing topicswithin academic and non-academic communities. Individuals participating in panels are usuallybrought together to express a wide range of viewpoints and to combine ideas, research, andexperiences. We see an opportunity to extend panel discussions to have enduring impact bybroadly distributing the data synthesized during the panel discussions. The use of paneldiscussions as a research endeavor has the potential to broaden researchers' ways of knowing, yetknowledge transfer from panel conversations to peer-reviewed publications has to this point beenminimal.This paper highlights a methodology for analyzing panel discussions, discourse content, andpanelist reflection to produce research results
Paper ID #21292Teach-Flipped: A Faculty Development MOOC on How to Teach FlippedDr. Cynthia Furse, University of Utah Dr. Cynthia Furse (PhD ’94) is the Associate Vice President for Research at the University of Utah and a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Furse teaches / has taught electromagnetics, wireless communication, computational electromagnetics, microwave engineering, circuits, and antenna design. She is a leader and early developer of the flipped classroom, and began flipping her classes in 2007. She is now regularly engaged helping other faculty flip their classes (see Teach-Flip.utah.edu
guide students towards crafting stronger, morepersuasive resumes tailored specifically for their post-graduation goals in an objective manner[1].Literature ReviewMany studies and reviews display the importance of teaching writing skills to developingengineers [5]–[8]. The ability to communicate clearly and concisely, especially within theconfines of a one-page resume, displays writing skill and professionalism. Many of these articlesalso recommend practice exercises for strengthening qualitative resume writing skills and theirimpact on student writing quality. For example, addition of written assignments to upper-levelengineering courses and learner-centered instructional strategies have been shown to increasemultiple aspects of a student’s
, study skills, and time management.3, 14 Previous researcherswho examined the use and impact of tutoring on engineering achievement and successidentified gaps in the literature about the impact of peer tutoring programs. Theyidentified a need for studies of the organization, results, and accomplishments associatedwith the impact of peer tutoring programs to support development of accepted bestpractices and outcomes.12, 15 Researchers called for studies into the frequency of use andtypes of students who used peer tutoring programs correlated with the impact of theprograms on their academic success.11, 12, 15Program DescriptionThe Scholars Assisting Scholars tutoring program was designed to support studentsuccess and learning for students in first
interconnected parts of this framework unified as a whole that has astatistically significant impact on student learning [8].Student-designed examsStudent-generated exam questions as a specific type of student-led formative assessment havebeen consistently studied in the literature. Research suggests that there are multiple potentialbenefits that arise from asking students to generate possible exam questions, includingimprovements in performance on summative assessments and overall course grades [9]–[14],the bank of questions functioning as a useful study aid [11], [15], encouraging higher-ordercognitive skills through peer review and discussion of questions [10], [14], [16], [17], andincreasing student engagement in the process of assessment, as well
examines the socio-technical realities of online experimentation and therapid transition from face-to-face to online labs. The study explores the impact of online labadoption on faculty who must satisfy lab-based experiential learning outcomes and studentswho must engage in lab exercises more independently. The purpose of this paper is to presentour approach to transitioning to the online mode for labs, as well as our research approachand beginning findings from two perspectives: the faculty and the student perspective. Withinthe study user experience (UX) is a third perspective, but it is not the focus of this paper.Finally, we explain the future steps of our project to expand our understanding of theseperspectives in ongoing research.2. Online
information on how one institution not only created a verysuccessful first-year/freshman (and sophomore) engagement experience that involvedundergraduate research, but also paid students for their time in research labs, thus addressing twoof the hottest topics today for students – the rising cost of obtaining a college degree and theastronomical level of student loan debt many students incur to earn an undergraduate degree.[2]Student and faculty impact of this program was exceptional, as measured by an anonymousonline survey, and will be discussed in the final section.IntroductionAs institutions, we work hard to recruit and attract students to our engineering programs, andwant to do everything we can to engage and retain those students. We want to
(EGR 102). The four EEES components are shown in the bubbles in Figure 1. The dark boxes Page 14.1295.2show groups of faculty or students who are part of the implementation of EEES. The dark bubbleshows the target group: early engineering students.Since the mathematics and physics courses are outside of the College of Engineering, the EGR102 course is the primary locale for engaging engineering faculty in 1) changing the curriculum;2) incorporating more active-learning, team-based projects, and integrating mathematics andphysics into the curriculum; and 3) fostering a sense of engineering community among facultyand students.Figure 1: EEES
that engages students in team-based, socially relevant projects. While at Texas A&M University Imbrie co-led the design of a 525,000 square foot state-of-the-art engineering education focused facility; the largest educational building in the state. His expertise in educational pedagogy, student learning, and teaching has impacted thousands of students at the universities for which he has been associated. Imbrie is nationally recognized for his work in ac- tive/collaborative learning pedagogies, teaming and student success modeling. His engineering education leadership has produced fundamental changes in the way students are educated around the world. Imbrie has been a member of ASEE since 2000 and has been
practice. Statistically, they are not representative of allengineers or disciplines, but they provide an informative cross-section. To date, 280 of the initialonline surveys have been completed, and 35 follow-up surveys focused on engineering thinkinghave been completed. Interviews of practicing engineers and engineering managers have been guided by aninterview protocol consisting of 15 open ended questions. The questions ask the engineers abouttheir current job, notable events in their work, values in relation to their work, continuingeducation, and advice to new engineers. These interviews were conducted by students in theirfirst year technical communication course in the college of engineering. Engineers involved inprofessional
Paper ID #42652Sparking Engineering Passion: Hands-on Science and Engineering Adventuresfor Diverse Future InnovatorsBianca Estella Salazar, University of California, Merced Bianca earned her Bachelor of Science in Biology from California State University, Channel Islands, and is currently pursuing her Ph.D. in the Quantitative Systems Biology program at the University of California, Merced. Her research investigates the impact of non-verbal communication on cognitive processes within collaborative learning settings.Melissa Almeida, University of California, Merced Melissa Almeida, a Ph.D. student in Cognitive and
regard, several engineering examples were explored for analyzing theaccuracy of quantitative results obtained from ChatGPT. In-class surveys were also conducted toassess the enthusiasm of students and enhanced interactivity of implementing ChatGPT-powerededucational platform in solving engineering problems. We discovered that students can noticeablybenefit from the key beneficial features offered by artificial intelligence including, but not limitedto, real-time assistance, personalized feedback, and dynamic content generation. Survey resultshighlight the positive impact of implementation of ChatGPT on engineering students' scholarlyperformance and their broader learning experience. Despite all the undeniable advantages AIoffers, it is essential