Engineering Education, 2018 New Course Development and Assessment Tools in Automotive Lightweighting TechnologiesAbstractAutomotive industry traditionally has reduced weight primarily by downsizing. Today,the strategy of downsizing vehicle has reached its limits. The OEMs are also facingsubstantial increases in Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) regulations in the U.S.and the other global markets. In this context, engineering students need to understandthe underlying contributors that significantly play a role in vehicle Lightweighting. Oneof the main contributors is the appropriate use of a variety of high strength andlightweight materials to meet the mass (weight) targets. Another aspect and a morechallenging issue is that
Associates (CRA) formed a board of “IT” deans in 2000 [3] that meets twice a yearProceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationworking to define the underlying principles and relevant body of research, and that same yearPeter Denning led a team that developed a model curriculum for an IT college [2]. The time waspropitious for programs teaching IT to participate in developing the criteria that defined thediscipline.The usual approach to developing a new academic program in an established discipline is toreview the existing body of knowledge and practice to establish the content and boundaries ofthe curriculum; but
Paper ID #6525Discovery Learning Experiments in a New Machine Design LaboratoryDr. Mark Nagurka, Marquette University MARK NAGURKA, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering and Lafferty Professor of Engineering Pedagogy at Marquette University. He received his B.S. and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics from the University of Pennsylvania and a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from M.I.T. He taught at Carnegie Mellon University before joining Marquette University. His professional interests are in the design of mechanical and electromechanical systems and in engineering
Paper ID #25096Work in Progress: Students’ Informal Reasoning when Approaching Classroom-based Scenarios Involving Diversity and Inclusion IssuesDarby Rose Riley, Rowan University Darby Riley is a student of mechanical engineering at Rowan University. She has a special interest in education, as well as issues of diversity and inclusion, both of which have pushed her to seek leadership positions wherever possible. She is a founding member of Rowan University’s oSTEM chapter, and working to make Rowan’s campus a safe and welcoming place for all students. Darby hopes to pursue a graduate’s degree in engineering education
Session 1168 AN INTEGRATED APPROACH FOR THE ENGINEERING DYNAMICS COURSE S. R. Ibrahim Professor of Mechanical Engineering Old Dominion University Norfolk, Virginia, U.S.AABSTRACT This paper aims at studying the feasibility of a new approach for teaching the dynamicscourse, which is usually taught in the sophomore year of engineering curriculum. The newproposed approach is an integrated one, which will be designed to offer the general concept fromwhich the special
self-evaluation process, required by ABET.As a consequence, in 2003 all engineering programs reached the substantial equivalence with theold criteria. At present ABET has started to apply the EC2000 criteria to the internationalevaluations, and it does not give the substantial equivalence anymore. Instead, it has startedaccrediting programs abroad.The College of Engineering is going through a curricular reengineering process, to face thesenew challenges and to go a step further in the internationalization process. The goals proposed tothe new curriculum are (1) to change the present paradigm towards a curriculum based onoutcomes, (2) to fulfill the ABET EC2000 criteria, (3) to improve the efficiency of the educationand learning process, (4) to
AC 2011-2099: MATH CURRICULUM IN A SET OF K-5(8) AND K-12STEM PRE-ENGINEERING TEACHER PREPARATION PROGRAMSStephen O’Brien, The College of New Jersey Dr. O’Brien is an Assistant Professor in the Dept. of Technological Studies within the School of Engi- neering at The College of New Jersey. Page 22.1045.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Applied Math Curriculum for Elementary and Secondary Integrated STEM teacher preparation programsAbstractIn this paper we describe the mathematical components of integrated Science-Technology-Engineering-Math (STEM) teacher
requirements (Burke and Snyder – 2008). Doing so can help inspire and engage this newage of students who are more used to digital tools and devices. Even the more traditional learnercan use the sites as an opportunity to gain understanding in new technology, which can becomeskills for future careers. Other work have utilized video technology with Chemical Engineering students.Liberatore has utilized YouTube to relate course topics to real world applications (Liberatore –2010). Falconer and colleagues have compiled screencasts where a narrator goes over aparticular chemical engineering concept, or a detailed problem solution (Falconer 2009 and 2012).A recent paper from JEE states that students who use screencasts and perceive their benefit
Paper ID #32607A New Approach to Equip Students to Solve 21st-Century GlobalChallenges: Integrated Problem-Based Mechanical Engineering LaboratoryDr. Siu Ling Leung, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Siu Ling Leung is an Assistant Teaching Professor and the Director of Undergraduate Laboratories of the Mechanical Engineering Department at the Pennsylvania State University. She is developing a new engineering laboratory curriculum to empower students’ cognition skills and equipped them to solve real-world challenges. Her past engineering education experience includes undergraduate curriculum management, student advising
Paper ID #10921Improving Student Engagement in Online CoursesDr. MD B. Sarder, University of Southern Mississippi Dr. Sarder is an associate professor and program coordinator of the industrial engineering technology program at the University of Southern Mississippi (USM). He is also an assistant director of the center for logistics, trade and transportation. At the USM, he revamped his program by developing as many as fourteen new courses, implementing hands on experience in courses, and delivering online courses for distant students. Dr. Sarder is very active in engineering and technology education research. He has
Paper ID #11530Integration of Mechatronics Design Approach into Teaching of Modeling Prac-ticesDr. Vukica M. Jovanovic, Old Dominion University Dr. Jovanovic received her dipl.ing and M.Sc. in Industrial Engineering from University of Novi Sad, Serbia. She received a PhD in Technology at Purdue University, while working as a PhD student in Cen- ter for Advanced Manufacturing, Product Lifecycle Management Center of Excellence. Dr. Jovanovic is currently serving as Assistant Professor of Engineering Technology, Frank Batten College of Engineering and Technology at ODU. She is teaching classes in the area of mechatronics
Paper ID #32855Design and Evaluation of Undergraduate Feedback-control System Course inDistance LearningDr. Chen Xu, New York City College of Technology Dr. Chen Xu is an Assistant Professor at Computer Engineering Technology department in New York City College of Technology. She received her Ph.D. degree in Biomedical Engineering from the Univer- sity of Connecticut.Her research areas of interest are in biomedical sensors and instrumentation, image processing, signal processing, and non-invasive medical test.Dr. Lili Ma, New York City College of Technology Professor Ma received her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Utah
fromentering degree programs and 2) the development of an accreditation system to establish a normof education across Russia in the various disciplines. Page 25.296.5ConclusionsThe Bologna Declaration has resulted in a major restructuring of the Russian educational system.The impacts include 1) a shift away from a deep specialization knowledge in the five yearspecialist degree and toward a broader but shallower general engineering base in the bachelordegree, 2) an uncertainty from employers about the capabilities of the new type of bachelordegree, 3) a reduction of the centrally controlled curricula which has lead to large variations inthe curriculum
demographics of entering engineering students, the intro toengineering course of today has become much more complex than it was even a decade ago, with ahost of new requirements. Traditionally, the introduction to engineering course taken by enteringfirst-year undergraduates has played a fairly modest role in the overall context of the undergraduateengineering curriculum, with primary attention given to developing the student’s general skills atsetting up and solving technical problems, emphasizing the importance of a methodical approach,application of appropriate theory, consistent handling of units and proper interpretation andpresentation of results. However, dramatic changes have brought new forces to bear, which arereshaping this traditional
determine if theapplied approach in circuits is a broadly beneficial practice or only a stylistic preference of thisparticular instructor.References [1] S.A. Zekavat, K. Hungwe, and S. Sorby. An optimized approach for teaching the interdisciplinary course electrical engineering for non majors. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Portland, OR, 2005. [2] Hooman Rashtian and Jun Ouyang. A New Application-Oriented Electronic Circuits Course for non-Electrical Engineering Students Using Arduino and NI VirtualBench. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Columbus, OH, 2017. doi: 10.18260/1-2–27490. [3] Kenneth Van Treuren. Encouraging Students to See the Role of Service Courses in Their Major. In ASEE Annual Conference and
oftheir high school classes with SAT scores of 1200 and above. The multidisciplinary aspect of the Rowan educational experience will produce a uniquely qualifiedprofessional. In addition to individual program requirements for discipline accreditation, the school willpromote a high level of multidisciplinary education. This will be through engineering clinics that are verticallyintegrated throughout the curriculum. These clinics will present a broad-based approach to engineering in thelower level and progress in depth and in technological and industrial relevance as the student progresses throughthe program. The nature of the clinics will allow students and faculty to work together in a hands-on projectenvironment that promotes teamwork to
Florida. Established in1997, FGCU attracts thousands of new freshmen each year because of its commitment toacademic excellence and an interdisciplinary focus on curriculum combined with a growing,younger regional population. The most unusual characteristic of FGCU, compared to otherUniversity systems, is its implementation of a 3-year renewable term contract rather than thetraditional tenure system. Despite this non-traditional approach, which has been in place sinceFGCU was started, there have been and continue to be many exceptional applicants to the newU.A. Whitaker School of Engineering (WSOE). The WSOE, which first admitted students lastyear, has debuted with three majors leading towards the Bachelor of Science degree inBioengineering, Civil
Creating a New, Junior-Level, Engineering Design Course in ECE Peter Mark Jansson and Amal Kabalan Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Bucknell UniversityAbstract – This paper describes the goals, pedagogical aspects and implementation of a new,junior-level engineering design course in the Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE)curriculum at Bucknell University. The need to build a more continuous set of designexperiences between a multi-disciplinary first-year course which contained some limited designexposure and the senior year culminating design experience was a key driver for thedevelopment of this new course. The authors
Paper ID #37974Adoption of CACPLA Pedagogy Collaborate Approach to ImprovePeer-Facilitated Tutorials in Material ScienceDr. David Olubiyi Obada, Africa Centre of Excellence on New Pedagogies in Engineering Education, AhmaduBello University, Zaria, Nigeria David O. Obada holds a Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering from the Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria, specializing in production/industrial engineering. His research interests include fracture mechanics, advanced materials, and condensed matter physics. Before joining the Atlantic Technological University, Ireland, David was a research fellow at the University of
teachingacross all levels of the curriculum, especially in Thermodynamics I, though it had been severalyears since Instructor A last taught that course. Instructor A has also frequently taught courseslater in the thermal-fluid sequence, and was the primary designer of homework and exams forSpring 2022 semester Thermo I. Instructor B also has extensive teaching experience, includingin Thermodynamics II, but was teaching Thermo I for the first time. Instructor C has the least © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Southeastern Section Conferenceexperience and is fairly new to teaching, though this instructor had recently taught Thermo I inprevious semesters without sufficient
question we can ask ourselves is: Are we ready to meet theengineering education challenges of the 21st century?The answers to these questions lie not just in the tweaking of some courses or curriculum,improving our teaching, or enhancing our efficiency, but in a willingness to consider new waysof doing business to better prepare our students for the future. Our response to the engineeringeducational challenges will determine the vitality, relevance, and indeed, the very future of ourengineering academic programs and our engineering profession. It is our contention thatengineering faculty with a passion for the scholarship of teaching and learning are uniquelyqualified and well positioned to face these challenges and assume the leading position in
Paper ID #36549Using modular assignments to assess MATLAB in a first year engineeringcourseMs. Karen Dinora Martinez Soto, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Karen Martinez Soto is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She received her B.Sc. in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Oklahoma and her M.Sc. in Aerospace Engineering at Virginia Tech. Her research interests are focused on teaching and assessment for conceptual understanding, curriculum development for the middle years, and student cultural compe- tencies.Dr. Homero Murzi, Virginia Polytechnic
a curated selection of additional videos and content by otherresearchers, educators, and news sources. A sampling of those resources includes content onbiologically inspired robots5-10 and biologically inspired design11; for the most current list, theinterested reader is referred to the project website4. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Southeastern Section ConferenceFigure 4: Example integration of videos into curriculum on swarming (left) and structuralengineering (right).We intend to track view and engagement rates as performance metrics for the videos. For the eightvideos posted to date, views are provided in Table 3. Notably, these videos have only been
materials engineering from Auburn University. He has authored several book chapters and articles on follower component of leadership and is active in research on the leadership processes. Page 25.517.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Embedding Leadership Topics in the Engineering CurriculumHow leadership is addressed in a quantitative based curriculum has challenged engineeringfaculty interested in leadership for some time. This paper describes an approach to developingleadership topics within a general engineering curricular program. Through the widespread useof student
]. Theymust now demonstrate their ability to “adopt an inclusive approach to engineering” [22]. TheRoyal Academy of Engineering [24] define six engineering habits of mind; systems thinking;adapting; problem-finding; creative problem-solving; visualizing; and improving. These areaccompanied by the following learning habits of mind: ethical consideration; curiosity, openmindedness; resilience; resourcefulness; collaboration; and reflection. It is therefore clear thatthis ‘new’ engineer of the future must have skills beyond the technical domain and Spinks,Silburn and Birchall [25] define three roles of an engineer: the first as a technical specialist;the second as an integrator who can work across boundaries in complex environments; andthird as a change
Paper ID #13988Pre-Engineering Education Collaborative at Four: Approaching the FinalPhasesDr. Robert V. Pieri, North Dakota State University Dr. Robert Pieri is Professor of Mechanical Engineering at North Dakota State University (NDSU) in Fargo, ND. He has many conference publications on engineering education and design. His primary interest areas include: Engineering Education, CADD, Design, Fracture Mechanics, Materials Science and Alternative Energy Options. Prior to joining NDSU, he worked for Allied-Signal Corporation and in the aircraft supply industry. Prior to his industrial experience he taught for 10 years at
Paper ID #11969Novel Approach to Developing and Implementing Curriculum in a 2-WeekHigh School Summer Engineering Experience (Work in Progress)Ms. Lauren Redfern, Duke University I am a second year doctoral student in Civil and Environmental Engineering at Duke University. I have a B.S in Biological Engineering from the University of Florida and a passion for K-12 Engineering.Mrs. A. Leyf Peirce Starling, North Carolina State University Leyf Peirce Starling received a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Virginia in 2003 and a Master of Arts in teaching with a focus on Special Education from UNC
British Columbia, where he serves as the program advisor for the Manufacturing Engineering undergraduate program. Casey’s research interests include multi-campus instruction and the development of open educational resources.Abbas Hosseini, University of British Columbia, Vancouver ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Reflections on Multi-campus Teaching in a New Manufacturing Engineering ProgramAbstractIn 2019, the University of British Columbia (UBC) initiated a new multi-campus manufacturingengineering program involving two campuses situated over 450 km apart. Each institution isresponsible for managing its own curriculum and specialization within manufacturing
“Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education” CAD is typically taught independently from studio and that the established studiotradition prevalent in architectural education contrasts with the typical skill-building approach toteaching CAD in which computer skills are taught in a way that is parallel with other classessuch as drawing, drafting, or model-making [5]. Mark argued that “the skill-focused means ofteaching is detrimental to the development of appropriate skills and attitudes in CAADapplication” and that “this mode of teaching reinforces the perception that CAAD is a techniqueand tool that is separate from
indicated that having to work on common curriculumelements, such as common foundational courses in the first and second year of new programs,with multiple departments or colleges created issues with program development. Beyondfocusing on buy-in from other science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)departments in the process, strategies for forming closer connections with other units in order todevelop shared goals and common instructional and assessment methods were discussed. Theseincluded large-scale decisions, such as choosing to merge an engineering college with the collegeof science at the institution to better support the collaborative curriculum initiatives that wereneeded.Planning for the future, allocation of resourcesItems 6