mathematics and science content, student-centered pedagogies, an engineeringdesign task, teamwork and communication skills10. Each of the units includes science andmathematics picture books, STEM activities, and an engineering design challenge to integrateSTEM learning. This provides students with contextual activities that engage learners in specificSTEM content as well as integrate concepts across traditional disciplinary boundaries. Theengineering and literacy contexts are important features within these STEM integration units thatfacilitate the authentic and meaningful integration of multiple STEM disciplines. Page 26.698.2
interventions for public school students, the effectiveness of mental health court programs, quality of life in the Hampton Roads (southeastern Virginia) area, percep- tions of mental health and substance abuse services in Virginia and New Hampshire, state-level factors impacting nursing home quality policies, various STEM programs at regional community colleges and universities, and predictive policing software. Dr. Vandecar-Burdin received her PhD in Public Adminis- tration and Urban Policy from Old Dominion University in 2009. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Opportunities in Manufacturing of Advanced Materials for Second Career Seeking Students
consideration of peoplein design in terms of their emotional reactions, how they will physically interact with thedesigned product, and how they communicate with others. Representations of people are notalways necessary in design, but their presence may encourage attention to specific elements ofhuman-centered design; for example, if a sketch does not include a person, there is no visualexplanation offered for how a user might physically engage with a product, potentially hinderingfurther design development or communication. Further research is needed to examine the roles ofthe qualities of representations on design outcomes.While students showed a range of ways (such as gendered and self-referential terms) to describepeople during their design
is a particular difficulty when assessing engineering.This paper addresses content questions; the issue of assessing skills and process knowledge isleft for future research.IntroductionEngineering is Elementary (EiE) is a research-based curriculum development project focused oncreating curriculum units that cover topics in engineering and technology as a supplement to corescience instruction. Each EiE curriculum unit is designed to build on and reinforce one sciencetopic through the exploration and development of a related technology. EiE has been committedfrom the project’s inception in 2003 to assessing students’ knowledge about engineering andtechnology, and measuring the impact of EiE on student knowledge and attitudes. EiE is
Zone Training. Those increases are in PTSD,engagement with community, and propensity for seeking help. The positive impacts weresmaller, but the enhancement by Green Zone Training of a few perceptions were actually greatersuch as the Veteran bias that they are more likely to suffer from PTSD, less likely to engage inthe community, and less likely to seek help.TABLE 4: Responses to Veteran Belief Statements, Based on Role and Level, Current DataSet with Veterans Excluded Versus Veterans Excluded and Having No Green ZoneTraining (Overall means for each category are given in red) When a greater than sign (>) isused, if the expected bias for the Veteran is observed then the value would be positive and anunexpected trend would be negative. When
discover alternate technologies to save vanishing natural resources. Inother words, it may be also defined as “meeting the needs of the present generation withoutcompromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs".12 The approach utilizedto study sustainability at a specific institution is presented which may also be used in otherinstitutions to present the concept of sustainability. Recently it has been estimated that the futuresustainable (green) economy could create roughly four million jobs. This forecast shouldcertainly be of interest to construction students and contractors.Introduction:“… the people who will succeed 15 years from now, the countries which will succeed, are thosewhich are most based on a sustainable vision
has documented the importance ofprogrammatic efforts, such as informal mentoring, co-curricular programs, support centers forengineering students, and living-learning programs [5]. Gándara and Maxwell-Jolly revealed thatmany minority student success programs focused on a combination of mentoring, financialsupport, academic support, psychosocial support, and professional opportunities [6].A Building Engineering and Science Talent (BEST) report recognized common characteristicsamong institutions that have been successful at increasing diversity in engineering by broadeningparticipation of underrepresented minorities. These characteristics included institutionalleadership, targeted recruitment, engaged faculty, developing student talent as a
discussed potentialcosts of engaging in the MDE; the only code associated with perceived cost was the amount oftime required to engage fully. Despite that acknowledgement, participants described the timeinvestment as worth it. Exemplar quotes are provided in Table 4.Table 3. MDE Inductive Coding Descriptions SVT Dimension Codes Participants describe… having people they can count on, finding their Attainment Value Having a Community “group”, or gaining a community. Helping Others Through the ability to help, influence, positively impact Attainment Value My Work others through
, When research on environmental problems seems like it is not having enough of an impact, mature idealist turn to outreach. This is convenient from the standpoint of career advancement because academics are expected to engage the community. Advising the local chapter of Engineers Without Borders, giving a talk at a local science museum, and serving on a government advisory panel are all counted by promotion committees. More often than not, the combination of meaningful research, mentorship and a few hours per week of outreach fulfills the need of the researcher to improve the planet. But encouraging forays into the real world comes with unintended consequences as researchers are exposed to
professional and ethical responsibility • An ability to communicate effectively • The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global/societal context • A recognition of the need for and an ability to engage in life-long learning • A knowledge of contemporary issuesGraded course work includes several short writing assignments, a case study report, and asemester research project. The case study, report, and the semester research project are done bystudent teams (the same team was used in a given semester for all team assignments), and eachof these was presented both in writing and orally, with equal grade weight placed on eachmethod of presentation. All students on a Team
maximize their academic skills; contribute to and benefit from productiveuniversity communities; offer best practices to help them navigate their college careers; andwork individually and collectively to further promote the goals of the program. The effortsdescribed in this study may provide a model for a wide range of retention and success programs,based around diverse populations and affinity groups, or general cohorts of students. Aggregateresults indicate that this cohort was able to achieve significantly higher GPAs and complete ahigher number of credits as compared to similar populations of students. This paper furtherdiscerns the impact on the engineering students, who coincidentally made up over 40% of thegroup, showing that first year
, and ability to function effectively on a team, with the latter twolearning outcomes scoring lowest in the pre-surveys. In addition to the survey analysis,lessons learned and recommendations for effective online education are discussed. Asonline education becomes more popular and in some cases more necessary, it is importantto understand the impact on engineering education, particularly in situations of forceddistance education. This study provides insight into the challenges that come withemergency online instruction and could drive decisions on priorities for in-personlearning environments.IntroductionHigher education in an online learning environment has been shown to be at least as effective asface-to-face, is appreciated by students [1, 2
. 712–731, 2020.[7] R. P. Loweth, S. R. Daly, K. H. Sienko, A. Hortop, and E. A. Strehl, “Student Designers’ Interactions with Users in Capstone Design Projects: A Comparison Across Teams,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[8] W. A. Sugar, “What is so good about user-centered design? Documenting the effect of usability sessions on novice software designers,” J. Res. Comput. Educ., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 235–250, 2001.[9] J. B. Scott, “The practice of usability: Teaching user engagement through service-learning,” Tech. Commun. Q., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 381–412, 2008.[10] J. L. Hess and N. D. Fila, “The manifestation of empathy within design: findings from a service-learning course,” CoDesign, vol. 12, no. 1–2
fewer problems and projects were generally more successful than seen in prior years. This may be the ‘placebo’ effect since we were focused on it, but we hope it indicates other ‘continuous improvement’ approaches are having a positive impact! • Regardless of team-forming method, each cohort experienced some team issues. A ‘stress-free’ senior project will not be achieved by changing how teams are formed!DiscussionDue to the size of our senior design program, we have the ability to gather a large amount of datain a relatively short period of time on the influence of different factors on student experience insenior project. In the current study, our focus was on the influence of two types of team-formingon that
institutions’ systemic impacts on minoritized students inengineering, we define these systems as systems of oppression, and their negative effects onminoritized students as marginalization [7]–[15]. While these negative experiences aredetrimental to minoritized engineering students’ health and well-being [3], [4], [16], their livedexperiences give minoritized doctoral students a unique perspective - one that enables them toviscerally understand and theorize about the inner mechanisms of the systems of oppression thatbear on them as well as stand outside the engineering institution to critique it [7], [17], [18]. For some minoritized doctoral students, the picture of doctoral student responsibilities iscomplicated by their desire to engage in
should considerthe nuances it implies. The solutions we can provide to barriers a paraplegic student may endureare very different from the solutions to those barriers a blind student might encounter. We cantherefore imagine how this might impact institutions, faculty, and administrators that areresponsible for providing services to students with disabilities.The authors of the articles screened in this review grounded their studies using a variety oftheories. Golding and colleagues [6] implemented a theory-informs-practice model named Modelof Co-Curricular Support (MCCS), which promoted the integration and engagement of studentswith the university in four main areas: academic, social, professional, and university integration[6]. On the other
study using Matlab interface that animates modal and time history response of a rigid diaphragm to illustrate impacts of changing mass, geometry, or stiffness.Students were surveyed at the end of the Winter 2018 quarter, and their responses with regards tothe new physical experiments/demonstrations were largely positive. In general, they indicatedthat observing the dynamic response of physical structural models; collecting and processingdata; and comparing the results to theoretical predictions was engaging and encourages them todevelop their engineering intuition, rather than memorize equations or procedures.IntroductionIt is uncommon for a course in advanced structural dynamics, with a focus on earthquakeengineering concepts, to
., Burks, G.A., Giron, J.J., Wong, W., Chung, G.K.W.K., & Baker, E. (2002). An Interactive Database Supporting Virtual Fieldwork in an Environmental Engineering Design Project. J. Eng. Edu., 91, 167-176.10. Richardson, J., Adamo-Villani, N., Carpenter, E. & Moore, G. (2006). Designing and Implementing a Virtual 3D Microcontroller Laboratory Environment. 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings.11. Chung, G.K.W.K., Harmon, T.C., & Baker, E. (2001). The Impact of a Simulation-Based Learning Design Project on Student Learning,” IEEE Trans. Educ., 44, 390-398.12. Campbell, J., Bourne, J., Mosterman, P., & Brodersen, A. (2002). The Effectiveness of Learning Simulations for
Paper ID #44944A Students Perspective of Professional Development in EngineeringTechnologyMr. Caeden Robert Goodnough, State University of New York, Canton Caeden Goodnough, growing up on my grandparents’ farm, I was immersed in the world of machinery. SUNY Canton welcomed me, and has given me hands on experience that has helped me greatly. I am currently a junior in the Mechanical Engineering Tech program. Beyond classes, I co-founded three clubs, including the Society of Manufacturing Engineers, fostering a community of enthusiasts. My farm experience instilled in me a strong work ethic and problem-solving skills, shaping
applicatons”9. It is also known that motivation to learnaffects student outcomes and that learners are motivated “when they can see the usefulness ofwhat they are learning and when they can use it to do something that has an impact onothers”25,9. Thus, it seems appropriate to find contexts for materials engineering course activitiesthat draw upon the students’ pre-existing knowledge and their previous/personal experiences. Inour courses, we have tried two such context areas. One of these focus areas used music stringsand stringed instrument design and the other, newer focus area uses biomedical devices thatexperience significant loads in service. The student response to the two different context areasdiffered and those differences are highlighted
and the lecture based method of instruction in a more uniform way thatwill allow future researchers to understand the impact of case-based instruction on studentlearning.IntroductionIn today’s typical science undergraduate courses, professors use a lecture style of teaching thatconcentrates on memorization and recall of material. This approach emphasizes declarativeknowledge rather than procedural knowledge.1 A lecture style format also frequently leads toreductions in student attention and engagement, which results in lower attendance (between 50 to65 percent) and information retention (typically about 10%).2 This means that students are notmotivated to come to class nor are they retaining information from classrooms that
empowerment of students is key to motivating them to persist in their studies includingSTEM [29]. Students develop intellectual growth that results in higher levels of resilience andpersistence when they experience instruction that is not only academically challenging but alsotaught content that directly impacts their lives. Culturally relevant, sustaining, and revitalizingpedagogy connects academic content to students’ communities by layering curriculum withcontent that is grounded in reflective language, traditions, events, and people [30]. Theoretical framework This study used three theories combined as one theoretical framework: Social CognitiveTheory (SCT), Community Cultural Wealth (CCW), and
mentors, and develop strong social connections with their engineeringpeers, all in order to facilitate the development of the students’ engineering identity [11].Instances for professional development allow the creation of a support network which is a criticalfactor in degree completion for women, who value community and collaboration more than theirmale counterparts [12]. This sense of belonging positively impacts academic achievement andretention in college as it increases women’s self-confidence and thus their self-efficacy [12]. Anexample of this is providing women students with the opportunity to engage with their peers andfaculty during an Engineering Field Trip, which would provide them with an engaged STEMlearning experience.In the past
same group of students working on both projects. As we have carried outthese projects, we observed that student team members seem to have developed a preference forone project over the other. Although both projects were generally perceived as very interesting andchallenging, one project involved more integration and configuration of “off-the-shelf” devices,such as Wi-Fi modems, radio frequency (RF) communication devices, microcontrollers, andcameras, as well as operating the complete system, while the other project involved more actualdesign of electronic devices from discrete electrical/electronic components and integrated circuits(ICs) as well as soldering and constructing physical hardware structures to build subsystems intoan entire
communicate effectively; (h) the broad educationnecessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic,environmental, and societal context; (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability toengage in life-long learning; and (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues. Often thesenontechnical skills do not receive as much emphasis in undergraduate engineeringeducation and instead must be learned on the job, learning "soft skills the hard way" 2.Opportunities do exist in current engineering curricula to better integrate the developmentof these nontechnical skills into students' experience. These include team projects incapstone design and freshman design courses, engineering study abroad courses, servicelearning projects in both
paper presents a methodical approach used to develop asynchronous web-basedengineering classes at undergraduate level.Challenges of Online TeachingCurrently, most online courses offering is in one of the following three formats: synchronous(zoom), asynchronous (web-based), or hybrid format with some in-person component. In asynchronous format (zoom), classes are offered at a set time and students are expected to log inin during that time. While this format provides a direct line of communication betweeninstructors and students, the instructors find it difficult to keep the class engaging. Also, it isdifficult to assess if students are paying attention during the class. If the instructor focuses oncreating opportunities for students to engage in
the first of five experiments was toassess how witnessing subtle gender bias events influences explicit stereotype activation amongpeople who recognize the events as gender stereotyping as well as those who do not. We utilizedvideo materials that were developed and tested in our previous NSF research that show a groupof four engineering students, 2 women and 2 men, working together on an engineering designtask. There are two versions of the video: one in which the students engaged in subtle genderbias (bias version), and one in which the students engaged in neutral interactions (controlversion). Over 400 participants were recruited from a large midwestern research university fromcomputer science and engineering majors in which 30% or fewer
engineering and is a registered professional engineer with APEGA (Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta). Prior to her career at MacEwan, Shelley worked in industry as a research engineer and a consulting engineer for several years.Dr. Jeffrey A Davis P.Eng., Grant MacEwan University Dr Davis obtained his PhD at ETH Zurich specializing in multiphase flows and thermal hydraulics in nuclear reactors. With a passion for teaching, Dr. Davis’ research focuses on pedagogical topics such as student engagement, active learning, and cognitive development. Projects he is currently working on include ”Development of a risk assessment model for the retention of students”, ”Development of
collaborativelyby partners from the fields of engineering, education and educational psychology. RRRC clubsare guided by teams comprising of STEM teachers and college engineering student mentors, whomirror the rich diversity of the primary and secondary school systems. This positive rolemodeling and one-on-one attention are a key focus wherein the program encourages students toexplore STEM careers and discover paths to achievement. Further, clubs frequently featurecareer presentations by community professionals from the private sector to encourage this careerexploration.While establishing itself as a sustainable program model that positively impacts students, RRRChas also been beneficial to its multiple partners. K-12 teachers have received additional
particular relevance to this work. The work of Cech [10] examines the role of cul-ture in student engagement and retention, in particular, the culture of disengagement in engineer-ing and how that culture influences students. Recent work by Nguyen [11], presents the effects ofcompetitive enrollment policies on students’ sense of belonging, emphasizing the importance ofdepartment policies in setting up students for success in computing.1.3. Quantifying Belonging We strive to use equity-minded sense making of our data. We use the analysis portionof the work discussed here, and we used the structure of the 2018 work of Rainey et al.[9] to cat-egorize questions related to impact on sense of belonging. In the Rainey et al. paper, the