. Allison, D., Cooley, L. & Lewkowicz, J. Dissertation writing in action: The development of a disseration writing support program for ESL graduate research students. English Specif. Purp. 17, 199–217 (1998).18. Locke, L. A. & Boyle, M. Avoiding the A . B . D . Abyss : A Grounded Theory Study of a Dissertation-Focused Course for Doctoral Students in an Educational Leadership Program. Qual. Rep. 21, 1574–1593 (2016).19. Hasbun, I. M., Matusovich, H. M. & Adams, S. G. The dissertation Institute: Motivating doctoral engineering students toward degree completion. in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) (2016).20. Swales, J. Genre analysis: English in
University. Dr. Ames is a registered professional engineer and in 2010, he received the Early Career Excellence Prize from the International Environmental Modeling and Software Society and the Idaho State University Distinguished Researcher Award. He is the creator of the widely-used open source GIS software MapWindow; has worked on several GIS and modeling related projects funded by EPA, USGS, NOAA and NSF; and presently leads the development of HydroDesktop, a free software client for the CUAHSI Hydrologic Information System. Page 23.1321.1Dr. Laura G Hunter, Utah Education Network Dr. Laura G. Hunter is
includestudents from Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) majors.These articles were published in 1 conference proceeding and 6 journals: ASEE conferenceproceeding (9), Journal of Engineering Education (6), European Journal of EngineeringEducation (1), International Journal of Engineering Education (1), International Journal forService Learning in Engineering (1), Journal of Women and Minorities in Science andEngineering (1), The Journal of Higher Education (1), Research in Higher Education (3).Table 1Summary of Research on Engineering Student Out of Class InvolvementAuthor/Year Article Source Research Types of Participants Methods
, “Civic Scientific Literacy in the United States in 2016,” International Centerfor the Advancement of Scientific Literacy, Ann Arbor, MI, Rep., Oct. 2016.[2] “STEM Integration in K-12 Education,” National Academy of Engineering and NationalResearch Council, National Academies Press, 2014.[3] J. D. Miller, “The Sources and Impact of Civic Scientific Literacy,” in The culture ofscience: how the public relates to science across the globe, New York: Routledge, 2012, pp.217–240.[4] S. Brophy, S. Klein, M. Portsmore, and C. Rogers, “Advancing Engineering Education inP-12 Classrooms,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 369–387, 2008.[5] National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council, Engineering in K
University.Dr. Joanna Mirecki Millunchick, University of Michigan Joanna Mirecki Millunchick is a professor of materials science and engineering and Associate Dean for Undergraduate Education in the College of Engineering at the University of Michigan. She is active in both scientific and pedagogical research. Her educational research ranges from investigating the efficacy of virtual and augmented reality tools in teaching materials science, to studying the patterns of participa- tion of undergraduates in co-curricular activities and research.Dr. Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan Aaron W. Johnson is a postdoctoral research fellow at the University of Michigan. He received his Ph.D. in Aeronautics and Astronautics from
, “Facilitating an elementary engineering design process module,” School Science and Mathematics, vol 118, no. 1-2, pp. 53–60, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12259[8] J. Krajcik, and I. Delen, “How to support learners in developing usable and lasting knowledge of STEM,” International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, no. 5, vol. 1, pp. 21–28, 2017.[9] J. Piaget, The construction of reality in the child. New York, NY, US: Basic Books.1954. https://doi.org/10.1037/11168-000[10] M. Scardamalia, C. Bereiter, “Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology,” In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.[11] J.S. Bruner
Sustainability in Learning and Teaching Initiatives,” International Journal for Academic Development, 9, 341–352. (2014)12. G. D. Kuh, “High-impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who has Access to Them, and Why They Matter,” Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2008)13. L. Reisberg, “Research by undergraduates proliferates, but is some of it just glorified homework,” The Chronicles of Higher Education, 20, A45-A46. (1998)14. A. Zydney, J. Bennett, A. Shahidand K. Bauer, “Impact of undergraduate research experience in engineering,” Journal of Engineering Education, 91, 151-157. (2002)15. H. Thiry, T. Weston, S. Laursen, and A. Hunter, "The benefits of multi-year research experiences: differences in
identification’ including Latinx, African American, Native American or Pacific Islander* (reference group: non URM responses including white and Asian American) Female Question about sex (reference group: male) Female URM Both URM and female (reference group: all others) College Experiences While an undergraduate, have you done (or are you currently doing) for at least one full academic or summer term: (binary measures where 1 = yes, 0 = no) Internship Worked in a professional engineering environment as an intern/co-op Research Conducted research with a faculty member Job Work-study or other type of job to help pay for college education Study Abroad Participate
University in Richmond, VA.Prof. Alen Docef, Virginia Commonwealth University Alen Docef received his PhD from Georgia Institute of Technology and pursued postdoctoral research at the University of British Columbia. Dr. Docef’s research interests are in medical image processing, including enhancement and coding of CT, MRI, and ultrasound images; multimedia signal coding using standard and unconventional methods; efficient and embedded implementations of signal processing and communications algorithms. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Work-in-Progress: Connecting Engineering with Mathematics through Differential
on Computers in Education, Putrajaya, Malaysia: Asia-PacificSociety for Computers in Education, (2010).5 Prince, M.J., Vigeant, M.A.S. & Nottis, K. (2009). “A preliminary study on the effectiveness of inquiry‐basedactivities for addressing misconceptions of undergraduate engineering students.” Education for Chemical Engineers,4(2), 29‐41.6 Prince, M. Vigeant, M., & Nottis, K. (2010), “Assessing Misconceptions of Undergraduate Engineering Studentsin the Thermal Sciences,” International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(4), 880‐890.7 Wolfinger, R.D. and Chang, M. (1995). “Comparing the SAS GLM and MIXED Procedures for repeatedmeasures.” Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual SAS Users Group Conference, SAS Institute Inc., Cary
. Page 25.26.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 A Comparative Analysis of 3D Parametric Surface Modeling and Freeform Mesh Modeling as Tools for Investigating Student LearningAbstractThis paper investigates the effectiveness with which similar outputs can be produced fromtwo 3D CAD packages that employ different modeling approaches. The modeling approachesin question are parametric NURBS1 (Non-Uniform Rational B-Spline) surface modeling andpolygonal freeform modeling. The former refers to the creation of organic geometry using 2Dsketches and building standalone faces between sketches fig1, the latter refers to taking anexisting geometric shape and
Paper ID #7820Work-in-progress: A novel approach to collaborative learning in engineeringprogramsDr. Neelam Soundarajan, Ohio State University Dr. Soundarajan is an associate professor in the Computer Science and Engineering Department at Ohio State. His interests include software engineering and engineering education. Page 23.1391.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Work-in-Progress: A Novel Approach to Collaborative Learning in Engineering
, Inc. 1992.3 Bordogna, Joseph. “Making Connections: The Role of Engineers and EngineeringEducation.” The Bridge (A Publication of the National Academy of Engineering), Spring, 1997. Volume 27,Number 14 Wulf, William A., and George M.C. Fisher. “A Makeover for Engineering Education.” Issues in Science andTechnology, Spring 2002.5 http://www.abet.org/downloads/EAC_99-00_Criteria.doc 20086 Cooper, C. "Product Innovation and Technology Strategy." Research / Technology Management, Vol. 43, No. 1,2000, 38-41.7 Salamon, N. and R.S. Engel. "A Management/Grading System for Teaching Design in Mechanics of Materials andOther Courses." International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 16, No. 5, 2000, 189-196.8 Schlater, N. and Hillary Grierson
, empirical results and future directions." internationalJournal of Training and Development 7.4 (2003): 245-258.[15] Boles, M.A. and Cengel, Y.A., 1989. Thermodynamics: an engineering approach. McGraw-Hill.[16] Railean, Elena. "Google Apps for Education–a powerful solution for global scientific classrooms with learnercentred environment." International Journal of Computer Science Research and Application 2.2 (2012): 19-27.[17] Brown, Maury Elizabeth, and Daniel L. Hocutt. "Learning to use, useful for learning: a usability study ofGoogle apps for education." Journal of Usability Studies 10.4 (2015): 160-181.[18] Blau, Ina, and Avner Caspi. "What type of collaboration helps? Psychological ownership, perceived learningand outcome quality of
AC 2012-3106: INTRODUCING CONTEMPORARY ISSUES TO ENGI-NEERING STUDENTS: A CASE STUDY MODULEDr. Joshua David Schwartz, Trinity University Joshua Schwartz has been an Assistant Professor with the Engineering Science Department at Trinity University since 2010. His graduate and postdoctoral studies have garnered international recognition in the area of analog microwave signal processing. In 2008 McGill University awarded him the Governor General’s Gold Medal, Canada’s highest academic award, for his doctoral thesis on the applications of a new microwave interconnect, and in 2009 he was awarded the distinguished IEEE Microwave Prize for the most significant paper contribution in an area of interest to the IEEE Microwave
, “Where is the engineering I applied for? A longitudinal study of students’ transition into higher education engineering, and their considerations of staying or leaving,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 154–171, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2015.1056094.[4] M. Meyer and S. Marx, “Engineering Dropouts: A Qualitative Examination of Why Undergraduates Leave Engineering,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 525–548, 2014, doi: 10.1002/jee.20054.[5] B. Geisinger and D. R. Raman, “Why They Leave: Understanding Student Attrition from Engineering Majors,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 914–925, Jan. 2013.[6] National Academy of Engineering
. They're all like four different types of subjects that will help you get farther in life. They all like are helping people learn more things. They're all very important for stuff in the future. Well I think they're all part of the education, you're all supposed to learn that. They all just kind of work together. Engineering and technology are kind of the same because they both use like batteries and stuff to make them work. It basically just all fits together because engineering creates the technology. Without engineering you
Engineering Edu- cation from Purdue University (2008). Her research focuses on strategies for design innovations through divergent and convergent thinking as well as through deep needs and community assessments using design ethnography, and translating those strategies to design tools and education. She teaches design and en- trepreneurship courses at the undergraduate and graduate levels, focusing on front-end design processes.Dr. Jaclyn Kuspiel Murray, University of Michigan Jaclyn K. Murray is a Research Fellow at the University of Michigan in the Department of Mechanical Engineering. Her interests include design, creativity, spatial skill development, and epistemic agency formation across STEM fields.Dr. Seda
., Rethinking design thinking: Part I. Design and culture, 2011. 3(3): p. 285- 306.14. Lucas, B., G. Claxton, and J. Hanson, Thinking Like an Engineer: Implications for the education system. 2014.15. Dym, C.L., et al., Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of engineering education, 2005. 94(1): p. 103-120.16. Brenner, W., F. Uebernickel, and T. Abrell, Design thinking as mindset, process, and toolbox: Experiences from research and teaching at the University of St. Gallen. Design thinking for innovation: Research and practice, 2016: p. 3-21.17. Grönman, S. and E. Lindfors, The process models of design thinking: A literature review and consideration from the perspective of craft, design and
AC 2012-4344: FUTURE ENGINEERING PROFESSORS’ VIEWS OF THEROLE OF MOTIVATION IN TEACHING AND LEARNINGMrs. Ana T. Torres-Ayala, University of South Florida Ana T. Torres-Ayala is a doctoral candidate in higher education at the University of South Florida. She holds a B.S. degree in computer engineering from the University of Puerto Rico, Mayagez, and a M.Eng. degree in computer and systems engineering from Rensselear Polytechnic Institute. She has experience in the telecommunications industry where she worked for Lucent Technologies. Torres-Ayala was previously an information technology instructor. Her research interests include faculty development, scholarship of teaching and learning, graduate education, and
AC 2011-2428: EXCHANGE - EXPERIENTIAL EARTHQUAKE ENGI-NEERING EDUCATION FOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS THROUGHTHE CALIFORNIA STATE SUMMER SCHOOL FOR MATHEMATICSAND SCIENCELelli Van Den Einde, University of California, San Diego Lelli Van Den Einde is a Lecturer (LPSOE) in the Department of Structural Engineering at UC San Diego’s Jacobs School of Engineering. Dr. Van Den Einde’s research has evolved from large-scale ex- perimentation in earthquake engineering with primary focus on reinforced concrete bridges, to research in engineering education focusing on introducing cyberinfrastructure and technology into engineering curriculum.Samuel Lee, UC San Diego Structural Engineering
aircraft engineer. Her research and professional interests include faculty development, innovations in engineering communication education, engineering student learning motivation, and nar- rative structure in technical communication.Dr. Nancy Ruzycki, University of Florida Director of Undergraduate Laboratories, Faculty Lecturer, Department of Materials Science and Engi- neeringDr. Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia Finelli, Director of the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching in Engineering and research associate professor of engineering education at University of Michigan (U-M), earned B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E., and Ph.D. degrees from U-M in 1988, 1989, and 1993, respectively. Prior to joining U
tempting to treat the specification andmeasurement of learning outcomes as an obstacle.In contrast to that view, this paper argues that outcomes based assessment benefits the design andcontinuing improvement of study abroad courses. To support this claim, the paper describes thedesign and assessment of “Jefferson in France 1787: Connoisseurship, Commerce, andEngineering,” a study abroad course taught at the University of Virginia that develops severalABET Criterion 3 outcomes, specifically, (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams,(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a globaland societal context, (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in, lifelonglearning, and (j
intersection,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 12–32, Jan. 2013.[10] W. F. Tate, “Returning to the root: A culturally relevant approach to mathematics pedagogy,” Theory Pract., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 166–173, Jun. 1995.[11] T. Yuen, M. Arreguín-Anderson, G. Carmona, and M. Gibson, “A culturally relevant pedagogical approach to computer science education to increase participation of underrepresented populations,” in Proceedings - 2016 International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering, LaTiCE 2016, 2016, pp. 147–153.[12] J. D. Lemus, K. D. Seraphin, A. Coopersmith, and C. K. V. Correa, “Infusing Traditional Knowledge and Ways of Knowing Into Science Communication Courses at the
Paper ID #21972The Challenges and Affordances of Engineering Identity as an Analytic LensMs. Christine Allison Gray, Northern Arizona University Christine Allison Gray is a doctoral student in the College of Education at Northern Arizona University. She also serves as a graduate assistant on the Reshaping Norms project in the College of Engineering, Forestry and Natural Sciences.Dr. Robin Tuchscherer P.E., Northern Arizona University Dr. Tuchscherer currently serves as an Associate Professor at Northern Arizona University where he has taught since 2011. Prior to academia, he accumulated eight years of professional
country isunique in its path to development hence LLD “is tied to each country’s unique political, social,cultural, economic, and environmental conditions, including through local systems practice andlocal capacity strengthening.” [10]. With the likely elimination of USAID, it is more imperativethat US universities take the helm in materializing LLD in their international communitydevelopment programs and initiatives.This work-in-progress paper provides a model for the creation of HE education that cancontribute to LLD by showing how to 1) build academic and professional networks in countryand interest and capacity in HE education in local universities, 2) map and assess needs andcapacities of local engineering schools and communities, and 3) map
. and Porter, J.R., “Using project-based learning to teach Six Sigma principles,” International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 26(3), 2 010, pp. 655-666.31. Zhan, W., Zoghi, B. and Fink, R., “The Benefit of Early and Frequent Exposure to Product Design Process”, Journal of Engineering Technology, Spring 2009, pp. 34-43.32. Zydney, A., Bennett, J. S., Shahid, A., and Bauer, K. W., “Impact of Undergraduate Research Experience in Engineering,” J. Eng. Educ., Vol. 19, 2002, pp. 151-157. Page 22.279.13
American Society for Engineering Education, 2014Advanced Student-Centric Learning Practices in Applied Engineering Programs Page 24.140.2 1AbstractStudent-Centric Learning (SCL) has been recognized as an effective methodology to engage andmotivate students for some time now. Research conducted by National Training Laboratory andother leading universities have identified several benefits of SCL including deeper learning,motivation, teamwork, etc. With the advent of high-speed internet technology, availability of largedata bases brimming with information and the rapid growth of online
its applied nature has aninherent and specific focus on problem solving. Engineers need to be/are educated to transferlearned principles into practice by way of designing solutions for various practical problems. It isthe centrality of problem-solving that inspired us to design our DBT course AME4163 – Principlesof Engineering Design with an explicit anchoring in multiple theoretical constructs that provide animmersive and authentic learning experience to our students while enriching their learnedoutcomes. Accordingly, the course is designed to embody the following essential components: 1. Internalizing the principles of engineering design and learning how to identify and develop career sustaining competencies. 2
The BOK Educational Fulfillment Committee was formed in 2007. Composed of representatives of ten widely varying institutions, this committee investigated the incorporation of the 24 BOK2 outcomes into civil engineering curricula. The BOK Experiential Fulfillment Committee was formed in early 2009 to address those BOK2 outcomes requiring pre-licensure experience. The committee was charged with developing early-career experience guidelines for engineer interns, supervisors, and mentors.In the course of their work, both of these committees identified a need for further refinement ofBOK2. For example, the Experiential Fulfillment Committee suggested additional emphasis onquality management and public safety