. Eachgroup must designate one of its members as a group manager whose responsibilities includegroup coordination and liaison between all parties involved.All final-year engineering students are required to meet three major reporting deadlines. Allreports require written documentation and an oral presentation. The approximate schedule andcontent of the reports are as follows. Page 6.580.2 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education1. Project Proposal. i) project description and scope
Added Headache? Kevin Pintong Alexander Hogen Abstract Instructors for digital logic and design courses have a wide variety of FPGA developmentkits to choose from. Should the instructor choose a commercial product or develop their ownsystem? Is there added value to custom hardware? Two programmable logic device based de-velopment kits were designed, manufactured, and used in the instruction of Digital Logic I,Digital Logic II, and Digital System Design I at Oregon Institute of Technology. In this paper,we review commercial based offerings versus our custom hardware from both the pedagogicaland value perspectives. Three use cases are evaluated- commercially
Advanced Electric Vehicles, and a thriving partnership for student recruitment with several universities in China. He has also been the dissertation advisor for and graduated many Ph.D. students. Dr. Das’s areas of research interests are modeling and simulation of multi-disciplinary engineering problems, modeling multi- physics problems in manufacturing, engineering education, and curriculum reform. He has worked in areas ranging from mechatronics system simulation to multi-physics process simulation using CAE tools such as Finite Elements and Boundary Elements. He has authored or co-authored five books on these topics. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022
Society of Professional Engineers, Cobb Chapter, a Member of the American Society of Engineering Educators ASEE, and a Member of the Institute of Transportation Engineers, USA. Dr. Okhio has carried out experimental and numerical investigations of, and developed statistical analysis tools and computer codes, for the numerical simulation/calculation of complex flows. He has been co-PI in a few successful research efforts including those related to NASA, WPAB, GE, NSF, NRO, ARO, ORNL, Honeywell, KCP, to name a few. He has also been the co-PI on Department of Energy sponsored Project called Minority Serving Institution Partnership Project MSIPP on Advance Manufacturing which involved the (1) use of research activities to
growth over sustainability and equity. This emphasis on limitlessgrowth is what led to the climate crisis to begin with. Therefore, to prepare engineering studentsto be a part of the effort to address the climate crisis, civil engineering instructors need todevelop curricula that will ensure students acquire the necessary knowledge and skills, as well asan understanding of the far-reaching impacts their work will have.Many institutions of higher education have begun to prepare undergraduate students to serve aspart of this workforce by developing sustainability-focused coursework, concentrations, minors,and in some cases, majors. Such curriculum initiatives, while necessary, take years to develop.Institutions that do not yet offer similar
withinnew and existing industries – government initiatives, and public service. The Major wasdeveloped with the efforts of faculty from several departments, plus feedback from externalindustrial advisors, over the course of several years. The Major has two tracks: a Bachelor ofScience that aims for ABET accreditation; and a Bachelor of Arts that offers more flexibility intechnical electives, including courses in Chemistry and Biology, that readily accommodatesdouble-majors. This paper details the process by which the major was developed, and describeschallenges such as faculty development and competition for scarce resources. In addition, wedescribe the program’s curriculum, budget, educational outcomes and objectives, and plans forthe future. It
Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Midwest Section Conference2.2 Milestone 2An example circuit for milestone 2 is shown in Figure 4. After introducing transistorfundamentals, students will be able to incorporate transistors in their design. This improves theefficiency of the circuit compared with the example in milestone 1. This milestone also helpsstudents learn how to read manufacturer manuals and select appropriate devices for the circuit.2.3 Milestone 3Milestone 3 is scheduled after the introduction of the digital logic circuit. Once they learn the555 timer and Pulse-Width-Modulation (PWM), they will be able to design a higher efficient butmore sophisticated circuit. This circuit is closer to the
biomedical engineer. She had interest in mechanical manufacturing. She was intent on contributing a large part of the design. This led to some good discussion and debating about how to best implement the adjustable table mechanic. The two people mentioned above developed a different solution than mine, and they were eventually able to convince me that their design was more accessible than my idea. The friendly competition of ideas drove us towards the best solution for that situation.” “Many courses in the undergraduate curriculum only allow for students to work with other students in their major. This course allowed for cross-discipline groups to work together which then allowed the students to gain different perspectives from
facilitation of thecourse to help continuously improve the project outcomes. The paper will address just fourissues that were identified as problems.2. Course BackgroundStudents enroll in the 1 credit hour capstone design course their senior year. The capstone designexperience allows students to apply their technical and non-technical knowledge to actualindustrial problems. The Six Sigma DMAIC model is used to manage the project. The projectmay draw on knowledge gained from any course in the curriculum. Students will either do Proceedings of the 2018 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright2018, American Society for Engineering Education
effects how students are motivated. Our curriculum is male dominated (about 85% male) and at the college level, male students are often less emotionally mature than their female counterparts. The female students seem to be easier “Proceedings of the 2009 Mid-Atlantic Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education” 8 to motivate perhaps because they are in a male dominated profession. I’m told the opposite is true in the School of Nursing. Sometimes, those in the minority try harder. Remember, the early Type X and Type Y Theory presupposed there are two types of
effects how students are motivated. Our curriculum is male dominated (about 85% male) and at the college level, male students are often less emotionally mature than their female counterparts. The female students seem to be easier “Proceedings of the 2009 Mid-Atlantic Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education” 8 to motivate perhaps because they are in a male dominated profession. I’m told the opposite is true in the School of Nursing. Sometimes, those in the minority try harder. Remember, the early Type X and Type Y Theory presupposed there are two types of
Relationship Between Student Engagement and Performance in Thermodynamics – Phase I,” Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (2007). Page 12.1208.7Figure 1: Main interface screen for the Engaged in Thermodynamics material (a portion of thescreen is cut off at the bottom). Page 12.1208.8Figure 2: Top of the Co-Generation narrative demonstrating use of equipment photographs and linked manufacturer data.Figure 3: Screen shot of skill based problem list for the
hospitals, evaluate implant performanceand failure, and present their data and educational experiences both locally and nationallythrough classroom and conference venues.The Creative Inquiry program is based on the concept of ‘discovery based learning,’ thus ithopes to promote the development of skills that will be used in future courses and ultimately, thestudents’ future careers. This type of learning uses the fundamentals of materials science andengineering to promote active student engagement in the medical device field and its clinicalapplication. Therefore, this program is intended to promote discovery guided by mentoring7.The National Science Foundation (NSF) reported in 1994 that there was a need for theengineering curriculum to include
2006-627: DEVELOPMENT OF A VIRTUAL REFRIGERATION APPARATUS TOPROMOTE UNDERSTANDING OF THE ACTUAL EXPERIMENTPatrick Tebbe, Minnesota State University-Mankato Patrick Tebbe is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Minnesota State University in Mankato where he serves as the Graduate Coordinator for Mechanical Engineering. Dr. Tebbe received the B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering as well as the M.S. in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Missouri – Columbia. He is currently a member of the American Society for Engineering Education, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers and the American Society for Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning
B.S. and M.S. in mechanical engineering fromthe Georgia Institute of Technology, and the Ph.D. from North Carolina State University. Priorto coming to Mercer, he held a faculty position at Texas A&M University. Page 10.827.6 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education Appendix I SELF/PEER TEAM ASSESSMENTName_________________________________
- ing Education and the Algae Biomass Organization. Dr. Shuman served as Chair for the ASEE Energy Conversion and Conservation Division last year. She received a Dipl.Ing. degree in mechanical engineering from Belgrade University in 1992, an M.S.M.E. from the University of Washington in 1994 and a Ph.D. from the University of Washington in 2000.Dr. Gregory Mason, Seattle University Gregory S. Mason was born and raised in Spokane Washington. He received the B.S.M.E. degree from Gonzaga University in 1983, the M.S.M.E. degree in manufacturing automation from Georgia Institute of Technology in 1984 and the Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering, specializing in multi-rate digital controls, from the University of
Engineering Education, 2021 Paper ID #33741with a private weather firm in Houston, TX, Mr. Duke returned to Mobile and began teaching high schoolmathematics. While teaching high school, he enrolled in the Alternative Masters Program at USA andearned a master’s degree in Mathematics Education and his teaching certificate in the state of Alabama. Heis currently in his twentieth year at Davidson High School in Mobile teaching AP Statistics, AP Calculus,and AP Physics and recently became a National Board Certified Teacher. For the past seven summers,Mr. Duke has work the the JROTC program for Mobile County Public Schools and STEMWorks, LLC. todevelop curriculum
long been an interesting research topic for engineeringand technology educators. During a discussion on curriculum development at Essex CountyCollege, some faculty members, believing that basic mathematical skills were fundamental forgraphics apprehension, advocated the adoption of a mathematics course as a prerequisite to thegraphics course. At the same time, others did not believe mathematical proficiency to be necessaryfor mastering graphics and computer-aided design (CAD) skills. The ability to visualize spatially isgenerally considered fundamental for graphics applications, especially for three-dimensional (3D)solid modeling using CAD software packages. Is there a relationship between basic mathematicalskills and spatial visualization
fortraditional disciplinary engineering programs nationwide.Engineering design at CSM begins in the freshman year with the award-winning EPICS(Engineering Practices Introductory Course Sequence) and continues in the sophomoreyear in a second semester of EPICS. Included in the CSM core curriculum is a uniquelaboratory sequence, the Multi-disciplinary Engineering Laboratory (MEL I, II, and III).MEL has won several awards, including the prestigious award for Academic Excellenceand Cost Management from the American Council on Education, a NSF CCLI grant, andgrants from the Parsons Foundation, Chevron, and Kennecott Mining. During senior yearengineering students in civil, electrical, environmental, and mechanical specialtiesparticipate in a two-semester
-calculus during freshmanmouse trap car year, the author enrolled in the Physics I class while taking AP Calculus I/AB during sophomore year. In the academic year, the author led a team in the project to brainstorm, design, I. INTRODUCTION manufacture, test, and analyze a car in which only mechanicalT He Union County Magnet High School (UCMHS) is a magnet public high school located in Scotch Plains, NewJersey on the Union County
Manufacturing Engineers (SME), since 2016. Dr. Sirinterlikci was actively involved in SME serving in its Journals Committee, and Manufac- turing Education and Research (MER) Community Steering Committee. He also served as an officer of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Manufacturing Division between 2003-2011 including its Chair.Dr. Khalid H. Tantawi, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Dr. Khalid Tantawi is an Assistant Professor of Mechatronics at the University of Tennessee at Chat- tanooga . He holds a PhD and MSc. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Alabama in Huntsville, and a double MSc. in Aerospace Engineering from the Institut Superieur de l’Aeronautique et de l’Espace and
the Internet will be illustrated using lessons developed for the sophomore-level chemicalengineering course on material and energy balances. The advantages offered by the Internet maybe exploited to create a valuable educational experience for the student that cannot be duplicatedin the formal classroom. These advantages include: i) convenient access to the course from anylocation and on any schedule; ii) an added level of communication of the scientific conceptsthrough well-designed audio-visual content (including voice, simulations, animations, pictures,and video); iii) the students’ control of the pace of the course; and iv) the ability to easilyintegrate problem solving with the “lecture” component of each lesson. We have developed
its Engineering Education Research Center (EERC), where her interests focus on active and experiential learning. She has 25 years of experience as an engineer and analyst, having worked most recently for Walgreens and General Motors/Delphi Automotive in the areas of data analysis, IT, and manufacturing. She received her PhD in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh and her MS in Mechanical Engineering from Case Western while working for Delphi. She completed her postdoctoral studies in engineering education at the University of Pittsburgh.Dr. Melissa M. Bilec, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Bilec is an associate professor in the Swanson School of Engineering’s Department of Civil and Environmental
enhancing undergraduate education through hands-on learning. Luchini-Colbry is also the Director of the Engineering Futures Program of Tau Beta Pi, the Engineering Honor Society, which provides interactive seminars on interpersonal communications and problem solving skills for engineering students across the U.S.Dr. Christopher McComb, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Christopher McComb is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Design, Technology, and Professional Programs with courtesy appointments in the Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engi- neering and the Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. He earned dual B.S. degrees in Civil and Mechanical Engineering from
, many commented thatthe courses emphasized solving engineering problems, yet the faculty were also teaching the coursesto build the student capabilities in many other areas like communication, ethics, teamwork, andlearning. The faculty may not have placed a large percentage toward the overall final grade in theclass, but the courses were broad in scope in educating engineers. After the 2019 notebookcollection, the undergraduate curriculum committee reviewed all of the courses and proposed toredistribute the SO by removing all but two for each course. The two SO were the only ones forwhich data was to be collected and analyzed.Figure 1 shows the distribution of SO. The goal was to have each required undergraduate class haveno more than two SO
-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2021-2 022/ (accessed Jan. 24, 2022).[4] I. van de Poel, “Engineering ethics,” in Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics, H. ten Have, Ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016, pp. 1112–1121. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_171. Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright © 2022, American Society for Engineering Education 6[5] M. Hersh, “Ethical engineering: definitions, theories and techniques,” in Ethical Engineering for International Development and Environmental Sustainability
worked as the Education Project Manager for the NSF-funded JTFD Engineering faculty development program, as a high school math and science teacher, and as an Assistant Principal and Instructional & Curriculum Coach.Dr. Ann F. McKenna, Arizona State University Ann F. McKenna is the Vice Dean of Strategic Advancement for the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University, and is a professor of engineering in the Polytechnic School, one of the seven Fulton Schools. Prior to joining ASU, she served as a program director at the National Science Founda- tion in the Division of Undergraduate Education, and was the director of education improvement in the McCormick School of Engineering at Northwestern
engineers if they are to address the energy issues of the world. This paper describes anexploratory analysis of undergraduate engineering students’ conceptions of energy. The study ispart of a larger investigation around the ways in which students respond to new integratedapproaches to energy (i.e., a disentanglement of the usage of the word “energy” acrossdisciplines) in the engineering curriculum. We are in the process of launching a new course,Integrated Approach to Energy, that will be our students’ first formal introduction to energy in arecently launched interdisciplinary engineering major.To better meet our students where they are, we wanted to understand how they conceptualizeenergy broadly from their own educational experiences and
. Taylor Parks, University of Illinois Urbana - Champaign Taylor Parks is a course development fellow in engineering education at the Siebel Center for Design. She earned her bachelor’s in engineering mechanics and master’s in curriculum and instruction from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her research focuses on promoting teamwork in complex engineering problem solving through collaborative task design. She currently co-leads the integration of human-centered design principles within select courses across the Grainger College of Engineering.jean-charles stinville, University of Illinois at Urbana - ChampaignDr. Blake Everett Johnson, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Dr. Blake Everett Johnson is a
AC 2012-4697: WHAT DID WE LEARN FROM USING ENGINEERING-BASED LEARNING PEDAGOGY IN JOSIAH QUINCY HIGH SCHOOL?Dr. Ibrahim F. Zeid, Northeastern University Ibrahim Zaid is a professor of mechanical, industrial, and manufacturing engineering at Northeastern Uni- versity. He received his Ph.D. degree from the University of Akron. Zeid has an international background. He received his B.S. (with highest honor) and M.S. from Cairo University in Egypt. He has received var- ious honors and awards both in Egypt and the United States. He is the recipient of both the Northeastern Excellence in Teaching Award and the SAE Ralph R. Teetor National Educational Award.Mr. William L. Chan, Josiah Quincy High School William Chan is