on the design along with a demonstration to the class. For the purpose ofassessments, the progress reports in Phase I and the final reports in Phase II were used as thestudents’ feedback. A survey was conducted during and after the project. The survey results werecompared and the changes of the students’ conceptions of engineering designs were discussed.IntroductionThe capability of design has been widely agreed to be one of the most important characteristicsof engineers. A good understanding of engineering design concepts and engineering designprocesses helps engineering graduates to achieve a smooth transition from academia to industry.Therefore, the well-known ABET engineering accreditation criteria1 requires engineeringgraduates should
Paper ID #42361Unpacking Student Workload through Elicitation Techniques: Perspectivesfrom Engineering Faculty and StudentsDr. Isabel Hilliger, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile Isabel Hilliger is Assistant Professor of Practice and Associate Director for Assessment and Evaluation at the Engineering Education Unit in Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile (PUC-Chile). Isabel received a BEng and PhD in Engineering Sciences from PUC-Chile, and an MA in Policy Organizations and Leadership Studies from Stanford Graduate School of Education.Prof. Marietta Castro, Universidad San Sebasti´an Marietta holds a
El Paso Dr. Everett is the MacGuire Distinguished Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Texas El Paso and the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies. Dr. Everett’s current research is in the areas of Mechatronics, Freshman Programs and Student Engagement. Having multiple years of experience with NASA, JPL, NSF and over 40 years of education at three institutions. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Predicting Outcomes of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Students via Artificial Intelligence Angel G. Ortega1*† Victor Bonilla2*† Meagan R. Kendall3** Louis J. Everett4
attainment of the targeted learning objectives. To that end, two engineering education researchers planned and carried out an intrinsic case study of the Winter 2013 offering of the course. After executing the study, the researchers were surprised to find quite a negative bent in students’ responses to the course in the data. They recognized that students’ expectations and perceived experiences were quite different from the instructor’s expectations and intended experiences for his students. Therefore, the study was extended for a second year. The objective of the broader study, within which this work is positioned, was to be a formative assessment tool for the course to explore students
Institute for research 1. Thisinstrument has been used by many colleges in the United States to measure the level of masterytheir graduates have in various skills. The instruments used in this study are composed of twomain sections. The first section contains demographic information about the professionalengineers and department heads, such as gender, race, level of education, employment type,experience, and location of the company. The second section on of the instruments contains thelist of skills that are needed for ECE graduates. The ECE professional engineers and ECEdepartment heads have been asked to rank the various skills based on their “level of importance”and the “degree of preparedness”. The focus of this paper is to highlight the
studies, Mr. Weiner served as the founding Program Director for CREATE at Arizona Science Center, a hybrid educational makerspace/ community learning center. He has previous experience as a physics and math instructor at the middle school and high school levels.Dr. Micah Lande, Arizona State University Micah Lande, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering and Manufacturing Engineering pro- grams and Tooker Professor at the Polytechnic School in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches human-centered engineering design, design thinking, and design innovation project courses. Dr. Lande researches how technical and non-technical people learn and apply a design process to
, experimental fluid mechanics, renewable energy and engineering education.Dr. Vimal Kumar Viswanathan, San Jose State University Dr. Vimal Viswanathan is an assistant professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at San Jose State University. He earned his Ph.D. from Texas A&M University. His research interests include design innovation, creativity, design theory and engineering education.Dr. Eric Hamilton, Pepperdine University Eric Hamilton is Professor and Associate Dean of Education at Pepperdine University in Los Angeles. He holds a joint appointment in mathematics. Dr. Hamilton currently carries out research activities under support from the US National Science Foundation and Department of Education, studying
Paper ID #20017Characterizing Indicators of Students’ Productive Disciplinary Engagementin Solving Fluids Mechanics ProblemsMs. Jessica E. S. Swenson, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach Jessica Swenson is a graduate student at Tufts University. She is currently pursuing a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering with a research focus on engineering education. She received a M.S. from Tufts University in science, technology, engineering and math education and a B.S. from Northwestern University in me- chanical engineering. Her current research involves examining different types of homework problems in mechanical
reason these classes are perceived aschallenging3,4 and are sometimes called stumbling block courses.The challenge students encounter in engineering courses is escalated by the fact that no ability orskill acts in isolation. Research from cognitive psychology5,6,7 provides ample evidence thatconstructs must be coordinated or integrated if students are to reach levels of competence orproficiency within their domain. Therefore, in this paper, the researchers advocate for designingclassroom measures that represent construct sets required to solve problems effectively in areas ofspecialization such as statics and thermodynamics.The researchers also introduce psychometric questions to be addressed in the study concerning thereliability and validity
studentswithin each of these non-URM groups, and ethnicity is not always easily defined. Some of theseequity gaps present themselves as differences in academic achievement betweenunderrepresented minority URM students and non-URM students or women in STEM fields andarise due to numerous academic and social factors. Significant factors for attrition areperceptions about careers in the STEM fields, poor experiences with the academic culture andteaching pedagogy, and declining confidence due to demanding curriculum. One study showsthat students without early exposure to real-world applications of their major, that give positiveinsight into potential careers, do not always connect with upper-classmen to use as successfulpeer role models. This research has
joining ASU he was a graduate student research assistant at the Tufts’ Center for Engineering Ed- ucation and Outreach. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work in Progress: Exploring ‘Ways of Thinking’ of Interdisciplinary CollaboratorsAbstractCalls have been made for novel ways of thinking about engineering education research. Buildingon an earlier qualitative inquiry, this work in progress study examined the number and nature offactors underlying the constructs of futures, values, systems, and strategic thinking within thecontext of interdisciplinary engineering education research. Exploratory factor analysis of surveydata (n =111) supported a correlated
student and faculty perceptions of productive conflict. Themain conflicts that were reported in our study included conflicts of commitment, differentideas about the project direction as well as different working styles.Results from this research will enable us to rethink common models of team conflict anddevelop direct and indirect intervention strategies that can help students to better integrateemotion and intellect in engineering design and innovation.IntroductionAlthough design projects and course structures may vary, there has been a consistentattempt to integrate team experiences into the engineering design curriculum 1-5. Whilethere has been significant work that describes instructional approaches for integrating andassessing teamwork
AC 2012-4399: STUDENTS’ CONFIDENCE LEVELS IN TECHNICAL CON-CEPT KNOWLEDGE WITH MODEL ELICITING ACTIVITIESMs. Nora Siewiorek, University of Pittsburgh Nora Siewiorek is a graduate student in the Administrative and Policy Studies Department in the School of Education at the University of Pittsburgh, where she also received her M.S. in information science. Her research interests include engineering education and educational assessment and evaluation. Her K-12 outreach activities are organizing a local science fair and a hands on workshop in nanotechnology. Her other research interests are higher education administration, comparative, and international education.Dr. Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh Larry
always proven to be verysuccessful. Even today, a large percentage of the deaf community has reading comprehensionand writing deficits and this has not changed much over the past 30 years.3When deaf or hard of hearing students arrive at college, they have high expectations ofthemselves for completing bachelor‟s and graduate degrees.4 The research led by Cuculick andKelly has shown through statistical analysis that only about 17% of incoming deaf students atNTID, 2001 and 2002 had the requisite reading and language skills to enter a baccalaureateprogram in their first year. Also, with the same data, it indicated that at NTID it takes longer forthe deaf students to complete Associate of Occupational Studies (AOS), Associated of AppliedScience (AAS
Education, and studies whether student participation in engineering co-curricular activities confers any benefits, and how to transfer those benefits to attract and retain students typically underrepresented in the science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) fields. She is also currently developing virtual and augmented reality learning tools to help students learn concepts in the physical sciences.Yixian Zhou, University of Michigan American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 What Affects Student Outcomes More: GPA or participation in co-curricular activities?AbstractIn this research paper, we examine how grade
adopted through a variety of courses,independently of the level (e.g. undergraduate/graduate). The Google Suite has become a focus topic across education practitioners. Railean [16]provides an overview of the capabilities provided by Google Apps while covering theory andpractical aspects of the tools and their advantages for the development of skillsets. In [17], ausability study was introduced, that examines the perception of student groups and the GCcommunity, assessing the importance of GC tools. In general, students identify the Google Suiteas quite easy to use, while its cost of usage remains minimal [18]. In addition, research studieshave been conducted to gauge the perception of university professors towards virtual
to knowledge, academic engagement and motivation, and self-regulation.Dr. Sheryl A. Sorby, University of Cincinnati Dr. Sheryl Sorby is currently a Professor of STEM Education at the University of Cincinnati and was recently a Fulbright Scholar at the Dublin Institute of Technology in Dublin, Ireland. She is a professor emerita of Mechanical Engineering-Engineering MecDr. Clodagh Reid, Technological University of the Shannon PhD in spatial ability and problem solving in engineering education from Technological University of the Shannon: Midlands Midwest. Graduated in 2017 from the University of Limerick with a B. Tech (Ed.). Member of Technology Education Research Group (TERG).Dr. Gibin Raju, University of
. Furthermore, peer mentoring is an integralcomponent, where senior-level Engineering and CS majors serve as mentors to scholars, offeringguidance and support throughout their academic journey.The purpose of this action research study is to investigate academic, social, and culturalexperiences that lead to HBCU-STEM student success and results in the enrollment, retention,and graduation of HBCU students in STEM disciplines. The methods used to support thisinvestigation will be discussed in the next section.MethodsTo measure student success, the HBCU-STEM Success Survey [4] was piloted with engineeringstudents at the institution to increase understanding of the experiences of STEM students fromlow-income backgrounds who participated in the program. The
include the role of motivation in learning engineering, construction of engineering identities, and faculty development.Dr. Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of engineering education at Virginia Tech, where she co-directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communica- tion in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, and design education. She was awarded a CAREER grant from NSF to study expert teaching practices in capstone design courses nationwide, and is Co-PI on several NSF grants to explore identity and interdisciplinary collaboration in engineering design.Dr. Brett D. Jones, Virginia Tech
Paper ID #26186Recognizing Engineering Students’ Funds of Knowledge: Creating and Vali-dating Survey MeasuresMs. Dina Verd´ın, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dina Verd´ın is a Ph.D. Candidate in Engineering Education and M.S. student in Industrial Engineering at Purdue University. She completed her B.S. in Industrial and Systems Engineering at San Jos´e State University. Dina is a 2016 recipient of the National Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship and an Honorable Mention for the Ford Foundation Fellowship Program. Her research interest focuses on changing the deficit
Pepperdine University for their support in this study. 15References:1. Bernold, L. E., Spurlin, J. E., and Anson, C. M., Understanding Our Students: A Longitudinal-Study of Success and Failure in Engineering with Implications for Increased Retention. Journal of Engineering Education 96, 3 (2007), 263-274.2. Henderson, F. T., and Kritsonis, W. A., Graduation Rates at Historically Black Colleges and Universities: A Review of Literature. National Journal for publishing and mentoring doctoral student research 4, 1 (2007).3. Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the
engineering from the University of Michigan in 2008.Ms. Mary Rola, University at BuffaloDr. Hoda Koushyar c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Making Assumptions in Open-ended Homework ProblemsAbstractThis research paper presents a study of students making assumptions and discretizing elementswhen solving an open-ended modeling problem (OEMP) in a sophomore-level statics class.OEMPs are homework problems with no single correct answer that ask students tomathematically model a real-world object. Our analysis focuses on two elements of engineerngjugement: making assumptions and discretizing elements. We found some students madeassumptions to model the real-world object as closely as possible, while
communicationactivities into engineering curricula at the University of Dayton, a mid-sized, private universityin the Midwestern United States. As a way to establish outcomes for engineering students’learning in professional communication, the purpose of this study is two-fold: (1) to understandthe values, standards of practice, and texts that engineering companies require of entry-levelengineers; and (2) to locate opportunities in engineering curricula where such values, standardsof practice, and texts can be integrated. The research question asks what kinds of activities cansuccessfully integrate developmental experience with professional communication (written,visual, verbal, and/or multimodal forms) while demonstrating students’ learning of
AC 2008-192: A TEXT FOR ENGINEERING EDUCATION IN THE 21STCENTURY 1. OBJECTIVES AND OVERVIEWCarl Lund, State University of New York at Buffalo Carl Lund has been on the faculty of the Chemical and Biological Engineering Department at the University at Buffalo, SUNY since 1986. He was appointed as a SUNY Distinguished Teaching Professor in 2007. Page 13.126.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 A TExT for Engineering Education in the 21st Century 1. Objectives and OverviewAbstractEngineering education research continues to demonstrate that a growing variety of
AC 2010-1869: A FRAMEWORK FOR USING GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATIONSAS ASSESSMENTS OF ENGINEERING THINKINGSean Brophy, Purdue University Sean P. Brophy, PhD. is an assistant professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Dr. Brophy is a learning scientist and engineer; his research focuses on the development of learners’ development of adaptive expertise needed to solve complex problems in engineering, mathematics and science contexts. He uses results from his work with learners to inform instructional design methods with and without advanced technology.Sensen Li, Purdue University, West Lafayette Sensen Li is a graduate student in Engineering Education program at Purdue University. She
Paper ID #25714A Connected Course Approach for Introduction to Engineering Problem Solv-ingDr. Anthony Ferrar, Temple University Tony Ferrar is obsessed with student success. He focuses on preparing students for rewarding careers through pedagogical innovation and incorporating professional development into educational experiences. Anthony received his BS, MS, and PhD in mechanical engineering from Virginia Tech, where his research revolved around air-breathing propulsion. As a graduate student he contributed to Virginia Tech’s Gradu- ate Education Development Institute, Faculty Development Institute, and Networked Learning
Paper ID #32458Strategies to Address Changes in Social Supports During the COVID-19PandemicDr. Amanda Johnston, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Johnston is a postdoctoral researcher in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue UniversityDr. Kerrie A. Douglas, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Douglas is an Assistant Professor in the Purdue School of Engineering Education. Her research is focused on improving methods of assessment in engineering education contexts.Dr. Julie P. Martin, Ohio State University Julie P. Martin, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor and the Associate Department Chair for Graduate Studies
Paper ID #25792Work in Progress: Finding the Right Questions: Using Data Science to Closethe Loop with Classroom Response SystemsAsuman Cagla Acun Sener, University of Louisville Asuman Cagla Acun Sener holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in Computer Science and Computer Engineer- ing. She is currently pursuing a doctoral degree in Computer Science at Knowledge Discovery & Web Mining Lab, Department of Computer Science and Computer Engineering, University of Louisville. She is also working as a graduate assistant. Her research interests are educational data mining, visualization, predictive modeling and recommender
].Expectations for TAs:While research shows that TAs believe that content knowledge is the sole key to being aneffective teacher [14], students have a much different idea of what TAs should bring to the table.In a study of seven laboratory and lecture courses in environmental and water resourcesengineering, students were asked to rank what makes an effective TA from 17 categories ofintellectual excitement and interpersonal rapport developed by the American Society of CivilEngineers Body of Knowledge (ASCE-BOK) to describe effective teaching [22]. 21.3% ofstudents ranked fair grading practices as their first choice for what makes for an effective TAfollowed by explaining difficult concepts well (14.9%), coming to the classroom or laboratoryprepared (13.3
AC 2011-1375: OUTCOMES OF ENGAGING ENGINEERING UNDER-GRADUATES IN CO-CURRICULAR EXPERIENCESBrian A. Burt, University of Michigan Brian A. Burt is a doctoral student in the Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education at the University of Michigan. He serves as a research assistant at the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching in Engineering. His broad research interests include understanding the doctoral student experience.Donald D. Carpenter, Lawrence Technological University Dr. Donald Carpenter is an Associate Professor of Civil Engineering and the Director of Assessment at Lawrence Technological University. Prior to being Director of Assessment, Dr. Carpenter was the Founding Director for