students of alldisciplines. Employers often indicate that effective communication skills are one of the mostimportant attributes of a potential employee. Possessing solid communication skills isparticularly important for students aspiring to technical careers such as those involved in physicsand engineering. The application of writing-based approaches in the classroom can help toimprove students’ communication skills.The current study was, in part, motivated by changes currently underway to the GeneralEducation Program at American University. As a result of these changes to the program, a newset of learning outcomes were created and courses aspiring to be included in the programofferings were tasked with making innovative changes to both the
the inspirational phase of an entrepreneurialventure. One must figure out the passion and iteration on the product, the new creation,and who the audience is.Imagine the experience as a student in the class: Jon walks into the classroom and sits down at the long seminar table. He quietlysuggests that while he is feeling confident about what he has done in his accomplishmentsat school, coordinating early seed funding for his start-up, he is not feeling so good aboutwhat is next for him. During the first moments of class, Jon begins his story, “This is my last class. Iam fulfilling my final credits for the graduate program in Mechanical Engineering,” Hecontinues his story in a comfortable, conversational manner, and quietly leads
) workforce andattracting diverse students into STEM disciplines have become issues of national importance.One method to aid in achieving this goal is through offering pre-college interventions tounderserved students. This paper discusses and examines a novel pre-college STEM interventionthat occurs at a technical engineering research conference. The intervention consists of a mini-workshop that has six components: (1) an introduction of graduate student mentors, (2) a generalintroduction to the engineering field of Smart Material and Structures through a PowerPointpresentation and live demonstrations of smart materials, (3) a low-cost design and buildengineering activity that uses smart materials to demonstrate the applicability of the field
also teaches courses in Science and Technology Studies such as the international history of the Internet, the history of science and race, and science fiction.Lindsay Anderberg, New York University Tandon School of Engineering Lindsay Anderberg is the Archivist and User Services Librarian at New York University Tandon School of Engineering in Brooklyn, New York. She received her MSLIS with a concentration in rare books and special collections from Long Island University’s Palmer School of Library and Information Science. She holds a master’s degree in science studies from New York University’s John W. Draper Interdisciplinary Master’s Program in Humanities and Social Thought and a bachelor’s degree in anthropology from
of e-booktitles into the institution’s information toolbox is the key here. Knovel provides resources topromote ready access to meet the needs of smaller institutions, including MARC records for thelibrary's catalog. The Head of Reference at the Colorado School of Mines library will discusshow Knovel provides support for access and outreach at this institution. Finally, librarians andKnovel work directly with faculty to integrate Knovel's content into their courses. An exampleis Purdue University’s "treasure hunt" assignment given in the Mechanical EngineeringTechnology program which includes questions which leverage Knovel titles to answer.By supporting outreach and access strategies appropriate for institution size and need, librariansand
teaching workloads. Proceedings of the thirty-first SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education. Volume 32 Issue 1.Emory, D. and R. Tamassia (2002). JERPA: a distance-learning environment for introductory Java programming courses. Proceedings of the 33rd SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, Volume 34 Issue 1.Grudin, J. (1988). Why CSCW applications fail: problems in the design and evaluation of organization of organizational interfaces. Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, January 1988.Kearsley, G. (1982) Authoring systems in computer based education. Communications of the ACM. Volume 25 Issue 7.Kurtz, B., D. Parks and E. Nicholson (2002). Effective
iterativeprocess of designing, predicting performance, building, and testing – should be taught from theearliest stages of the curriculum, including the first year” 7. Many programs are also seeking toanswer this call by integrating more hands-on activities and active learning in lower-divisioncourses, which require more facilitation than the traditional large lectures. This sharply increasesthe need for teaching resources compared to traditional, large-lecture format courses. Because oftime and budget constraints, more and more engineering graduate students are assuming teachingresponsibilities, especially in introductory courses.In 2007, the last year for which data are available, more than 70,000 full-time graduate studentsin science and engineering
preparing for their exam and in-class quizzes, allowed them to studymore than they would have without EOQ, and enjoyed getting the immediate feedback to helpwith “the little things”.With regard to ease, the students indicated that on a scale of 1 – 5 (with one meaning easy andfive meaning very difficult), EOQs rated at 1 or 2. The students indicated that working withEOQs was easy because you could “fill in the blank with the answer instead of working step-by-step.” This observation may be because students maybe getting some their answers from a Javaapplet on the internet or writing a short MATLAB program. This was discouraged by requiringeach student to submit the first quiz attempt also by hand, and one problem was then randomlyselected from the
, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan, May- October 1993; Institute of Mining and Mineral Engineering, University of Science and Technology, Ku- masi, Ghana, Sept. 1992-Feb. 1993; Academic Visitor, Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College, London, U. K., Jan.-June, 1985. Prof. Osseo-Asare has contributed to the following books: K. Osseo-Asare and J. D. Miller, eds., Hydrometallurgy-Research Development and Plant Practice, TMS- AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1982; United Nations, Analysis of Processing Technology for Manganese Nod- ules, Seabed Minerals Series, Vol. 3, Graham & Trotman, London, 1986 (K.O.A. co-author); K. Osseo- Asare, Aqueous Processing of Materials: Unit Processes with Applications to
benefited by pedagogical enhancement using casting simulation. 17 Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright © 2024, American Society for Engineering EducationThere were several benefits of using the casting simulation activities within curriculum. Theseadvantages were: • Activities were designed for practical application in the metal casting industry (terminology, process technology, gating and risering, defect identification and control) • Integration for processing, material science, fluid, and thermodynamics in metal casting • Education and training programs to
focusing on inclusive classroom spaces and diversifying research models.Animesh Paul, University of Georgia Animesh, originally from Tripura, India, brings a diverse and liberal background, shaped by his military upbringing, to his role as a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Georgia’s Engineering Education and Transformative Practices program. Holding a bachelor’s degree in Electronics and Electrical Engineering from KIIT University, he currently conducts research under Dr. Racheida Lewis, focusing on equity and inclusion within engineering education. Animesh is dedicated to facilitating the transition of STEM students into the workforce and advocates for a learning environment enriched with diversity and fairness
. In 2005, a group of roughly 100 high school students participatingin the Smith Summer Science and Engineering Program were surveyed about what they wouldwant to see in a novel; an overwhelming majority said that they would enjoy a mystery story. Page 22.1092.6This coincides perfectly with the theory of IE, and reinforces the use of mystery as an engagingelement. By framing engineering within the context of a mystery, learners are encouraged tofurther explore engineering. Thus Talk to Me’s structuring of engineering within the framework of a mystery story isdesigned to be highly engaging. The characters of the story utilize certain
Practices (ESSEnCe). Mohammadreza Chimehrad, is currently a student enrolled in a Ph.D. program in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Central Florida. His research interests encompass a diverse range of captivating domains within Mechanical Engineering, particularly the complex realm of Microfabrication, which involves exploring and mastering the art of crafting miniature objects. The scope of his work encompasses Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS), Electrochemical sensors, Actuators, and Microfluidic devices. Chimehrad is dedicated to providing innovative solutions for intricate problems in these areas. In addition, he is currently serving as a Research Assistant at the University of Central Florida
CDIO initiative in aerospace engineering, contextualization isfound to be a compelling learning approach that goes beyond the regular educationalenvironments: “The evidence for adopting a contextual learning approach is compelling. This approach encourages students to choose specific careers and remain in their respective career preparation programs. Learning environments and experiences set in professional contexts open students’ minds, enabling them to become more thoughtful, participative members of society and the workforce. Moreover, a contextual learning approach assists students in learning how to monitor their own learning so that they can become self-regulated learners.”52 As a point of
degree from Clemson University. His research interests focus on teacher education and students learning issues within Engineering Education/Pedagogy and Computa- tional Thinking/Pedagogy field of studies. He received national and international recognitions including an Early Career Researcher award from European Science Education Research Association (ESERA) and a Jhumki Basu Scholar award from National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST). In addition, he is one of two scholarship recipients awarded by NARST to attend the ESERA summer re- ˇ e Budˇejovice, Czech Republic in 2016. He can be reached at iyeter@purdue.edu. search program in Cesk´Dr. Anastasia Marie Rynearson, Campbell
AC 2010-1121: THE ENACTED CURRICULUM: A VIDEO BASED ANALYSISAmy Prevost, University of Wisconsin, Madison Amy Prevost is a graduate student in Education Leadership and Policy Analysis at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Her research has focused on the STEM career pipeline, especially related to engineering and engineering education and biotechnology.Mitchell Nathan, University of Wisconsin, Madison Mitchell J. Nathan is Professor of Educational Psychology, Curriculum & Instruction, and Psychology, in the School of Education at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and Chair of the Learning Sciences program. He is a research fellow at the Wisconsin Center for Education Research
Session 2566 The Tinkerer’s Pendulum for Machine System’s Education: Creating a Basic Hands-On Environment with Mechanical “Breadboards” John J. Wood*, Kristin L. Wood** *Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University **Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at AustinAbstractThe pendulum of engineering education is swinging from an emphasis of theoretical material to abalance between theory and hands-on activities. This transformation is motivated, in part, by thechanging students entering engineering programs. Instead of a
computer aided engineering (CAE) market space. At MSC Software he pioneered new techniques and guided the development of two highly successful inter- active DVD based courses in the application of finite element analysis (FEA) in product development. He also developed a unique, low-cost, flexible method to produce and maintain DVD versions of a curricu- lum of 15 courses related to CAE. Both provided increased knowledge access, transfer and retention. His industrial background also focused on applying theoretical aspects of numerical methods in simulation and design to wide variety of product development issues. He has served on the faculty at UC Irvine since 1986 and has brought these practical applications into the
qualitative consultant, trained in survey methods, statistics, focus groups, interviews, and program eval- uation. Consulting work has included local and national transdisciplinary endeavors. Current interests include evaluation of innovations in STEM products and education, transdisciplinary scientific collabora- tion, and understanding how the social and physical environment interacts with human development and behavior.Dr. Faye Linda Wachs, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Faye Linda Wachs is a professor of Sociology in the Department of Sociology at California State Poly- technic University, Pomona. Dr. Wachs received her Phd in Sociology from the University of Southern California, along with a graduate
Paper ID #43931Investigating Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Understanding and Perceptionsof Affective Domain of LearningMs. Anna Li Coffman, University of OklahomaDr. Javeed Kittur, University of Oklahoma Dr. Kittur is an Assistant Professor in the Gallogly College of Engineering at The University of Oklahoma. He completed his Ph.D. in Engineering Education Systems and Design program from Arizona State University, 2022. He received a bachelor’s degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering and a Master’s in Power Systems from India in 2011 and 2014, respectively. He has worked with Tata Consultancy Services as an
-nation cross-cultural applied-disseminationsurvey conducted during the last semester of the project. The results indicate that theinstructional multimedia developed in this project can have a substantial positive impact inenhancing fundamental engineering classes. Further, the research also indicates that the LITEmodel can be an effective tool for guiding a comprehensive evaluation program.2. “Taking the Next Step in Engineering Education” ProjectThe University of Missouri–Rolla (UMR) recently completed a comprehensive three-year projectsponsored by the U.S. Department of Education’s FIPSE program [1-5] entitled “Taking theNext Step in Engineering Education: Integrating Educational Software and Active Learning”(#P116B000100). The project
Page 7.511.1experiments; understand professional and ethical responsibility; understand the impact of Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationengineering solutions in a global and societal context; and recognize the need for, and have anability to, engage in life-long learning. In addition, few involve interaction with engineeringdesign and construction professionals.Many engineering programs count on the capstone design class to address these importantcriteria. However, implementing a suitable project in a design class improves student learning andallows students to develop abilities and
Paper ID #7484Models of Mobile Hands-On STEM EducationProf. Kenneth A Connor, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Kenneth Connor is a professor in the Department of Electrical, Computer, and Systems Engineering, where he teaches courses on plasma physics, electromagnetics, electronics and instrumentation, electric power, and general engineering. His research involves plasma physics, electromagnetics, photonics, en- gineering education, diversity in the engineering workforce, and technology enhanced learning. Since joining the Rensselaer faculty in 1974, he has been continuously involved in research programs at such
). Page 26.1676.10For my research, the phenomenon I am analyzing is broad: technological challenges experiencedin the everyday life. It is broad due to its general nature; a technological challenge can be experienced by interacting with a computer, the Internet, hi-tech lab equipment, or a complex procedure. All of them are different experiences but my analysis focus on those similarities among them.2. Application of outcome spaceWithin this section we reflected on our expectations about the format and purpose of theoutcome space, including whom should use it and how it should be used. In other words, wewere considering why performing phenomenography may be valuable in our field. All of us areaware of the importance of building
Movement and his dissertation will explore the effect Maker-based initiatives, such as the establishment of school makerspaces, are having on the culture of formal educational institutions. Before starting his doctoral studies, Mr. Weiner served as the founding Program Director for CREATE at Arizona Science Center, a hybrid educational makerspace/ community learning center. He has previous experience as a physics and math instructor at the middle school and high school levels.Dr. Micah Lande, Arizona State University Micah Lande, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering and Manufacturing Engineering pro- grams and Tooker Professor at the Polytechnic School in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at
types of capstone projects may enhancethe pedagogical value.References1. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs,” (Accessed 2017). Available WWW: http://www.abet.org.2. IEEE, IEEE Code of Ethics, (Accessed 2017). Available WWW: http://www.ieee.org/about/corporate/governance/p7-8.html.3. Watkins, S. E., “Teaching Engineering Ethics,” Proceedings of the 2015 ASEE Zone III Conference, ASEE, Missouri, USA, 2015.4. Dhillon, B. S., Engineering Safety: Fundamentals, Techniques, Applications, World Scientific Publishing Company, 2003.5. Cadick, J. and Capelli-Schellpfeffer, M., Electrical Safety Handbook, 4th Edition, McGraw
Paper ID #37298How to Spice up Your Balsawood Bridge Competition (Other)J Chris Carroll (Associate Professor and Civil Engineering ProgramCoordinator) Associate Professor and Chair, Department of Civil, Computer, and Electrical EngineeringKyle Mitchell (Associate Professor) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com How to Spice up Your Balsawood Bridge CompetitionIntroduction Student-focused engineering outreach programs generally include onsite presentations,field trips, mentoring programs, summer camps, and/or
. 2007, p. 12.1240.1-12.1240.16. doi: 10.18260/1-2--2628.[38] D. Radhakrishnan, J. DeBoer, and N. Bhide, “Recentering local knowledge and developing collaborative relationships: Reflections on the design of a localized engineering program for former ‘street-youth’ in western Kenya using an asset-based framework,” in REES AAEE 2021 The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia, 2021.[39] M. A. Dridi, D. Radhakrishnan, B. Moser-Mercer, and J. DeBoer, “Challenges of blended learning in refugee camps: When internet connectivity fails, human connection succeeds,” Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 250–263, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4770.[40] “Teachers as guides: The role of
. The first ofthese is a technological movement. This technological movement has enabled the amplificationand duplication of information at an extremely low-cost. It started with the printing press in the1400s, and has continued at an ever-increasing rate. The electronic telegraph came in the 1830s,wireless radio in the late 1800s and early 1900s, television in the 1920s, computers in the 1940s,the internet in the 1960s, and the world-wide web in the 1990s.As these technologies have been adopted, the ideas that have been spread through their channelshave enabled a second movement. Whereas the technological movement sought to overcome realphysical barriers to the free and open flow of information, this ideological movement seeks toremove the
willprovide analyses for other engineering disciplines.Table 2. Student-reported outcomes scales used in this investigation as variables tooperationalize E2020 outcomes.FUNDAMENTAL SKILLS1 (alpha = .71); Please rate your ability to:Applying Math & Science to: The physical sciences to engineering problemsApplying Math & Science to: Math to engineering problemsApplying Math & Science to: Computer tools and applications to engineering problemsDESIGN SKILLS1 (alpha = .92); Please rate your ability to:Evaluate design solutions based on a specified set of criteria.Generate and prioritize criteria for evaluating the quality of a solution.Producing a product (prototype, program, simulation, etc.).Apply systems thinking in developing solutions to