Eric is a Ph.D. Candidate in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University and NSF Graduate Research Fellow conducting research in global product development and experiential learning. He was as a teaching assistant in Stanford’s Product Realization Lab for two years. From 2011 to 2016, he worked extensively in Zambia while growing programs and teaching courses at MIT D-Lab. Previously, he was an engineer at Battelle Memorial Institute, researcher at New England Complex Systems Institute, and co-creator of Zimba Water. He holds a M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Stanford (2018) and B.S. in Mechanical Engineering with honors from Ohio State University (2009).Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D
, adjusting curriculum, andcoping with the loss of personal connection that teaching often brings [3, 8].One concern that the pandemic specifically highlighted was the need for equity in education. Thisis not a new concern, but the added layer of unequitable impacts of the virus itself and unequitabledistribution of resources highlighted the need for equitable improvements to our education system[3, 7]. In fact, a 2020 study by Gillis et. al. found that even at an “elite university” studentsexperience internet and housing insecurity which can be prohibitive to online learning.Furthermore, there are significant differences in the ability of various student groups to be able towork and study from home. Some students had no access to a dedicated
Paper ID #13696Ethics in Engineering Students’ Design Considerations: Case Studies of Elec-tric Power Systems for the ”Developing World”Mr. Ryan C. Campbell, University of Washington Ryan is a Ph.D. candidate in the University of Washington’s interdisciplinary Individual Ph.D. Program. His research interests include: engineering education, ethics, humanitarian engineering, and computer modeling of electric power and renewable energy systems.Dr. Ken Yasuhara, Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching, University of WashingtonDr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is a professor of electrical engineering
Committee (2006-2008), president of the committee in 2008, member and president of the Philanthropy Committee (2011-2013), member of the Member- ship and Benefits Committee (2012-2015), founding president of the American Association of Physics Teachers, Mexican section. In the AAPT he is currently a member of the Research in Physics Education Committtee (RiPE) and elected member of the Physics Education Research Leadership Organizing Coun- cil (PERLOC). He is a member of the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnolog´ıa (CONACYT) Network on Information Technology, and coordinator of the Science Education Community of the Corporaci´on Universitaria para el Desarrollo del Internet (CUDI). The main area of interest of Prof
was run as a seminar. Each session consisted of joint problem-solving of review, and then new, problems. Between classes the students completed gradedhomework on previous problem types, read the textbook and took notes on the content andproblem types of the next section, and then attempted some new problems. Aspects of readingand note-taking were occasionally discussed in the class and the students completed onlinejournals reflecting on what worked and what did not regarding their own learning. The journalswere retained as data and analyzed with qualitative methods based on inductive content analysis.Literature reviewIf one does an internet search on “how to read a textbook” a plethora of sites come up. Many ofthese sites are created by
presents a briefoverview of mixed methods research, and provides a content analysis how it is being used andreported in engineering education journals. Using a mixed methods approach, the authors firstreviewed the application of mixed methods designs from fifteen articles from 2005 to the presentagainst an existing set of criteria. Each article was then re-examined to explore how the authorsaddress the integration of the quantitative and qualitative data. Finally consideration is given tohow the authors of studies in engineering education interpret and report the meaning and use ofmixed methods designs. The paper concludes with recommendations for engineering educationresearchers considering the use of a mixed methods approach.I
Channel coastal system. I currently works at West Texas A&M University in the Texas Panhandle, a semi-arid region. My activities there are applications of water engineering to benefit people and communities. The research and service span three areas. The first is the use of inexpensive biochar for preserving environmental quality in developing communities by using it as an adsorbent for agrochemical pesticides and nutrients. Second is the use of marginal quality water for irrigation to profit agriculture and maintain soil health. The third is the use of water footprint and blue-gray-green water categories to better understand the water impacts of food waste and strategies for its reduction. In the world of engineering
Tennessee in Knoxville where I will be graduating this May.Mr. Daniel Patrick Mountain, University of Tennessee - Knoxville Daniel Mountain is a graduate of the University of Tennessee with a BS in chemical engineering, and is currently a master’s candidate in chemical engineering at the University of Tennessee as well.Ms. Sarah Emily NorrisDr. Courtney June Faber, University of Tennessee at Knoxville Courtney is a Research Assistant Professor and Lecturer in the Cook Grand Challenge Engineering Honors Program at the University of Tennessee. She completed her Ph.D. in Engineering & Science Education at Clemson University. Prior to her Ph.D. work, she received her B.S. in Bioengineering at Clemson University and her
separate from others,rather they feel that their actions are self-motivated and that they are able to direct themselves 3.Faculty members support student autonomy by providing resources and encouraging students tobe self-motivated. Students that are unable to understand the flow of individual lectures, courses,or even program requirements would have their autonomy threatened. Another commoncomplaint is about professors not providing the tools, e.g. working equipment and/or adequateinstructions, which students need to succeed in their laboratory classes.FreshmanFive freshman report the faculty are supportive of their autonomy, five freshmen are neutral, andone reports the faculty negatively impacts his autonomy. A common theme is that the faculty
material to their lives, not just their studies. And most importantly, wewanted to foster discussion—real, dynamic, decentered discussion, in which students genuinelyspeak and listen to each other.We suspect that some of the programs Haws examined and some of those discussed at last year’sconference also had other goals in addition to ethics instruction, and we therefore advocate amore complicated view of how “best” to teach ethics at any particular institution. Thus, whilewe do not dispute Haws’s theoretical prescription of the ideal pedagogical approach to bringingabout ethics-related learning outcomes, we wish to present here the design and assessment of acourse that combines ethics with several other complementary course goals. Such a
evolution in industry, substantial efforts have been made by faculty members ofengineering programs across the nation to improve the quality of the undergraduate education inthis particular field. This becomes evident if one considers the evolution over time in the numberand type of product design and development courses that are typically offered to the students, thechanges in the style, content and instructional materials used in those courses, and the attempts tointegrate design across the curricula. As a first step to better prepare the students for the “real-world” practice of engineering,Senior Design Project or Capstone-type courses were incorporated into the engineering curricula.The results of an extensive survey conducted by Todd
globalsociety. It is essential to manage relationships among all actors involved in humanitarian relief alongthe entire emergency supply chain to ensure efficient and effective delivery of aid to victims of theemergency. While there is a growing body of literature on humanitarian logistics (Holguín-Veras,Jaller, and Wachtendorf 2012; Cozzolino 2012; Manopiniwes and Irohara 2014; Gizaw and Gumus2016; Jahre et al. 2016), only a few studies or applications deal with humanitarian supply chainmanagement (SCM). Actually, humanitarian supply chain has been long viewed by many as anapplication of commercial supply chains. Only recently, the design of humanitarian supply chainshas been recognized to be fundamentally different from commercial supply chains
, University of Illinois, Urbana-ChampaignDr. Chrysafis Vogiatzis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign I am a teaching assistant professor for the Department of Industrial and Enterprise Systems Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Prior to that, I was an assistant professor at North Car- olina A&T State University. My current research interests lie in network optimization and combinatorial optimization, along with their vast applications in modern socio-technical and biological systems.Prof. Yun Huang Dr. Yun Huang is faculty in the School of Information Sciences at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign. Her expertise is in the area of social computing, human-computer interaction
fivedistinct sections: an introduction to the module, followed by a prior knowledge review, the corecontent, a knowledge check, an application task, and then a reflection activity. For moreinformation about the structure of the learning block modules see [16], [25].Each interview consisted of two engineering scenarios such that participants engaged with a totalof four distinct scenarios. Within each interview the scenarios were presented sequentially.Participants were first shown a problem statement that included information on the background,goal, and requirements for the problem. After reviewing the problem statement, they were askeda series of questions broadly centered around gauging participants initial impressions of theproblem, how they would
Paper ID #22439Flipped Classroom and Emotional Learning in an Engineering LeadershipDevelopment CourseDr. Dean H. Lang, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Lang is the Associate Director of the Engineering Leadership Research Program at Penn State Uni- versity. She holds a BS in Mechanical Engineering from West Virginia University, an MBA from Johns Hopkins University, and a PhD in Kinesiology with a focus on Biomechanics from Penn State University. Dr. Lang’s previous professional experiences and research interests range from mechanical engineering facilities design to research that applied engineering
Engineering’s (NAE) Center for Engineering Ethics and SocietyAdvisory Group and Infusing Ethics Selection Committee selected 25 Exemplars of EngineeringEthics Education (NAE, 2016). In evaluating the applicants’ submissions they looked for ninekey characteristics. The following are examples of how online learning and webinars could beutilized as tools to help institutions deliver the NAE’s exemplary characteristics 1, 4, 7, and 9. 1. Provides an interactive format that encourages active learning: Synchronous online learning is when the instructor or TAs meet with students live in real-time through webinars / web conferencing or simple text chat. When used properly, these tools can be highly interactive. Discussion forums allow for
impactsummative assessment later in the course1. Competency integrated standards of achievementprovide guidelines for improvement including strengths and weaknesses of the course, contentchanges, methods of content delivery, and assessment8.Competency is defined as having the ability to do a set task(s) focusing on the application ofknowledge and not only on the acquisition of knowledge or skills8,9. Using competency basedstandards, the strengths and weakness of a course could be effectively determined8. One methodis to define a competency based curriculum, where students have to achieve a minimum level ofknowledge in their studies to graduate. These competencies provide a set of guidelines for studentsto move closer to their educational goals. These
and Environmental Engineering, and the Engineering Studies Program. Her research focuses on decision-making for environmental and infrastructure systems. Dr. Jones received a BS Civil Engineering from Columbia University, and a PhD Engineering and Public Policy from Carnegie Mellon University. She is a licensed professional engineer in several states.Christopher Ruebeck, Lafayette College CHRISTOPHER S. RUEBECK is an Associate Professor in the Economics Department at Lafayette College, teaching in the areas of industrial organization, marketing research, introductory Principles and Microeconomics courses, as well as simulation and evolutionary game theory. Dr. Ruebeck holds the
Paper ID #7013On Adopting an Inquiry Stance: A Case Study of Three Teachers as They In-tegrated the InterLACE Technology to Encourage Student Sharing and Rea-soningMs. Danielle Marie Dowling, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and OutreachDr. Morgan M Hynes, Arizona State University Dr. Morgan Hynes is a research faculty associate at Arizona State University conducting research on the impact of product archaeology dissection activities on students’ knowledge and abilities to engineer in broader contexts. Before joining ASU, Hynes was a research assistant professor in the Education Depart- ment and Education Research Program
Ramirez, Purdue University Nichole Ramirez is the Assistant Director of the Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) program at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. She is also an involved member of NAMI at the local and state levels. She advises NAMI on Campus Purdue and helped launch Ending the Silence, a NAMI Signature program for the state of Indiana.Dr. Douglas B. Samuel My research focuses on the development of dimensional trait models of mental health problems and their application in clinical practice.Mr. Syed Ali Kamal, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Syed Ali Kamal is a doctoral student at the Department of Engineering Education at
”flipped” classroom design.Dr. Anna L. Flaming, University of Iowa Anna L. Bostwick Flaming (Specialist in Teaching and Learning, University of Iowa Center for Teach- ing) provides pedagogical support through one-on-one consultations, workshops, and other programs for instructors across campus. She has designed and facilitated workshops and institutes on a variety of top- ics, including basic teaching strategies, active learning, student motivation, inclusive teaching, and course design. Anna currently directs the Early Career and SOTL Programs and previously ran the TILE active learning Program at Iowa. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018
through practices that allow students to feel welcome in their chosen153 major [51]. We note that there has been little to no research on non-binary or other self-reported gender154 identification and impacts on any of the affective domains.155156 Interrelatedness of the Affective Domains157 Growth mindset, self-efficacy, metacognition, and belongingness may act synergistically or158 antagonistically. For instance, with a self-efficacy intervention, Marra and her colleagues indicated that159 women showed positive increases in self-efficacy, even though women also show a significant decrease160 in feelings of inclusion while they stay in engineering programs. This suggests an antagonistic161 relationship with belongingness[52], [53