-After our presentation: -22 of 41 students showed interest in a job using HPC to solve problems brief (40 minute) presentation and hands on -27 of 37 students felt they can learn how to write
21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn,unlearn, and relearn‖.Learning requires thinking that is a multi level activity. Bloom’s taxonomy has modeled that very well. It isconsidered to be a fundamental and essential idea within the education community as noted by H.G. Shane4andAnderson and Sosniak5. The taxonomy was revised in 2001 from its six levels that were originally devised inthe 1950s. It offers a language to qualitatively express different kinds of thinking and provides a way toorganize thinking skills into six levels from remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating andcreating. The taxonomy was adopted by Pohl6 for classroom planning and is regarded as one of the
dynamic and active presentationstyle that is supported by Swivl. Of note, students can selectively choose what to pay attention toduring F2F modes: lecture, group work, note-writing, board notes, etc. In contrast, during RS andRAS modes, faculty select the object of attention, and opportunities for interaction are reduced.This selective contrast may account for some of the mismatch between students and facultyregarding Swivl and RS instruction.For faculty, though RS courses may require less technology, it may be worth reflecting on howmuch classroom interaction, the physical act of creating notes on the whiteboard, and the visualstimulus of the instructor moving about the room really contribute to student learning andengagement. After all
learning, and energy resilience fundamentals. His work has been published through the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and the Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineering (IEEE); he is an active member of both organizations. He holds a PhD and BS in Electrical Engineering from the University of Kentucky.Runna Alghazo, Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, Saudi Arabia Runna Al Ghazo is an educational researcher and rehabilitation counselor. She received her Ph.D. in rehabilitation from Southern Illinois University-Carbondale (USA). Her areas of interest include psycho- logical and systemic variables that may contribute to students’ academic success in Higher Education, educational
5 0 The Engineering Design Process is an important tool for 7. solving challenges.8 - 10 Write three brief descriptions on how robots are used below: 1. 2. 3. Male Female Decline to My gender is: State White African-American Hispanic
algebra, plane geometry, trigonometry, pre-calculus, and/or calculus • Two years of science with an average grade of B including at least one year of chemistry with a laboratory • SAT-I (MATH only) score of 560 or higher; SAT-R (MATH only) score of 580 or higher; or an ACT (MATH only) score of 26 or higher • Four years of English Applicants whose native language is not English must achieve a minimum TOEFL score of 550 (Paper Based Test), 79 (Internet Based Test), or 213 (Computer Based Test), or a minimum IELTS score of 6.5. As an alternate language consideration, a SAT-R (Reading and Writing) minimum score of 560 or an ACT (English) minimum score of 23 may be submitted in
habitual. Assigning marks to participationcomponents will be a necessary extrinsic motivator as long as the problems are “textbook-style”or “exam-type” problems. Students must practice the fundamentals, and this is best done withclosed-ended problems of manageable scope. However, students may not perceive that suchproblems are deeply meaningful or inspirational, even if effort is made to relate the problem toindustry. The author is optimistic that student engagement in unstructured active problem-solving sessions would be higher in a course where the instructional team acted as coaches forlarger, open-ended, societally impactful problems (ideally sourced by the students)[11].When generating the videos for the first iteration of the course, the
address this challenging task of datacollection, our research team developed a mobile application called CourseMIRROR (Mobile In-situ Reflections and Review with Optimized Rubrics) [1], [51], [52]. CourseMIRROR promptsstudents to write insightful reflections on concepts taught in class and for problems faced duringthe class. Students are asked to generate reflections after each class throughout the semester.CourseMIRROR then uses NLP algorithms to generate summaries of reflections [51]. Thesesummaries are available to both the instructors and the students, and they allow instructors tofind the difficulties and misunderstandings in students’ understanding of fundamental conceptsin each lecture. CourseMIRROR is tested for reflection gathering in
graphical, analytical and design software-basedanalysis and synthesis throughout the course; involvement by an engineering technologystudent intern to foster team collaboration; implementation of an industrial topic thread throughthe course; and a pre-team-formation assessment of background and skills of students, followedby team selection based on the assessment. The outcome of the course improvements includedimproved student morale and interest level, and higher student evaluations.Course OverviewMechanical Engineering Technology 206, Dynamics and Machine Elements, is a sophomore-level course in kinematics and kinetics as applied to mechanism and machine design. It is
fields, importance of hands on LOTS! Industry and college want/need to break stereo types Number of fields of engineering and what engineering is really about! Gained a better understanding of what engineers do and became aware of all the supports out there. Math/science is only about half of what the day to day job is. Problem- solving and team work area slo very important along with communication and writing skills. How to encourage many more to enter this field. That engineering answers problems in all facets of modern life. Engineering is art! Engineering is the application of math and science to serve humanity. State and national efforts to improve participation in science and
underrepresentation in engineering tomove toward action, reflection, praxis, and concientización.Future work will expand our literature review to explore elements of “insider” and “outsider”perspectives in doing critical theoretical frameworks, the value of storytelling, and use of racial-specific critical theoretical frameworks in engineering. Storytelling is a fundamental componentof Critical Race Theory because it challenges the current norms and reductionist constructions ofunderrepresented ethnic minorities.35 Storytelling is an important part of culture and acommunity, and as part of a community the engineering education research community has donea good job in starting this story. There has been an emphasis on trying to understand theexperiences of
assessments intended for the public (which many are). Learning how peer review is done, and the role of critical feedback, is a critical piece of the standard process. This means both writing peer reviews and reading/ comprehending existing reviews.Study MethodThe research involved study over a 2 year period. We asked faculty who taught a full-semesterlife cycle assessment course that used our textbook as a resource to participate and eleven facultyat different institutions volunteered. These institutions included eight doctoral, highest researchlevel universities, and one each of doctoral - higher research, doctoral - moderate research, andmasters institutions. The courses included mostly courses for graduate students but
indicated that the training received is not what is desired,and it leaves them unprepared for future careers [1]. Engineering doctoral students play differentroles while in the process of earning their doctoral degrees, performing research and teachingwhile still students themselves, yet treating these as separate roles without any seeming overlap.Examining the current state of teaching and research at the graduate level is a fundamental stepin explaining why both should receive focus when preparing doctoral students to create aprofessional and cohesive faculty identity. Although research exists on the mixed messages sent to early career faculty membersabout the promotion and tenure process [2-4], there have not yet been similar studies on
applications.Dr. Robert Allen Bubeck, Michigan State University - St. Andrews Dr. Robert A. Bubeck is currently a Research Assistant Professor at Michigan State University in Midland, Michigan with over 44 years of experience in industrial research and development. He is a graduate of Drexel and Cornell Universities. Research areas include the development of new liquid crystalline polymers, semi-crystalline polymers, thermoplastics, hyperbranched polymers, and dendrimers. He has broad-based expertise in the areas of structure/property fundamentals, mechanical behavior, composites and blends, rheology, fiber spinning, 3D additive fabrication, surface science, and interfaces. Prior to joining the Michigan State University, Dr
engineering course that is required by all civilengineering undergraduate students. The Geotechnical and Laboratory course has the followingcatalog description: Basic physical and mechanical structural characteristics of geotechnical engineering applied tosoil classification, permeability and Seepage, In-situ stresses and Compressibility, lateral earthpressures, slope stability and bearing capacity of shallow foundations.The instructional objectives of this course are: 1. To present the fundamentals concepts, theory, and mechanics of soils for relationships to engineering designs in the environment. 2. To develop an ability to employ broad-based analytical tools for development of soil related concepts 3. To
AC 2008-2443: DISCOURSE-BASED COMMUNITIES OF PRACTICE:DEVELOPING GRADUATE STUDENTS’ ABILITIES TO COMMUNICATETHEIR RESEARCH ACROSS DISPARATE DISCIPLINES AND EXPERIENCELEVELSLinda Anthony, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey LINDA J. ANTHONY is Program Manager for the NSF IGERT Program on Integratively Engineered Biointerfaces at Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. She joined Rutgers shortly after the IGERT grant was awarded, following over twenty years as a Member of Technical Staff in the Research Division of AT&T/Lucent Technologies Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey. Her research interests included capillary microcolumn separations, submicron particle sizing, and
Paper ID #17723Student Perceptions of Sustainability and Engineering Mechanics in Under-graduate Civil and Environmental Engineering Education at Virginia TechProf. Craig M. Shillaber, Northeastern University Craig M. Shillaber is an assistant teaching professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engi- neering at Northeastern University. He earned a Ph.D. in civil engineering from Virginia Tech in 2016, an M.S. in civil engineering from Virginia Tech in 2009, and a B.S. in civil engineering from the University of New Hampshire in 2008. His research interests include sustainability education in civil engineering
Paper ID #13219Does it stick? - Investigating long-term retention of conceptual knowledge inmechanics instructionJulie Direnga, Hamburg University of Technology Julie Direnga studied General Engineering Science at Hamburg University of Technology in Hamburg, Germany from 2006 to 2010. Specializing in the field of mechatronics, she received a M.Sc. degree in 2014. Since March 2014, she is pursuing her Ph.D. in Engineering Education Research at the same institution.Mr. Bradley Presentati, Hamburg University of Technology Bradley Presentati completed a B.A. in English literature with an emphasis on creative writing in 2006 at
Paper ID #11310Application of Computer Simulation and Animation (CSA) in Teaching andLearning Engineering MechanicsMr. Moe Tajvidi, Utah State University Moe Tajvidi is a PhD student in engineering education at Utah State University. His BSc and MS degrees are in civil and structural engineering and he has a sixteen year long career experience in structural engi- neering along with four years of college instruction of both basic and advanced civil engineering courses. In his teaching experience he has been committed to introducing real life engineering problems to the learning environment. The subjects he has taught
the role that the liberal arts play in engineering education20 21 22,the humanities field with the most to contribute to engineering design (due to its design-under-constraint approach and the prominence of problem-solving in its practice) has been mostlyoverlooked.The arts go beyond the need for engineers to be well-rounded individuals who have anappreciation for another kind of beauty. They provide a parallel avenue for problem-solvingpractice and development. 3. Problem-Solving in the Arts a. Evidence for Problem-Solving in the ArtsBowden, writing about art and design, emphasizes the role of problem-solving in art (“in whichthe outcome is not predetermined”23), and lists as essential to artistic learning the elements“intuitive leaps
offering.Specifically how the course was intentionally developed to include practical applications ofindustry-standard writing and to center student learning with regular feedback and practice. Next,we break down the core concepts for autonomous vehicle engineering across engineering andcomputer science disciplines. We address the issue of prerequisites and how the class conceptswere ultimately organized and how existing university research and computer labs were utilized.Lastly, we also discuss group dynamics and techniques for ensuring course project teams havediverse majors. Our results section is primarily composed of survey results from our third courseoffering. We show the evolution of skills from the mechanical engineering students and thecomputer
experiences orwithin a specific cultural context such as a research study or an engineering classroom. Sincethese aspects cannot be separated, anthropologists focus on understanding students’ experiences,social interactions, and how to interpret them.Thus, interdisciplinarity is fundamentally difficult because the epistemologies underlyingpsychology and anthropology represent core ontological and epistemological commitments thatcannot be easily blended or synthesized. Nevertheless, the theories (and the researchersthemselves) do not have to remain locked in a duel about the nature of reality in order to come touseful insights. We need not limit ourselves to our unique disciplines and have our ‘siloed headsexplode’ at the thought of meaningful
) outputs to drive motors, turn onLEDs, open/close a gripper, sound a buzzer, write text output to an LCD, and do many morefunctionalities. More resources are available on the Arduino forum, Arduino project hub as wellas websites such as Instructables, SparkFun, AdaFruit, HowToMechatronics and YouTube.Some of the benefits of Arduino over other systems include the cost, flexibility, programmingenvironment, and open-source features. The Arduino is relatively inexpensive with some boardscosting as little as $50, with many clones less than that. The Arduino is flexible because it can beused with Windows, Mac, OSX, and Linux operating systems. An Arduino program is a sketchthat can be expanded with C++ libraries or extended to the AVR C programming
Transformations Institute (EETI) in the College of Engineering. The Engineering Education Transformations Institute at UGA is an innovative approach that fuses high quality engineering education research with systematic educational innovation to transform the educational practices and cultures of engineering. Dr. Walther’s research group, the Collab- orative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), is a dynamic interdisciplinary team that brings together professors, graduate, and undergraduate students from engineering, art, educational psychology, and social work in the context of fundamental educational research. Dr. Walther’s research program spans interpretive research
science, math, and engineering courses do not adequately address the rapidchanges that these students face in their industrial careers. Specifically in engineering, theAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET)— which is the only agencyresponsible for accreditation of education programs leading to degrees in engineering — hasrecently published new standards which increases the focus on students’ ability to perform real-world job tasks (PRISM, 1997).Augustine (Augustine, 1997) tells us that ABET is correctly responding to fundamental changesin the engineering profession that push us to accredit programs on more than simplyprofieciencies in traditional engineering skills. Because of these changes, todays engineer mustbe able to
externally yet directly motivate or discourage astudent’s decision in choosing engineering major and career.The second category measures engineering students’ characteristics that are determined by their internal orpersonal factors. Only internal characteristics that have direct impact on educational process are relevant to thisstudy. It is well accepted that education is an aggregate of both intellective (cognitive) and non-intellective(affective) processes. Therefore, these internal characteristics are further classified into two sub-categories:cognitive characteristics and affective characteristics. Cognitive characteristics, such as high school math scores,learning style, writing skills, will directly affect a student’s academic standing in
, EvalTools R 6 for faculty, E learning with EvalTools R 6 for students, ABET accreditation process. He is Digital Integrated Quality Management Systems Expert for Automated Academic Student Outcomes based Assessments Methodology specializing in EvalTools R 6 by MAKTEAM Inc.Dr. William G. Spady, International Network for OBE Dr. Spady has been a leading pioneer in Outcome Based thinking and implementation for 45 years. As a Ph.D. graduate of the U. of Chicago in 1967, he was introduced to the seminal work of Benjamin Bloom in 1968 and transformed its fundamentals into a comprehensive paradigm-shifting system of educational transformation that he has shared through his 8 books, dozens of published papers, and countless pre
write storiesabout the female CEO (male participant with female CEO prompt).The findings shed light on interpersonal perceptions of gender and implicit innovation pro-cess of the Founder (individual behind the idea generation to become Founder and implemen-tation as CEO). However, implementing ideas also depends on motivation and interpersonalperceptions of negativity that interferes with commitment and follow-through.Another limitation is that we used only six variables among the many that make-up interper-sonal motivation and emotions. Further study design would consider the value or reassessingthe specific elements of achievement, affiliation, and innovation. Finally, two measures wereused: the mood data from the short version PANAS scale
, and oneAsian) and Mentees (one Latina, one multiracial [African-American, Native, Asian, White], one Page 14.277.8b The Sophomore Research Experience is an eight-week summer internship of the UWM Graduate School that precedes and feeds into the Ronald E. McNair Post-Baccalaureate Program. ASEE Topic: Undergraduate Retention and Developmentwhite first generation college immigrant, one African-American, and two Asian). Mentors 1 and4 in Table 3 entered with deficits (e.g., Adv Alg, college writing) that required remediation butnot a mathematics post-test. Mentors 2 and 3 pretested at
. Engineers do technical writing to explain the design and process they have gone through in their work. The audience for this technical writing is someone with background knowledge in the area being addressed. In addition, engineers need to be able to communicate their technical Communication ideas in common language for those without an engineering Related to Engineering background. With these two types of communication, engineers write (Comm-Engr) client reports, create presentations, and perform explicit demonstrations. Engineers need to embody information through